CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01342510Updated May 29, 2019Results posted

Combination of Magnesium and Lidocaine for the Pretreatment of Pain That is Caused by the Injection of Propofol

A Phase 4 interventional study of Magnesium Sulfate and Lidocaine in General Anesthesia and Intravenous Anesthesia, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-29.

Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Since the introduction of propofol into routine anesthesia practice, the phenomena of pain on injection has plagued anesthesia providers. Propofol, an unstable phenol, triggers the release of bradykinin on injection. This release causes a painful burning sensation in the patient at the site of injection. Anesthesia providers have attempted a large number of remedies to prevent this pain on injection. Previously explored ideas include injecting propofol into larger veins, warming of the hand with hot packs, and intravenous pretreatment with numerous other medications. Currently, pretreatment with lidocaine is commonly administered to prevent propofol injection pain. No studies to date have looked at the combination of lidocaine and magnesium in a single syringe for the pretreatment of pain on injection caused by propofol. In addition, the administration protocols that have been studied thus far do not mirror clinical practice at the University of Wisconsin. The investigators propose studying the use of magnesium and lidocaine in a single syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Read the detailed description

This study will involve little if any change from the typical induction of general anesthesia. Considering that lidocaine is routinely used for the induction of anesthesia, and that some anesthesia staff also inject magnesium prior to propofol, there will be little variation in the induction of anesthesia. Patients will be randomly assigned (by microsoft excel program providing a random number 1-4) to one of four groups:

  1. Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe
  2. Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe
  3. 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe
  4. Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe

Study drugs will be prepared in identical syringes by the Pharmaceutical Research Center (PRC). Study personnel will receive a syringe labeled with the study number as well as a data collection sheet labeled with the study number. A 20 gauge angiocatheter will be inserted into the dorsum of the hand for IV fluids and medication administration. Subjects will be given preoperative 1-2 mg intravenous midazolam for sedation when the subject is en route to the operating room as is typically done at the discretion of the anesthesia provider caring for the patient. After instituting standard monitors and providing preoxygenation, the study drug will be injected. Twenty seconds later, 50 mg of propofol will be injected. Ten seconds after infusion of propofol, the subjects will then be asked a standard question about pain on injection "Are you having pain at your IV site?". Any behavioral signs such as facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, or tears will be noted. Pain will be assessed using a four point scale: 0=no pain, 1=mild pain (pain reported only in response to questioning and without behavioral signs), 2=moderate pain (pain reported in response to questioning and accompanied by a behavioral sign, or pain reported spontaneously without questioning), 3=severe pain (strong vocal response or response accompanied by facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, or tears). Study key personnel will do these pain assessments; the behavioral signs and self-reporting of pain will be recorded separate from one another. The induction of anesthesia will then by completed with the appropriate amount of propofol. Formally assessing pain following injection is not something that is standard care but all patients are currently warned prior to injection that they may experience some warmth or burning at the site of their intravenous line.

02

Conditions studied

  • General Anesthesia
  • Intravenous Anesthesia

Keywords

  • Intravenous Anesthesia
  • General Anesthesia
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison is the lead sponsor of 1,161 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.

Of its 151 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 114 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • All adults American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 and 2 patients selected for general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age \< 18 years
  • allergy to local anesthetics
  • end stage renal disease
  • pregnancy
  • prisoners
  • patients requiring a rapid sequence induction
  • refusal to participate and patients already participating in another study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine

    Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe

    Drug: Magnesium Sulfate · Drug: Lidocaine

  • Experimental
    Magnesium

    Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe

    Drug: Magnesium Sulfate

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine/Magnesium

    Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe

    Drug: Magnesium Sulfate · Drug: Lidocaine/Magnesium

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe

    Drug: Magnesium Sulfate · Drug: Control

Interventions

  • DrugMagnesium Sulfate

    We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

  • DrugLidocaine

    We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

  • DrugControl

    We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

  • DrugLidocaine/Magnesium

    We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Reporting Pain With Injection of Propofol

    Following injection of the study drug, 50 mg of propofol will be injected. Ten seconds after propofol, subjects will be asked a standard question about pain. Behavioral signs will be noted. Pain will be assessed using a four point scale: 0=no pain, 1=mild pain (pain reported only in response to questioning and without behavioral signs), 2=moderate pain (pain reported in response to questioning and a behavioral sign, or pain reported without questioning), 3=severe pain (strong vocal response or behavioral response).

    Time frame: Approximately 10 seconds following administration of propofol.

  2. Number of Patients With Pain Associated With Injection of Propofol.

    Ten seconds following injection of propofol, subjects were asked "Are you having pain at your IV site?" Any behavioral signs were noted. Injection pain was assessed using the following four point scale: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild pain (pain reported only in response to questioning and without behavioral signs); 2 = moderate pain (pain reported in response to questioning and accompanied by a behavioral sign, or pain reported spontaneously without questioning); and 3 = severe pain (strong vocal response or response accompanied by facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, or tears).

    Time frame: < 1 minute.

07

Results

Posted Jun 25, 2012
Limitations and caveats
Problems with designation of ASA score differing from that given by anesthesiologist, insertion of a 20 gauge angiocatheter into the dorsum of the hand and anesthesia plan changing (general to monitored) prior to going to the operating room.

Participant flow

Participants were recruited between 6/2011 and 10/2011.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLidocaineMagnesiumLidocaine/MagnesiumControl
Started50505050
Completed38443739
Not completed1261311
Withdrew: Protocol violation1261311

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Reporting Pain With Injection of Propofol

Following injection of the study drug, 50 mg of propofol will be injected. Ten seconds after propofol, subjects will be asked a standard question about pain. Behavioral signs will be noted. Pain will be assessed using a four point scale: 0=no pain, 1=mild pain (pain reported only in response to questioning and without behavioral signs), 2=moderate pain (pain reported in response to questioning and a behavioral sign, or pain reported without questioning), 3=severe pain (strong vocal response or behavioral response).

Time frame:
Approximately 10 seconds following administration of propofol.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients reporting pain
Percentage of Participants Reporting Pain With Injection of Propofol
percentage of patients reporting painLidocaineMagnesiumLidocaine/MagnesiumControl
Percentage of Participants Reporting Pain With Injection of Propofol29 (17 to 45)57 (42 to 70)41 (26 to 56)46 (32 to 61)
PrimaryNumber of Patients With Pain Associated With Injection of Propofol.

Ten seconds following injection of propofol, subjects were asked "Are you having pain at your IV site?" Any behavioral signs were noted. Injection pain was assessed using the following four point scale: 0 = no pain; 1 = mild pain (pain reported only in response to questioning and without behavioral signs); 2 = moderate pain (pain reported in response to questioning and accompanied by a behavioral sign, or pain reported spontaneously without questioning); and 3 = severe pain (strong vocal response or response accompanied by facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, or tears).

Time frame:
< 1 minute.
Reported as:
Number · participants reporting pain
Number of Patients With Pain Associated With Injection of Propofol.
participants reporting painLidocaineMagnesiumLidocaine/MagnesiumControl
Number of Patients With Pain Associated With Injection of Propofol.11251518

Adverse events

Collected over Less than one minute following injection in intravenous propofol.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lidocaine—0/50 (0%)11/50 (22%)
Magnesium—0/50 (0%)25/50 (50%)
Lidocaine/Magnesium—0/50 (0%)15/50 (30%)
Control—0/50 (0%)18/50 (36%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLidocaineMagnesiumLidocaine/MagnesiumControl
Pain with injection of propofolGeneral disorders11/5025/5015/5018/50

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)LidocaineMagnesiumLidocaine/MagnesiumControlTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years35413331140
>=65 years334818
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)LidocaineMagnesiumLidocaine/MagnesiumControlTotal
Mean45.4 ± 15.344.4 ± 17.244.3 ± 16.245.3 ± 18.645.1 ± 16.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LidocaineMagnesiumLidocaine/MagnesiumControlTotal
Female2221141471
Male1623232587
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)LidocaineMagnesiumLidocaine/MagnesiumControlTotal
United States38443739158
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Johnson RA, Harper NJ, Chadwick S, Vohra A. Pain on injection of propofol. Methods of alleviation. Anaesthesia. 1990 Jun;45(6):439-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14328.x. PubMed 2200299 ↗
  • Yull DN, Barkshire KF, Dexter T. Pretreatment with ketorolac and venous occlusion to reduce pain on injection of propofol. Anaesthesia. 2000 Mar;55(3):284-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01320.x. PubMed 10671850 ↗
  • Huang YW, Buerkle H, Lee TH, Lu CY, Lin CR, Lin SH, Chou AK, Muhammad R, Yang LC. Effect of pretreatment with ketorolac on propofol injection pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Sep;46(8):1021-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460816.x. PubMed 12190806 ↗
  • Ambesh SP, Dubey PK, Sinha PK. Ondansetron pretreatment to alleviate pain on propofol injection: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jul;89(1):197-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199907000-00035. PubMed 10389803 ↗
  • Apiliogullari S, Keles B, Apiliogullari B, Balasar M, Yilmaz H, Duman A. Comparison of diphenhydramine and lidocaine for prevention of pain after injection of propofol: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Mar;24(3):235-8. doi: 10.1017/S026502150600202X. Epub 2007 Jan 4. PubMed 17202008 ↗
  • Ishiyama T, Kashimoto S, Oguchi T, Furuya A, Fukushima H, Kumazawa T. Clonidine-ephedrine combination reduces pain on injection of propofol and blunts hemodynamic stress responses during the induction sequence. J Clin Anesth. 2006 May;18(3):211-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.08.005. PubMed 16731324 ↗
  • Saadawy I, Ertok E, Boker A. Painless injection of propofol: pretreatment with ketamine vs thiopental, meperidine, and lidocaine. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;19(3):631-44. Erratum In: Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2008 Feb;19(4):919. PubMed 18044291 ↗
  • Asik I, Yorukoglu D, Gulay I, Tulunay M. Pain on injection of propofol: comparison of metoprolol with lidocaine. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Jun;20(6):487-9. doi: 10.1017/s0265021503000784. PubMed 12803269 ↗
  • Ghai B, Makkar JK, Bala I, Wig J. Effect of parecoxib pretreatment and venous occlusion on propofol injection pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2010 Mar;22(2):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.03.011. PubMed 20304348 ↗
  • Fujii Y, Itakura M. Comparison of lidocaine, metoclopramide, and flurbiprofen axetil for reducing pain on injection of propofol in Japanese adult surgical patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.02.018. PubMed 18343266 ↗
  • Kwak KH, Ha J, Kim Y, Jeon Y. Efficacy of combination intravenous lidocaine and dexamethasone on propofol injection pain: a randomized, double-blind, prospective study in adult Korean surgical patients. Clin Ther. 2008 Jun;30(6):1113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.019. PubMed 18640467 ↗
  • Agarwal A, Ansari MF, Gupta D, Pandey R, Raza M, Singh PK, Shiopriye, Dhiraj S, Singh U. Pretreatment with thiopental for prevention of pain associated with propofol injection. Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):683-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000103266.73568.18. PubMed 14980919 ↗
  • Borazan H, Erdem TB, Kececioglu M, Otelcioglu S. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: a comparison of lidocaine with different doses of paracetamol. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Mar;27(3):253-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328330eca2. PubMed 19696679 ↗
  • Kwak K, Kim J, Park S, Lim D, Kim S, Baek W, Jeon Y. Reduction of pain on injection of propofol: combination of pretreatment of remifentanil and premixture of lidocaine with propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Sep;24(9):746-50. doi: 10.1017/S026502150600233X. Epub 2007 Jan 30. PubMed 17261216 ↗
  • Ayoglu H, Altunkaya H, Ozer Y, Yapakci O, Cukdar G, Ozkocak I. Does dexmedetomidine reduce the injection pain due to propofol and rocuronium? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Jun;24(6):541-5. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506002250. Epub 2007 Jan 23. PubMed 17241503 ↗
  • Memis D, Turan A, Karamanlioglu B, Sut N, Pamukcu Z. The use of magnesium sulfate to prevent pain on injection of propofol. Anesth Analg. 2002 Sep;95(3):606-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200209000-00020. PubMed 12198045 ↗
  • Agarwal A, Dhiraj S, Raza M, Pandey R, Pandey CK, Singh PK, Singh U, Gupta D. Vein pretreatment with magnesium sulfate to prevent pain on injection of propofol is not justified. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Feb;51(2):130-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03018771. PubMed 14766688 ↗
  • Gajraj NM, Nathanson MH. Preventing pain during injection of propofol: the optimal dose of lidocaine. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Nov;8(7):575-7. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(96)00133-x. PubMed 8910180 ↗
  • Sasaki T, Okamura S, Kisara A, Ito M, Yogosawa K, Yagishita Y, Yogosawa T. Effect of lidocaine on pain caused by injection of propofol: comparison of three methods at two injection rates. J Anesth. 1999;13(1):14-6. doi: 10.1007/s005400050015. No abstract available. PubMed 15235946 ↗
  • Tramer MR, Glynn CJ. An evaluation of a single dose of magnesium to supplement analgesia after ambulatory surgery: randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jun;104(6):1374-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000263416.14948.dc. PubMed 17513629 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01342510
Lead sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 27, 2011
Start date
Apr 2011
Primary completion
Apr 2012
Completion
Apr 2012
Results posted
Jun 25, 2012
Last update
May 29, 2019

Study contacts

Kristopher M Schroeder, MD
principal investigator · University of Wisconsin, Madison

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion