CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01340209Updated Jul 4, 2014Results posted

Evaluation of Tiotropium 2.5 and 5 µg Once Daily Delivered Via the Respimat Inhaler Compared to Placebo in Patient With Moderate to Severe Persistent Asthma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Tiotropium Respimat and Placebo Respimat in Asthma, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Completed at 55 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-04.

Sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
285
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2.5 and 5 µg tiotropium over a 52-week treatment period as compared to placebo. Tiotropium inhalation solution delivered by the Respimat inhaler will be examined on top of maintenance treatment with inhaled corticosteroid controller medication in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma. Efficacy and safety will be assessed by measuring effects on lung function, effects on asthma exacerbations, effects on asthma control, and number of adverse events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Asthma

3,920 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 506 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 285 is above the median of 83 across 2,751 interventional studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim is the lead sponsor of 2,245 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 116 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. All patients including the patients under age (under 20 years old) must sign and date an Informed Consent Form consistent with ICH-GCP guidelines and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) prior to participation in the trial [i.e. prior to any trial procedures, including any pre-trial washout of medications and medication restrictions for pulmonary function test (PFT) at Visit 1]. Regarding patients under age, a guardian or a legally authorised representative must also sign and date an Informed Consent Form.
  2. Male or female outpatients aged at least 18 years but not more than 75 years at Visit 0.
  3. All patients must have at least a 12-week history of asthma at the time of enrolment (Visit 0) into the trial. The diagnosis should be confirmed at Visit 1 by fulfilling inclusion criterion 5.
  4. The initial diagnosis of asthma must have been made before the patient's age of 40.
  5. The diagnosis of asthma has to be confirmed at Visit 1 with a bronchodilator reversibility (15-30 minutes after 400 µg salbutamol) resulting in a Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) increase of at least 12% and at least 200 mL .
  6. All patients must have been on maintenance treatment with a medium, stable dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) [alone or in a fixed combination with a Long-acting beta-adrenergic (LABA)] for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
  7. All patients must be symptomatic at Visit 1 (screening) and prior to randomisation at Visit 2 as defined by an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) mean score of at least 1.5.
  8. All patients must have a pre-bronchodilator FEV1 at least 60% and less than or equal to 90% of predicted normal at Visit 1.
  9. Patients must be never-smokers or ex-smokers who stopped smoking at least one year (52 weeks) prior to enrolment (Visit 0) and who have a smoking history of less than 10 pack years.
  10. Patients must be able to use the Respimat inhaler correctly, which is judged at the discretion of the investigator..
  11. Patients must be able to perform all trial related procedures including technically acceptable PFTs and use of electronic diary (eDiary)/peak flow meter, which is judged at the discretion of the investigator.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with a significant disease other than asthma. A significant disease is defined as a disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, may (i) put the patient at risk because of participation in the trial, or (ii) influence the results of the trial, or (iii) cause concern regarding the patient's ability to participate in the trial.
  2. Patients with a clinically relevant abnormal screening (Visit 1) haematology or blood chemistry if the abnormality defines a significant disease as defined in exclusion criterion no 1.
  3. Patients with a recent history (i.e. 6 months or less) of myocardial infarction prior to Visit 0.
  4. Patients who have been hospitalised for cardiac failure during the past year prior to Visit 0.
  5. Patients with any unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia or cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or a change in drug therapy within the past year prior to Visit 0.
  6. Patients with lung diseases other than asthma (e.g. COPD).
  7. Patients with known active tuberculosis.
  8. Patients with malignancy and/or patients who have undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy for malignancy within the last 5 years prior to Visit 0. Patients with treated basal cell carcinoma are allowed.
  9. Patients who have undergone thoracotomy with pulmonary resection. Patients with a history of thoracotomy for other reasons should be evaluated as per exclusion criterion no. 1.
  10. Patients with significant alcohol or drug abuse, which is judged at the discretion of the investigator, within the past 2 years prior to Visit 0.
  11. Patients with known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), or any other components of the study medication delivery systems.
  12. Pregnant or nursing women.
  13. Women of childbearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control.
  14. Patients who have taken an investigational drug within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
  15. Patients who have been treated with beta-blocker medication within four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period. Topical cardio-selective beta-blocker eye medications for non-narrow angle glaucoma are allowed.
  16. Patients who have been treated with the long-acting anticholinergic tiotropium (Spiriva) within four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
  17. Patients who have been treated with oral beta-adrenergics within four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the Screening period.
  18. Patients who have been treated with systemic corticosteroids within four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
  19. Patients who have been treated with anti-IgE antibodies, e.g. omalizumab (Xolair®), within 6 months prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
  20. Patients who have been treated with other non-approved and according to international guidelines not recommended "experimental" drugs for routine asthma therapy within four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
  21. Patients with any asthma exacerbation or any respiratory tract infection in the four weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or during the screening period.
  22. Patients who are currently participating in another trial.
  23. Patients with narrow-angle glaucoma and/or micturition disorder due to prostatic hyperplasia.
  24. Patients with below 80% of the eDiary completion compliance on Visit 2 (diary compliance of at least 80% is required).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double
Enrollment
285 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tiotropium Respimat (low dose)

    Tiotropium low dose once daily delivered with Respimat inhaler

    Drug: Tiotropium Respimat

  • Experimental
    Tiotropium Respimat (high dose)

    Tiotropium high dose once daily delivered with Respimat inhaler

    Drug: Tiotropium Respimat

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Respimat

    Tiotropium placebo once daily delivered with Respimat inhaler

    Drug: Placebo Respimat

Interventions

  • DrugTiotropium Respimat

    Tiotropium high dose once daily delivered with Respimat inhaler

  • DrugPlacebo Respimat

    Tiotropium placebo once daily delivered with Respimat inhaler

  • DrugTiotropium Respimat

    Tiotropium low dose once daily delivered with Respimat inhaler

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Drug-related Adverse Events

    The primary endpoint is the number of patients with drug-related adverse events

    Time frame: after the first dose of trial medication and within 30 days after the last dose of trial medication, up to 409

Secondary outcomes

  1. Trough FEV1 Response

    Trough FEV1 response was defined as change from baseline at week 52

    Time frame: baseline and week 52

  2. Trough FVC Response

    Trough FVC response was defined as change from baseline at week 52

    Time frame: baseline and week 52

  3. Trough PEF Response

    Trough PEF response was defined as change from baseline at week 52

    Time frame: baseline and week 52

  4. Weekly Mean PEFam Response

    Weekly mean PEFam response was defined as change from baseline at week 52

    Time frame: baseline and week 52

  5. Weekly Mean PEFpm Response

    Weekly mean PEFpm response was defined as change from baseline at week 52

    Time frame: baseline and week 52

  6. Weekly Mean PEF Variability Response

    Weekly mean PEF variability response was defined as change from baseline at week 52. The PEF variability is the absolute difference between morning and evening PEF value, divided by their mean, expressed as a percent. Response was defined as change from baseline.

    Time frame: baseline and week 52

  7. Weekly Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication During the Whole Day (Response)

    Response of weekly mean number of puffs of rescue medication during the whole day at week 52. Response was defined as change from baseline.

    Time frame: baseline and week 52

  8. Weekly Mean Score of Asthma Symptoms in the Morning (Response)

    Response of weekly mean score of asthma symptoms in the morning at week 52. Response was defined as change from baseline. 5-point verbal rating scale, with answer 1 representing no impairment at all and answer 5 representing the greatest impairment.

    Time frame: baseline and week 52

  9. Weekly Mean Score of Asthma Symptoms During the Day (Response)

    Response of weekly mean score of asthma symptoms during the day at week 52. Response was defined as change from baseline. 5-point verbal rating scale, with answer 1 representing no impairment at all and answer 5 representing the greatest impairment.

    Time frame: baseline and week 52

07

Results

Posted Jul 4, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Started57114114
Completed52106106
Not completed588
Withdrew: Adverse event112
Withdrew: Protocol violation121
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject001
Withdrew: Other reason not defined above354

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients With Drug-related Adverse Events

The primary endpoint is the number of patients with drug-related adverse events

Time frame:
after the first dose of trial medication and within 30 days after the last dose of trial medication, up to 409
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With Drug-related Adverse Events
participantsPlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Number of Patients With Drug-related Adverse Events3610
SecondaryTrough FEV1 Response

Trough FEV1 response was defined as change from baseline at week 52

Time frame:
baseline and week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FEV1 Response
LiterPlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Trough FEV1 Response0.075 ± 0.0390.087 ± 0.0270.187 ± 0.027
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.7971 · Mean difference (final values): 0.012 · 95% CI -0.082 to 0.106adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0203 · Mean difference (final values): 0.112 · 95% CI 0.018 to 0.207adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
SecondaryTrough FVC Response

Trough FVC response was defined as change from baseline at week 52

Time frame:
baseline and week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FVC Response
LiterPlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Trough FVC Response0.122 ± 0.0440.085 ± 0.0300.204 ± 0.031
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.4944 · Mean difference (final values): -0.037 · 95% CI -0.141 to 0.068adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1270 · Mean difference (final values): 0.082 · 95% CI -0.023 to 0.188adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
SecondaryTrough PEF Response

Trough PEF response was defined as change from baseline at week 52

Time frame:
baseline and week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · L/min
Trough PEF Response
L/minPlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Trough PEF Response35.078 ± 10.11935.576 ± 6.91769.254 ± 7.004
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.9677 · Mean difference (final values): 0.498 · 95% CI -23.634 to 24.630adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0058 · Median difference (final values): 34.176 · 95% CI 9.919 to 58.432adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
SecondaryWeekly Mean PEFam Response

Weekly mean PEFam response was defined as change from baseline at week 52

Time frame:
baseline and week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · L/min
Weekly Mean PEFam Response
L/minPlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Weekly Mean PEFam Response2.288 ± 7.55410.934 ± 5.2318.504 ± 5.267
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.3468 · Mean difference (final values): 8.646 · 95% CI -9.388 to 26.680adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.5013 · Mean difference (final values): 6.216 · 95% CI -11.927 to 24.359adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
SecondaryWeekly Mean PEFpm Response

Weekly mean PEFpm response was defined as change from baseline at week 52

Time frame:
baseline and week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · L/min
Weekly Mean PEFpm Response
L/minPlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Weekly Mean PEFpm Response-10.357 ± 7.5661.101 ± 5.2396.041 ± 5.284
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2132 · Mean difference (final values): 11.458 · 95% CI -6.601 to 29.517adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0766 · Mean difference (final values): 16.398 · 95% CI -1.759 to 34.555adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
SecondaryWeekly Mean PEF Variability Response

Weekly mean PEF variability response was defined as change from baseline at week 52. The PEF variability is the absolute difference between morning and evening PEF value, divided by their mean, expressed as a percent. Response was defined as change from baseline.

Time frame:
baseline and week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage
Weekly Mean PEF Variability Response
percentagePlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Weekly Mean PEF Variability Response-0.367 ± 0.851-0.968 ± 0.5950.197 ± 0.595
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.5629 · Mean difference (final values): -0.601 · 95% CI -2.637 to 1.436adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
  • Placebo Respimat vs Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg) · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.5871 · Mean difference (final values): 0.564 · 95% CI -1.473 to 2.601adjusted for treatment, week, baseline, treatment\*week and baseline\*week
SecondaryWeekly Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication During the Whole Day (Response)

Response of weekly mean number of puffs of rescue medication during the whole day at week 52. Response was defined as change from baseline.

Time frame:
baseline and week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Puffs
Weekly Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication During the Whole Day (Response)
PuffsPlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Weekly Mean Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication During the Whole Day (Response)-0.25 ± 0.77-0.29 ± 1.01-0.22 ± 0.96
SecondaryWeekly Mean Score of Asthma Symptoms in the Morning (Response)

Response of weekly mean score of asthma symptoms in the morning at week 52. Response was defined as change from baseline. 5-point verbal rating scale, with answer 1 representing no impairment at all and answer 5 representing the greatest impairment.

Time frame:
baseline and week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Weekly Mean Score of Asthma Symptoms in the Morning (Response)
Scores on a scalePlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Weekly Mean Score of Asthma Symptoms in the Morning (Response)-0.22 ± 0.43-0.14 ± 0.49-0.21 ± 0.43
SecondaryWeekly Mean Score of Asthma Symptoms During the Day (Response)

Response of weekly mean score of asthma symptoms during the day at week 52. Response was defined as change from baseline. 5-point verbal rating scale, with answer 1 representing no impairment at all and answer 5 representing the greatest impairment.

Time frame:
baseline and week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Weekly Mean Score of Asthma Symptoms During the Day (Response)
Scores on a scalePlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Weekly Mean Score of Asthma Symptoms During the Day (Response)-0.24 ± 0.35-0.15 ± 0.48-0.17 ± 0.48

Adverse events

Collected over after the first dose of trial medication and within 30 days after the last dose of trial medication, up to 409 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo Respimat—9/57 (15.8%)50/57 (87.7%)
Tiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)—4/114 (3.5%)97/114 (85.1%)
Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)—4/114 (3.5%)101/114 (88.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
Mesenteric haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/570/1140/114
CystGeneral disorders1/570/1140/114
DiverticulitisInfections and infestations1/570/1140/114
Pneumonia bacterialInfections and infestations1/570/1140/114
Rib fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/570/1140/114
Sternal fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/570/1140/114
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/570/1140/114
Loss of consciousnessNervous system disorders1/570/1140/114
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/570/1141/114
Aortic dissectionVascular disorders1/570/1140/114
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations24/5751/11455/114
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders21/5734/11432/114
Peak expiratory flow rate decreasedInvestigations12/579/11418/114
BronchitisInfections and infestations4/5715/11411/114
PharyngitisInfections and infestations2/5715/1149/114
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations3/574/11412/114
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders4/573/1146/114
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/578/1145/114
Rhinitis allergicRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/573/1142/114
Upper respiratory tract inflammationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/577/1147/114

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)Total
Mean47.8 ± 13.044.7 ± 12.142.6 ± 12.844.5 ± 12.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo RespimatTiotropium Respimat (2.5 µg)Tiotropium Respimat (5 μg)Total
Female387266176
Male194248109
08

Study locations

55 sites
  • 205.464.81020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
  • 205.464.81031 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan
  • 205.464.81029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Chigasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
  • 205.464.81011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Chino, Nagano, Japan
  • 205.464.81050 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  • 205.464.81051 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  • 205.464.81006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  • 205.464.81010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan
  • 205.464.81016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
  • 205.464.81004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hanno, Saitama, Japan
  • 205.464.81040 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Himeji, Hyogo, Japan
  • 205.464.81041 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Himeji, Hyogo, Japan
  • 205.464.81053 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Himeji, Hyogo, Japan
  • 205.464.81007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hino, Tokyo, Japan
  • 205.464.81015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan
  • 205.464.81002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hitachinaka, Ibaraki, Japan
  • 205.464.81048 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan
  • 205.464.81005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  • 205.464.81033 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kaga, Ishikawa, Japan
  • 205.464.81017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kagoshima, Kagoshima, Japan
  • 205.464.81023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan
  • 205.464.81024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kisarazu, Chiba, Japan
  • 205.464.81047 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kitakyusyu,Fukuoka, Japan
  • 205.464.81008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kiyose, Tokyo, Japan
  • 205.464.81046 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kochi, Kochi, Japan
  • 205.464.81025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan
  • 205.464.81022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
  • 205.464.81043 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan
  • 205.464.81044 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kure, Hiroshima, Japan
  • 205.464.81014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan
  • 205.464.81038 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan
  • 205.464.81003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Maebashi, Gumma, Japan
  • 205.464.81042 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Matsue, Shimane, Japan
  • 205.464.81026 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  • 205.464.81012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
  • 205.464.81013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
  • 205.464.81034 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
  • 205.464.81035 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
  • 205.464.81036 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
  • 205.464.81037 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
  • 205.464.81001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
  • 205.464.81018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
  • 205.464.81054 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Oita, Oita, Japan
  • 205.464.81055 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Oita, Oita, Japan
  • 205.464.81039 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Osaka, Osaka, Japan
  • 205.464.81049 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Saga, Saga, Japan
  • 205.464.81019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
  • 205.464.81021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • 205.464.81027 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Setagaya-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
  • 205.464.81028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  • 205.464.81045 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Toon, Ehime, Japan
  • 205.464.81009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
  • 205.464.81052 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
  • 205.464.81030 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
  • 205.464.81032 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Zama, Kanagawa, Japan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Halpin DMG, Meltzer EO, Pisternick-Ruf W, Moroni-Zentgraf P, Engel M, Zaremba-Pechmann L, Casale T, FitzGerald JM. Peak expiratory flow as an endpoint for clinical trials in asthma: a comparison with FEV1. Respir Res. 2019 Jul 18;20(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1119-6. PubMed 31319851 ↗
  • Ohta K, Ichinose M, Tohda Y, Engel M, Moroni-Zentgraf P, Kunimitsu S, Sakamoto W, Adachi M. Long-Term Once-Daily Tiotropium Respimat(R) Is Well Tolerated and Maintains Efficacy over 52 Weeks in Patients with Symptomatic Asthma in Japan: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Study. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0124109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124109. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25894430 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 4, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01340209
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Collaborators
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 22, 2011
Start date
Apr 2011
Primary completion
Apr 2013
Completion
Apr 2013
Results posted
Jul 4, 2014
Last update
Jul 4, 2014

Study contacts

Boehringer Ingelheim
study chair · Boehringer Ingelheim
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion