ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01330355Updated Sep 3, 2014Results posted

Besifloxacin Ophthalmic Suspension Verses Gatifloxacin Ophthalmic Solution in Neonates With Bacterial Conjunctivitis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Besivance and Gatifloxacin in Bacterial Conjunctivitis, sponsored by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 31 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-09-03.

Sponsored by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (part of Bausch Health Companies Inc.) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Lack of enrollment
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
33
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Day to 31 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Besivance (besifloxacin 0.6%) ophthalmic suspension compared to gatifloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution when administered three times daily (TID) for seven days to neonatal subjects who are 31 days or younger on the day of randomization (Visit 1).

02

Conditions studied

  • Bacterial Conjunctivitis

Keywords

  • Ocular infections, bacterial
03

In context

Conjunctivitis, Bacterial

40 studies on the registry are indexed under Conjunctivitis, Bacterial; 2 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 33 is below the median of 261 across 36 interventional studies indexed under Conjunctivitis, Bacterial.

Browse Conjunctivitis, Bacterial studies →

Lead sponsor

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated is the lead sponsor of 223 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 51 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 41 (80%) have results posted.

First submitted before Bausch & Lomb Incorporated became part of Bausch Health Companies Inc..

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 31 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects who have a clinical diagnosis of acute bacterial conjunctivitis and exhibit conjunctival discharge and redness in at least one eye. A minimum score of 1 should be present for discharge and a minimum score of 1 for conjunctival hyperemia in the same eye.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with conjunctivitis signs and/or symptoms suggestive of fungal, protozoal, or viral etiology in either eye.
  • Subjects who require or are expected to require (other than study medication) use of any topical ocular medication in either eye, or systemic medications during the course of the study or prior to Day 1 specified in the protocol as ineligible.
  • Subjects with any abnormality of the ocular anatomy or ocular disease/disorder specified in the protocol as ineligible.
  • Subjects with systemic disease/disorder specified in the protocol as ineligible.
  • Subjects who have a known or suspected poor tolerance, sensitivity, or allergy to the study medications or any of their components.
  • Subjects who have a condition or are in a situation which in the investigator's opinion may impact their safety or would negatively affect the conduct or outcome of the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Besivance

    Besifloxacin 0.6% ophthalmic suspension

    Drug: Besivance

  • Active comparator
    Gatifloxacin

    Gatifloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution

    Drug: Gatifloxacin

Interventions

  • Besifloxacin hydrochloride 0.6% ophthalmic suspension, one drop instilled into infected eye, three times daily (TID) for 7 days

  • Gatifloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution one drop instilled into infected eye, TID for 7 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Resolution

    Clinical resolution defined as the absence of both conjunctival discharge and conjunctival hyperemia.

    Time frame: Visit 5 (Day 8+1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Resolution

    Clinical resolution defined as the absence of both conjunctival discharge and conjunctival hyperemia.

    Time frame: Visit 3 (Day 3)

  2. Microbial Eradication

    Eradication defined as the absence of all accepted ocular bacterial species (as measured on the ordinal scale) that were present at or above threshold at baseline

    Time frame: Visit 5 (Day 8+1)

  3. Microbial Outcome

    Microbial outcome for the following groups of accepted ocular bacterial species that were present at or above threshold at baseline: * over all bacterial species * over all and individual gram-positive bacterial species * over all and individual gram-negative bacterial species

    Time frame: Visit 3 (Day 3) and Visit 5 (Day 8+1)

07

Results

Posted Sep 3, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBesivanceGatifloxacin
Started1617
Completed1617
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryClinical Resolution

Clinical resolution defined as the absence of both conjunctival discharge and conjunctival hyperemia.

Time frame:
Visit 5 (Day 8+1)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Clinical Resolution
participantsBesivanceGatifloxacin
Clinical Resolution1212
SecondaryClinical Resolution

Clinical resolution defined as the absence of both conjunctival discharge and conjunctival hyperemia.

Time frame:
Visit 3 (Day 3)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Clinical Resolution
participantsBesivanceGatifloxacin
Clinical Resolution35
SecondaryMicrobial Eradication

Eradication defined as the absence of all accepted ocular bacterial species (as measured on the ordinal scale) that were present at or above threshold at baseline

Time frame:
Visit 5 (Day 8+1)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Microbial Eradication
participantsBesivanceGatifloxacin
Microbial Eradication128
SecondaryMicrobial Outcome

Microbial outcome for the following groups of accepted ocular bacterial species that were present at or above threshold at baseline: * over all bacterial species * over all and individual gram-positive bacterial species * over all and individual gram-negative bacterial species

Time frame:
Visit 3 (Day 3) and Visit 5 (Day 8+1)
Reported as:
Number · events
Microbial Outcome
eventsBesivanceGatifloxacin
Visit 3 (Day 3) Gram-Positive166
Visit 3 (Day 3) Gram-Negative63
Visit 5 (Day 8) Gram-Positive1712
Visit 5 (Day8) Gram-Negative64

Adverse events

Collected over The period of observation for collection of AEs extended from the time the subject's parent/legally authorized representative provided informed consent until the last study visit, Visit 5.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Besivance—0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)
Gatifloxacin—0/17 (0%)5/17 (29.4%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBesivanceGatifloxacin
Conjunctivitis BacterialEye disorders0/161/17
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders0/161/17
IrritabilityPsychiatric disorders0/161/17
RhinorrhoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/161/17
Acne InfantileSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/161/17
DermatitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/161/17

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(days)BesivanceGatifloxacinTotal
Median17 (6 to 26)14 (5 to 25)14 (5 to 26)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BesivanceGatifloxacinTotal
Female12719
Male41014
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BesivanceGatifloxacinTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White121224
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported336
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
    Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of May 2011, a primary completion of Jan 2013 and a completion of Oct 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Sep 2014, 1 year 8 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 5, 2011
First posted
Apr 6, 2011
Start
May 2011
Primary completionActual
Jan 2013
CompletionActual
Oct 2013
Results first posted
Sep 3, 2014
Last update
Sep 3, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01330355
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 6, 2011
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
Jan 2013
Completion
Oct 2013
Results posted
Sep 3, 2014
Last update
Sep 3, 2014

Study contacts

Johnson Varughese
study director · Valeant/Bausch & Lomb

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Besifloxacin

Start the discussion