ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01303328Colvir-PhaseIIUpdated Feb 18, 2013

Safety and Efficacy Study of Antiviral Local Application to Treat High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Lesions (CIN2/3)

A Phase 2 interventional study of C1 in Uterine Cervical Neoplasia and Cervix Intraepithelial Neoplasia, sponsored by Mithra Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 9 sites in Belgium. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-02-18.

Sponsored by Mithra Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this phase-II study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an aqueous gel containing an antiviral, administered directly on cervix exhibiting high grade squamous or glandular intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2 and 3) in comparison with a placebo treatment.

Read the detailed description

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infections induce cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of cervix. To reduce incidence of invasive tumor associated with high grade CIN lesions, the standard treatment is the conisation of cervix (surgical act). A local treatment with antiviral would preserve the cervix of young subjects and reduce obstetrical morbidity induced by the conisation.

This clinical study is aimed at:

  • to evaluate the efficacy of a gel with antiviral directly applied on the cervix exhibiting high grade CIN lesions (CIN2/3): conisation is still indicated?
  • to evaluate the safety and tolerance after local application.
02

Conditions studied

  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasia
  • Cervix Intraepithelial Neoplasia
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

367 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Dysplasia; 70 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 166 across 253 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Dysplasia.

Browse Uterine Cervical Dysplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Mithra Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged between 18 and 50 years old
  • Informed consent signed
  • Cervical lesion classified CIN 2 or 3, on a biopsy made during the 60 days before inclusion
  • No sexual activity, or proved sterility, or use of effective mechanical, hormonal or intrauterine contraception during 30 days following inclusion (except vaginal ring Nuvaring, diaphragm and spermicide)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Invasive or microinvasive cervical neoplasia
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Subtotal hysterectomy
  • Current renal impairment
  • Current immune disorder including serology HIV +
  • Current use of drugs interfering with renal function
  • Current use of oncologic treatment
  • Current use of immune treatment
  • Current use of anti-viral treatment
  • Current vaginal application of drugs or cosmetics
  • Prior treatment with the antiviral on the cervix
  • Local or general condition incompatible with the experimental treatment in the opinion of the principal investigator
  • Current or recent participation to another experimental study during the last 3 months before the screening visit
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment group

    Drug: C1

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    Drug: C1

Interventions

  • DrugC1

    Local application of the experimental gel or placebo gel.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy at week 12: change of histological and cytological parameters (success or not)

    Efficacy will be measured by histological and cytological criteria at week 12 (disappearance of CIN 2+) in correlation with viral status (positive or negative) before and after treatment.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Efficacy at week 28: recurrence rate

    The recurrence rate will be assessed at week 28, by the same histological and cytological criteria in correlation with the viral status (positive or negative) before and after treatment.

    Time frame: 28 weeks

  3. Tolerance and Safety (AE reporting, changes of gynecological and biological parameters)

    Safety will be measured by record of adverse events, changes in clinical biology test results; local tolerance will be measured by patient questioning and gynecological examination of vagina and cervix.

    Time frame: during 30 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Virological status (infection)

    The viral load and genotypes of HPVhr will be determined before treatment, during follow-up and at the end of the study, by using a quantitative analysis.

    Time frame: during 30 weeks

  2. Changes in lesion (colposcopic changes)

    Colposcopic description of lesion will be done before, during and after treatment of the lesion, during follow up and at the end of the study.

    Time frame: during 30 weeks

07

Study locations

9 sites
  • Hôpital Saint Pierre
    Brussels, Brussels Capital 1000, Belgium
  • CHU Brugmann
    Brussels, Brussels Capital 1020, Belgium
  • Hôpital Erasme
    Brussels, Brussels Capital 1070, Belgium
  • HIS Ixelles
    Ixelles-Elsene, Brussels Capital 1050, Belgium
  • CHU Charleroi Hôpital Civil
    Charleroi, Charleroi 6000, Belgium
  • CHU Charleroi Site André Vésale
    Montigny-le-Tilleul, Charleroi 6110, Belgium
  • CHU Tivoli
    La Louvière, La Louvière 7100, Belgium
  • CHU ND des Bruyères
    Chênée, Liege 4032, Belgium
  • CHR Citadelle
    Liège, Liege 4000, Belgium
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2011, a primary completion of Feb 2013 and a completion of Feb 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 18, 2011
First posted
Feb 24, 2011
Start
Mar 2011
Primary completionActual
Feb 2013
CompletionActual
Feb 2013
Last update
Feb 18, 2013
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01303328
Lead sponsor
Mithra Pharmaceuticals
First posted
Feb 24, 2011
Start date
Mar 2011
Primary completion
Feb 2013
Completion
Feb 2013
Last update
Feb 18, 2013

Study contacts

Philippe SIMON, MD, PhD, Professor
principal investigator · Hôpital Erasme, service de gynécologie obstétrique

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion