CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01290614Updated Jul 13, 2015Results posted

A Chronic Care Model Based Quality Improvement (QI) Program to Improve the Care of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Pharmacist based QI program and Usual Care in Chronic Kidney Disease, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-13.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Phase 4, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,199
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of a chronic care model (CCM) based quality improvement program on 1) outcomes for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 2) adherence to CKD guidelines. This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of a CCM based quality improvement program for patients with CKD and assess potential mechanisms for the intervention's effect.

Hypothesis: Implementing a CCM based quality improvement program including system level support in the form of collaborative care, a CKD registry, and provider education will 1) reduce systolic BP in patients with poorly controlled hypertension, 2) increase the percentage of patients appropriately monitored for metabolic complications, and 3) decrease the rate of catheter use in patients initiating dialysis.

Read the detailed description

Research Plan:

The experimental design is a prospective, randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a Chronic Care Model (CCM) based quality improvement program on CKD guideline adherence. The intervention will focus on three main goals: 1) reduction of BP to target levels, 2) appropriate monitoring of patients for metabolic complications of CKD, and 3) reduced use of dialysis catheters in patients initiating dialysis. The CKD CCM QI program will include a lecture on CKD guidelines and hypertension to all CBOC providers and a centrally located pharmacist with access to the CKD registry.

Methodology:

Veterans receive primary care at Community Based Outpatient Centers (CBOCs) throughout Northeast Ohio. Patients with CKD who receive their primary care at a Northeast Ohio CBOC will be eligible for the study. The hypothesis was formulated before data collection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Kidney Disease
03

In context

Kidney Diseases

3,840 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Diseases; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,199 is above the median of 70 across 2,640 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Diseases.

Browse Kidney Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,184 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 132 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • receipt of primary care at a VISN 10 Northeast Ohio CBOC
  • GFR (calculated according to the 4 variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation) less than 45 mL/min per 1.73m2 with a second GFR less than 60 at least 90 to 730 days prior to the index GFR (26); and
  • at least one primary care visit in the year prior to study initiation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ESRD as defined by chronic renal replacement therapy,
  • receipt of a renal transplant,
  • hospice care, and
  • age greater than 85 years or less than 18 years at the time of study initiation.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,199 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pharmacist intervention

    Other: Pharmacist based QI program

  • Active comparator
    Control - usual care

    Patients assigned to control will continue to receive care from their VA provider.

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • OtherPharmacist based QI program

    Per a study protocol, the pharmacist will call each subject (who has not opted out) and discuss their CKD. In brief, the pharmacist will introduce themselves, ask the subject if they have time to discuss their medical care, inform the subject that they have CKD, briefly discuss CKD, ask the subject if they can come for labs, discuss hypertension management as appropriate, and answer any questions. In addition, for subjects with poorly controlled hypertension, the study pharmacist will arrange for a nutrition consult for a low sodium diet, a mainstay of hypertension management in patients with CKD. Finally, for patients with advanced CKD (GFR \<30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) who are not seeing a nephrologist, the study pharmacist will arrange for a nephrology outpatient appointment to assess the need for placement of access for renal replacement therapy.

  • OtherUsual Care

    Patients in the control arm will continue to receive "usual care" from their VA providers.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

    Average SBP for those with a baseline BP \> 130/80

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With PTH Measurement During the Study Period

    The primary process outcome was measurement of PTH during the study period.

    Time frame: one year

07

Results

Posted Jul 13, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePharmacist InterventionControl - Usual Care
Started10701129
Completed5181129
Not completed5520

Outcome measures

PrimarySystolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

Average SBP for those with a baseline BP \> 130/80

Time frame:
one year
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
mmHgPharmacist InterventionControl - Usual Care
Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)135.1 ± 17.4134.4 ± 17.6
Statistical analysis
  • Pharmacist Intervention vs Control - Usual Care · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.57
SecondaryNumber of Participants With PTH Measurement During the Study Period

The primary process outcome was measurement of PTH during the study period.

Time frame:
one year
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With PTH Measurement During the Study Period
participantsPharmacist InterventionControl - Usual Care
Number of Participants With PTH Measurement During the Study Period502182
Statistical analysis
  • Pharmacist Intervention vs Control - Usual Care · Chi-squared · p = <0.001

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pharmacist Intervention—0/1,070 (0%)0/1,070 (0%)
Control - Usual Care—0/1,129 (0%)0/1,129 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Pharmacist InterventionControl - Usual CareTotal
Mean75.6 ± 8.275.7 ± 8.275.6 ± 8.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pharmacist InterventionControl - Usual CareTotal
Female162339
Male105411062160
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Pharmacist InterventionControl - Usual CareTotal
Black6256118
Not Black100810732081
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Pharmacist InterventionControl - Usual CareTotal
United States107011292199
08

Study locations

1 site
  • LSCDVAMC
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Cooney D, Moon H, Liu Y, Miller RT, Perzynski A, Watts B, Drawz PE. A pharmacist based intervention to improve the care of patients with CKD: a pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Nephrol. 2015 Apr 16;16:56. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0052-2. PubMed 25881226 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 13, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01290614
Lead sponsor
University of Minnesota
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 7, 2011
Start date
Feb 2011
Primary completion
Feb 2012
Completion
Jun 2012
Results posted
Jul 13, 2015
Last update
Jul 13, 2015

Study contacts

Paul E Drawz, MD, MHS, MS
principal investigator · LSCDVAMC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion