CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01289418Updated Aug 21, 2012Results posted

Surveillance for Adverse Events Following Pandemic H1N1 Immunization

An observational study in Novel Influenza A/H1N1, sponsored by PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-08-21.

Sponsored by PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
6,525
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Influenza vaccines are continuously modified to adjust to the virus antigenic shifts or drifts, and its safety profile may vary. While generally considered safe, influenza vaccines have been associated in the past with increases in cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (1976) or with oculorespiratory syndrome (2001). The emergence of a novel strain of H1N1 influenza virus (pH1N1) has prompted health departments worldwide to prepare for mass vaccination campaigns with a new H1N1 pandemic vaccine. Following recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO), Canada immunized its population with a dose-sparing adjuvanted vaccine. While the adjuvant developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has been administered to over 39 000 people, only a few hundred will have been vaccinated with the H1N1 formulation in clinical trials before the mass campaign was launched. With this small number, adverse events occurring at a rate \< 1% will not be detected by these clinical trials.

Considering that most cases of pH1N1 to date have been relatively mild, it will be imperative to rapidly detect adverse events serious enough to reconsider the use of the vaccine. Passive surveillance is collecting notifications of adverse events but the sensitivity of this system is not high and its timeliness is not necessarily optimal.

In Canada, healthcare workers (HCW) are among those who were offered the new pandemic vaccine in priority. Because they were offered the vaccine early in the campaign and because they constitute a well-defined group in good general health, this group of people may be well suited for monitoring the safety of the pH1N1 vaccine.

The main objective of this project was to estimate in HCW vaccinated against pH1N1 the frequency of adverse events of sufficient severity to cause work absenteeism or medical consultation.

The active surveillance was done in HCW from 3 sites (Canadian hospitals) participating in the Pandemic Influenza Research Network (PCIRN): (1) Halifax (Nova Scotia), (2) Quebec City (Quebec): 3 hospitals, (3) Toronto

02

Conditions studied

  • Novel Influenza A/H1N1

Keywords

  • H1N1
  • vaccine safety
  • adverse events
  • health care workers
03

In context

Lead sponsor

PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The active surveillance was conducted in three Canadian hospitals participating in the Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes for Health Research- Influenza Research Network (PCIRN): Quebec City, Toronto, and Halifax. Healthcare workers immunized in these institutions were offered to participate in a web-based active surveillance of vaccine safety.

Inclusion criteria

  • To be a health care worker from one of the three Canadian Hospitals participating in the Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes for Health Research- Influenza Research Network (PCIRN): Quebec City, Toronto, and Halifax.
  • To have been immunized with the pH1N1 vaccine.
  • To have an email address.
  • To be 18 years old and older.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
6,525 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Health care workers in Québec

    Health care workers from CHUQ hospitals

  • Health care workers in Toronto

    Health care workers from the Mount Sinai Hospital

  • Health care workers in Halifax

    Health care workers from the Queen Elizabeth Hospital

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in a Medical Consultation.

    Time frame: at day 8, 15 and 29

  2. Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in Work Absenteeism.

    Time frame: day 8, 15 and 29

  3. the Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 14, 2012
Limitations and caveats
Only 52% answered the 3 surveys. We don't know why 48% didn't complete the 3 surveys (were they too sick or not motivated).We didn't have a group of comparable unvaccinated individuals (to estimate the risks attributable to the vaccine).

Participant flow

Day 8 Survey
Participant flow — Day 8 Survey
MilestoneHealth Care Workers
Started6525
Completed4307
Not completed2218
Withdrew: Email address invalid283
Withdrew: Participants did not complete the survey1935
Day 29 Survey
Participant flow — Day 29 Survey
MilestoneHealth Care Workers
Started6525
Completed4057
Not completed2468
Withdrew: Email address invalid283
Withdrew: Participants did not complete the survey2185

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in a Medical Consultation.
Time frame:
at day 8, 15 and 29
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in a Medical Consultation.
participantsHealth Care Workers
Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in a Medical Consultation.234
PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in Work Absenteeism.
Time frame:
day 8, 15 and 29
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in Work Absenteeism.
participantsHealth Care Workers
Number of Participants Who Had Experienced a New Health Problem or the Worsening of an Existing Health Condition That Resulted in Work Absenteeism.374
Primarythe Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
the Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
participantsHealth Care Workers From CHUQ Hospitals
the Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE)35

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Health Care Workers From CHUQ Hospitals—35/3,064 (1.1%)383/4,984 (7.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 21
Most frequent serious events
EventHealth Care Workers From CHUQ Hospitals
GastroenteritisGastrointestinal disorders4/3064
abdominal problemsGastrointestinal disorders4/3064
gynecologic problems/obstetricalPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions3/3064
gynecologic problemsReproductive system and breast disorders3/3064
Respiratory infectionInfections and infestations3/3064
cutaneous infectionInfections and infestations2/3064
Musculoskeletal problemsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/3064
Breast cancerReproductive system and breast disorders1/3064
lung cancerRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/3064
pancreas cancerEndocrine disorders1/3064
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventHealth Care Workers From CHUQ Hospitals
respiratory problemsRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders201/4984
gastroenteritisGastrointestinal disorders73/4984
myalgiaGeneral disorders70/4984
Local reactionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders39/4984

Baseline characteristics

Age Categorical
Age Categorical(participants)Health Care Workers in QuebecHealth Care Workers in TorontoHealth Care Workers in HalifaxTotal
<=18 years0NANA0
Between 18 and 65 years3152NANA3152
>=65 years1NANA1
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Health Care Workers in QuebecHealth Care Workers in TorontoHealth Care Workers in HalifaxTotal
Mean37.5 ± 11.7NA ± NANA ± NA37.5 ± 11.7
Gender
Gender(participants)Health Care Workers in QuebecHealth Care Workers in TorontoHealth Care Workers in HalifaxTotal
Female2310NANA2310
Male841NANA841
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Health Care Workers in QuebecHealth Care Workers in TorontoHealth Care Workers in HalifaxTotal
Canada51835198236525
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • De Serres G, Gariepy MC, Coleman B, Rouleau I, McNeil S, Benoit M, McGeer A, Ambrose A, Needham J, Bergeron C, Grenier C, Sleigh K, Kallos A, Ouakki M, Ouhoummane N, Stiver G, Valiquette L, McCarthy A, Bettinger J; PHAC-CIHR influenza Research Network (PCIRN). Short and long-term safety of the 2009 AS03-adjuvanted pandemic vaccine. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e38563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038563. Epub 2012 Jul 3. PubMed 22802929 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01289418
Lead sponsor
PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network
Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline, Institut National en Santé Publique du Québec, Laval University, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, The Ottawa Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Alberta Children's Hospital, Vancouver General Hospital
Responsible party
Gaston De Serres (Epidemiologist at the National Institute of Public Health of Quebec and professor of epidemiology at the University Laval, Laval University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 3, 2011
Start date
Oct 2009
Primary completion
May 2010
Completion
May 2010
Results posted
Aug 14, 2012
Last update
Aug 21, 2012

Study contacts

Gaston De Serres, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Institut National en Santé Publique du Québec

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion