CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01285557DIGESTUpdated Sep 19, 2024Results posted

Diffuse Gastric and Esophagogastric Junction Cancer S-1 Trial

A Phase 3 interventional study of S-1 (Tegafur+Gimeracil+Oteracil) /cisplatin (investigational arm) and Fluorouracil/cisplatin (control arm) in Metastatic Diffuse Gastric Cancer Including Carcinoma of the Gastro-esophageal Junction, sponsored by Taiho Oncology, Inc.. Terminated at 87 sites in 20 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by Taiho Oncology, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Due to significant changes in investigational and clinical practice landscape of frontline advanced gastric cancer, which challenged viability of trial and increased use of modified chemotherapeutic triplets led to slow participant accrual in study.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
361
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of S-1 and Cisplatin compared to 5-FU and Cisplatin in treatment of patients with metastatic diffuse gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy.

Read the detailed description

This is an open-label, international, Phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the S-1/cisplatin regimen versus the 5-FU/cisplatin regimen in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic diffuse gastric carcinoma including carcinoma of the gastro-esophageal junction. Patients will be randomly assigned to S-1/cisplatin (experimental regimen, Arm A) or 5-FU/cisplatin (control regimen, Arm B).

02

Conditions studied

  • Metastatic Diffuse Gastric Cancer Including Carcinoma of the Gastro-esophageal Junction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Gastric Cancer , S-1, Phase 3
03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

2,851 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 864 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 361 is above the median of 67 across 2,096 interventional studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Taiho Oncology, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 13 (52%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Has given written Informed Consent.
  • Histologically confirmed, unresectable, metastatic diffuse gastric cancer including carcinoma of the gastro-esophageal junction.
  • No prior chemotherapy for gastric cancer except adjuvant and/or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy more than 12 months ago.
  • Life expectancy of at least 3 months.
  • Able to take medications orally.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1.
  • Adequate organ function (bone marrow, kidney and liver).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Certain type(s) of non-measurable lesion(s), if the only one(s).
  • Certain serious illness or medical condition(s).
  • Lost greater than or equal to 10% of body weight in the 3 months proceeding signing the Informed Consent Form.
  • Treatment with drugs interacting with S-1, 5-FU, or cisplatin.
  • Pregnant or lactating female.
  • Known hypersensitivity to fluoropyrimidines or cisplatin.

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
361 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    S-1+Cisplatin

    Participants received S-1 25 milligrams per meter square (mg/m\^2) orally twice daily (BID) every 12 hours from Day 1 through Day 21, 1 hour before or after meal with a glass of water; followed by a 7-day rest period from Day 22 to Day 28 in a 28-day cycle. Participants received a single dose of cisplatin 75 mg/m\^2 as a 1- to 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 following the morning dose of S-1 for a maximum of 8 cycles (each cycle of 28 days). Participants received study medication until progression of disease (PD), adverse event (AE), withdrawal of consent, or other reason for discontinuation, whichever happened earlier.

    Drug: S-1 (Tegafur+Gimeracil+Oteracil) /cisplatin (investigational arm)

  • Active comparator
    5FU+Cisplatin

    Participants received 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m\^2 per 24 hours as continuous IV infusion over 120 hours from Day 1 through Day 5 followed by a 16-day rest period on Days 6 through 21 in a 21-day cycle. Participants received a single dose of cisplatin 80 mg/m\^2 as a 1- to 3-hour IV infusion on Day 1 prior to the start of the 5-FU infusion on Day 1 for a maximum of 8 cycles (each cycle of 21 days). Participants received study medication until PD, AE, withdrawal of consent, or other reason for discontinuation, whichever happened earlier.

    Drug: Fluorouracil/cisplatin (control arm)

Interventions

  • DrugS-1 (Tegafur+Gimeracil+Oteracil) /cisplatin (investigational arm)

    25 mg/m² body surface area (BSA) orally 2 times daily from Days 1 through 21 followed by a 7 day rest period, plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 BSA on Day 1 each 28 day cycle Number of Cycles: until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops. Treatment with cisplatin is limited to a maximum of 8 cycles.

    Also known as: TS-1, Tegafur+Gimeracil+Oteracil

  • DrugFluorouracil/cisplatin (control arm)

    5-FU: 800 mg/m2 BSA/24 hours by continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) from Days 1 through 5 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 BSA on Day 1 each 21 day cycle. Number of Cycles: until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops. Treatment with cisplatin is limited to a maximum of 8 cycles.

    Also known as: TS-1, Tegafur+Gimeracil+Oteracil

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death for the ITT population. Participants who did not die were censored at the date last known to be alive. Analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until disease progression or death, cut-off date: 15 August 2014 (approximately 40 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization until date of radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Disease Progression was defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, where any of the 3 criteria have been met: 1) at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum, 2) Progression in no-target lesion(s), 3) appearance of new lesion(s) Participants who were alive with no PD were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Participants who received new anticancer therapy before disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before new anticancer therapy was initiated. Analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until disease progression or death, cut-off date: 07 March 2014 (approximately 34.7 months)

  2. Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

    TTF was defined as the time from date of randomization until date of PD (clinical or radiologic), or permanent discontinuation of study treatment (S-1 or 5-FU), or death due to any cause. Participates who were still on study treatment at the time of the analysis were censored at the last date the participants was known to be on treatment.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until disease progression, cut-off date: 07 March 2014 (approximately 34.7 months)

  3. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)

    AE was defined as any untoward medical condition that occurs in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the use of the study medication. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (from first dose of study medication up to 30 days of last study medication \[maximum duration: 35.7 months\]).

    Time frame: From first dose of study medication up to 30 days of last study medication (maximum duration: 35.7 months)

  4. Number of Participants With TEAEs With Severity Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3

    An AE was any untoward medical condition that occurred in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the use of the study medication. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (from first dose of study medication up to 30 days of last study medication \[maximum duration: 35.7 months\]).

    Time frame: From first dose of study medication up to 30 days of last study medication (maximum duration: 35.7 months)

  5. Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on the Investigator review of the images and application of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target or non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes for target lesions or all lymph nodes for non-target lesions were non-pathological morphologically that was reduced in size in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as target lesions with at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters, taking baseline sum diameters as reference.

    Time frame: From date of first study medication until cut-off date: 07 March 2014 (approximately 34.7 months)

  6. Duration of Response (DR)

    Duration of response was defined as the time (in months) from date of first confirmed response (CR or PR) to date of first progressive disease (PD) or death. Per the RECIST criteria, definitions were as follows: CR was defined as the disappearance of all target or non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes for target lesions or all lymph nodes for non-target lesions were non-pathological morphologically that was reduced in size in short axis to \<10 mm. Analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From date of first study medication until cut-off date: 07 March 2014 (approximately 34.7 months)

  7. Time to Tumor Response (TTR)

    TTR was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of first observation of response (PR or CR) (whichever status was recorded first). TTR was assessed based on investigator assessment utilizing RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target or non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes for target lesions or all lymph nodes for non-target lesions were non-pathological morphologically that was reduced in size in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as target lesions with at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters, taking baseline sum diameters as reference. Analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From date of first study medication until cut-off date: 07 March 2014 (approximately 34.7 months)

07

Results

Posted May 17, 2022
Limitations and caveats
Enrollment closure and study termination was due to significant changes in investigational and clinical practice landscape of frontline advanced gastric cancer, which challenged viability of trial and increased use of modified chemotherapeutic triplets led to slow participant accrual in the study. The decision to halt further accrual was not based on any safety or study quality concerns.

Participant flow

A total of 690 participants were screened from 14 April 2011 to 25 February 2014, of which 361 participants enrolled in the study. The data cut-off date for all clinical data except overall survival was 07 Mar 2014 and for overall survival was 15 Aug 2014. The participants were randomized using interactive Voice/Web randomization system(2:1 ratio) to receive S-1/cisplatin or 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin. A total of 329 participants failed screening due to failure to meet inclusion criteria.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneS-1+Cisplatin5FU+Cisplatin
Started239122
Treated238121
As treated (at) population230118
Completed00
Not completed239122
Withdrew: Death17390
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up62
Withdrew: Withdrew consent61
Withdrew: Sponsor study termination2313
Withdrew: Randomized but not treated11
Withdrew: Study follow-up ongoing2814
Withdrew: Sponsor decision21

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death for the ITT population. Participants who did not die were censored at the date last known to be alive. Analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization until disease progression or death, cut-off date: 15 August 2014 (approximately 40 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsS-1+Cisplatin5FU+Cisplatin
Overall Survival (OS)7.5 (6.7 to 9.3)6.6 (5.7 to 8.1)
Statistical analysis
  • S-1+Cisplatin vs 5FU+Cisplatin · Unstratified Log-rank · p = 0.9312 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.99 · 95% CI 0.76 to 1.28
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization until date of radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Disease Progression was defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, where any of the 3 criteria have been met: 1) at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including the baseline sum, 2) Progression in no-target lesion(s), 3) appearance of new lesion(s) Participants who were alive with no PD were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Participants who received new anticancer therapy before disease progression were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment before new anticancer therapy was initiated. Analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until disease progression or death, cut-off date: 07 March 2014 (approximately 34.7 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsS-1+Cisplatin5FU+Cisplatin
Progression-free Survival (PFS)4.4 (3.8 to 5.6)3.9 (3.6 to 5.2)
Statistical analysis
  • S-1+Cisplatin vs 5FU+Cisplatin · Log Rank · p = 0.3039 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.86 · 95% CI 0.65 to 1.14
SecondaryTime to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF was defined as the time from date of randomization until date of PD (clinical or radiologic), or permanent discontinuation of study treatment (S-1 or 5-FU), or death due to any cause. Participates who were still on study treatment at the time of the analysis were censored at the last date the participants was known to be on treatment.

Time frame:
From date of randomization until disease progression, cut-off date: 07 March 2014 (approximately 34.7 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
monthsS-1+Cisplatin5FU+Cisplatin
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)4.2 (3.8 to 4.9)3.8 (3.4 to 4.3)
Statistical analysis
  • S-1+Cisplatin vs 5FU+Cisplatin · Log Rank · p = 0.1683 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.66 to 1.08
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)

AE was defined as any untoward medical condition that occurs in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the use of the study medication. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (from first dose of study medication up to 30 days of last study medication \[maximum duration: 35.7 months\]).

Time frame:
From first dose of study medication up to 30 days of last study medication (maximum duration: 35.7 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE)
ParticipantsS-1+Cisplatin5FU+Cisplatin
TEAE214111
TESAE6331
SecondaryNumber of Participants With TEAEs With Severity Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3

An AE was any untoward medical condition that occurred in a participants while participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily had to have a causal relationship with the use of the study medication. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period (from first dose of study medication up to 30 days of last study medication \[maximum duration: 35.7 months\]).

Time frame:
From first dose of study medication up to 30 days of last study medication (maximum duration: 35.7 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs With Severity Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3
ParticipantsS-1+Cisplatin5FU+Cisplatin
Number of Participants With TEAEs With Severity Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 315778
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective evidence of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on the Investigator review of the images and application of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target or non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes for target lesions or all lymph nodes for non-target lesions were non-pathological morphologically that was reduced in size in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as target lesions with at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters, taking baseline sum diameters as reference.

Time frame:
From date of first study medication until cut-off date: 07 March 2014 (approximately 34.7 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Overall Response
percentage of participantsS-1+Cisplatin5FU+Cisplatin
Overall Response Rate (ORR): Percentage of Participants With Overall Response34.7 (28.0 to 41.9)19.8 (12.2 to 29.4)
SecondaryDuration of Response (DR)

Duration of response was defined as the time (in months) from date of first confirmed response (CR or PR) to date of first progressive disease (PD) or death. Per the RECIST criteria, definitions were as follows: CR was defined as the disappearance of all target or non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes for target lesions or all lymph nodes for non-target lesions were non-pathological morphologically that was reduced in size in short axis to \<10 mm. Analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From date of first study medication until cut-off date: 07 March 2014 (approximately 34.7 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Response (DR)
monthsS-1+Cisplatin5FU+Cisplatin
Duration of Response (DR)5.1 (3.0 to 5.8)4.2 (2.0 to 6.0)
SecondaryTime to Tumor Response (TTR)

TTR was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of first observation of response (PR or CR) (whichever status was recorded first). TTR was assessed based on investigator assessment utilizing RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target or non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes for target lesions or all lymph nodes for non-target lesions were non-pathological morphologically that was reduced in size in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as target lesions with at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters, taking baseline sum diameters as reference. Analysis was performed by using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From date of first study medication until cut-off date: 07 March 2014 (approximately 34.7 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Tumor Response (TTR)
monthsS-1+Cisplatin5FU+Cisplatin
Time to Tumor Response (TTR)1.8 (1.8 to 1.9)1.9 (1.8 to 2.1)

Adverse events

Collected over AEs were collected from first dose of study medication up to 30 days of last study medication (maximum duration: 35.7 months). Deaths were collected from Baseline up to end of study (up to approximately 40 months).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
S-1+Cisplatin173/239 (72.4%)63/230 (27.4%)210/230 (91.3%)
5FU+Cisplatin90/122 (73.8%)31/118 (26.3%)110/118 (93.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 84
Most frequent serious events
EventS-1+Cisplatin5FU+Cisplatin
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders11/2305/118
Gastric haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders3/2304/118
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders5/2304/118
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders6/2304/118
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/2304/118
Renal failure acuteRenal and urinary disorders5/2301/118
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders4/2301/118
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/2301/118
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/2302/118
HaematemesisGastrointestinal disorders1/2302/118
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 40
Most frequent other events
EventS-1+Cisplatin5FU+Cisplatin
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders122/23062/118
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders97/23049/118
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders95/23040/118
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders68/23043/118
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders82/23034/118
AstheniaGeneral disorders55/23036/118
FatigueGeneral disorders59/23028/118
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders41/23022/118
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders42/23012/118
Weight decreasedInvestigations40/23018/118

Baseline characteristics

The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants including those not dosed according to their randomization.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)S-1+Cisplatin5FU+CisplatinTotal
Mean55.1 ± 11.0155.8 ± 11.8055.4 ± 11.27
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)S-1+Cisplatin5FU+CisplatinTotal
Female11562177
Male12460184
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)S-1+Cisplatin5FU+CisplatinTotal
Caucasian/White226117343
Black426
Asian/Oriental404
American Indian or Alaska Native202
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Other336
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status(Participants)S-1+Cisplatin5FU+CisplatinTotal
ECOG Grade 07538113
ECOG Grade 116483247
Missing011
08

Study locations

87 sites
  • Alexandria, Louisiana 71301, United States
  • Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States
  • Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Rosario, Santa Fe S2000KZE, Argentina
  • Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, 1264, Argentina
  • Bruxelles, 1200, Belgium
  • Edegem, 2650, Belgium
  • Gent, 9000, Belgium
  • Salvador, BA 41820-021, Brazil
  • Porto Alegre, RS 90610-000, Brazil
  • Barretos, SP 14784-400, Brazil
  • Ribeirão Preto, SP 14015-130, Brazil
  • São Paulo, SP 01246-000, Brazil
  • São Paulo, SP 01406-100, Brazil
  • Belo Horizonte, 31110-580, Brazil
  • Fortaleza, 60160-230, Brazil
  • Ijuí, 98700-000, Brazil
  • Porto Alegre, 90050-170, Brazil
  • Pleven, 5800, Bulgaria
  • Vratsa, 3000, Bulgaria
  • Osijek, 31000, Croatia
  • Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • Tallinn, 11312, Estonia
  • Tallinn, 13419, Estonia
  • Essen, 45147, Germany
  • Budapest, 1032, Hungary
  • Budapest, 1122, Hungary
  • Győor, 9024, Hungary
  • Nyíregyháza, 4400, Hungary
  • Pécs, 7624, Hungary
  • Szeged, 6720, Hungary
  • Székesfehérvár, 8000, Hungary
  • Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
  • Ancona, 60020, Italy
  • Candiolo, 10060, Italy
  • Milano, 20141, Italy
  • Modena, 41100, Italy
  • Potenza, 85100, Italy
  • Reggio Emilia, 42100, Italy
  • Rimini, 47900, Italy
  • Chihuahua, 31000, Mexico
  • Mexico City, 14080, Mexico
  • Oaxaca, 68000, Mexico
  • Szczecin, 71-730, Poland
  • Warszawa, 02-781, Poland
  • Aveiro, 3814-501, Portugal
  • Coimbra, 3000-226, Portugal
  • Lisboa, 1649-035, Portugal
  • Porto, 4200-072, Portugal
  • Baia Mare, 430031, Romania
  • Cluj-Napoca, 400015, Romania
  • Craiova, 200385, Romania
  • Iasi, 700106, Romania
  • Barnaul, 656049, Russian Federation
  • Krasnodar, 350040, Russian Federation
  • Moscow, 115478, Russian Federation
  • Pyatigorsk, 357502, Russian Federation
  • Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation
  • Saint Petersburg, 197758, Russian Federation
  • Saint-Petersburg, 194214, Russian Federation
  • Groenkloof Pretoria, Gauteng 0181, South Africa
  • Pretoria, Gauteng 0002, South Africa
  • Durban, KZN 4091, South Africa
  • Cape Town, Western Cape 7500, South Africa
  • Sabadell, Barcelona 08208, Spain
  • Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Barcelona, 08907, Spain
  • Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Madrid, 28033, Spain
  • Madrid, 28034, Spain
  • Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Madrid, 28050, Spain
  • Cherkassy, 18009, Ukraine
  • Chernivtsiy, 58013, Ukraine
  • Dnepropetrovsk, 49102, Ukraine
  • Donetsk, 83092, Ukraine
  • Kharkiv, 61070, Ukraine
  • Kyiv, 3115, Ukraine
  • Lutsk, 43018, Ukraine
  • Lviv, 79031, Ukraine
  • Sumy, 40005, Ukraine
  • Uzhgorod, 88000, Ukraine
  • Zaporizzhya, 69040, Ukraine
  • Rhyl, Wales LL18 5UJ, United Kingdom
  • London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ajani JA, Abramov M, Bondarenko I, Shparyk Y, Gorbunova V, Hontsa A, Otchenash N, Alsina M, Lazarev S, Feliu J, Elme A, Esko V, Abdalla K, Verma U, Benedetti F, Aoyama T, Mizuguchi H, Makris L, Rosati G; DIGEST Study Group. A phase III trial comparing oral S-1/cisplatin and intravenous 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin in patients with untreated diffuse gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2142-2148. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx275. PubMed 28911091 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01285557
Lead sponsor
Taiho Oncology, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 28, 2011
Start date
Apr 14, 2011
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2014
Completion
Aug 15, 2014
Results posted
May 17, 2022
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Study contacts

Taiho Central
study director · Taiho Oncology, Inc. USA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion