ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01281644KPUpdated Dec 6, 2021Results posted

Treatment of Keratosis Pilaris With 810 nm Diode Laser

An interventional study of Diode Laser in Keratosis Pilaris (KP), sponsored by Northwestern University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-06.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators hope to establish whether or not the diode laser, a longer-wavelength laser, is effective in treating keratosis pilaris, and hopefully opening a door into the discussion and management of this skin condition. The primary outcome of interest is the difference in the overall blind rater severity scores of the treated versus the untreated sites. The secondary outcome of interest is the change in the patient's self-rated severity score of the treated site. To account for potential natural disease progression or regression, the investigators will also compare patient mean changes to the mean changes in severity scores of the untreated site.

02

Conditions studied

  • Keratosis Pilaris (KP)

Keywords

  • Keratosis pilaris (KP)
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,423 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 105 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 78 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject is age 18 to 65
  • Subject has diagnosis of keratosis pilaris involving both arms
  • Subject has Fitzpatrick Skin Type I - III
  • Subject is in good health
  • Subject has the willingness and ability to understand and provide informed consen

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 or over 65 years of age
  • Subjects with Fitzpatrick Skin Type greater than III
  • Subjects who have received any laser therapy to the armsin the past year
  • Subjects with concurrent diagnosis of another skin condition or
  • Subjects with tan or sunburn over the upper arms in the past month
  • Subjects with open, non-healing sores or infections at any skin site
  • Subjects who are unable to understand the protocol or give
  • Subjects who take oral photosensitizing medications or who apply topical photosensitizing medications to either arm
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    No Laser Treatment
  • Active comparator
    45-60 J Diode Laser Therapy

    Diode laser therapy will be initiated at 45-60 J for 30 ms to 100 ms.

    Device: Diode Laser

Interventions

  • DeviceDiode Laser

    810 nm diode laser

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in Disease Severity Scores

    The primary outcome measure was the difference in disease severity total score, combining redness and roughness/bumpiness scales, between the treated site and the control site, as rated by the blinded dermatologists at 12 weeks post-initial visit. These scales were not validated, as no relevant validated scale was available. However, raters were trained and calibrated on the use of the scale, and prior to review of study images, were asked to rate archival skin images on the same 4-point qualitative subscales used in the study. Each scale ranged from 0 to 3, with 0 being none and 3 being severe. The total score summed the redness and roughness/bumpiness scale scores for a range of 0 (none/better outcome) to 6 (severe/worse outcome).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Self-rated Severity

    This outcome measure was the difference in disease severity total score, combining redness and roughness/bumpiness scales, between the treated site and the control site, as rated by the patient at 12 weeks post-initial visit. These scales were not validated, as no relevant validated scale was available. Each scale ranged from 0 to 3, with 0 being none and 3 being severe. The total score summed the redness and roughness/bumpiness scale scores for a range of 0 (none/better outcome) to 6 (severe/worse outcome).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Oct 20, 2014

Participant flow

The principal investigator selected patients presenting to the Dermatology Clinic at Northwestern Memorial Hospital who met the inclusion criteria. A brief, written description of the study was given to the patient.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSubjects Receiving Split Body Treatment
Started23
Completed18
Not completed5
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2

Outcome measures

PrimaryDifference in Disease Severity Scores

The primary outcome measure was the difference in disease severity total score, combining redness and roughness/bumpiness scales, between the treated site and the control site, as rated by the blinded dermatologists at 12 weeks post-initial visit. These scales were not validated, as no relevant validated scale was available. However, raters were trained and calibrated on the use of the scale, and prior to review of study images, were asked to rate archival skin images on the same 4-point qualitative subscales used in the study. Each scale ranged from 0 to 3, with 0 being none and 3 being severe. The total score summed the redness and roughness/bumpiness scale scores for a range of 0 (none/better outcome) to 6 (severe/worse outcome).

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Difference in Disease Severity Scores
units on a scaleNo Laser Treatment45-60 J Diode Laser Therapy
Difference in Disease Severity Scores4 (3 to 5)3 (2 to 4)
SecondaryPatient Self-rated Severity

This outcome measure was the difference in disease severity total score, combining redness and roughness/bumpiness scales, between the treated site and the control site, as rated by the patient at 12 weeks post-initial visit. These scales were not validated, as no relevant validated scale was available. Each scale ranged from 0 to 3, with 0 being none and 3 being severe. The total score summed the redness and roughness/bumpiness scale scores for a range of 0 (none/better outcome) to 6 (severe/worse outcome).

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Patient Self-rated Severity
units on a scaleNo Laser Treatment45-60 J Diode Laser Therapy
Patient Self-rated Severity4 (3 to 4)2.5 (2 to 4)

Adverse events

Collected over 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
No Laser Treatment—0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)
45-60 J Diode Laser Therapy—0/23 (0%)2/23 (8.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventNo Laser Treatment45-60 J Diode Laser Therapy
post-inflammatory hyperpigmentationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/232/23

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Subjects Receiving Split Body Treatment
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years18
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Subjects Receiving Split Body Treatment
Female15
Male3
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ibrahim O, Khan M, Bolotin D, Dubina M, Nodzenski M, Disphanurat W, Kakar R, Yoo S, Whiting D, West DP, Poon E, Veledar E, Alam M. Treatment of keratosis pilaris with 810-nm diode laser: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Feb;151(2):187-91. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.2211. PubMed 25372313 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2011, a primary completion of Oct 2011 and a completion of Oct 2011. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Oct 2014, 3 years after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 20, 2011
First posted
Jan 24, 2011
Start
Mar 2011
Primary completionActual
Oct 2011
CompletionActual
Oct 2011
Results first posted
Oct 20, 2014
Last update
Dec 6, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 6, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01281644
Responsible party
Murad Alam (Associate Professor of Dermatology, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 24, 2011
Start date
Mar 2011
Primary completion
Oct 2011
Completion
Oct 2011
Results posted
Oct 20, 2014
Last update
Dec 6, 2021

Study contacts

Murad Alam, MD
principal investigator · Northwestern University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion