CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01280656Updated Nov 29, 2016Results posted

A Retrospective Study to Assess the Impact of the Use of Interferon in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C (DECISION)

An observational study in Hepatitis C, Chronic, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Completed at 37 sites in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-29.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
660
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This retrospective study will assess the sustained virologic response and the safety of two different interferons (pegylated or conventional) in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Data will be collected for 24 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Hepatitis A

2,710 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis A; 142 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 660 is above the median of 250 across 687 observational studies indexed under Hepatitis A.

Browse Hepatitis A studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,061 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Of its 319 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Hepatitis C patients that received interferon (pegylated or conventional) during the period stipulated (from 01-Sep-2007 to 31-Aug-2008)

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients, >/=18 years and \<70 years of age
  • Diagnosis of hepatitis C
  • Assessment of viral load prior to treatment (mandatory for genotype 1 only)
  • Liver biopsy
  • Co-morbidities data
  • Use of interferon (pegylated or conventional) and ribavirin to treat hepatitis C infection genotype 2 and 3 and pegylated interferon plus ribavirin to treat hepatitis C infection genotype 1
  • Above mentioned treatment started between 01-Sep-2007 and 31-Aug-2008

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus
  • Co-infection with hepatitis B virus
  • Presence of hepatocarcinoma
  • Patients submitted to hemodialysis
  • Organ transplant patients
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
660 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin

    Eligible participants who will receive conventional interferon plus ribavirin for Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC) according to the standard of care and aligned with the local prescription instructions will be observed during treatment period (48 weeks) and follow up period (24 weeks).

    Drug: Conventional Interferon · Drug: Ribavirin

  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin

    Eligible participants who will receive peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for CHC according to the standard of care and aligned with the local prescription instructions will be observed during treatment period (48 weeks) and follow up period (24 weeks).

    Drug: Peginterferon Alfa-2a · Drug: Ribavirin

  • Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin

    Eligible participants who will receive peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for CHC according to the standard of care and aligned with the local prescription instructions will be observed during treatment period (48 weeks) and follow up period (24 weeks).

    Drug: Peginterferon Alfa-2b · Drug: Ribavirin

Interventions

  • DrugConventional Interferon

    Conventional interferon according to the standard of care and aligned with the local prescription instructions

  • DrugPeginterferon Alfa-2a

    Peginterferon alfa-2a according to the standard of care and aligned with the local prescription instructions

  • DrugPeginterferon Alfa-2b

    Peginterferon alfa-2b according to the standard of care and aligned with the local prescription instructions

  • DrugRibavirin

    Ribavirin according to the standard of care and aligned with the local prescription instructions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment

    Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as virological response at 12 weeks after end of treatment (EOT). Virologic response was either defined as having undetectable (that is, no hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid \[HCV RNA\] was detected in the participants' plasma samples) or less than 50 international units/milliliter (IU/mL) HCV RNA (that is, the participants' plasma samples contained traces of HCV RNA at a concentration below the limit of quantification of the viral load assay or no HCV RNA was detected in the samples). EOT= Week 48. Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy.

    Time frame: At Week 60

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment

    SVR was defined as virological response at 24 weeks after EOT, EOT= Week 48. Virologic response was either defined as having undetectable (that is, no hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid \[HCV RNA\] was detected in the participants' plasma samples) or less than 50 IU/mL HCV RNA (that is, the participants' plasma samples contained traces of HCV RNA at a concentration below the limit of quantification of the viral load assay or no HCV RNA was detected in the samples). Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy.

    Time frame: At Week 72

  2. Number of Participants With Interferon Dose Reduction Rates in Function of the Interferon Type Being Used

    The number of participants with Interferon dose reduction rates in function of the interferon type being used are reported

    Time frame: At Week 24

  3. Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 12

    An early virologic response (EVR) was defined as a HCV-RNA decrease of at least two logarithmic scales (2 Log) or 100 times the pretreatment value or non-detection at Week 12 of treatment period.

    Time frame: At Week 12

  4. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response Treated at Interferon Application Centers and Treated at Home

    The percentage of participants with SVR-12 and SVR-24 treated at interferon application centers (IAC) and treated at home are presented.

    Time frame: At Week 60 (SVR 12) and Week 72 (SVR 24)

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Were Treated at Interferon Application Centers and at Home and Discontinued Treatment

    The percentage of participants who were treated at interferon application centers and at home and who discontinued treatment is presented. Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy.

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

  6. Mean Percentage Reduction of Hemoglobin in Treatment Responders and Treatment Non-Responders

    The average percentage reduction of hemoglobin (Hb) in treatment responders and treatment non-responders between the conventional group, peginterferon alfa-2a plus and peginterferon alfa-2b is presented. Participants with undetectable HCV RNA at specified time points (Weeks 4/12/18/24/48) were considered as treatment responders. Participants with positive viral load (detectable HCV RNA) at end of treatment regardless of the treatment duration were considered as treatment non-responders.

    Time frame: Up to Week 72

  7. Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response at Week 4

    Rapid virologic response was defined as qualitative or quantitative HCV-RNA (viral load) undetectable (below the lower limit of detection) at Week 4 of treatment period.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  8. Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response at End of Treatment

    Virologic response at EOT was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at EOT (regardless in which week treatment was concluded). EOT = Week 48.

    Time frame: At Week 48

  9. Percentage of Participants With Virologic Relapse up to Week 72

    Virologic relapse was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at end of treatment and detectable HCV-RNA at the last follow-up assessment available. If the participant was a responder at end of treatment and was not submitted to any viral load assessment during the follow-up period, he was considered a relapser.

    Time frame: Up to Week 72

  10. Percentage of Participants With Null Response or No Responder at End of Treatment

    Null response or no responders were defined as those participants presenting positive viral load at EOT (regardless of the treatment duration). EOT= Week 48.

    Time frame: At Week 48

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events

    The percentage of participants with treatment discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AE) between conventional group, peginterferon alfa-2a and peginterferon alfa-2b is presented.

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

  12. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Any Serious Adverse Events

    An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a significant medical event in the investigator's judgment or requires intervention to prevent one or other of these outcomes.

    Time frame: Up to Week 72

07

Results

Posted Sep 26, 2016

Participant flow

A total of 660 participants were enrolled from 39 centers in Brazil. The study was conducted from January 2010 to June 2013.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Started62312286
Completed59265223
Not completed34763
Withdrew: Adverse event11413
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy12238
Withdrew: Treatment shortening (rgt)045
Withdrew: Other177

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment

Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as virological response at 12 weeks after end of treatment (EOT). Virologic response was either defined as having undetectable (that is, no hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid \[HCV RNA\] was detected in the participants' plasma samples) or less than 50 international units/milliliter (IU/mL) HCV RNA (that is, the participants' plasma samples contained traces of HCV RNA at a concentration below the limit of quantification of the viral load assay or no HCV RNA was detected in the samples). EOT= Week 48. Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy.

Time frame:
At Week 60
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment
percentage of participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment07.120.8
Statistical analysis
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin vs Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin · Chi-squared · p = 0.003
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment

SVR was defined as virological response at 24 weeks after EOT, EOT= Week 48. Virologic response was either defined as having undetectable (that is, no hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid \[HCV RNA\] was detected in the participants' plasma samples) or less than 50 IU/mL HCV RNA (that is, the participants' plasma samples contained traces of HCV RNA at a concentration below the limit of quantification of the viral load assay or no HCV RNA was detected in the samples). Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy.

Time frame:
At Week 72
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment
percentage of participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment62.574.672.3
Statistical analysis
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin vs Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin · Chi-squared · p = 0.693
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Interferon Dose Reduction Rates in Function of the Interferon Type Being Used

The number of participants with Interferon dose reduction rates in function of the interferon type being used are reported

Time frame:
At Week 24
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Interferon Dose Reduction Rates in Function of the Interferon Type Being Used
participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Number of Participants With Interferon Dose Reduction Rates in Function of the Interferon Type Being Used1929
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 12

An early virologic response (EVR) was defined as a HCV-RNA decrease of at least two logarithmic scales (2 Log) or 100 times the pretreatment value or non-detection at Week 12 of treatment period.

Time frame:
At Week 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 12
percentage of participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 1214.537.235.0
Statistical analysis
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin vs Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin · Chi-squared · p = 0.573
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response Treated at Interferon Application Centers and Treated at Home

The percentage of participants with SVR-12 and SVR-24 treated at interferon application centers (IAC) and treated at home are presented.

Time frame:
At Week 60 (SVR 12) and Week 72 (SVR 24)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response Treated at Interferon Application Centers and Treated at Home
percentage of participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
SVR-12, treated at IAC (n=0, 40, 35)NA5.02.9
SVR-12, treated at home (n=14, 81, 57)08.633.3
SVR-24, treated at IAC (n=0, 40, 35)NA80.077.1
SVR-24, treated at home (n=14, 81, 57)64.375.368.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Treated at Interferon Application Centers and at Home and Discontinued Treatment

The percentage of participants who were treated at interferon application centers and at home and who discontinued treatment is presented. Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy.

Time frame:
Up to Week 48
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Were Treated at Interferon Application Centers and at Home and Discontinued Treatment
percentage of participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
At the site (n=0,98,126)NA17.417.5
At home (n=55,204,137)5.511.821.9
Statistical analysis
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin vs Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin · Chi-squared · p = 0.982
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin vs Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin · Chi-squared · p = 0.012
SecondaryMean Percentage Reduction of Hemoglobin in Treatment Responders and Treatment Non-Responders

The average percentage reduction of hemoglobin (Hb) in treatment responders and treatment non-responders between the conventional group, peginterferon alfa-2a plus and peginterferon alfa-2b is presented. Participants with undetectable HCV RNA at specified time points (Weeks 4/12/18/24/48) were considered as treatment responders. Participants with positive viral load (detectable HCV RNA) at end of treatment regardless of the treatment duration were considered as treatment non-responders.

Time frame:
Up to Week 72
Reported as:
Mean · mean percentage reduction of hemoglobin
Mean Percentage Reduction of Hemoglobin in Treatment Responders and Treatment Non-Responders
mean percentage reduction of hemoglobinConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Responders (n=0,19,15)NA ± NA14.4 ± 8.515.8 ± 10.3
Non-responders (n=10,54,48)18.3 ± 9.59.8 ± 27.712.6 ± 11.1
Statistical analysis
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.476
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.320
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response at Week 4

Rapid virologic response was defined as qualitative or quantitative HCV-RNA (viral load) undetectable (below the lower limit of detection) at Week 4 of treatment period.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response at Week 4
percentage of participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response at Week 46.521.220.3
Statistical analysis
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin vs Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin · Chi-squared · p = 0.792
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Virologic Response at End of Treatment

Virologic response at EOT was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at EOT (regardless in which week treatment was concluded). EOT = Week 48.

Time frame:
At Week 48
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response at End of Treatment
percentage of participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response at End of Treatment25.840.435.3
Statistical analysis
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin vs Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin · Chi-squared · p = 0.202
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Virologic Relapse up to Week 72

Virologic relapse was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at end of treatment and detectable HCV-RNA at the last follow-up assessment available. If the participant was a responder at end of treatment and was not submitted to any viral load assessment during the follow-up period, he was considered a relapser.

Time frame:
Up to Week 72
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Relapse up to Week 72
percentage of participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Relapse up to Week 7237.522.222.8
Statistical analysis
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin vs Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin · Chi-squared · p = 0.921
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Null Response or No Responder at End of Treatment

Null response or no responders were defined as those participants presenting positive viral load at EOT (regardless of the treatment duration). EOT= Week 48.

Time frame:
At Week 48
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Null Response or No Responder at End of Treatment
percentage of participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Percentage of Participants With Null Response or No Responder at End of Treatment74.259.664.7
Statistical analysis
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin vs Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin · Chi-squared · p = 0.202
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events

The percentage of participants with treatment discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AE) between conventional group, peginterferon alfa-2a and peginterferon alfa-2b is presented.

Time frame:
Up to Week 48
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events
percentage of participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events1.64.54.6
Statistical analysis
  • Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin vs Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin · Chi-squared · p = 0.973
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Any Serious Adverse Events

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a significant medical event in the investigator's judgment or requires intervention to prevent one or other of these outcomes.

Time frame:
Up to Week 72
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Any Serious Adverse Events
participantsConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
any AE57285264
any SAE2159

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Week 72. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Conventional Interferon Plus Ribavirin—2/62 (3.2%)55/62 (88.7%)
Peginterferon Alfa-2a Plus Ribavirin—15/312 (4.8%)275/312 (88.1%)
Peginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin—9/286 (3.1%)262/286 (91.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent serious events
EventConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
Inguinal herniaGastrointestinal disorders1/620/3120/286
DepressionPsychiatric disorders1/620/3120/286
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/621/3123/286
GallstonesHepatobiliary disorders0/620/3121/286
Thoracic painCardiac disorders0/620/3121/286
Diabetic KetoacidosisMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/620/3121/286
NeutropaeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/620/3121/286
Febrile neutropaeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/620/3121/286
ThrombocytopaeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/620/3121/286
PneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/620/3121/286
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent other events
EventConventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders11/62109/312111/286
AstheniaGeneral disorders23/62114/312107/286
HeadacheNervous system disorders19/6267/31267/286
PyrexiaGeneral disorders16/6265/31266/286
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders12/6275/31252/286
NeutropaeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/6260/31245/286
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders10/6257/31245/286
Flu conditionGeneral disorders3/6225/31250/286
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders8/6251/31233/286
ItchSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders9/6250/31244/286

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Conventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus RibavirinTotal
Mean50.4 ± 8.649.2 ± 10.749.5 ± 9.549.5 ± 10.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Conventional Interferon Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2a Plus RibavirinPeginterferon Alfa-2b Plus RibavirinTotal
Female22188147357
Male40124139303
08

Study locations

37 sites
  • Rio Branco, AC 69908-210, Brazil
  • Manaus, AM 69040-000, Brazil
  • Salvador, BA 41110-170, Brazil
  • Vitoria, ES 29043-260, Brazil
  • Goiania, GO 74535170, Brazil
  • Sao Luis, MA 65020560, Brazil
  • Pouso Alegre, MG 37550-000, Brazil
  • Uberaba, MG 38025-180, Brazil
  • Campo Grande - MS, MS 79034-000, Brazil
  • Belem, PA 66050-380, Brazil
  • Recife, PE 50100-130, Brazil
  • Recife, PE 50670-420, Brazil
  • Curitiba, PR 80060-900, Brazil
  • Curitiba, PR 80810-040, Brazil
  • Niteroi, RJ 24033-900, Brazil
  • Nova Iguacu, RJ 26030-380, Brazil
  • Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20270-004, Brazil
  • Porto Velho, RO 78812-329, Brazil
  • Porto Alegre, RS 90035-003, Brazil
  • Porto Alegre, RS 90610-000, Brazil
  • Rio Grande, RS 96200-310, Brazil
  • Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, SC 15090-000, Brazil
  • Aracaju, SE 49060-100, Brazil
  • Botucatu, SP 18600-400, Brazil
  • Campinas, SP 13060-803, Brazil
  • Ribeirao Preto, SP 14049-900, Brazil
  • Ribeirao Preto, SP 14085-410, Brazil
  • Santo Andre, SP 09060-650, Brazil
  • Santos, SP 11015470, Brazil
  • Sao Paulo, SP 01246-000, Brazil
  • Sao Paulo, SP 01323-020, Brazil
  • Sao Paulo, SP 04039-004, Brazil
  • Sao Paulo, SP 04040-002, Brazil
  • Sao Paulo, SP 04040-003, Brazil
  • Sao Paulo, SP 05403-000, Brazil
  • Sao Paulo, SP 05403-010, Brazil
  • Sorocaba, SP 18047-600, Brazil
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 29, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01280656
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 21, 2011
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Nov 2012
Completion
Jun 2013
Results posted
Sep 26, 2016
Last update
Nov 29, 2016

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion