CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01273818Updated Dec 29, 2014Results posted

Effectiveness of Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Inguinal Hernia Repair

A Phase 4 interventional study of Gentamicin and cefazolin and Cefazolin in Inguinal Hernia, sponsored by Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-12-29.

Sponsored by Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
276
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim of this study is to measure the effectiveness of topical gentamicin to prevent post-operative infection in inguinal tension-free hernia repair operation.Secondary aim is, if it is effective as a prophylactic agent, to compare it's effect with intra venous single dose cefazolin sodium prophylaxis.

Read the detailed description

This study is a single blind prospective randomized trial. To measure and compare the effectiveness intra-operative topical gentamicin application in tension-free inguinal hernia repair in contrast to intravenous peri-operative prophylactic cefazolin sodium and combination of gentamicin and cephazolin this study is designed.

The patients are grouped randomly in to two groups:

  • Group1;intravenous cefazolin sodium
  • Group2;topical gentamicin
  • Group3:topical gentamicin and intravenous cefazolin sodium

As a control group we decided to use the data of control groups ( without any prophylactic agent usage ) of previous studies done in our clinic and medical data base reviews.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inguinal Hernia

Keywords

  • inguinal hernia
  • infection prophylaxis
  • topical gentamicin
03

In context

Hernia

1,096 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia; 132 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 276 is above the median of 80 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Hernia.

Browse Hernia studies →

Lead sponsor

Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of inguinal hernia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Femoral hernia
  • Emergency cases
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
276 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    gentamicin

    80 mg gentamicin topical application intraoperatively

    Drug: Gentamicin

  • Active comparator
    Cefazolin

    Application of 1000 mg cefazolin intra venously 1 hour before surgery

    Drug: Cefazolin

  • Active comparator
    gentamicin and cefazolin

    1000 mg cefazolin application 1 hour before surgery and topical 80 mg gentamicin intraoperatively

    Drug: Gentamicin and cefazolin

Interventions

  • DrugGentamicin and cefazolin

    80 mg topically, intra-operative,single dose and intravenous 1000 mg cefazolin 1 hour before operation

    Also known as: Drug: Cefazolin, Other names:, Cezol, Eqizolin, Drug: Gentamicin, Gensif, Gentamed

  • DrugCefazolin

    1000 mg cefazolin application intravenously 1 hour before operation

    Also known as: Cezal, Eqizolin

  • DrugGentamicin

    80 mg gentamicin application intraoperatively

    Also known as: Gensif, Gentamed

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Post-operative Infection

    Time frame: within the first 30 days after surgery

  2. Number of Infections in Each Study Arm

    Patients were examined on postoperative 30 days for the presence of surgical site infection.

    Time frame: within the 30 days after surgery

07

Results

Posted Dec 29, 2014

Participant flow

Recruitment period begins in Jan 2011. This period will be completed when record of minimum number participants ( according to power analysis) in each arm is completed.Location is surgery clinic of our hospital.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGentamicinCefazolinGentamicin+ Cefazolin Sodium
Started100100100
Completed879891
Not completed1329
Withdrew: Physician decision1329

Outcome measures

PrimaryRate of Post-operative Infection
Time frame:
within the first 30 days after surgery

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

PrimaryNumber of Infections in Each Study Arm

Patients were examined on postoperative 30 days for the presence of surgical site infection.

Time frame:
within the 30 days after surgery
Reported as:
Number · infections
Number of Infections in Each Study Arm
infectionsTopical GentamicinCefazolin IVTopical and iv
Number of Infections in Each Study Arm130
Statistical analysis
  • Topical Gentamicin vs Cefazolin IV · Fisher Exact · p = 0.198we did not need an estimation parameter such as odds or relative risk because of our experimental design and hypothesis of this study.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Gentamicin—0/87 (0%)0/87 (0%)
Cephazolin—0/98 (0%)0/98 (0%)
Gentamicin+ Cefazolin Sodium—0/91 (0%)0/91 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

300 consequtive patients were diveded into three groups randomly, but during follow-up period since 24 patients used any kind of antibiotics for reasons other than postoperative complications, only 276 patients were analyzed.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)GentamicinCephazolinGentamicin+ Cefazolin SodiumTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years606571196
>=65 years27332080
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)GentamicinCephazolinGentamicin+ Cefazolin SodiumTotal
Mean50.39 ± 15.3949.60 ± 13.8550.36 ± 15.4950.10 ± 14.85
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GentamicinCephazolinGentamicin+ Cefazolin SodiumTotal
Female75517
Male809386259
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)GentamicinCephazolinGentamicin+ Cefazolin SodiumTotal
Turkey879891276
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and research Hospital
    Ankara, 06000, Turkey
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pessaux P, Lermite E, Blezel E, Msika S, Hay JM, Flamant Y, Deepak V, Arnaud JP; French Associations for Surgical Research. Predictive risk score for infection after inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2006 Aug;192(2):165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.05.003. PubMed 16860624 ↗
  • Tzovaras G, Delikoukos S, Christodoulides G, Spyridakis M, Mantzos F, Tepetes K, Athanassiou E, Hatzitheofilou C. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective tension-free mesh inguinal hernia repair: results of a single-centre prospective randomised trial. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;61(2):236-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.00977.x. PubMed 16930145 ↗
  • Zuvela M, Milicevic M, Galun D, Lekic N, Basaric D, Tomic D, Petrovic M, Palibrk I. [Infection in hernia surgery]. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2005;52(1):9-26. doi: 10.2298/aci0501009z. Serbian. PubMed 16119310 ↗
  • Praveen S, Rohaizak M. Local antibiotics are equivalent to intravenous antibiotics in the prevention of superficial wound infection in inguinal hernioplasty. Asian J Surg. 2009 Jan;32(1):59-63. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60011-7. PubMed 19321405 ↗
  • Aufenacker TJ, Koelemay MJ, Gouma DJ, Simons MP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of wound infection after mesh repair of abdominal wall hernia. Br J Surg. 2006 Jan;93(1):5-10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5186. PubMed 16252314 ↗
  • Shankar VG, Srinivasan K, Sistla SC, Jagdish S. Prophylactic antibiotics in open mesh repair of inguinal hernia - a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2010;8(6):444-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.05.011. Epub 2010 Jun 9. PubMed 20538079 ↗
  • Aufenacker TJ, van Geldere D, van Mesdag T, Bossers AN, Dekker B, Scheijde E, van Nieuwenhuizen R, Hiemstra E, Maduro JH, Juttmann JW, Hofstede D, van Der Linden CT, Gouma DJ, Simons MP. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of wound infection after Lichtenstein open mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia: a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2004 Dec;240(6):955-60; discussion 960-1. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000145926.74300.42. PubMed 15570201 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 29, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01273818
Lead sponsor
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Duray Seker (M.D. Surgery, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 11, 2011
Start date
Jan 2011
Primary completion
Feb 2013
Completion
Mar 2013
Results posted
Dec 29, 2014
Last update
Dec 29, 2014

Study contacts

Gaye E Seker, MD
principal investigator · Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and research Hospital
Duray Seker, MD
study director · Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and research Hospital
Bahattin Bayar, MD
study chair · Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and research Hospital
Zafer Ergul, MD
study chair · Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and research Hospital
Hakan Kulacoglu, Professor
study chair · Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Teaching and research Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion