CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01269931Updated Jan 4, 2011

Evaluation of Clinical Endobronchial Ultrasound Skills Following Clinical Versus Simulation Training.

An observational study in EBUS-TBNA Training Methods, sponsored by University of Calgary. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-01-04.

Sponsored by University of Calgary · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
24
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Bronchoscopy is a procedure whereby a small flexible camera is used to inspect and biopsy abnormalities in the lungs. Linear endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a revolutionary diagnostic pulmonary procedure that allows visualization and safe, accurate biopsies of structures in and around the lungs during bronchoscopy. EBUS-TBNA can be challenging to learn.

Historically, bronchoscopy has been taught using an apprenticeship model, whereby trainees practice on patients. With the introduction of computer bronchoscopy simulators, trainees can now obtain basic bronchoscopy skills by practicing on the simulator, rather than practicing on patients.

This study aims to compare trainee EBUS-TBNA performance during actual procedures on patients, following training with a computer EBUS-TBNA simulator versus conventional clinical EBUS-TBNA training (trainees taught by practicing on patients). Our hypothesis is that the skills learned using a computer EBUS-TBNA simulator are transferable to clinical EBUS-TBNA performance, meaning that using a computer EBUS-TBNA simulator for training is just as good as learning these skills by practicing on patients.

The use of EBUS-TBNA simulators for training could have the advantage of minimizing the burden of procedural learning on patients.

Read the detailed description

Learners in Group 1 undergo training on the EBUS-TBNA simulator before performing EBUS-TBNA on the study patients.

Learners in Group 2 completed a one month clinical Interventional Pulmonary Medicine rotation. During this rotation, they completed ≥15 and ≤25 EBUS-TBNA clinical procedures with an Interventional Pulmonologist experienced in EBUS-TBNA.

Learners in both groups receive a standard EBUS-TBNA knowledge review process before their patient care EBUS-TBNA experience. This includes a series of oral questions and a written lymph node staging diagram which they need to correctly answer, prior to performing EBUS-TBNA on study patients. Learners in Group 2 complete this review process informally on a number of occasions during their Interventional Pulmonary Medicine rotations. Learners in Group 1 formally undergo this review process 5 times during the EBUS-TBNA simulation training.

Bronchoscopy is performed utilizing a 1T-160 Olympus video bronchoscope (Olympus Canada, Markham, Canada) for the airway examination and a BF-UC160F-OL8 (EBUS bronchoscope - Olympus Canada, Markham, Canada) for the EBUS-TBNA procedure. In order to standardize for differences in bronchoscopy method, a single attending Interventional Pulmonologist (IP) is responsible for performing all 16 bronchoscopies with the learners. The complete airway examination and any additional non-EBUS-TBNA samples are performed by the attending IP. All endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopy performance metrics are recorded by another IP not involved in the procedure on a standard data sheet.

EBUS-TBNA is performed by the learner with 3 specific goals:

  1. Intubation with the EBUS-TBNA bronchoscope.
  2. Lymph Node Ultrasound Examination. Identify 5 major lymph node stations (11R, 4R, 7, 4L, 11L).
  3. Sampling of two lymph nodes per patient. The order and location of lymph nodes was at the discretion of the attending IP. Following the biopsy of two lymph nodes stations by the learner, the attending IP completes the rest of the procedure, including any further biopsies that are necessary. The learner is expected to perform 3 successful passes in each of the two lymph nodes, with a total of 5 allowed attempts per lymph node station.

The learner procedure time starts at the time of the first intubation attempt with the EBUS-TBNA bronchoscope, and finishes with the last biopsy of the second lymph node station. If other clinically important lymph nodes are present or if more than 3 successful aspirations are desired, the stopwatch is stopped while the attending IP performed the biopsies.

Samples are placed in alcohol preservative and sent to the cytopathology lab as per our routine procedure. No indication as to group allocation is available to the clinical cytopathologist interpreting the samples.

To be enrolled, patients and learners must give written informed consent.

The EBUS-TBNA simulator used for this study is the AccuTouch Flexible Bronchoscopy Simulator (CAE Healthcare, Montreal, Canada), equipped with an EBUS-TBNA module. This simulator has been described in detail previously in the articles cited at the end of this ClinicalTrials.gov entry.

02

Conditions studied

  • EBUS-TBNA Training Methods

Keywords

  • endobronchial ultrasound
  • bronchoscopy
  • education
  • interventional bronchoscopy
  • simulation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Calgary is the lead sponsor of 686 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

A prospective, comparative study of 2 groups of learners, performing EBUS-TBNA on patients. Patients are randomly assigned to undergo bronchoscopy with a trainee from Group 1 or Group 2. Learners are pulmonary medicine trainees at the University of Calgary. Patients are suspected lung cancer patients with mediastinal adenopathy seen by the University of Calgary Interventional Pulmonary Medicine service.

Eligibility criteria

Patients:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • suspected lung cancer patients with mediastinal adenopathy
  • at least 2 enlarged mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes (one >1.0 cm and one >1.5 cm in short axis on CT Chest, one of the lymph nodes must be in position 7 or 4R
  • eighteen years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of informed consent
  • any contraindication to bronchoscopy
  • any significant severe co-morbidities (i.e. severe obstructive lung disease, active cardiac disease such as angina)

Learners:

Group 1 (EBUS-TBNA simulator training):

Inclusion Criteria:

  • pulmonary medicine trainees with >30 bronchoscopy procedures experience, >nine months of pulmonary fellowship training and no clinical EBUS-TBNA experience (n=4)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lack of informed consent

Group 2 (Clinical EBUS-TBNA training):

Inclusion Criteria:

  • pulmonary medicine trainees in the 2nd half of their final year of pulmonary training or recent graduates (within one year), with >50 bronchoscopy procedures experience who completed a one-month elective with the Interventional Pulmonary Medicine (IPM) service with ≥15 and ≤25 EBUS-TBNA procedures experience (n=4).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lack of informed consent
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Group 1 (EBUS-TBNA simulator training)

    Group 1 (EBUS-TBNA simulator training): pulmonary medicine trainees with \>30 bronchoscopy procedures experience, \>nine months of pulmonary fellowship training and no clinical EBUS-TBNA experience (n=4).

    Procedure: EBUS-TBNA

  • Group 2 (Clinical EBUS-TBNA training)

    Group 2 (Clinical EBUS-TBNA training): pulmonary medicine trainees in the 2nd half of their final year of pulmonary training or recent graduates (within one year), with \>50 bronchoscopy procedures experience who completed a one-month elective with the Interventional Pulmonary Medicine (IPM) service with ≥15 and ≤25 EBUS-TBNA procedures experience (n=4).

    Procedure: EBUS-TBNA

Interventions

  • ProcedureEBUS-TBNA

    Endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a revolutionary diagnostic pulmonary procedure that allows visualization and safe, accurate biopsies of intra-thoracic structures during bronchoscopy. Patients enrolled in this study at the University of Calgary would have undergone this procedure regardless of being enrolled in this study. The purpose of the study was to prospectively compare the EBUS-TBNA performance of 2 groups of learners, performing EBUS-TBNA on patients, who had received to different methods of EBUS-TBNA training. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo bronchoscopy with a trainee from Group 1 or Group 2.

    Also known as: - endobronchial ultrasound, - EBUS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. total learner EBUS-TBNA procedure time/number of successful aspirations

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. total learner EBUS-TBNA procedure time

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  2. time to intubation

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  3. lymph node ultrasound examination time

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  4. percentage of successful aspirations

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  5. number of intubation attempts

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  6. percentage of lymph node stations correctly identified during lymph node ultrasound examination

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  7. number of instructional comments required by the attending pulmonologist

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  8. sample adequacy

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  9. diagnostic yield

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  10. expert respiratory therapist subjective EBUS-TBNA technical skill assessment

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  11. total lymph node biopsy time

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  12. time to EBUS-TBNA intubation

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

  13. number of unsuccessful biopsies per case

    includes a list of reasons for unsuccessful biopsies: bronchoscope damage, contaminated sample, penetrating far side of lymph node, missing the lymph node, vascular puncture

    Time frame: patients followed for 2 months or until death - measured at patient EBUS-TBNA procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dr. David R Stather
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stather DR, Maceachern P, Rimmer K, Hergott CA, Tremblay A. Validation of an endobronchial ultrasound simulator: differentiating operator skill level. Respiration. 2011;81(4):325-32. doi: 10.1159/000323520. Epub 2011 Feb 9. PubMed 21311171 ↗
  • Stather DR, MacEachern P, Rimmer K, Tremblay A. Assessment of Endobronchial Ultrasound Skills Following Clinical vs Simulator Training. Chest 2010;138:589A
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 4, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01269931
Lead sponsor
University of Calgary
First posted
Jan 4, 2011
Start date
Jun 2010
Primary completion
Nov 2010
Completion
Nov 2010
Last update
Jan 4, 2011

Study contacts

David R Stather, MD
principal investigator · University of Calgary

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion