CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01248819Updated Nov 25, 2010

Local Anesthetic Nebulization and Instillation for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Surgery

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ropivacaine 60 mg and Ropivacaine 100 mg in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, sponsored by San Gerardo Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-11-25.

Sponsored by San Gerardo Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Studies evaluating intraperitoneal local anesthetic instillation for pain relief after laparoscopic procedures have provided conflicting results. This randomized, double-blind study was designed to assess the effects of a novel intraperitoneal local anesthetic administration technique using nebulization on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Read the detailed description

Studies evaluating intraperitoneal local anesthetic (LA) instillation for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy have provided conflicting results. One of the factors that might contribute to failure of the instillation technique may be related to inadequate distribution of local anesthetic throughout the peritoneal surface. In contrast, nebulization should provide a uniform spread of drugs throughout the peritoneal cavity and thus may be beneficial to improve pain relief after laparoscopic procedures. A recent study reported that bupivacaine nebulization significantly reduced pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with bupivacaine instillation in the gallbladder bed. However, these investigators used a custom-made nebulization system that needs a separate gas source and tubing that is cumbersome and may not be easily available.

Recently, the investigators reported that a microvibration-based nebulization device (Aeroneb Pro® system, Aerogen, Galway, Ireland) could be used for ropivacaine delivery into the insufflation gas required to create pneumorpeitoneum. The investigators hypothesized that intraperitoneal ropivacaine nebulization would provide superior pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy than intraperitoneal ropivacaine instillation. This randomized, double blind, controlled clinical trial was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine nebulization using the Aeroneb Pro® device laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with intraperitoneal ropivacaine instillation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  • Nebulization
  • Ropivacaine
03

In context

Lead sponsor

San Gerardo Hospital is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA Score I-III
  • Scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Free from pain in preoperative period
  • Not using analgesic drugs before surgery
  • Without cognitive impairment or mental retardation
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency/urgency surgery
  • Postoperative admission in an intensive care unit
  • Cognitive impairment or mental retardation
  • Progressive degenerative diseases of the CNS
  • Seizures or chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs
  • Severe hepatic or renal impairment
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Allergy to one of the specific drugs under study
  • Acute infection or inflammatory chronic disease
  • Alcohol or drug addiction
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Instillation

    Instillation of Ropivacaine 100 mg in the abdominal cavity

    Drug: Ropivacaine 100 mg

  • Experimental
    Nebulization

    Nebulization of Ropivacaine 60 mg in the abdominal cavity

    Drug: Ropivacaine 60 mg

Interventions

  • DrugRopivacaine 60 mg

    Nebulization grou received intraperitoneal instillation of saline 20 ml on the gall bladder after induction of pneumoperitoneum but before dissection of gall bladder plus intraperitoneal nebulization of ropivacaine 1% 3 ml (30 mg) the start of gall bladder dissection and again at the end of surgery just before deflation of pneumoperitoneum (total of 60 mg). The first ropivacaine nebulization was performed over 5-6 minutes using the Aeroneb Pro® device through the umbilical port while the other ports were being inserted, while second nebulization was performed before the withdrawal of the ports

  • DrugRopivacaine 100 mg

    Instillation group received intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine 0.5%, 20 ml (100 mg) on the gall bladder after induction of pneumoperitoneum but before dissection of gall bladder plus and intraperitoneal nebulization of normal saline 3 ml before the start of gall bladder dissection and again at the end of surgery just before deflation of pneumoperitoneum. The first saline nebulization was performed over 5-6 minutes using the Aeroneb Pro® device through the umbilical port while the other ports were being inserted, while second nebulization was performed before the withdrawal of the ports

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain

    Postoperative pain was assessed by Visual analgue scale (VAS 0 to 100 points) at rest (static VAS) and after a deep inspiration or cough (dynamic VAS). The proportion of patients with adequate pain control after surgery (dynamic VAS \< 3) will also be assessed.

    Time frame: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Morphine consumption (mg)

    The total dose of morphine at every evaluation after awakening will be quantified using the PACU clinical chart and/or PCA infusers memory display

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  2. Time of unassisted walking

    Unassisted walking time is defined as the time in hours between PACU discharge and when the patient is able to walk out of his room and back to bed without any assistance.

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  3. Hospital morbidity

    All complications or adverse effects associated or possibly associated with the interventions under study, surgery or anesthesia will be quantified using the anesthesia charts, surgical charts, surgical database.

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  4. Time to hospital discharge

    We define hospital stay as the elapsed time between surgery and hospital discharge

    Time frame: 48 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • San Gerardo Hospital
    Monza, MB 20052, Italy
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alkhamesi NA, Peck DH, Lomax D, Darzi AW. Intraperitoneal aerosolization of bupivacaine reduces postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized prospective controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):602-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9087-6. Epub 2006 Dec 16. PubMed 17180268 ↗
  • Greib N, Schlotterbeck H, Dow WA, Joshi GP, Geny B, Diemunsch PA. An evaluation of gas humidifying devices as a means of intraperitoneal local anesthetic administration for laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008 Aug;107(2):549-51. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318176fa1c. PubMed 18633034 ↗
  • Schlotterbeck H, Schaeffer R, Dow WA, Diemunsch P. Cold nebulization used to prevent heat loss during laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study in pigs. Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2616-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9841-z. Epub 2008 Mar 18. PubMed 18347861 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 25, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01248819
Lead sponsor
San Gerardo Hospital
Collaborators
Hôpital de Hautepierre
First posted
Nov 25, 2010
Start date
Apr 2008
Primary completion
May 2009
Completion
May 2009
Last update
Nov 25, 2010

Study contacts

Pablo M Ingelmo, MD
principal investigator · San Gerardo Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion