ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01247909InfasemeUpdated Oct 26, 2016

Infant Severe Sepsis and Bacterial Meningitis in Malawi

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ceftriaxone v penicillin and gentamicin in Infant Bacterial Meningitis, sponsored by Kamuzu University of Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in Malawi. Open to participants aged Up to 2 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-26.

Sponsored by Kamuzu University of Health Sciences · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
351
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 2 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to improve the outcome of infants (\<2 months) with severe sepsis and meningitis at the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi.

Currently WHO recommends the treatment of infant severe sepsis and bacterial meningitis with 14 to 21 day course of penicillin and gentamicin as first line. The second line treatment is cefotaxime or ceftriaxone.

Severe bacterial infections are common in infants under 2 months of age and the mortality is very high (\~50%). There are several reasons for this; one is that the first line antibiotics used are no longer as effective as they used to be. Bacterial resistance to the first line antibiotics has increased and some infections especially of the central nervous system may only be partly treated and not eradicated by present therapy. First line treatment is cheap and available but requires 4 injections a day, for at least 14 days, a total of 58 injections. Many mothers find this number too much and abscond. The investigators second line therapy is ceftriaxone which is also available and cheap and the advantage of being given as a daily injection. The disadvantage is that it can cause (reversible) jaundice particularly in premature babies and it must not be given with calcium products. The investigators do not give calcium to the investigators infants as the investigators cannot routinely check electrolytes. All the most common causes of bacterial meningitis in this age group in the investigators setting are sensitive to ceftriaxone.

The investigators wish to undertake an open randomized trial of penicillin and gentamicin v ceftriaxone as first line treatment for infant meningitis. The investigators are able to monitor for side effects.

The investigators hypothesise that the ceftriaxone arm will have 20% less deaths that the penicillin and gentamicin group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant Bacterial Meningitis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kamuzu University of Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 2 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children less than 2 months
  • Suspicion of bacterial meningitis
  • Parental/guardian informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infant with hyperbilirubinaemia
  • Infant requiring calcium
  • Infant know to be hypersensitive to any of the three drugs
  • Infant who has been an inpatient for more than 72 hours
  • Infant with congenital central nervous system abnormalities
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
351 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ceftriaxone

    Ceftriaxone in infants with sepsis and bacterial meningitis

    Drug: Ceftriaxone v penicillin and gentamicin

  • Active comparator
    Penicillin and gentamicin

    Penicillin and Gentamicin in infants with sepsis and bacterial meningitis

    Drug: Ceftriaxone v penicillin and gentamicin

Interventions

  • DrugCeftriaxone v penicillin and gentamicin

    Ceftriaxone v the standard treatment of infant meningitis (penicillin and gentamicin). Ceftriaxone will be given at a dose of 80mg/kg once a day for at least 14 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recovery v death or severe residual neurological sequelae at hospital discharge, 1 month and 6 months post discharge.

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Outcome by causative bacterial agent, recovery v death or severe residual neurological sequelae at hospital discharge, 1 month and 6 months post discharge.

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital/ College of Medicne
    Private Bag 360 Blantyre, 3, Malawi
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2010, a primary completion of Feb 2015 and a completion of Apr 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 14, 2010
First posted
Nov 25, 2010
Start
Apr 2010
Primary completionActual
Feb 2015
CompletionActual
Apr 2015
Last update
Oct 26, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 26, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01247909
Lead sponsor
Kamuzu University of Health Sciences
Responsible party
Elizabeth Molyneux (Professor of Paediatircs, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 25, 2010
Start date
Apr 2010
Primary completion
Feb 2015
Completion
Apr 2015
Last update
Oct 26, 2016

Study contacts

Elizabeth Molyneux, FRCPCH
principal investigator · Malawi College of Medicine, Paediatrics Department

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion