CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT01244789Updated Apr 13, 2026

Chemotherapy or Observation in Stage I-II Intermediate or High Risk Endometrial Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of carboplatin and paclitaxel and observation in Endometrial Cancer, sponsored by Danish Gynecological Cancer Group. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by Danish Gynecological Cancer Group · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
244
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Patients with stage 1 \& 2 endometrial cancer are treated with surgery. Despite the fact that disease is confound to uterus, unfortunately some of these patients may relapse and die of their disease. Postoperative radiotherapy cannot improve survival. Chemotherapy has shown survival benefit in more advanced stage disease (stage 3 \& 4).

This study evaluates if one can improve survival in intermediate and high risk early-stage patients by offering them postoperative chemotherapy. This is a randomized phase 3 trial where effect of postoperative chemotherapy is compared with postoperative observation alone (standard strategy).

Substudy: Translational research

Read the detailed description

Patients with medium and high risk stage I and II endometrial cancers have, despite radical surgery, a rather high risk for progression.

Adjuvant radiotherapy was the traditional therapy for many decades. Four randomized phase III studies and a meta-analysis have revealed that adjuvant radiotherapy improves local control at the cost of excessive short and long term toxicity, though has absolutely no impact on survival.

Two phase III studies have randomized between adjuvant radiotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy, both failed to show any difference in survival between radiotherapy and chemotherapy, though both studies are criticized for inferior chemotherapy regimens or inclusion of good prognosis patients. The GOG-122 study on more advanced cases (stage 3 \& 4) randomized between combination chemotherapy versus whole abdominal irradiation and found significant improvement in survival in the chemotherapy arm.

NSGO-EC-9501 and MaNGO studies have indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy added to adjuvant radiotherapy may improve survival compared to adjuvant radiotherapy alone in early stage medium and high risk patients. One may conclude that impact on survival comes only from chemotherapy. Many investigators have therefore adapted adjuvant chemotherapy as standard treatment in various countries including Denmark. However, such conclusion has low level of evidence, as there are no randomized phase III studies comparing postoperative observation alone versus adjuvant chemotherapy.

It is of utmost importance to demonstrate efficacy of adjuvant combination chemotherapy in a randomized phase III trial comparing to no further treatment in the medium and high risk node negative stage 1 \& 2 patients.

Combination chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel-carboplatin is proposed in this study, as this combination is effective and well tolerated.

The eligible patients for such a study are a fraction of patients with endometrial cancer therefore this study will be performed within the ENGOT collaboration.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometrial Cancer

Keywords

  • endometrial cancer
  • chemotherapy
  • carboplatin
  • paclitaxel
  • Stage 1 & 2
  • node-negative
  • intermediate risk
  • high risk
03

In context

Endometrial Neoplasms

1,325 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms; 447 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 244 is above the median of 70 across 941 interventional studies indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms.

Browse Endometrial Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Danish Gynecological Cancer Group as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Target Population

  1. Only node-negative patients are eligible: Histological confirmed endometrial carcinoma with no macroscopic remaining tumour after primary surgery and lymph-node negative disease, with one of the following postoperative FIGO 2009 stage and grade:

    1. Stage I grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma
    2. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma
    3. Stage I and II type 2 histology (clear cell, serous, squamous cell carcinoma, or undifferentiated carcinoma) Prior therapy
  2. Patients have undergone hysterectomy (total abdominal hysterectomy, radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (LNE).
  3. LNE: minimum 12 pelvic nodes (6 from each side) should be removed. Para-aortic LNE is optional
  4. Omentectomy strongly recommended in clear cell, serous or undifferentiated carcinoma.
  5. Surgery performed within 10 weeks of randomization. If the dates for hysterectomy and lymph node dissection are different, 10 weeks are counted from the last surgery, and in that case the gap between two surgeries should not exceed 8 weeks.

    Other inclusion criteria

  6. Patients must give informed consent according to the rules and regulations of the individual participating centres
  7. Patients have not received any other anticancer therapy other than surgery.
  8. Adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy is permitted in both arms. In chemotherapy arm, timing of VBT should not cause delay in chemotherapy delivery.
  9. Patients must have a WHO performance status of 0-2
  10. Patients must have an adequate bone-marrow, renal and hepatic function (WBC ≥3.0x109/L, neutrophils ≥1.5x109/L, platelets ≥100x109/L, total S-bilirubin \<2 x upper normal value, ALAT \<2.5 x upper normal value, estimated GFR >50 ml/min (measured or calculated according to Cockroft-Gault or Jeliffe). Up to 5% deviation for hematological values and 10% deviation for s-bilirubin and ALAT are tolerated.
  11. Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
  12. Patients must be fit to receive combination chemotherapy
  13. Patient's age >18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Target Disease Exceptions

  1. Carcinosarcoma, Sarcomas or small cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation.

    Prohibited Treatments and/or Therapies

  2. External Beam Radiotherapy
  3. Concurrent cancer therapy
  4. Concurrent treatment with an anticancer investigational agent or participation in another anticancer clinical trial Other exclusion criteria
  5. Previous or concurrent malignant disease except for curatively treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
  6. Active infection or other serious underlying medical condition, which might prevent the patient from receiving treatment or to be followed
  7. Whatever reasons which interferes with an adequate follow-up
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
244 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Observation

    postoperative observation only

    Other: observation

  • Experimental
    Combination chemotherapy

    postoperative 6 courses of 3 weekly iv carboplatin-paclitaxel combination chemotherapy

    Drug: carboplatin and paclitaxel

Interventions

  • Drugcarboplatin and paclitaxel

    6 courses of iv 3-weekly chemotherapy Carboplatin AUC5 Paclitaxel 175mg/m2

  • Otherobservation

    active observation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    To detect an overall absolute difference in five-year survival of 10%, from 72% to 82%, at the 2.5% level with 80% power, 135 deaths corresponding to 644 patients are needed. Assuming a dropout rate of 5%, 678 patients have to be accrued, leaving 644 patients for the overall analysis.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival in endometrioid subgroup

    In the endometrioid subgroup an absolute difference in five-year survival of 12%, from 74% to 86% is expected. Assuming this, 79 deaths corresponding to 438 patients are needed to yield 80% power at the 2.5% level. Assuming a dropout rate of 5%, 678 patients have to be accrued, leaving 644 patients for the overall analysis and 75% of these, or 483 patients, for the analysis in the endometrioid subgroup.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Disease Specific Survival

    Exploratory endpoint

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Progression-Free Survival

    Exploratory endpoint

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Toxicity - Acute toxicity (0-6 months from randomization). Late toxicity is registered during whole study period.

    Acute toxicity (0-6 months from randomization). Late toxicity is registered during whole study period. Exploratory endpoint

    Time frame: through study duration, 13 years

  5. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-EN30)

    European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 60 months

  6. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-EN24)

    European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire- Endometrial Cancer Module, 24

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 60 months

  7. Rate of isolated pelvic relapse

    Exploratory endpoint

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 17 years

  8. Rate of isolated distant relapse

    Exploratory endpoint

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 17 years

  9. Rate of mixed (local & distant) relapses

    Exploratory endpoint

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 17 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Danish Gynecological Cancer Group (DGCG)
    Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01244789
Lead sponsor
Danish Gynecological Cancer Group
Collaborators
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Austria, North Eastern German Society of Gynaecological Oncology, Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology - Clinical Trials Unit, Belgian Gynaecological Oncology Group, Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology group (MaNGO), Israeli Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO), Central and Eastern European Oncology Group
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 19, 2010
Start date
Dec 2011
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Study contacts

Kristine Madsen, MD
study chair · Danish Gynecological Cancer Group

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion