ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01242098Fos/Ser_switchUpdated Jun 8, 2012

Real-world Effectiveness of Combination Therapies in Primary Care Asthma Management

An observational study in Asthma, sponsored by Research in Real-Life Ltd. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-06-08.

Sponsored by Research in Real-Life Ltd · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
137
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether beclomethasone dipropionate / formoterol (BDP/FOR; Fostair® 100/6) is at least equivalent in terms of exacerbation prevention to fluticasone dipropionate / salmeterol (FP/SAL; Seretide® 125) in matched asthma patients switching to BDP/FOR following treatment with FP/SAL in normal clinical practice compared with patients not switched.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Combination therapy
  • Primary care management
  • Switch
  • ICS/LABA
  • Fostair
  • Seretide
03

In context

Asthma

4,012 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 137 is close to the median of 150 across 993 observational studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Research in Real-Life Ltd is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients receiving ICS/LABA therapy as FP/SAL (Seretide® 125) who, at an index prescription date (IPD) receive a routine asthma review* and either:

(i) Switched to BDP/FOR (Fostair®)at same or lower BDP-equivalent ICS dose;

OR,

(ii) Continues on FP/SAL (Seretide® 125) for the duration of the outcome period at the same or lower BDP-equivalent ICS dose prescribed at baseline.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged:

    • 18-60 years:
    • 61-80 years who are never-smokers
  • Evidence of asthma:

    • a diagnostic code for asthma, or
    • ≥2 prescriptions for asthma at different points in time during the prior year
  • Baseline FP/SAL therapy:

    • ≥2 prescription for ICS/LABA therapy as FP/SAL (Seretide® 125).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any chronic respiratory disease other than asthma
  • Are receiving maintenance oral steroid therapy during baseline period.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
137 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Fostair switch cohort

    Seretide patients who, at an index date, had a step down in therapy (reduction in ICS dose of ≥50%) and switch to Fostair

    Drug: Fixed-dose combination beclometasone dipropionate / formoterol

  • Seretide continuation cohort

    Seretide patients who, at an index date, had a step down in therapy (reduction in ICS dose of ≥50%) and continue on Seretide

    Drug: Fixed dose combination salmeterol / fluticasone

Interventions

  • DrugFixed dose combination salmeterol / fluticasone

    Branded fixed-dose combination inhaled corticosteroid / long-acting beta2-agonist therapy

    Also known as: FP/SAL; Seretide® 125

  • DrugFixed-dose combination beclometasone dipropionate / formoterol

    Branded fixed-dose combination inhaled corticosteroid / long-acting beta2-agonist therapy

    Also known as: BDP/FOR; Fostair® 100/6

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Exacerbation rate

    Where an exacerbation is defined as: (i) Asthma-related 1. Hospital attendance / admissions OR 2. Accident \& Emergency (A\&E) attendance OR (ii) Use of oral steroids.

    Time frame: One-year outcome period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Exacerbation control (a composite proxy measure)

    Controlled: Absence of: (i) Asthma-related: 1. Hospital attendance or admission 2. A\&E attendance, OR 3. Out of hours consultations, OR 4. Out-patient department attendance (ii) GP consultations for lower respiratory tract infection (iii) Prescriptions for acute courses of oral steroids

    Time frame: One-year outcome period

  2. Treatment success 1

    (i) Exacerbation control AND (ii) No change in therapeutic regimen: * ≥50% increase in ICS dose relative to IPD dose, and/or * Change in ICS/LABA drug within class, and/or * Change in delivery device, and/or * Use of additional (defined as not received during baseline year) therapy as defined by: theophylline, leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs).

    Time frame: One-year outcome period

  3. Asthma hospitalisations

    1. Definite: Hospitalisations coded with an asthma read code 2. Definite + Probable: Hospitalisations with an asthma read code + uncoded hospitalisations occurring within a 7-day window (either side of the hospitalisation date) of an asthma read code

    Time frame: One-year outcome period

  4. Compliance with ICS/LABA therapy

    Compliance calculation based on prescription refills and (where possible) compliance questionnaire data

    Time frame: One-year outcome period

  5. Use of reliever medication

    average daily dosage during outcome year. Outcome SABA usage will be categorised within ranges used to match baseline SABA use to optimise matching of the treatment arms.

    Time frame: One-year outcome period

  6. Cost of therapeutic regimen.

    Mean healthcare costs (drug costs + consultation, admission costs, etc - total and respiratory-related) per patient recorded during the outcome year

    Time frame: One-year outcome period

  7. Asthma-related / respiratory hospitalisations

    1. Definite: Hospitalisations coded with a lower respiratory code 2. Definite + Probable: Hospitalisations with an asthma read code + uncoded hospitalisations occurring within a 7-day window (either side of the hospitalisation date) of a lower respiratory read code

    Time frame: one year outcome period

  8. Oral Thrush

    Identified as: (i) Topical oral anti-fungal prescriptions, and / or (ii) Coded for oral candidiasis

    Time frame: One-year outcome period

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Optimum Patient Care
    Cawston, Norfolk NR10 4FE, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2008, a primary completion of Dec 2011 and a completion of Dec 2011. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 11, 2010
First posted
Nov 16, 2010
Start
Jan 2008
Primary completionActual
Dec 2011
CompletionActual
Dec 2011
Last update
Jun 8, 2012
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01242098
Lead sponsor
Research in Real-Life Ltd
Responsible party
Alison Chisholm (David Price, Research in Real-Life Ltd) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 16, 2010
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2011
Completion
Dec 2011
Last update
Jun 8, 2012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion