CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01237470DESLICHUpdated Nov 9, 2010

The Desarda and Lichtenstein Techniques in Inguinal Hernia Treatment.

An interventional study of Desarda technique and Lichtenstein technique in Hernia, Inguinal, sponsored by Nicolaus Copernicus University. Terminated at 1 site in Poland. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-11-09.

Sponsored by Nicolaus Copernicus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
protocol completed
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,009
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Contemporary treatment of inguinal hernia is generally based on surgical methods with the use of synthetic meshes. The implanted meshes however have some disadvantages: they increase the risk of infection, tend to sustain inflammation process, can generate chronic pain and fertility disorders, can move from the initial implantation site, increase costs of treatment etc. The research to find any new hernioplasty without the use of meshes is still going on.

Desarda in 2002 year published his own results over hernia treatment with the use of external oblique aponeurosis. These results were comparable with the effects of Lichtenstein technique.

The initial assessment done in our own department revealed good clinical results after hernia treatment with Desarda's method.

To make appropriate and objective clinical assessment of the Desarda's technique for primary inguinal hernia treatment the randomized multicentre double blinded clinical trial (RCT) was projected and conducted. Finally, 105 patients were included in the Desarda group and 103 in the Lichtenstein group. Personal clinical follow up was made up to 3 years after operation.

Generally no statistically significant differences were found between these groups. The only difference was higher rate of seroma after Lichtenstein technique and different pain perception in both groups. To the summary it is clear that Desarda technique is quite attractive and good proposition for operative hernia treatment without mesh. The RCT was done with the use of SharePoint Portal Server (Microsoft) which seems to be appropriate for clinical trials.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hernia, Inguinal

Keywords

  • inguinal hernia
  • hernia recurrence
  • no mesh techniques
  • Desarda technique
03

In context

Hernia

1,096 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia; 132 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,009 is above the median of 80 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Hernia.

Browse Hernia studies →

Lead sponsor

Nicolaus Copernicus University is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • primary inguinal hernia
  • male adults
  • signed informed consent
  • god condition of external oblique aponeurosis (assessed during the operation)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age \< 18
  • recurrent hernia
  • incarcerated hernia
  • diagnosed mental disorder
  • manual reduction of hernia on inpatient
  • infection at groin area
  • wound or scar at the groin
  • no consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
2,009 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Desarda group

    Patients with primary inguinal hernia operated using the Desarda technique

    Procedure: Desarda technique

  • Experimental
    Lichtenstein group

    Patients with primary inguinal hernia operated using the Lichtenstein technique.

    Procedure: Lichtenstein technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureDesarda technique

    no mesh technique with undetached strip of external oblique aponeurosis placed at the floor of inguinal canal

  • ProcedureLichtenstein technique

    hernioplasty with the usage of plain polypropylene mesh

    Also known as: open plain mesh technique

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. recurrence

    hernia recurrence after surgical treatement

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. chronic pain

    persistent chronic pain (lasting longer then 6 months)

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. surgical complications

    edema, hematoma, ecchymosis, infaction of the wound

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University
    Bydgoszcz, 85-094, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Desarda MP. Inguinal herniorrhaphy with an undetached strip of external oblique aponeurosis: a new approach used in 400 patients. Eur J Surg. 2001 Jun;167(6):443-8. doi: 10.1080/110241501750243798. PubMed 11471669 ↗
  • Desarda MP. Surgical physiology of inguinal hernia repair--a study of 200 cases. BMC Surg. 2003 Apr 16;3:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-3-2. PubMed 12697071 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 9, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01237470
Lead sponsor
Nicolaus Copernicus University
First posted
Nov 9, 2010
Start date
Jan 2005
Primary completion
Jun 2009
Completion
Jun 2009
Last update
Nov 9, 2010

Study contacts

Stanislaw Dabrowiecki, MD, PhD
study chair · Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University Bydgoszcz, Poland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion