CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01236170Updated Jun 27, 2019Results posted

Understanding Quality and Equity in Wheelchairs for Veterans

An observational study in Spinal Cord Injuries and Amputees, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-27.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
497
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) provides wheelchairs to about 42,000 Veterans with SCI and more than 40,000 Veterans with amputated limbs (AL). Despite VA's efforts to remove financial and other barriers to the provision of wheelchairs to all Veterans who need them, preliminary evidence suggests that disparities exist in the quality of wheelchairs prescribed to racial minorities and low income Veterans with SCI or AL. The proposed project will provide important information to the VA about the quality and equity of wheelchairs provided to Veterans with SCI or AL, and it will identify the patient and provider factors associated with wheelchair provision. Because Veterans with SCI and AL are considered special disability populations, identifying and understanding these factors is a critical first step to developing interventions to increase the quality and equity of wheelchairs provided to all disabled Veterans.

Read the detailed description

Wheelchairs enable Veterans to participate in home, employment, and social activities that might otherwise be inaccessible to them, thereby improving their quality of life (QOL). Despite VA's efforts to remove financial and other barriers to the provision of high quality wheelchairs to all Veterans, preliminary evidence suggests that disparities exist in the quality of wheelchairs prescribed to vulnerable (e.g., minority race/ethnicity, lower socioeconomic status) Veterans with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) or amputated limbs (AL). This finding is concerning because patients who receive lower quality wheelchairs may be at risk for adverse physical, psychological, economic, and QOL outcomes. Mounting research demonstrates that patient psychosocial characteristics (e.g., medical mistrust, perceived discrimination, locus of control) and provider factors (e.g., demographics and training) are associated with disparities in healthcare processes and outcomes. However, for Veterans with SCI or AL, no studies to date have examined (a) what patient and provider factors are associated with the prescription of high quality wheelchairs, and (b) how these factors are associated with wheelchair quality and patient outcomes. The proposed cross-sectional, multi-site study of Veterans with SCI or AL who use a wheelchair as their primary source of mobility aims to determine whether: (1) patient demographic (e.g., race, SES) and psychosocial characteristics (e.g., medical mistrust, experience of discrimination) and provider factors (e.g., years of practice, certification, demographics) are associated with wheelchair quality; (2) wheelchair quality is associated with key patient outcomes, including satisfaction with medical care, QOL, amount of wheelchair activity, and participation in social and work-related activities; (3) patient and provider factors are independently associated with key patient outcomes including satisfaction with medical care, QOL, amount of wheelchair activity, and participation; and (4) the association of patient and provider factors with patient outcomes is explained by differences in wheelchair quality. Veterans with SCI or AL, who were prescribed their wheelchairs through the VA, will be recruited from the Philadelphia, PA, Cleveland, OH, Richmond, VA, and Bronx, NY VA Medical Centers to participate in an interview to assess their demographic characteristics, health information, psychosocial characteristics (including, experience of discrimination, perceived racism, medical mistrust, self-image, anxiety/depression, health beliefs, health literacy, and communication) and health-related outcomes (including wheelchair skills, satisfaction, QOL, participation). We will also assess amount of wheelchair activity using data logging devices, and determine wheelchair quality by its make and model. Data will also be collected from all health care providers involved in wheelchair provision for study participants.

Provider factors will include demographics (e.g., race/ethnicity, age, gender), and specialty (i.e., MD/OT/PT).

For Occupational and Physical Therapists, we will determine if they are certified by the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America. Years of practice since completion of medical training, number of chairs prescribed over the span of their career, what role each provider plays in the wheelchair provision process, as well as the number of continuing medical education (CME) credits and/or educational credit units (ECU) they have obtained in the past 3 years related specifically to wheelchairs, will also be assessed. Understanding the associations among the proposed patient characteristics and provider factors is an essential step toward developing tailored interventions, aimed at patients and providers, to improve the quality and equity of wheelchair service delivery for Veterans.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Amputees

Keywords

  • Amputees
  • spinal cord injuries
  • quality of life
  • satisfaction
  • healthcare disparities
  • wheelchairs
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 497 is above the median of 60 across 323 observational studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Participants will be recruited from the following four VA Medical Centers: the Philadelphia VA Medical Center in Philadelphia, PA; the Louis Stokes VA Medical Center in Cleveland, OH; The Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center in Richmond, VA; and the James J. Peters VA Medical Center in Bronx, NY. Recruitment will occur at SCI clinics, amputee clinics, wheelchair clinics, and patient registries.

Inclusion criteria

Veterans

  • age >18 years
  • must have SCI with discernible neurological impairments or an amputated lower limb which results in the use of a wheelchair
  • must be in power or manual wheelchair >1 year and treated at the participating VAMC
  • participants must use a manual or power wheelchair as their primary means of mobility (e.g., use wheelchair > 40 hours/week
  • and be non-ambulatory except for exercise purposes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • In wheelchair less than 1 year
  • Able to ambulate without the use of a wheelchair
  • Other disorders requiring the use of a wheelchair (e.g., MS)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
497 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Group 1

    Veterans with spinal cord injury or amputated limbs who use a wheelchair as their primary source of mobility

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life Assessed With the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)

    The investigators will assess QOL with the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) and two additional physical function items designed for patients with SCI. Eight QOL domains are assessed, including physical functioning, vitality, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, bodily pain, general health, social functioning, and mental health. The VR-12 has been used extensively with Veterans in a variety of health domains and has shown to be reliable and valid in ambulatory care populations (Cronbach's alpha= .83-.85). The additional two items were added because previous research demonstrated that existing measures of physical function in the VR12 are not appropriate to patients with SCI and are not able to reveal differences in physical function among SCI patients. The investigators assessed physical QOL and mental QOL, both scales range from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).

    Time frame: Measured at baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction With Wheelchair Service Delivery

    The investigators assessed Satisfaction with Wheelchair Service Delivery using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). The CSQ-8 is an 8-item, easily administered and scored measure of client satisfaction with services (e.g., "How would you rate the quality of service you have received?"). For the purpose of this study, the investigators asked patients to focus specifically on satisfaction with service at their SCI or AL wheelchair clinic. The scale is unidimensional, yielding a homogenous estimate of general satisfaction with services. It is scored by summing the individual items and produces a score ranging from 8-32, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. The CSQ-8 has been extensively used in a variety of healthcare settings, operates similarly across ethnic groups, and demonstrates excellent psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha = .83-.93).

    Time frame: one time use, at baseline

  2. Satisfaction With Prescribed Wheelchair

    We assessed Satisfaction with patients' prescribe wheelchair using the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology ( (QUEST). We used an 8-item subset of the QUEST to assess patients' satisfaction with their wheelchair. QUEST is the first and only standardized satisfaction assessment tool that was designed specifically for assistive technology devices. Its' development was based on major theoretical models of assistive technology. The QUEST has been widely cited and used in clinical and research settings, and demonstrates strong psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha = .82). The 8 item subset focuses specifically on patients' satisfaction with different aspects of their wheelchair (e.g., "How satisfied are you with the dimensions (size, height, length, width) of your assistive device?"). Responses range from 1(not satisfied at all) to 5(very satisfied). Cronbach's alpha = .80 for the 8-item wheelchair subset. We chose to eliminate the other four items.

    Time frame: one time use, at baseline

  3. Participation in Society

    We assessed participation in society with a modified version of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique Short Form (CHART-SF). The CHART was designed to provide a simple measure of involvement in life situations ("In a typical week, how many days do you get out of your house and go somewhere?") with sub-scales measuring physical independence, cognitive independence, mobility, occupation, social integration and economic self-sufficiency. The CHART-SF produces scores ranging from 0 (severe handicap) to 100 (no handicap) for each of the sub-scales and a total score ranging from 0-600. The CHART-SF is the most widely used participation measure in rehabilitation research. It has been used in various ethnic groups, and has well-established psychometric properties (test-retest reliability = .93; inter-rater reliability = .83). We dichotomized into "Disabled" and "Not Disabled" where disabled are those with a CHART score \<100, and not disabled are those with a CHART score \>=100

    Time frame: Measured at baseline

  4. Wheelchair Activity

    Time frame: over a two week period following baseline

07

Results

Posted Dec 31, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1
Started497
Completed482
Not completed15

Outcome measures

PrimaryQuality of Life Assessed With the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)

The investigators will assess QOL with the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) and two additional physical function items designed for patients with SCI. Eight QOL domains are assessed, including physical functioning, vitality, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, bodily pain, general health, social functioning, and mental health. The VR-12 has been used extensively with Veterans in a variety of health domains and has shown to be reliable and valid in ambulatory care populations (Cronbach's alpha= .83-.85). The additional two items were added because previous research demonstrated that existing measures of physical function in the VR12 are not appropriate to patients with SCI and are not able to reveal differences in physical function among SCI patients. The investigators assessed physical QOL and mental QOL, both scales range from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 100 (best possible outcome).

Time frame:
Measured at baseline
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life Assessed With the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)
units on a scaleGroup 1
Physical Quality of Life Summary Score44.7 ± 7.7
Mental Quality of Life Summary Score43.6 ± 15.4
SecondarySatisfaction With Wheelchair Service Delivery

The investigators assessed Satisfaction with Wheelchair Service Delivery using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). The CSQ-8 is an 8-item, easily administered and scored measure of client satisfaction with services (e.g., "How would you rate the quality of service you have received?"). For the purpose of this study, the investigators asked patients to focus specifically on satisfaction with service at their SCI or AL wheelchair clinic. The scale is unidimensional, yielding a homogenous estimate of general satisfaction with services. It is scored by summing the individual items and produces a score ranging from 8-32, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. The CSQ-8 has been extensively used in a variety of healthcare settings, operates similarly across ethnic groups, and demonstrates excellent psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha = .83-.93).

Time frame:
one time use, at baseline
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Satisfaction With Wheelchair Service Delivery
units on a scaleGroup 1
Satisfaction With Wheelchair Service Delivery26.6 ± 5.5
SecondarySatisfaction With Prescribed Wheelchair

We assessed Satisfaction with patients' prescribe wheelchair using the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology ( (QUEST). We used an 8-item subset of the QUEST to assess patients' satisfaction with their wheelchair. QUEST is the first and only standardized satisfaction assessment tool that was designed specifically for assistive technology devices. Its' development was based on major theoretical models of assistive technology. The QUEST has been widely cited and used in clinical and research settings, and demonstrates strong psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha = .82). The 8 item subset focuses specifically on patients' satisfaction with different aspects of their wheelchair (e.g., "How satisfied are you with the dimensions (size, height, length, width) of your assistive device?"). Responses range from 1(not satisfied at all) to 5(very satisfied). Cronbach's alpha = .80 for the 8-item wheelchair subset. We chose to eliminate the other four items.

Time frame:
one time use, at baseline
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Satisfaction With Prescribed Wheelchair
units on a scaleGroup 1
Satisfaction With Prescribed Wheelchair4.1 ± 0.9
SecondaryParticipation in Society

We assessed participation in society with a modified version of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique Short Form (CHART-SF). The CHART was designed to provide a simple measure of involvement in life situations ("In a typical week, how many days do you get out of your house and go somewhere?") with sub-scales measuring physical independence, cognitive independence, mobility, occupation, social integration and economic self-sufficiency. The CHART-SF produces scores ranging from 0 (severe handicap) to 100 (no handicap) for each of the sub-scales and a total score ranging from 0-600. The CHART-SF is the most widely used participation measure in rehabilitation research. It has been used in various ethnic groups, and has well-established psychometric properties (test-retest reliability = .93; inter-rater reliability = .83). We dichotomized into "Disabled" and "Not Disabled" where disabled are those with a CHART score \<100, and not disabled are those with a CHART score \>=100

Time frame:
Measured at baseline
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participation in Society
participantsGroup 1
Disabled (<100)208
Not Disabled (>=100)244
SecondaryWheelchair Activity
Time frame:
over a two week period following baseline

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 1—0/497 (0%)0/497 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Group 1
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years327
>=65 years151
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(participants)Group 1
Female19
Male462
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Group 1
United States482
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY
    Bronx, New York 10468, United States
  • Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15206, United States
  • Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
    Richmond, Virginia 23249, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hart-Hughes S, Highsmith MJ, Phillips SL, Groer S. A review of clinical outcome assessment instruments for gait, balance, and fall rish in persons with lower level extremity amputation. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 2014 Mar 31; 30(1):70-76.
  • Myaskovsky L, Gao S, Hausmann LRM, Bornemann KR, Burkitt KH, Switzer GE, Fine MJ, Phillips SL, Gater D, Spungen AM, Boninger ML. How Are Race, Cultural, and Psychosocial Factors Associated With Outcomes in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Sep;98(9):1812-1820.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.12.015. Epub 2017 Jan 25. PubMed 28130083 ↗
  • Myaskovsky L, Gao S, Hausmann LRM, Bornemann KR, Burkitt KH, Switzer GE, Fine MJ, Phillips SL, Gater D, Spungen AM, Worobey L, Boninger ML. Quality and Equity in Wheelchairs Used by Veterans. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Mar;98(3):442-449. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.09.116. Epub 2016 Oct 3. PubMed 27713075 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01236170
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 7, 2010
Start date
Mar 2011
Primary completion
Aug 2013
Completion
Sep 2013
Results posted
Dec 31, 2014
Last update
Jun 27, 2019

Study contacts

Larissa Myaskovsky, PhD
principal investigator · Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion