CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01203046Updated Aug 10, 2012Results posted

Early Short-term Antibiotic Therapy in Penetrating Abdominal Trauma, 3 vs 7 Days

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Ertapenem in SURGICAL SITE INFECTION, sponsored by Silvia M. Pinango L.. Completed. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-08-10.

Sponsored by Silvia M. Pinango L. · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Abdominal penetrating trauma represents a frequent cause of consult into emergency rooms in Venezuela. Accidents and violence at Hospital "Miguel Perez Carreño" along april 2009 were represented by gunshots and stabbing wounds which 8th. and 18th cause for medical attention respectively within a total of 76 cases. Likewise gunshot wounds reach the first cause of morbility into general surgery services with 21 cases and the stabbing wounds the 12th cause with 12 cases within the same period.

Early therapy is defined as the antibiotic dose administrated within the first 12 hours after the trauma. Abdominal cavity contamination by micro-organism is not synonymous of stablished infection, the extension of contamination and intensity of reaction should be enough in order to allow the inflammatory focus developing.

Abdominal cavity needs at least 12 - 24 hours of exposure to the infectious material to allow the stablishment of such infection. Origin and amount of contaminant material influence the size of inoculated bacteria and the speed that infection develops.

There is not an absolute criteria to determine when intrabdominal contamination progress to an established infection. Surgeons decides the must adequated therapy according to clinical history, radiology tests and findings during surgery.

Selected patients for early antibiotic therapy in penetrating abdominal trauma includes those with traumatic intestinal wounds with less than 12 hours of evolution and those with gastroduodenal wounds lesser than 24 hours as well.

There are different antibiotics indicated for intrabdominal infections. Ertapenem is a low resistance carbapenem with a broad spectrum into microbial flora presenting in penetrating abdominal trauma. Its media life and blood therapeutic levels allows the use of an unique dose within the first 24 hours of trauma.

This research protocol has been designed according to established patterns for clinical investigation and our goal is to achieve criteria in decision making about antibiotic administration in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma and evaluate the security of an Early short term antibiotic therapy with Ertapenem 3 days vs 7 days, decreasing hospital costs related to indiscriminate use of antibiotics.

Read the detailed description

General objectives The object of this research is to evaluated the impact of Early short-term antibiotic therapy with Ertapenem, 3 vs 7 days, upon clinical postoperatory evolution in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma at emergency room of "Miguel Perez Carreño" Hospital

Specific objectives

  1. To determine the incidence of postoperatory infectious complications in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma under Early short term antibiotic therapy with Ertapenem.
  2. To establish the efficacy of Early short term antibiotic therapy 3 days with Ertapenem versus systematic administration of the same antibiotic up to the 7th day after surgery in order to prevent postoperatory infections.
  3. To identify the risk factors that predispose the appearance of infectious complications in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.

Investigation type This will be a prospective, comparative, double blind, randomized, experimental clinical trial in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma, who attend the emergency room of Dr. "Miguel Perez Carreño" Hospital between February and July 2010.

Therapy. Surgery will be perform within a period no longer than twelve hours since time of trauma. Culture samples from abdominal cavity will be taken during the surgery in order to identify the bacterial prevalence and its sensibility to antibiotics.

Ertapenem will be administrated within the first 2 hours of Hospital´s admission and the next two days after surgery. At day four, patients will be assigned to different groups A or B, according to they entrance number into this trial.

Group A treatment will be continued with Ertapenem until 7th day. Group B antibiotic therapy will be stopped.

Patients follow up will be done during the first 10 days after trauma in two phases:

  1. First 7 days patients will be controlled by a daily evaluation and the data will be recorded according to variables in the control sheet (Appendix 3).
  2. Patients with evolution as follows, will be treated under medical criteria and cultures results:

    1. Temperature 38,5 °C or higher more than 24 hours within the first 7 postoperatory days.
    2. Sustained WBC count higher than 14,000 or increase after 48 hrs. Postoperatory.
    3. Postoperatory complications such as gastric or intestinal fistula, purulent drainage, intrabdominal abscess.
  3. On day 10 a new evaluation of patients will be performed and recorded in the control sheet (Appendix 4).

Evaluation variables. Information will be recorded by full register of standard control sheets which includes: admittance date, medical history number, age, sex, clinical conditions, associated comorbidity, surgical findings, time since trauma, surgery time, and starting time of antibiotic administration (Appendix 1).

Penetrating abdominal trauma scale will be applied in order to determine the seriousness of trauma and its potential general echoes (Appendix 2).

During the postoperatory period the control sheet will include: WBC count, albumin, lymphocyte, local conditions of the surgical wound and penetration site wound at the abdominal wall, complications(Appendix 3).

After patient discharge, they will be appointed and evaluated 10 to 12 days after surgery and the following items will be recorded: local conditions of the surgical wound, and penetration site wound, complications. (Appendix 4).

Data from excluded patients will be recorded by exclusion causes and their evolution (Appendix 5). Result of sample cultures taken during surgery and its antibiogram will be reported (Appendix 6).

Operations plan timetable

  1. Problem identification request and project design. October 2009 - Feb 2010.
  2. Authorization request to the Bioethics Board of "Dr. Miguel Perez Carreño" Hospital. Feb 2010.
  3. Authorization request to the Technical Commission of "Dr. Miguel Perez Carreño" Hospital. Feb 2010
  4. Development and execution. Feb Nov - 2010.
  5. Data analysis. November 2010.
  6. Presentation and introduction for publication.

Data processing analysis.

To establish non-inferiority of the use of the therapy with ertapenem between three days versus 7 days of treatment, was considered a significance level of 5%, 95% confidence interval, a power of 80% and in the group control of 60%, a margin of not less 10% is considered of no clinical importance. For a balanced design of type n1 = n2 r = 1. Still needed 26 patients per group. The period of advance recruitment of patients was 6 months.

Ethical aspects. It will be required and informed consent to individuals whom enter to this study, after explaining to them what is all about, the benefits and the possible risks, they wil be asked for their signatures or the signatures of closest relatives at the entrance time. (Appendix 6).

02

Conditions studied

  • SURGICAL SITE INFECTION

Keywords

  • DURATION OF THERAPY
  • PENETRATING ABDOMINAL TRAUMA
03

In context

Surgical Wound Infection

670 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound Infection; 141 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 200 across 514 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound Infection.

Browse Surgical Wound Infection studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Silvia M. Pinango L. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with penetrating abdominal trauma who attended the emergency room within 12 hours after trauma, admitted to an exploratory laparotomy.
  2. Patients aged 12 to 65 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical history of immunologic diseases, cancer, use of immunosuppressors, steroids, malnutrition, morbid obesity.
  2. Concomitant pathology at admittance: urinary infections, respiratory infections, hepatitis, viral diseases.
  3. Associated open bone fractures.
  4. Patients with hemodynamic instability during pre or peroperative.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    GROUP A: 7 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY

    Ertapenem will be administrated within the first 2 hours of Hospital´s admission and the during the next 7 days after surgery.

    Drug: Ertapenem

  • Experimental
    GROUP B - 3 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY

    Ertapenem will be administrated within the first 2 hours of Hospital´s admission and during the next 3 days after surgery.

    Drug: Ertapenem

Interventions

  • DrugErtapenem

    Ertapenem 1 gr endovenous 3 or 7 days

    Also known as: Invanz, Early antibiotic therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Surgical Site Infection

    The patients were evaluated up to 10 days with close observation of surgical site. We concluded as surgical site infection when inflammatory signs, purulent discharge, intestinal liquid and aponeurosis disruption was observed.

    Time frame: 10 days

  2. Other Complications

    Patients with complications different to surgical site infection.

    Time frame: 10 days

07

Results

Posted Jul 26, 2012
Limitations and caveats
Presented limitations because patients with penetrating abdominal trauma usually had associated bone fractures or haemodynamic instability.Identifying other predisposing factors is not reached since the sample size was restricted to only two groups.

Participant flow

The data was collected between December 2010 and November 2011 including patients with penetrating abdominal trauma admitted at Dr. Miguel Perez Carreño Hospital emergency room.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGROUP A: 7 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPYGROUP B: 3 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY
Started2828
Completed2828
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimarySurgical Site Infection

The patients were evaluated up to 10 days with close observation of surgical site. We concluded as surgical site infection when inflammatory signs, purulent discharge, intestinal liquid and aponeurosis disruption was observed.

Time frame:
10 days
Reported as:
Number · participants
Surgical Site Infection
participantsGROUP A: 7 DAYS THERAPYGROUP B - 3 DAYS THERAPY
Surgical Site Infection63
Statistical analysis
  • GROUP A: 7 DAYS THERAPY vs GROUP B - 3 DAYS THERAPY · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.05 · Odds ratio (or): 2.65 · 95% CI 0.35 to 19.83
PrimaryOther Complications

Patients with complications different to surgical site infection.

Time frame:
10 days
Reported as:
Number · participants
Other Complications
participantsGROUP A - 7 DAYS THERAPYGROUP B - 3 DAYS THERAPY
Other Complications85
Statistical analysis
  • GROUP A - 7 DAYS THERAPY vs GROUP B - 3 DAYS THERAPY · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.05 · Odds ratio (or): 1.18 · 95% CI 0.21 to 6.51

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
GROUP A: 7 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY—0/28 (0%)0/28 (0%)
GROUP B: 3 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY—0/28 (0%)0/28 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)GROUP A: 7 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPYGROUP B: 3 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPYTotal
<=18 years7310
Between 18 and 65 years212546
>=65 years000
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)GROUP A: 7 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPYGROUP B: 3 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPYTotal
Mean26.2857 ± 9.545028.5000 ± 9.863927.3929 ± 9.6929
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GROUP A: 7 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPYGROUP B: 3 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPYTotal
Female235
Male262551
Type of trauma
Type of trauma(participants)GROUP A: 7 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPYGROUP B: 3 DAYS ANTIBIOTIC THERAPYTotal
GSW242246
SW4610
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dellinger EP. Antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma: penetrating abdominal injuries and open fractures. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;13 Suppl 10:S847-57. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_10.s847. PubMed 1754794 ↗
  • Kirton OC, O'Neill PA, Kestner M, Tortella BJ. Perioperative antibiotic use in high-risk penetrating hollow viscus injury: a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trial of 24 hours versus 5 days. J Trauma. 2000 Nov;49(5):822-32. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200011000-00006. PubMed 11086771 ↗
  • Bozorgzadeh A, Pizzi WF, Barie PS, Khaneja SC, LaMaute HR, Mandava N, Richards N, Noorollah H. The duration of antibiotic administration in penetrating abdominal trauma. Am J Surg. 1999 Feb;177(2):125-31. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00317-1. PubMed 10204554 ↗
  • Schnuriger B, Inaba K, Eberle BM, Wu T, Talving P, Bukur M, Belzberg H, Demetriades D. Microbiological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility in surgical site infections following hollow viscus injury. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Aug;14(8):1304-10. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1231-x. Epub 2010 May 25. PubMed 20499202 ↗
  • de Lalla F. Antimicrobial chemotherapy in the control of surgical infectious complications. J Chemother. 1999 Dec;11(6):440-5. doi: 10.1179/joc.1999.11.6.440. PubMed 10678785 ↗
  • Borbone S, Cascone C, Santagati M, Mezzatesta ML, Stefani S. Bactericidal activity of ertapenem against major intra-abdominal pathogens. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Nov;28(5):396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.07.018. Epub 2006 Oct 11. PubMed 17045463 ↗
  • Girgin S, Gedik E, Uysal E, Tacyildiz IH. Independent risk factors of morbidity in penetrating colon injuries. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 May;15(3):232-8. PubMed 19562544 ↗
  • Salim A, Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Brown C, Browder T, Demetriades D. Analysis of 178 penetrating stomach and small bowel injuries. World J Surg. 2008 Mar;32(3):471-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9350-6. PubMed 18196326 ↗
  • Morales CH, Villegas MI, Villavicencio R, Gonzalez G, Perez LF, Pena AM, Vanegas LE. Intra-abdominal infection in patients with abdominal trauma. Arch Surg. 2004 Dec;139(12):1278-85; discussion 1285. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.12.1278. PubMed 15611450 ↗
  • Oreskovich MR, Dellinger EP, Lennard ES, Wertz M, Carrico CJ, Minshew BH. Duration of preventive antibiotic administration for penetrating abdominal trauma. Arch Surg. 1982 Feb;117(2):200-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380260068012. PubMed 7055433 ↗
  • Farre Rovira R, Frasquet Pons I, Ibor Pica JF. [Postoperative complications in malnourished patients: economic impact and predictive value of some nutritional indicators]. Nutr Hosp. 1998 Sep-Oct;13(5):233-9. Spanish. PubMed 9830844 ↗
  • Scheunemann L, Wazlawik E, Bastos JL, Ristow Cardinal T, Mayumi Nakazora L. Agreement and association between the phase angle and parameters of nutritional status assessment in surgical patients. Nutr Hosp. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):480-7. doi: 10.1590/S0212-16112011000300008. PubMed 21892564 ↗
  • Pull ter Gunne AF, Skolasky RL, Ross H, van Laarhoven CJ, Cohen DB. Influence of perioperative resuscitation status on postoperative spine surgery complications. Spine J. 2010 Feb;10(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.002. Epub 2009 Nov 14. PubMed 19914877 ↗
  • Cheadle WG. Risk factors for surgical site infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006;7 Suppl 1:S7-11. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.7.s1-7. PubMed 16834549 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 10, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01203046
Lead sponsor
Silvia M. Pinango L.
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Silvia M. Pinango L. (Pinango L, Silvia M., Pinango, Silvia M. L., M.D.) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 16, 2010
Start date
Dec 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Completion
Oct 2011
Results posted
Jul 26, 2012
Last update
Aug 10, 2012

Study contacts

SILVIA M. PIÑANGO, MD
principal investigator · IVSS Dr. MIGUEL PEREZ CARREÑO HOSPITAL
LUIS R. LEVEL, MD FACS
study chair · IVSS Dr. MIGUEL PEREZ CARREÑO HOSPITAL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion