CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01199237Updated May 16, 2014Results posted

Impact of Anesthetic Choice (Sevoflurane Versus Desflurane) on Airway Reflex Recovery in the Context of Antagonized Neuromuscular Block

A Phase 4 interventional study of Sevoflurane and Desflurane in Airway Reflexes, Protective, Recovery After Neuromuscular Block and Anesthetic Recovery, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-05-16.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
107
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Protective airway reflexes may be impaired in the postoperative period, creating the potential for aspiration of gastric contents, even after a patient exhibits appropriate response to command. Because assessment of airway reflex recovery is not possible in an intubated patient, the clinician must make an empiric decision as to when a patient is safe to extubate, and choose a combination of techniques least likely to result in pharyngeal impairment. Adequacy of reversal of neuromuscular block by cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., neostigmine) is unpredictable, especially in the presence of profound paralysis, and tactile assessment of train-of four and sustained tetanus has shown poor correlation with objective assessments. Protective airway reflexes may also be impaired during early recovery by the anesthetics themselves, even when muscle relaxant has been avoided. In the absence of muscle relaxant the investigators previously demonstrated that patients receiving an anesthetic with higher tissue solubility, sevoflurane showed significantly greater impairment of swallowing up to 14 minutes after response to command compared to patients receiving an anesthetic with lower tissue solubility, desflurane. Therefore, we ask whether the combination of the more soluble anesthetic and the presence of neuromuscular block antagonized by neostigmine may create a multiplicative effect that might further prolong pharyngeal recovery. We plan to randomly assign 100 patients scheduled to undergo surgery with general anesthesia to a standardized anesthetic that includes 1) sevoflurane, rocuronium with 70 µg/kg neostigmine + 14 µg/kg glycopyrrolate antagonism (group S); or 2) desflurane, rocuronium with 70 µg/kg neostigmine + 14 µg/kg glycopyrrolate antagonism (group D). Airway reflex recovery will be judged as adequate by the patient's ability to swallow 20 mL of water without coughing or drooling 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 and 60 minutes after response to command. Anesthetic (sevoflurane or desflurane) will be discontinued after administration of reversal agent and recovery to TOF (train-of-four) ratio of 0.7.

02

Conditions studied

  • Airway Reflexes, Protective
  • Recovery After Neuromuscular Block
  • Anesthetic Recovery

Keywords

  • Reflex, Pharyngeal
  • Anesthetics, Inhalation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA 1-2 patients
  • Age 18-65 years
  • body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35kg/m2
  • Planned surgery requiring general anesthesia lasting approximately 1.5-3.0 hours
  • Surgery requires or benefits from skeletal muscle relaxation
  • All must pass the baseline 20 mL water swallowing test as previously described.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-existing neuromuscular or central nervous system disorder
  • Known condition interfering with gastric emptying
  • Planned surgical procedure on the head or neck
  • Known liver disease
  • Serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL
  • Concurrent use of neuroleptic medications
  • Contraindication or previous adverse response to any of the study drugs
  • Active asthma or reactive airways disease
  • Surgery where upright position or brief cough would be contraindicated
  • Inability to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
107 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Sevoflurane

    Patients receive sevoflurane, rocuronium with neostigmine + glycopyrrolate reversal (70 and 14 ug/kg)

    Drug: Sevoflurane · Drug: Rocuronium · Drug: Neostigmine · Drug: Glycopyrrolate

  • Active comparator
    Desflurane

    Patients receive Desflurane, rocuronium with neostigmine + glycopyrrolate reversal (70 and 14 ug/kg)

    Drug: Desflurane · Drug: Rocuronium · Drug: Neostigmine · Drug: Glycopyrrolate

Interventions

  • DrugSevoflurane

    Protective airway reflexes will be tested, judged by subject's ability to swallow 20 mL water

  • DrugDesflurane

    Protective airway reflexes will be tested, judged by subject's ability to swallow 20 mL water

  • DrugRocuronium
  • DrugNeostigmine
  • DrugGlycopyrrolate
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recovery of Ability to Swallow After Neostigmine/Glycopyrrolate Antagonism of Rocuronium Paralysis.

    The patient is judged by the primary anesthetist to be awake at time T1. At 2 minutes after T1, the patient was asked to swallow 20mL of water from a paper cup, and a blinded observer judged the ability to swallow based on transit of water to the posterior pharynx (absence of pooling or drooling) and absence of cough or gag.

    Time frame: At 2 minutes after response to command (T1).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time From Potent Inhaled Anesthetic Discontinuation to First Response to Command (T1)

    At the conclusion of surgery, after the patient's potent inhaled anesthetic was discontinued, the commands "open your eyes" and "squeeze my hand" were given at 30-second intervals. The time at which patient first appropriately response to both commands was noted as T1.

    Time frame: Up to 1 hour post-operative

  2. Nausea and Vomiting

    Patients were asked to rate their experience of nausea and vomiting on a 0-10 verbal analog scale, with 0 being absence and 10 being the worst imaginable

    Time frame: 30 minutes after T1

  3. Nausea and Vomiting

    Patients were asked to rate their experience of nausea and vomiting on a 0-10 verbal analog scale, with 0 being absence and 10 being the worst imaginable

    Time frame: 60 minutes after T1

  4. Time From Anesthetic Discontinuation to First Ability to Swallow

    At 2 minutes after first response to command (T1), the patient was asked to swallow 20 mL of water from a paper cup, and an observer blinded to anesthetic assignment assessed the ability to swallow based on transit of water to the posterior pharynx (absence of pooling or drooling) and absence of cough or gag (indicating misdirection of the water bolus into the laryngeal inlet). This test was repeated at 6, 14, 22, 30 and 60 minutes after the time of first response to command.

    Time frame: up to 60 minutes after T1

07

Results

Posted May 8, 2014

Participant flow

At one U.S. clinical site, patients scheduled to undergo surgery requiring general anesthesia lasting approximately 1.5 - 3.0 hours requiring tracheal intubation and paralysis during surgery were invited to participate

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSevofluraneDesflurane
Started4140
Completed4140
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryRecovery of Ability to Swallow After Neostigmine/Glycopyrrolate Antagonism of Rocuronium Paralysis.

The patient is judged by the primary anesthetist to be awake at time T1. At 2 minutes after T1, the patient was asked to swallow 20mL of water from a paper cup, and a blinded observer judged the ability to swallow based on transit of water to the posterior pharynx (absence of pooling or drooling) and absence of cough or gag.

Time frame:
At 2 minutes after response to command (T1).
Reported as:
Number · participants
Recovery of Ability to Swallow After Neostigmine/Glycopyrrolate Antagonism of Rocuronium Paralysis.
participantsSevofluraneDesflurane
able to swallow at T1+2 minutes1625
unable to swallow at T1+2 minutes106
Statistical analysis
  • Sevoflurane vs Desflurane · Chi-squared · p = 0.11 (Significant at p\<0.05)
SecondaryTime From Potent Inhaled Anesthetic Discontinuation to First Response to Command (T1)

At the conclusion of surgery, after the patient's potent inhaled anesthetic was discontinued, the commands "open your eyes" and "squeeze my hand" were given at 30-second intervals. The time at which patient first appropriately response to both commands was noted as T1.

Time frame:
Up to 1 hour post-operative
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Time From Potent Inhaled Anesthetic Discontinuation to First Response to Command (T1)
secondsSevofluraneDesflurane
Time From Potent Inhaled Anesthetic Discontinuation to First Response to Command (T1)623 (509 to 736)343 (271 to 415)
SecondaryNausea and Vomiting

Patients were asked to rate their experience of nausea and vomiting on a 0-10 verbal analog scale, with 0 being absence and 10 being the worst imaginable

Time frame:
30 minutes after T1
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Nausea and Vomiting
units on a scaleSevofluraneDesflurane
Nausea0.385 (0 to 8)1.359 (0 to 8)
Vomiting0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
SecondaryNausea and Vomiting

Patients were asked to rate their experience of nausea and vomiting on a 0-10 verbal analog scale, with 0 being absence and 10 being the worst imaginable

Time frame:
60 minutes after T1
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Nausea and Vomiting
units on a scaleSevofluraneDesflurane
Nausea0.263 (0 to 4)1.333 (0 to 10)
Vomiting0 (0 to 0)0.026 (0 to 1)
SecondaryTime From Anesthetic Discontinuation to First Ability to Swallow

At 2 minutes after first response to command (T1), the patient was asked to swallow 20 mL of water from a paper cup, and an observer blinded to anesthetic assignment assessed the ability to swallow based on transit of water to the posterior pharynx (absence of pooling or drooling) and absence of cough or gag (indicating misdirection of the water bolus into the laryngeal inlet). This test was repeated at 6, 14, 22, 30 and 60 minutes after the time of first response to command.

Time frame:
up to 60 minutes after T1
Reported as:
Mean · Seconds
Time From Anesthetic Discontinuation to First Ability to Swallow
SecondsSevofluraneDesflurane
Time From Anesthetic Discontinuation to First Ability to Swallow1275 (947 to 1603)718 (513 to 922)

Adverse events

Collected over 1-2 hours postoperatively. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sevoflurane—0/41 (0%)0/41 (0%)
Desflurane—0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SevofluraneDesfluraneTotal
Mean45.3 (42.0 to 48.7)43.3 (40.2 to 46.5)44.3 (40.2 to 48.7)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SevofluraneDesfluraneTotal
Female413677
Male044
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)SevofluraneDesfluraneTotal
United States414081
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • UCSF Helen Diller Cancer Center
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • UCSF Moffitt-Long Hospital
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sundman E, Witt H, Olsson R, Ekberg O, Kuylenstierna R, Eriksson LI. The incidence and mechanisms of pharyngeal and upper esophageal dysfunction in partially paralyzed humans: pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry after atracurium. Anesthesiology. 2000 Apr;92(4):977-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200004000-00014. PubMed 10754616 ↗
  • Sundman E, Witt H, Sandin R, Kuylenstierna R, Boden K, Ekberg O, Eriksson LI. Pharyngeal function and airway protection during subhypnotic concentrations of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: volunteers examined by pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry. Anesthesiology. 2001 Nov;95(5):1125-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200111000-00016. PubMed 11684981 ↗
  • Mckay RE, Large MJC, Balea MC, Mckay WR. Airway reflexes return more rapidly after desflurane anesthesia than after sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2005 Mar;100(3):697-700. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000146514.65070.AE. PubMed 15728054 ↗
  • McKay RE, Malhotra A, Cakmakkaya OS, Hall KT, McKay WR, Apfel CC. Effect of increased body mass index and anaesthetic duration on recovery of protective airway reflexes after sevoflurane vs desflurane. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):175-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep374. Epub 2009 Dec 26. PubMed 20037150 ↗
  • Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):130-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1268. PubMed 18635478 ↗
  • DePippo KL, Holas MA, Reding MJ. Validation of the 3-oz water swallow test for aspiration following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1992 Dec;49(12):1259-61. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530360057018. PubMed 1449405 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 16, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01199237
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 10, 2010
Start date
Aug 2010
Primary completion
Aug 2012
Completion
Aug 2013
Results posted
May 8, 2014
Last update
May 16, 2014

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion