An interventional study of Central venous catheter in Time to Insertion and Rates of Complications, sponsored by E-DA Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-11-27.
Sponsored by E-DA Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
There is no randomized controlled trial to compare the rates of complications associated with internal jugular and subclavian venous catheterization. The aim of this study is to compare mechanical, infectious, and thrombotic complications of internal jugular and subclavian venous catheterization. An improved understanding of CVC-related risks might help clinicians to choose one approach over the other in specific clinical settings.
Central venous catheterization is often necessary to treat critically ill patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs). However, this procedure may lead to serious and sometimes life-threatening complications, including mechanical, infectious, or thrombotic complications. The choice of insertion site can influence the incidence and type of such complications. The most frequently used sites for CVC insertion are the internal jugular and the subclavian vein. However, in an individual patient, criteria for choosing one approach over the other remain unclear.
E-DA Hospital is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: Central venous catheter
Central venous catheter insertion to subclavian vein
Also known as: venous access
Time to completely insertion
Time frame: 1 hour
rates of mechanical, infectious, and thrombotic complications
Time frame: 14 days
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
E-DA Hospital