CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01191619Updated Aug 31, 2010

Comparison of Two Insertion Techniques of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway by Unskilled Personnel in Children

An interventional study of McIvor retractor in Airway Management, sponsored by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 9 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-08-31.

Sponsored by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · Not applicable and Interventional

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2010), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
134
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 9 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is one of the alternative methods for effective airway management. It is an advanced form of laryngeal mask airway(LMA) with a softer and larger cuff to improve sealing and a drain tube to permit venting of the stomach. However, the larger cuff is more difficult to save space for insertion in the mouth and is more likely to fold over. Particularly, a relatively large tongue, a floppy epiglottis, a cephalad and more anterior larynx and frequent presence of tonsillar hypertrophy may disturb PLMA insertion in pediatric patients. The manufacturer recommends inserting PLMA using digital manipulation or with an introducer, but these techniques have lower success rates compared to those of LMA insertion.

McIvor blade is a tongue retractor with a thin and curved blade and a flat handle. It is used to secure the operating field by pressing tongue during tonsillectomy. The investigators hypothesized that McIvor blade would provide more space in the mouth for PLMA insertion, and therefore it could improve the PLMA insertion as well as reducing injuries to the pharyngeal wall. The investigators compared the success rate and the incidence of complications of the digital technique with those of McIvor blade-guided insertion by unskilled anesthesia residents.

Read the detailed description

Rapid and successful airway management is important for the patient's outcome in emergency care. Tracheal intubation with an endotracheal tube is the gold standard for airway management, but tracheal intubation by paramedical staff in pre-hospital setting can be time-consuming and difficult. The ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is one of the alternative methods for effective airway management. It is an advanced form of laryngeal mask airway(LMA) with a softer and larger cuff to improve sealing and a drain tube to permit venting of the stomach. However, the larger cuff is more difficult to save space for insertion in the mouth and is more likely to fold over. Particularly, a relatively large tongue, a floppy epiglottis, a cephalad and more anterior larynx and frequent presence of tonsillar hypertrophy may disturb PLMA insertion in pediatric patients. The manufacturer recommends inserting PLMA using digital manipulation or with an introducer, but these techniques have lower success rates compared to those of LMA insertion. The first attempt success rate of PLMA insertion by inexperienced personnel was reported to be 83%. Several techniques have been introduced to improve the insertion success rate; the use of fiberoscopy, gum-elastic bougie, and a suction catheter. However, all of them can not save enough oral space for PLMA insertion and it would not be easy for the unskilled personnel to use them in emergency situations. A larger space between tongue and retropharynx, not being accompanied with an index finger for insertion would make make it easier for the unskilled personnel to insert the PLMA.

McIvor blade is a tongue retractor with a thin and curved blade and a flat handle. It is used to secure the operating field by pressing tongue during tonsillectomy. We hypothesized that McIvor blade would provide more space in the mouth for PLMA insertion, and therefore it could improve the PLMA insertion as well as reducing injuries to the pharyngeal wall. We compared the success rate and the incidence of complications of the digital technique with those of McIvor blade-guided insertion by unskilled anesthesia residents.

02

Conditions studied

  • Airway Management

Keywords

  • McIvor retractor
  • Proseal laryngeal mask airway
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital is the lead sponsor of 368 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 9 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy pediatric patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pediatric patients with a known or predicted difficult airway, recent sore throat, mouth opening less than 2.5 cm, or at risk of aspiration
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
134 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    McIvor group

    groups in which proseal laryngeal mask airway is inserted with McIvor retractor.

    Procedure: McIvor retractor

Interventions

  • ProcedureMcIvor retractor

    The Mclvor blade- guided technique (McIvor group) involved the following steps. The PLMA was lubricated on the posterior aspect of the deflated mask with a water-based lubricant. The McIvor blade was fully inserted beneath the tongue of the patients. The tongue was lifted gently with the McIvor blade and PLMA was introduced into a space between the McIvor blade and maxillary incisors holding the bite block of the PLMA. The PLMA was advanced into the hypopharynx until definite resistance was felt and McIvor blade was removed.

    Also known as: McIvor group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the success rate of proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion

    immediately after the insertion of PLMA

    Time frame: at the time of insertion of PLMA

Secondary outcomes

  1. the incidence of complications following PLMA insertion

    blood staining: after the removal of PLMA; sore throat: 1 day after surgery

    Time frame: after the removal of PLMA, and 1 day after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
    Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, Korea, Republic of
    • Jin-Young Hwang, MD · Contact · mistyblue15@naver.com · 82-16-746-4750
    • Jin-Young Hwang, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hwang J, Han S, Hwang J, Oh A, Park S, Kim J. The McIvor blade improves insertion of the LMA ProSeal in children. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;58(9):796-801. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9540-4. Epub 2011 Jun 21. PubMed 21691935 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 31, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01191619
Lead sponsor
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
First posted
Aug 31, 2010
Start date
Jul 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2010 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2010 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 31, 2010

Study contacts

Jin-Young Hwang, MD
Contact
mistyblue15@naver.com
82-16-746-4750
Jin-Young Hwang, MD
principal investigator · Fellow

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion