CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01184417Updated Mar 9, 2012Results posted

Phenobarbital for Acute Alcohol Withdrawal

An interventional study of 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline and placebo in Alcohol Withdrawal, sponsored by Jonathan Rosenson. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-03-09.

Sponsored by Jonathan Rosenson · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
102
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intravenous phenobarbital in combination with a symptom-guided standardized lorazepam-based alcohol withdrawal protocol will be associated with decreased need for ICU admission, continuous lorazepam infusion and will not be associated with increased adverse events.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Withdrawal
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Jonathan Rosenson as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Need for admission to hospital for acute alcohol withdrawal

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergy to phenobarbital, lorazepam, age\<18 or >65
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
102 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Phenobarbital group

    10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline

    Drug: 10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    100 ml saline

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • Drug10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline

    10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline

  • Drugplacebo

    100 m l saline

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients Requiring Continuous Lorazepam Infusion

    All study patients are placed on the standardized institutional alcohol withdrawal protocol and receive boluses of lorazepam (1, 2 or 4 mg IV) based on their acute alcohol withdrawal score (AAWS), adminstered serially up to every 15 minutes. Patients who are refractory to the maximum dose of lorazepam allowed by the protocol (up to 4mg lorazepam IV q 15 mins)are placed on a continuous IV lorazepam infusion (or "lorazepam drip"). Thus, continuous lorazepam infusion is a "yes or no" variable (i.e. continuous infusion, or not).

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Percentage of Patients Requiring ICU Admission

    admission to intensive care unit

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Total Lorazepam Required Per Patient Per Admission

    How much total lorazepam did each study patient receive from inital presentation in the Emergency Department through their discharge from the hospital, in milligrams.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Stay

    hospital LOS, per patient, in hours from admission to discharge

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Number of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    The outome answeres the question "Did the study patient require endotracheal intubation, or not". This outcome investigates if the phenobarbital intervention is associted with increased incidence of respiratory depression and subsequent increased need for intubation.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Percentage of Patients Requiring a Bedside Sitter as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Did the study patient require a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) or other hospital staff to serve as a "bedside sitter" to observe the patient and provide additional safety supervision during any portion of their hospitalization.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Number of Study Patients With Seizure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Did the study patient have a witnessed seizure during their hospitaliztion (yes/no).

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Number of Study Patients With Mortality as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    mortality in study patients

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted Mar 9, 2012

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePhenobarbital GroupPlacebo Group
Started5151
Completed5151
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients Requiring Continuous Lorazepam Infusion

All study patients are placed on the standardized institutional alcohol withdrawal protocol and receive boluses of lorazepam (1, 2 or 4 mg IV) based on their acute alcohol withdrawal score (AAWS), adminstered serially up to every 15 minutes. Patients who are refractory to the maximum dose of lorazepam allowed by the protocol (up to 4mg lorazepam IV q 15 mins)are placed on a continuous IV lorazepam infusion (or "lorazepam drip"). Thus, continuous lorazepam infusion is a "yes or no" variable (i.e. continuous infusion, or not).

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients Requiring Continuous Lorazepam Infusion
participantsPhenobarbital GroupPlacebo Group
Number of Patients Requiring Continuous Lorazepam Infusion216
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Requiring ICU Admission

admission to intensive care unit

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Requiring ICU Admission
percentage of participantsPhenobarbital GroupPlacebo Group
Percentage of Patients Requiring ICU Admission8 (4 to 32)25 (4 to 32)
Statistical analysis
  • Phenobarbital Group vs Placebo Group · Mean difference (final values): 17 · 95% CI 4 to 32
PrimaryTotal Lorazepam Required Per Patient Per Admission

How much total lorazepam did each study patient receive from inital presentation in the Emergency Department through their discharge from the hospital, in milligrams.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · milligrams
Total Lorazepam Required Per Patient Per Admission
milligramsPhenobarbital GroupPlacebo Group
Total Lorazepam Required Per Patient Per Admission26 ± 4549 ± 37
Statistical analysis
  • Phenobarbital Group vs Placebo Group · Mean difference (final values): 23 · 95% CI 4 to 49
SecondaryLength of Stay

hospital LOS, per patient, in hours from admission to discharge

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Median · hours
Length of Stay
hoursPhenobarbital GroupPlacebo Group
Length of Stay76 (54 to 114)118 (47 to 190)
Statistical analysis
  • Phenobarbital Group vs Placebo Group · Mean difference (final values): 42 · 95% CI -4 to 82
SecondaryNumber of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

The outome answeres the question "Did the study patient require endotracheal intubation, or not". This outcome investigates if the phenobarbital intervention is associted with increased incidence of respiratory depression and subsequent increased need for intubation.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
participantsPhenobarbital GroupPlacebo Group
Number of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability00
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Requiring a Bedside Sitter as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

Did the study patient require a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) or other hospital staff to serve as a "bedside sitter" to observe the patient and provide additional safety supervision during any portion of their hospitalization.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Requiring a Bedside Sitter as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
percentage of participantsPhenobarbital GroupPlacebo Group
Percentage of Patients Requiring a Bedside Sitter as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability28 (-11 to 23)22 (-11 to 23)
Statistical analysis
  • Phenobarbital Group vs Placebo Group · Mean difference (final values): 6 · 95% CI -11 to 23
SecondaryNumber of Study Patients With Seizure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

Did the study patient have a witnessed seizure during their hospitaliztion (yes/no).

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Study Patients With Seizure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
participantsPhenobarbital GroupPlacebo Group
Number of Study Patients With Seizure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability12
SecondaryNumber of Study Patients With Mortality as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

mortality in study patients

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Study Patients With Mortality as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
participantsPhenobarbital GroupPlacebo Group
Number of Study Patients With Mortality as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability00

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phenobarbital Group—0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)
Placebo Group—0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Phenobarbital GroupPlacebo GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years5151102
>=65 years000
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Phenobarbital GroupPlacebo GroupTotal
Mean46 ± 1248 ± 1747 ± 14
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Phenobarbital GroupPlacebo GroupTotal
Female464591
Male5611
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Phenobarbital GroupPlacebo GroupTotal
United States5151102
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Alameda County Medical Center
    Oakland, California 94608, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01184417
Lead sponsor
Jonathan Rosenson
Collaborators
Alameda County Medical Center
Responsible party
Jonathan Rosenson (Jonathan Rosenson MD, Alameda County Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2010
Start date
Jan 2009
Primary completion
Mar 2010
Completion
Mar 2010
Results posted
Mar 9, 2012
Last update
Mar 9, 2012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion