CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01183858Updated Aug 19, 2015Results posted

A Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) to Compare Two Different Doses in in Currently Smoking Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (CURRENTS)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Erlotinib [Tarceva] in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Completed at 63 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-08-19.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
315
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective, double-blind, randomized study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of two dose levels of erlotinib [Tarceva] on progression-free survival, response and disease control rates and overall survival in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients must be current smokers and not intending to stop smoking during the study. Patients will be randomized to receive either 150 mg or 300 mg of study drug as single daily oral doses. Treatment will continue until disease progression.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 315 is above the median of 60 across 5,295 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,061 studies on the registry; 85 are open to participants now.

Of its 319 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 239 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged ≥18 years
  • inoperable, locally advanced (stage IIIB/IV) with supraclavicular lymph node metastases or malignant pleural or pericardial effusion) or metastatic (stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Disease must be characterized according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria
  • Patients have received one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC, but must have recovered from any treatment-related toxicity
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Life expectancy ≥12 weeks
  • Current cigarette smoker (having smoked >100 cigarettes in entire lifetime and currently smoking on average ≥1 cigarette per day), not intending to stop during the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior antibody or small molecule therapy against Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)
  • Radiotherapy within 28 days prior to enrollment
  • Received more than one line of chemotherapy for locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC (first-line maintenance chemotherapy after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy is allowed)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
315 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Erlotinib 150 mg

    Erlotinib 150 mg single daily oral dose until disease progression.

    Drug: Erlotinib [Tarceva]

  • Experimental
    Erlotinib 300 mg

    Erlotinib 300 mg single daily oral dose until disease progression.

    Drug: Erlotinib [Tarceva]

Interventions

  • DrugErlotinib [Tarceva]

    Single daily oral dose

    Also known as: Tarceva

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of first occurrence of disease progression or death. For target lesions, Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Time frame: Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 28 October 2013 (Up to 36.5 Months)

  2. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at the End of Study

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of first occurrence of disease progression or death. For target lesions, Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Time frame: Randomization to End of Study: 14 October 2010 - 7 February 2014 (Up to 39.8 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause.

    Time frame: Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 28 October 2013 (Up to 36.5 months)

  2. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    Tumor response was assessed by the investigator using computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. A participant was defined as a responder if they sustained a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) for at least 4 weeks during randomized treatment (confirmed response). Patients with no tumor assessment after the start of study treatment were to be considered as non-responders. The percentage of participants in each best response category is presented.

    Time frame: Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 28 October 2013 (Up to 36.5 months)

  3. Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    Tumor response was assessed by the investigator using computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Disease control rates were measured according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria. A participant was defined as having controlled disease if they sustained a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) for at least 4 weeks during randomized treatment (confirmed response), or Stable Disease (SD) for at least 6 weeks. Patients with no tumor assessment after the start of study treatment were considered as having uncontrolled disease. The percentage of participants with Disease Control is presented.

    Time frame: Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 28 October 2013 (Up to 36.5 months)

  4. Time to Progression (TTP)

    Tumor response was assessed by the investigator using computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria. Time to progression (TTP) in weeks was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression. Participants without event were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment when the patient was known to be progression free.

    Time frame: Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 28 October 2013 (Up to 36.5 months)

  5. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) at the End of the Study

    An adverse event was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events. A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Adverse Events in the following categories are presented: Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, AEs leading to withdrawal from treatment and AEs leading to death.

    Time frame: Randomization to End of Study: 14 October 2010 - 7 February 2014 (Up to 39.8 months)

  6. Overall Survival (OS) at the End of Study

    OS defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause.

    Time frame: Randomization to End of Study: 14 October 2010 - 7 February 2014 (Up to 39.8 months)

07

Results

Posted Feb 23, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneErlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mg
Started154159
Safety population154158
Completed13
Not completed153156
Withdrew: Death not related to progressive disease56
Withdrew: Adverse event1411
Withdrew: Investigator's decision03
Withdrew: Insufficient therapeutic response20
Withdrew: Refused treatment14
Withdrew: Withdrew consent44
Withdrew: Discontinued smoking31
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Administrative/other66
Withdrew: Progressive disease112115
Withdrew: Death related to progressive disease45
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of first occurrence of disease progression or death. For target lesions, Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame:
Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 28 October 2013 (Up to 36.5 Months)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
weeksErlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mg
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)6.86 (6.29 to 12.00)7.00 (6.29 to 11.00)
Statistical analysis
  • Erlotinib 150 mg vs Erlotinib 300 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.671 (Unstratified analysis.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.05 · 95% CI 0.83 to 1.33
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame:
Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 28 October 2013 (Up to 36.5 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsErlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mg
Overall Survival (OS)6.77 (5.65 to 8.77)6.83 (5.39 to 8.48)
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR)

Tumor response was assessed by the investigator using computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. A participant was defined as a responder if they sustained a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) for at least 4 weeks during randomized treatment (confirmed response). Patients with no tumor assessment after the start of study treatment were to be considered as non-responders. The percentage of participants in each best response category is presented.

Time frame:
Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 28 October 2013 (Up to 36.5 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
percentage of participantsErlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mg
Complete Response0.0 (0.0 to 0.0)0.0 (0.0 to 0.0)
Partial Response7.1 (3.6 to 12.4)2.5 (0.7 to 6.3)
Stable Disease33.1 (25.8 to 41.1)34.0 (26.6 to 41.9)
Progressive Disease44.8 (36.8 to 53.0)45.9 (38.0 to 54.0)
Not Evaluable14.9 (9.7 to 21.6)17.6 (12.0 to 24.4)
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR)

Tumor response was assessed by the investigator using computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Disease control rates were measured according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria. A participant was defined as having controlled disease if they sustained a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) for at least 4 weeks during randomized treatment (confirmed response), or Stable Disease (SD) for at least 6 weeks. Patients with no tumor assessment after the start of study treatment were considered as having uncontrolled disease. The percentage of participants with Disease Control is presented.

Time frame:
Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 28 October 2013 (Up to 36.5 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
percentage of participantsErlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mg
Disease Control Rate (DCR)40.3 (32.4 to 48.5)36.5 (29.0 to 44.5)
SecondaryTime to Progression (TTP)

Tumor response was assessed by the investigator using computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria. Time to progression (TTP) in weeks was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression. Participants without event were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment when the patient was known to be progression free.

Time frame:
Randomization to Clinical Cutoff: 28 October 2013 (Up to 36.5 months)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Time to Progression (TTP)
weeksErlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mg
Time to Progression (TTP)9.86 (6.43 to 12.14)9.14 (6.43 to 12.00)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) at the End of the Study

An adverse event was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events. A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. Adverse Events in the following categories are presented: Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, AEs leading to withdrawal from treatment and AEs leading to death.

Time frame:
Randomization to End of Study: 14 October 2010 - 7 February 2014 (Up to 39.8 months)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) at the End of the Study
participantsErlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mg
Adverse Events (AEs)130141
Serious Adverse Events2935
AEs leading to withdrawal1815
AEs leading to death1213
PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) at the End of Study

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of first occurrence of disease progression or death. For target lesions, Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. For non-target lesions, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame:
Randomization to End of Study: 14 October 2010 - 7 February 2014 (Up to 39.8 months)
Reported as:
Median · weeks
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at the End of Study
weeksErlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mg
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at the End of Study6.86 (6.29 to 12.00)7.00 (6.29 to 11.43)
Statistical analysis
  • Erlotinib 150 mg vs Erlotinib 300 mg · Log Rank · p = 0.625 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.06 · 95% CI 0.84 to 1.33
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) at the End of Study

OS defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame:
Randomization to End of Study: 14 October 2010 - 7 February 2014 (Up to 39.8 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS) at the End of Study
monthsErlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mg
Overall Survival (OS) at the End of Study7.00 (5.65 to 8.84)6.90 (5.62 to 8.64)

Adverse events

Collected over Randomization to End of Study: 14 October 2010 - 7 February 2014 (Up to 39.8 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Erlotinib 150 mg—29/154 (18.8%)115/154 (74.7%)
Erlotinib 300 mg—35/158 (22.2%)128/158 (81%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 53
Most frequent serious events
EventErlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mg
PneumoniaInfections and infestations6/1543/158
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/1541/158
Respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/1543/158
General physical health deteriorationGeneral disorders1/1543/158
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/1543/158
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/1541/158
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1542/158
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/1542/158
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/1542/158
Lung infectionInfections and infestations1/1540/158
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent other events
EventErlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mg
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders43/15475/158
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders29/15446/158
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders26/15432/158
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders26/15419/158
FatigueGeneral disorders21/15426/158
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders23/15419/158
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders20/15417/158
Dry skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders13/15417/158
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders8/15416/158
Weight decreasedInvestigations7/15415/158

Baseline characteristics

Intent-to-treat Population included all randomized participants. 2 participants were excluded from analysis: 1 participant randomized in error and 1 participant with missing source data.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Erlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mgTotal
Mean59.7 ± 9.2559.2 ± 9.1459.4 ± 9.18
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Erlotinib 150 mgErlotinib 300 mgTotal
Female343569
Male120124244
08

Study locations

63 sites
  • Beijing, 100071, China
  • Changchun, 130012, China
  • Chengdu, 610041, China
  • Fuzhou, 350014, China
  • Guangzhou, 510030, China
  • Nanjing, 210009, China
  • Nanning, 530021, China
  • Shanghai, 200030, China
  • Shanghai, 200433, China
  • Shenyang, 110001, China
  • Tianjin, 300060, China
  • Wuhan, 430030, China
  • Hillerod, 3400, Denmark
  • København, 2100, Denmark
  • Naestved, 4700, Denmark
  • Roskilde, 4000, Denmark
  • Cairo, 11796, Egypt
  • Cairo, Egypt
  • Caen, 14076, France
  • Limoges, 87042, France
  • Marseille, 13915, France
  • Paris, 75014, France
  • Paris, 75674, France
  • Paris, 75908, France
  • Pontoise, 95300, France
  • Berlin, 13125, Germany
  • Berlin, 14165, Germany
  • Essen, 45122, Germany
  • Gauting, 82131, Germany
  • Grosshansdorf, 22927, Germany
  • Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Hannover, 30659, Germany
  • Immenhausen, 34376, Germany
  • Lostau, 39291, Germany
  • München, 81925, Germany
  • Nürnberg, 90419, Germany
  • Rheine, 48431, Germany
  • Villingen-Schwenningen, 78052, Germany
  • Wuerselen, 52146, Germany
  • Wuppertal, 42283, Germany
  • Amsterdam, 1007 MB, Netherlands
  • Breda, 4818 CK, Netherlands
  • Nieuwegein, 3435 CM, Netherlands
  • Zwolle, 8011 JW, Netherlands
  • Sabadell, Barcelona, Barcelona 08208, Spain
  • Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Barcelona, 08041, Spain
  • Madrid, 28040, Spain
  • Madrid, 28041, Spain
  • Malaga, 29010, Spain
  • Sevilla, 41013, Spain
  • Valencia, 46009, Spain
  • Baden, 5404, Switzerland
  • Basel, 4031, Switzerland
  • Bern, 3011, Switzerland
  • Fribourg, 1708, Switzerland
  • Ankara, 06000, Turkey
  • Ankara, 06200, Turkey
  • Eskisehir, 26480, Turkey
  • Gaziantep, 27310, Turkey
  • Izmir, 35110, Turkey
  • Izmir, 35340, Turkey
  • Konya, 42050, Turkey
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01183858
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2010
Start date
Oct 2010
Primary completion
Oct 2013
Completion
Feb 2014
Results posted
Feb 23, 2015
Last update
Aug 19, 2015

Study contacts

Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion