CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01183637EAGLE PilotUpdated May 25, 2015

Evaluation of an Acellular Osteochondral Graft for Cartilage LEsions Pilot Trial

A Phase 2 interventional study of Kensey Nash Corp. Cartilage Repair Device and Microfracture in Articular Cartilage Injury, sponsored by Kensey Nash Corporation. Terminated at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-25.

Sponsored by Kensey Nash Corporation · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Study enrollment rate was far slower than anticipated. Study was stopped for business purposes.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Kensey Nash Corp. Cartilage Repair Device is a bioresorbable scaffold designed to promote repair of knee cartilage and subchondral bone. Subjects with knee cartilage damage meeting eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to receive treatment with the Cartilage Repair Device or a standard surgical technique called microfracture. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the initial safety and effectiveness of the Cartilage Repair Device compared to microfracture.

Read the detailed description

Damage to articular cartilage in the knee by acute or chronic injury causes pain and limits knee function. If left untreated, damage to the articular cartilage can lead to painful osteoarthritis. The human body has a limited ability to regenerate or adequately repair damage to articular cartilage. There are several surgical techniques available to assist the repair of articular cartilage and improve pain and function. Microfracture is the most commonly used technique for cartilage repair. Microfracture involves the creation of numerous small fractures in the bone with a pick. These small fractures cause the release of multipotential stem cells from the bone marrow creating a clot on the surface. Over time, this clot causes reparative fibrocartilage to form. However, fibrocartilage is less durable and lacks the mechanical properties of normal articular cartilage. The majority of patients treated with microfracture has good results within the first 2 years after microfracture. However, beyond 2 years, functional deterioration is seen in over 50% of patients. Therefore, there is a clinical need for a product that improves surgical outcomes in patients with cartilage damage.

The Kensey Nash Corp. Cartilage Repair Device is a two layer, bioresorbable implant. The top layer consists of collagen fibers like those found in normal cartilage. The collagen layer is about as thick as the cartilage in human knees. The bottom layer of the Cartilage Repair Device mainly consists of a calcium mineral naturally found in human bones. The mineral is held within a biodegradable polymer material. The device has a highly porous structure that allows the blood, stem cells and joint fluid to infiltrate the device during the healing process. Over time, the top layer is designed to be replaced by cartilage and the bottom layer is designed to be replaced by bone.

Both microfracture and the Cartilage Repair Device are expected to reduce knee pain and increase knee function in a majority of patients during the first 2 years post-operative. However, if the Cartilage Repair Device produces better and more durable cartilage than the microfracture technique, those patients treated with the Cartilage Repair Device may have a better long term outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Articular Cartilage Injury

Keywords

  • Cartilage
  • Knee
  • Osteochondral
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kensey Nash Corporation is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 21 years old and skeletally mature
  • KOOS Pain subscale score is less than 65 (i.e. moderate pain)
  • KOOS Activities of Daily Living score is less than 70 (i.e. moderate functional limitations)
  • ICRS grade 3 or 4 cartilage lesion on the medial femoral condyle, lateral femoral condyle or trochlea measuring less than or equal to 15mm in diameter
  • Stable meniscus with greater than 50% remaining bilaterally
  • Mental capacity and willingness to comply with the post-operative rehabilitation plan and follow-up evaluations
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index greater than 35
  • Contraindication for MRI
  • Previous microfracture, autograft implantation, allograft implantation or autologous chondrocyte implantation procedure on the damaged cartilage surface
  • Knee ligament surgery within the past 6 months
  • Clinically significant knee malalignment
  • Osteoarthritis in the knee
  • Multiple cartilage lesions
  • Inflammatory arthropathy (i.e. rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus or active gout)
  • Active infection in either lower limb
  • Hyaluronic acid or cortisone injections within the past 3 months
  • History of substance abuse
  • Current participation in a study of an investigational product for a similar purpose
  • Active litigation for the knee injury
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment

    Patients assigned to the treatment arm will receive treatment with the Kensey Nash Corp. Cartilage Repair Device.

    Device: Kensey Nash Corp. Cartilage Repair Device

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Patients assigned to the Control Arm will receive treatment with the standard surgical technique known as microfracture.

    Procedure: Microfracture

Interventions

  • DeviceKensey Nash Corp. Cartilage Repair Device

    To perform the Cartilage Repair Device implantation procedure, the surgeon first removes the damaged cartilage. Then, the surgeon creates a cylindrical hole in the bone below the area of damaged cartilage. The Cartilage Repair Device is then implanted into the hole so that the surface is level with the surrounding native cartilage. The Cartilage Repair Device will then absorb blood and bone marrow from the bone to begin the healing process.

  • ProcedureMicrofracture

    To perform the microfracture technique, the surgeon will first remove the damaged cartilage. Then, the surgeon will make a number of small fractures in the bone below the area of damaged cartilage. The fractures cause the bone to bleed and a clot to form over the exposed bone. Over time, the clot forms a layer of fibrocartilage over the bone.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Success

    Improvement in pain, function, and cartilage defect appearance without any treatment related serious adverse events.

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritic Outcome Score ("KOOS")

    Clinically significant improvement in the KOOS Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Symptoms, Sports \& Recreation and Quality of Life subscale scores

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Cartilage defect appearance on MRI

    Cartilage defect filling, repair cartilage integration with surrounding native cartilage and presence of bony overgrowth will be assessed.

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Lyshom Score

    Clinical significant improvement in the Lysolm Knee Scale score

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Peninsula Orthopedic Associates
    Salisbury, Maryland 21804, United States
  • U.S. Center for Sports Medicine
    Kirkwood, Missouri 63122, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 25, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01183637
Lead sponsor
Kensey Nash Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 17, 2010
Start date
Jun 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
May 2014
Last update
May 25, 2015

Study contacts

Richard C Lehman, M.D.
principal investigator · U.S. Center for Sports Medicine, Kirkwood, MO
Phillip A Davidson, M.D.
principal investigator · Heiden - Davidson Orthopedics, Park City, UT

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion