CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01170663RAINBOWUpdated Sep 18, 2019Results posted

A Study of Paclitaxel With or Without Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) in Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) DP and Placebo in Gastric Cancer, sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company. Completed at 167 sites in 26 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-18.

Sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
665
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase III randomized multicenter double-blind, placebo controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) drug product (DP) compared to paclitaxel plus placebo.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to determine if paclitaxel given together with ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) as second line therapy will prolong overall survival (OS) compared to paclitaxel alone.

Approximately 663 participants (at least 18 years) in approximately 200 study centers and in approximately 30 countries will be randomized with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Participants must have received at least one cycle of first line therapy with any platinum/fluoropyrimidine doublet with or without anthracycline (epirubicin or doxorubicin) and must have discontinued this therapy prior to study entry due to disease progression.

Upon registration and completion of screening procedure and reviewing the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria eligible participants will be randomized to receive either paclitaxel plus ramucirumab or paclitaxel plus placebo.

Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) DP/placebo will be administered IV on Days 1 and 15, paclitaxel will be administered IV on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 4 weekly cycle.

Participants will be continuously treated and monitored until radiographic or symptomatic progression of disease, toxicity requiring cessation, protocol noncompliance, or withdrawal of consent.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Metastatic Adenocarcinoma
  • Gastric Adenocarcinoma
  • Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
03

In context

Adenocarcinoma

2,004 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenocarcinoma; 375 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 665 is above the median of 45 across 1,553 interventional studies indexed under Adenocarcinoma.

Browse Adenocarcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Eli Lilly and Company is the lead sponsor of 2,048 studies on the registry; 140 are open to participants now.

Of its 521 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 341 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent
  • histologically or cytologically confirmed gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
  • Metastatic disease or locally advanced, unresectable disease
  • Disease progression during or within 4 months after the last dose of the first-line therapy (platinum/fluoropyrimidine doublet with or without anthracycline)
  • Organs are functioning well (liver, kidney, blood)
  • Good performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) 0 to 1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • First line chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer other than platinum/fluoropyrimidine doublet with or without anthracycline
  • Previous systemic therapy with other anti-angiogenic drugs
  • Uncontrolled high blood pressure
  • Symptomatic or poorly controlled heart disease or had a heart attack or stroke within the last 6 month
  • Evidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis at baseline
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
665 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Drug Product (DP) and Paclitaxel

    Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) DP and Paclitaxel

    Biological: Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) DP · Drug: Paclitaxel

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo and Paclitaxel

    Placebo and Paclitaxel

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Paclitaxel

Interventions

  • BiologicalRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) DP

    8 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Days 1 and 15 of every 4-week cycle

    Also known as: LY3009806, IMC-1211B

  • DrugPlacebo

    Ramucirumab placebo IV infusion on Days 1 and 15 of every 4-week cycle

  • DrugPaclitaxel

    Paclitaxel 80 milligrams per square meter (mg/m²) IV infusion on Days 1, 8, and 15 of every 4-week cycle

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival Time (OS)

    OS time was measured from date of randomization to date of death from any cause. Participants who were not known to have died on or before the date of data cut-off, OS data was censored on the last date (on or before the cut-off date) the participant was known to be alive.

    Time frame: Randomization up to 27.5 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was measured from date of randomization to first radiographically documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. PD defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 (RECIST v1.1) as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Participants who had no baseline or post baseline radiological tumor assessment were censored at date of randomization. Participants who had no tumor progression or death within 2 scan intervals following the last assessment were censored at the date of last radiographic tumor assessment. Participants who began new anticancer treatment and had no tumor progression were censored at date of assessment prior to initiation of new therapy. Participants lost to follow-up or withdrew consent were censored at the date of their last assessment.

    Time frame: Randomization up to 22.2 months

  2. Time to Progressive Disease (TTP)

    TTP was defined as the time from randomization until date of radiographic progression using RECIST v1.1 criteria. PD was defined as having a ≥20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions and at minimum 5 millimeters (mm) increase above nadir. Participants who did not progress or were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of last tumor assessment. Participants who had no baseline tumor assessment or no post baseline assessment and no death reported with 2 scan intervals post randomization were censored at date of randomization. Participants with no progression and not died within 2 scan intervals after last assessment were censored at date of last tumor assessment. Participants with no post baseline assessment or tumor progression but death reported within 2 scan intervals after randomization were censored at date of death.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 22.2 months

  3. Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD) or PD

    BOR was defined as the best response across all time points from randomization until radiologically confirmed PD using RECIST, v1.1 criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm and normalization of tumor marker level of non-target lesions. PR was defined as having a ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions. PD was defined as having a ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions and ≥5 mm increase above nadir. SD was defined as small changes that did not meet above criteria.

    Time frame: Randomization up to 22.2 months

  4. Percentage of Participants With CR or PR (Objective Response Rate [ORR])

    ORR was the percentage of participants who had CR or PR defined using RECIST v1.1 criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm and normalization of tumor marker level of non-target lesions. PR was defined as having a ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions. Percentage of participants calculated as: (number of participants with CR + PR)/(total number of participants)\*100.

    Time frame: Randomization up to 22.2 months

  5. Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ramucirumab Antibodies (Serum Anti-Ramucirumab Antibody Assessment )(Immunogenicity)

    Participants who developed treatment-emergent antibody responses to Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) after baseline.

    Time frame: Prior to and after ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) infusion: Day 1 Cycles 1, 2 and 3 (28-day cycles) Doses 1, 4, 7 and 30-37 days after last dose of study therapy up to 103 weeks

  6. Maximum Concentration (Cmax) After First Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion

    Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 1, 1 hour post end of infusion (28-day cycles)

  7. Cmax After 4th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion

    Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 15 1 hour post end of infusion (28-day cycles)

  8. Cmax After 7th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion

    Time frame: Cycle 4, Day 1, 1 hour post end of infusion (28-day cycles)

  9. Minimum Concentration (Cmin) Prior to First Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion

    This outcome measure was included in error as the time point was before ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) was administered. Cmin was not analyzed.

    Time frame: Cycle 1, Day 1 predose (28-day cycles)

  10. Cmin Prior to 4th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion

    Time frame: Cycle 2, Day 15 (28-day cycle)

  11. Cmin Prior to 7th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion

    Time frame: Cycle 4, Day 1 (28-day cycles)

  12. Change From Baseline to End of Therapy in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life: Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in Global Health Status

    EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a 30-item, self-administered questionnaire with multidimensional scales assessing 15 domains (5 functional domains \[physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social\], 9 symptom scales \[fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation and diarrhea, and financial difficulties\] and global health status scale). 28 questions assessed on a 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) scale and the remaining 2 questions used a 1 (poor) to 7 (excellent) scale. A linear transformation was applied to standardize the raw scores to range between 0 and 100 per developer guidelines. For the functional domains and global health status scale, higher scores represent a better level of functioning. For symptoms scales, higher scores represented a greater degree of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of therapy (up to 103 weeks)

  13. Change From Baseline to End of Therapy in European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EuroQol EQ-5D) Index Score

    The EQ-5D is a generic, multidimensional, health status instrument. The profile allowed participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood using a 3-level scale \[1 (no problem), 2 (some problems), and 3 (major problems)\]. These combinations of responses were converted into a weighted health-state Index Score according to the United Kingdom (UK) population-based algorithm. The possible values for the Index Score ranged from -0.59 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in any dimension). A negative change indicated a worsening of the participant's health status.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of therapy (up to 103 weeks)

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Serious and Other Non-serious Adverse Events (AE) and Who Died

    Participants who died or who had clinically significant events defined as serious AEs (SAEs) and other non-serious AEs (regardless of causality). A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

    Time frame: Baseline up to 103 weeks and within 30 days of last dose of study drug

07

Results

Posted Jul 31, 2014
Limitations and caveats
One (1) participant was randomized to the placebo/paclitaxel group but received ramucirumab in error. For ITT population this participant was included in placebo/paclitaxel group and for the Safety population included in the ramucirumab group.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus Paclitaxel
Started330335
Received any treatment (safety pop)327329
Completed316315
Not completed1420
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up39
Withdrew: Withdrawal of consent without follow-up1111

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Survival Time (OS)

OS time was measured from date of randomization to date of death from any cause. Participants who were not known to have died on or before the date of data cut-off, OS data was censored on the last date (on or before the cut-off date) the participant was known to be alive.

Time frame:
Randomization up to 27.5 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival Time (OS)
monthsRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus Paclitaxel
Overall Survival Time (OS)9.6 (8.5 to 10.8)7.4 (6.3 to 8.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus Paclitaxel vs Placebo Plus Paclitaxel · Stratified Log Rank Test · p = 0.0169 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.807 · 95% CI 0.678 to 0.962Adjusted for stratification factors: geographic region, time-to-progression from start of first-line therapy and disease measurability.
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was measured from date of randomization to first radiographically documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause. PD defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 (RECIST v1.1) as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Participants who had no baseline or post baseline radiological tumor assessment were censored at date of randomization. Participants who had no tumor progression or death within 2 scan intervals following the last assessment were censored at the date of last radiographic tumor assessment. Participants who began new anticancer treatment and had no tumor progression were censored at date of assessment prior to initiation of new therapy. Participants lost to follow-up or withdrew consent were censored at the date of their last assessment.

Time frame:
Randomization up to 22.2 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
monthsRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus Paclitaxel
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)4.4 (4.2 to 5.3)2.9 (2.8 to 3.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus Paclitaxel vs Placebo Plus Paclitaxel · Stratified Log Rank Test · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.635 · 95% CI 0.536 to 0.752Adjusted for stratification factors: geographic region, time-to-progression from start of first-line therapy and disease measurability.
SecondaryTime to Progressive Disease (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from randomization until date of radiographic progression using RECIST v1.1 criteria. PD was defined as having a ≥20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions and at minimum 5 millimeters (mm) increase above nadir. Participants who did not progress or were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of last tumor assessment. Participants who had no baseline tumor assessment or no post baseline assessment and no death reported with 2 scan intervals post randomization were censored at date of randomization. Participants with no progression and not died within 2 scan intervals after last assessment were censored at date of last tumor assessment. Participants with no post baseline assessment or tumor progression but death reported within 2 scan intervals after randomization were censored at date of death.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 22.2 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Progressive Disease (TTP)
monthsRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus Paclitaxel
Time to Progressive Disease (TTP)5.52 (4.50 to 5.68)3.02 (2.86 to 4.14)
Statistical analysis
  • Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus Paclitaxel vs Placebo Plus Paclitaxel · Stratified Log Rank Test · p = <0.0001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.596 · 95% CI 0.494 to 0.720Adjusted for stratification factors: geographic region, time-to-progression from start of first-line therapy and disease measurability.
SecondaryBest Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD) or PD

BOR was defined as the best response across all time points from randomization until radiologically confirmed PD using RECIST, v1.1 criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm and normalization of tumor marker level of non-target lesions. PR was defined as having a ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions. PD was defined as having a ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions and ≥5 mm increase above nadir. SD was defined as small changes that did not meet above criteria.

Time frame:
Randomization up to 22.2 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD) or PD
percentage of participantsRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus Paclitaxel
CR0.60.3
PR27.315.8
SD52.147.5
PD13.024.8
Not Evaluable0.30.9
No Tumor Response Evaluation6.710.7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With CR or PR (Objective Response Rate [ORR])

ORR was the percentage of participants who had CR or PR defined using RECIST v1.1 criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm and normalization of tumor marker level of non-target lesions. PR was defined as having a ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions. Percentage of participants calculated as: (number of participants with CR + PR)/(total number of participants)\*100.

Time frame:
Randomization up to 22.2 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With CR or PR (Objective Response Rate [ORR])
percentage of participantsRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus Paclitaxel
Percentage of Participants With CR or PR (Objective Response Rate [ORR])27.9 (23.3 to 33.0)16.1 (12.6 to 20.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus Paclitaxel vs Placebo Plus Paclitaxel · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 2.14 · 95% CI 1.45 to 3.16Adjusted for stratification factors: geographic region, time-to-progression from the start of first-line therapy and disease measurability.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Anti-Ramucirumab Antibodies (Serum Anti-Ramucirumab Antibody Assessment )(Immunogenicity)

Participants who developed treatment-emergent antibody responses to Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) after baseline.

Time frame:
Prior to and after ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) infusion: Day 1 Cycles 1, 2 and 3 (28-day cycles) Doses 1, 4, 7 and 30-37 days after last dose of study therapy up to 103 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ramucirumab Antibodies (Serum Anti-Ramucirumab Antibody Assessment )(Immunogenicity)
percentage of participantsRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus Paclitaxel
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ramucirumab Antibodies (Serum Anti-Ramucirumab Antibody Assessment )(Immunogenicity)1.60.3
SecondaryMaximum Concentration (Cmax) After First Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion
Time frame:
Cycle 1, Day 1, 1 hour post end of infusion (28-day cycles)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) After First Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion
micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL)Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus Paclitaxel
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) After First Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion146 ± 28
SecondaryCmax After 4th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion
Time frame:
Cycle 2, Day 15 1 hour post end of infusion (28-day cycles)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · µg/mL
Cmax After 4th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion
µg/mLRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus Paclitaxel
Cmax After 4th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion193 ± 34
SecondaryCmax After 7th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion
Time frame:
Cycle 4, Day 1, 1 hour post end of infusion (28-day cycles)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · µg/mL
Cmax After 7th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion
µg/mLRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus Paclitaxel
Cmax After 7th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion216 ± 30
SecondaryMinimum Concentration (Cmin) Prior to First Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion

This outcome measure was included in error as the time point was before ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) was administered. Cmin was not analyzed.

Time frame:
Cycle 1, Day 1 predose (28-day cycles)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryCmin Prior to 4th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion
Time frame:
Cycle 2, Day 15 (28-day cycle)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · µg/mL
Cmin Prior to 4th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion
µg/mLRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus Paclitaxel
Cmin Prior to 4th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion45.0 ± 50
SecondaryCmin Prior to 7th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion
Time frame:
Cycle 4, Day 1 (28-day cycles)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · µg/mL
Cmin Prior to 7th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion
µg/mLRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus Paclitaxel
Cmin Prior to 7th Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Infusion62.8 ± 47
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Therapy in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life: Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in Global Health Status

EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a 30-item, self-administered questionnaire with multidimensional scales assessing 15 domains (5 functional domains \[physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social\], 9 symptom scales \[fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation and diarrhea, and financial difficulties\] and global health status scale). 28 questions assessed on a 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) scale and the remaining 2 questions used a 1 (poor) to 7 (excellent) scale. A linear transformation was applied to standardize the raw scores to range between 0 and 100 per developer guidelines. For the functional domains and global health status scale, higher scores represent a better level of functioning. For symptoms scales, higher scores represented a greater degree of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline, end of therapy (up to 103 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Therapy in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life: Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in Global Health Status
units on a scaleRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus Paclitaxel
Change From Baseline to End of Therapy in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life: Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in Global Health Status-13.5 ± 23.24-12.1 ± 24.81
Statistical analysis
  • Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus Paclitaxel vs Placebo Plus Paclitaxel · ANCOVA · p = 0.3973 (Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) included treatment group, randomization stratification factors and baseline value of Global Health Status scale.)
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Therapy in European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EuroQol EQ-5D) Index Score

The EQ-5D is a generic, multidimensional, health status instrument. The profile allowed participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood using a 3-level scale \[1 (no problem), 2 (some problems), and 3 (major problems)\]. These combinations of responses were converted into a weighted health-state Index Score according to the United Kingdom (UK) population-based algorithm. The possible values for the Index Score ranged from -0.59 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in any dimension). A negative change indicated a worsening of the participant's health status.

Time frame:
Baseline, end of therapy (up to 103 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Therapy in European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EuroQol EQ-5D) Index Score
units on a scaleRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus Paclitaxel
Change From Baseline to End of Therapy in European Quality of Life Questionnaire-5 Dimension (EuroQol EQ-5D) Index Score-0.16 ± 0.279-0.19 ± 0.337
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Serious and Other Non-serious Adverse Events (AE) and Who Died

Participants who died or who had clinically significant events defined as serious AEs (SAEs) and other non-serious AEs (regardless of causality). A summary of SAEs and other non-serious AEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame:
Baseline up to 103 weeks and within 30 days of last dose of study drug
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Serious and Other Non-serious Adverse Events (AE) and Who Died
participantsRamucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus Paclitaxel
SAEs161146
Other Non-serious AEs324321
Died3752

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ramucirumab and Paclitaxel—161/327 (49.2%)324/327 (99.1%)
Placebo and Paclitaxel—146/329 (44.4%)321/329 (97.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 184
Most frequent serious events
EventRamucirumab and PaclitaxelPlacebo and Paclitaxel
Malignant neoplasm progressionNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)48/32749/329
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders12/3274/329
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders10/32711/329
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders7/32710/329
General physical health deteriorationGeneral disorders8/3279/329
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders8/3277/329
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders8/3275/329
PyrexiaGeneral disorders8/3277/329
FatigueGeneral disorders5/3277/329
Intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders6/3273/329
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 49
Most frequent other events
EventRamucirumab and PaclitaxelPlacebo and Paclitaxel
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders174/327102/329
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders131/327105/329
FatigueGeneral disorders128/327104/329
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders107/327127/329
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders110/327116/329
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders114/327106/329
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders111/32769/329
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders105/32776/329
EpistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders100/32723/329
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders98/32762/329

Baseline characteristics

All randomized participants.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus PaclitaxelTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years205213418
>=65 years125122247
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus PaclitaxelTotal
Median61 (25 to 83)61 (24 to 84)61 (24 to 84)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus PaclitaxelTotal
Female10192193
Male229243472
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus PaclitaxelTotal
Hispanic or Latino312657
Not Hispanic or Latino299309608
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus PaclitaxelTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian110121231
Black or African American6612
White208199407
More than one race011
Other6713
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Ramucirumab (IMC-1211B) Plus PaclitaxelPlacebo Plus PaclitaxelTotal
Portugal202
United States121224
Estonia5510
Taiwan141630
Spain81321
Russia81321
Chile134
Italy131528
France201434
Australia182341
South Korea232245
Lithuania6612
Austria426
United Kingdom6915
Hungary20929
Mexico224
Argentina101
Poland151833
Brazil191635
Belgium121426
Singapore235
Romania7714
Bulgaria7512
Germany202040
Japan6872140
Hong Kong213
Israel151530
08

Study locations

167 sites
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Burbank, California 91505, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Jacksonville, Florida 32207, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Miramar, Florida 33027, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    East Orange, New Jersey 07018, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37404, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Buenos Aires, C1019ABS, Argentina
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Caba, C1050AAK, Argentina
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Rosario, 2000, Argentina
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Santa Fe, 3000, Argentina
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Bankstown, New South Wales 2200, Australia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Kogarah, New South Wales 2217, Australia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Liverpool, New South Wales 2170, Australia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Wollongong, New South Wales 2500, Australia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Southport, Queensland 4215, Australia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Kurralta Park, South Australia 5037, Australia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Coburg, Victoria 3058, Australia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Footscray, Victoria 3011, Australia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Graz, 8036, Austria
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Linz, A-4010, Austria
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Steyr, 4400, Austria
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Vienna, 1100, Austria
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Bonheiden, 2820, Belgium
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Brugge, 8310, Belgium
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Brussels, 1000, Belgium
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Brussels, 1070, Belgium
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Edegem, 2650, Belgium
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Belo Horizonte, 30130-100, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Belo Horizonte, 30150-281, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Caxias Do Sul, 95070560, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Dois Lajeados, 95900-000, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Gavea, 22451-010, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Ijui, 98700 000, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Itajai, 88301-170, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Londrina, 86050-190, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Passo Fundo, 99010-260, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Porto Alegre-Rs, 90020090, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Porto Alegre, 90035-903, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Ribeirão Preto, 14015-130, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Rio De Janeiro, 20231-050, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Salvador, 41820-021, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Sao Jose Rio Preto, 15090-000, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Sorocaba, 18031-000, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    São Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    São Paulo, 04122-000, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    São Paulo, Brazil
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Sofia, 1756, Bulgaria
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Varna, 9000, Bulgaria
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Providencia, Chile
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Vina Del Mar, Chile
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Tallinn, 10138, Estonia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Tallinn, 13419, Estonia
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Besancon, 25030, France
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Brest, 29609, France
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Marseille, 13385, France
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Montbeliard, 25200, France
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Montpellier, 34298, France
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Paris, 75013, France
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Paris, 75015, France
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Paris, 75475, France
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Saint-Etienne, 42055, France
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Bielefeld, 33611, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Essen, 45136, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Frankfurt, 60596, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Hamburg, 22087, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Heidelberg, 69115, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Mainz, 55131, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Munich, 81737, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Recklinghausen, 45657, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Tuebingen, 72076, Germany
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Budapest, 1125, Hungary
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Gyula, 5700, Hungary
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Kaposvar, 7400, Hungary
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Pecs, 7624, Hungary
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Szekesfehervar, 8000, Hungary
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Beer Sheva, 84101, Israel
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Haifa, 31096, Israel
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Holon, 58100, Israel
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Petah Tikva, 49100, Israel
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Tel Hashomer, 52661, Israel
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Tel-Aviv, 64239, Israel
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Ancona, 60100, Italy
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Bari, 70126, Italy
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Bergamo, 24125, Italy
  • ImClone Investigational Site
    Catania, 95122, Italy

Showing the first 100 of 167 sites across 26 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mitani S, Chen Y, Inoue K, Mori J, Gao L, Long A, Wakabayashi S. Clinical Impact of a Shortened Infusion Duration of Ramucirumab in Japanese Patients -A Model-Based Approach. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2021 Nov;48(11):1381-1387. PubMed 34795131 ↗
  • Yamaguchi K, Shimada Y, Hironaka S, Sugimoto N, Komatsu Y, Nishina T, Omuro Y, Tamura T, Piao Y, Homma G, Jen MH, Liepa AM, Muro K. Quality of Life Associated with Ramucirumab Treatment in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer in Japan: Exploratory Analysis from the Phase III RAINBOW Trial. Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Jan;41(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00979-3. Epub 2020 Dec 23. PubMed 33355909 ↗
  • Cascinu S, Bodoky G, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, Oh SC, Folprecht G, Ananda S, Girotto G, Wainberg ZA, Miron MLL, Ajani J, Wei R, Liepa AM, Carlesi R, Emig M, Ohtsu A. Tumor Response and Symptom Palliation from RAINBOW, a Phase III Trial of Ramucirumab Plus Paclitaxel in Previously Treated Advanced Gastric Cancer. Oncologist. 2021 Mar;26(3):e414-e424. doi: 10.1002/onco.13623. Epub 2020 Dec 23. PubMed 33274542 ↗
  • De Vita F, Borg C, Farina G, Geva R, Carton I, Cuku H, Wei R, Muro K. Ramucirumab and paclitaxel in patients with gastric cancer and prior trastuzumab: subgroup analysis from RAINBOW study. Future Oncol. 2019 Aug;15(23):2723-2731. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0243. Epub 2019 Jun 25. Erratum In: Future Oncol. 2021 Sep;17(25):3409. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0243c1. PubMed 31234645 ↗
  • Chau I, Fuchs CS, Ohtsu A, Barzi A, Liepa AM, Cui ZL, Hsu Y, Al-Batran SE. Association of quality of life with disease characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with advanced gastric cancer: Exploratory analysis of RAINBOW and REGARD phase III trials. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;107:115-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Dec 14. PubMed 30557792 ↗
  • Tabernero J, Ohtsu A, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, Oh SC, Bodoky G, Shimada Y, Hironaka S, Ajani JA, Tomasek J, Safran H, Chandrawansa K, Hsu Y, Heathman M, Khan A, Ni L, Melemed AS, Gao L, Ferry D, Fuchs CS. Exposure-Response Analyses of Ramucirumab from Two Randomized, Phase III Trials of Second-line Treatment for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 Oct;16(10):2215-2222. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0895. Epub 2017 Jul 17. PubMed 28716815 ↗
  • Al-Batran SE, Van Cutsem E, Oh SC, Bodoky G, Shimada Y, Hironaka S, Sugimoto N, Lipatov ON, Kim TY, Cunningham D, Rougier P, Muro K, Liepa AM, Chandrawansa K, Emig M, Ohtsu A, Wilke H. Quality-of-life and performance status results from the phase III RAINBOW study of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2016 Apr;27(4):673-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv625. Epub 2016 Jan 7. PubMed 26747859 ↗
  • Shitara K, Muro K, Shimada Y, Hironaka S, Sugimoto N, Komatsu Y, Nishina T, Yamaguchi K, Segawa Y, Omuro Y, Tamura T, Doi T, Yukisawa S, Yasui H, Nagashima F, Gotoh M, Esaki T, Emig M, Chandrawansa K, Liepa AM, Wilke H, Ichimiya Y, Ohtsu A. Subgroup analyses of the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab in Japanese and Western patients in RAINBOW: a randomized clinical trial in second-line treatment of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jul;19(3):927-38. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0559-z. Epub 2015 Oct 28. PubMed 26510663 ↗
  • Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, Oh SC, Bodoky G, Shimada Y, Hironaka S, Sugimoto N, Lipatov O, Kim TY, Cunningham D, Rougier P, Komatsu Y, Ajani J, Emig M, Carlesi R, Ferry D, Chandrawansa K, Schwartz JD, Ohtsu A; RAINBOW Study Group. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1224-35. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70420-6. Epub 2014 Sep 17. PubMed 25240821 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01170663
Lead sponsor
Eli Lilly and Company
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 27, 2010
Start date
Dec 2010
Primary completion
Jul 2013
Completion
Feb 2017
Results posted
Jul 31, 2014
Last update
Sep 18, 2019

Study contacts

Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)
study director · Eli Lilly and Company

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion