ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01152333Updated Jun 19, 2015

The Role of GLP-1 in Satiety Perception in Humans

An interventional study of Exendin-(9-39) Acetate and Saline 0.9% in Appetite Regulation and Obesity, sponsored by University of Washington. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 29 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-06-19.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Why this study was withdrawn
This study is delayed. It was not funded.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 29 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Scientists have discovered a number of hormones that control our feelings of hunger and fullness. One particular hormone, called GLP-1, has been associated with feelings of hunger and fullness. The overall purpose of this study is to look more closely at how GLP-1 changes these feelings and to observe how these hormones affect the brain's function. To do this, volunteers will be asked to come to the clinic for a screening visit, and 2 study visits. This is an outpatient study with a screening visit which will last about an hour and the two subsequent study visits for about 3 hours each. During the study, patients will receive a drug that blocks the effect of a hormone made in the gut. We will take a series of blood samples to measure hormones and use functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to take pictures of the brain. Understanding the action of these hormones in the brain may eventually lead to new ways to help people avoid obesity or lose weight.

Read the detailed description

Many times each day, we see food or representations of food and evaluate whether or not the food looks good to us. If it does, we then balance external factors, such as the social situation or time of day, against internal signals about our hunger state in order to decide what and when to eat. However, recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies suggest that internal signals, such as hormones regulating appetite and satiety, govern our food intake in part by acting on neural circuits to affect whether a given food appears appetizing at that moment. In addition, photographs of food perceived to be "fattening" activate brain regions involved in appetite and reward processing, including the hypothalamus, nucleus accumbens, and orbital frontal cortex. This activity is potently reduced by food intake, suggesting that it reflects underlying brain mechanisms involved in satiety. We now propose to study the mechanism of these changes in brain activity by asking if they are directly related to the action of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), a satiety signal. GLP-1 is released by cells in the gut in response to nutrients, suppressing food intake, and its actions can be blocked by a GLP-1 receptor antagonist, exendin-[9-39]. In 2 randomized, controlled, crossover studies, we will assess whether exendin-[9-39] infusions reverse GLP-1-mediated effects on food intake and on brain response to visual food cues. Our scientific aims are to 1) observe the effect of exendin (9-39) on blocking GLP-1-mediated satiety in humans and assess its effect on food intake in humans for the first time (to our knowledge) and 2) to test whether endogenous GLP-1 signaling is required for the effect of a meal to reduce brain response to visual food cues in humans. We hypothesize that exendin-[9-39] will diminish the effect of a meal in suppressing subsequent food intake and in reducing activation to visual food cues in reward pathways. Determining the extent to which the experience of satiety arises from a decrease in the reward value of food is fundamentally important to understanding human feeding behavior. In addition, this promising line of research is directly relevant to some of the most pressing public health issues of our time: obesity and overnutrition. We hope that investigating mechanisms affecting our perception of satiety at the most basic level will eventually result in novel behavioral or pharmacologic strategies for obesity prevention and treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Appetite Regulation
  • Obesity

Browse trials for

03

In context

Obesity

6,570 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,718 are open to participants now.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,431 studies on the registry; 226 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 29 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female between 18-29 years of age
  2. BMI between 18.5-24.9 kg/m2
  3. Written informed consent obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic health conditions, including diabetes and kidney disease.
  2. Current dieting for weight loss or restrained eating
  3. History of obesity, eating disorders, or weight loss surgery
  4. Random blood glucose >140
  5. Pregnancy or use of oral contraceptives
  6. Current smoker
  7. Recreational drug use or alcohol use of > 1 drink per day for females, > 2 per day for males
  8. Food allergy or intolerance to study foods.
  9. Medications known to alter appetite (e.g., amphetamines, atypical antipsychotics) or gastric emptying (e.g., metoclopromide)
  10. Contraindications to MRI, such as implanted metal or claustrophobia.
  11. Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Exendin (9-39) Acetate

    Exendin (9-39) is a synthetic peptide that acts as an antagonist to the GLP-1 receptor. Exendin (9-39) will be diluted in saline 0.9% and administered through IV infusion once for a maximum of 2.5 hours in length at 600-750 pM/kg/min.

    Drug: Exendin-(9-39) Acetate

  • Placebo comparator
    Saline

    Saline 0.9% will be used as the control infusion.

    Drug: Saline 0.9%

Interventions

  • DrugExendin-(9-39) Acetate

    Exendin (9-39) will be diluted in saline 0.9% and administered through IV infusion once for a maximum of 2.5 hours in length.

  • DrugSaline 0.9%

    Saline will be administered through IV infusion once for a maximum of 2.5 hours in length

    Also known as: Sodium chloride (NaCl)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Study 1 - Amount of food eaten at a lunch buffet

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Study 2 - BOLD response as measured by fMRI during viewing of food photographs

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Study 1 - Patient-reported appetite and appeal ratings

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Study 2 - Amount of food eaten at a lunch buffet and self-reported appetite ratings

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Washington
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Melhorn SJ, Tyagi V, Smeraglio A, Roth CL, Schur EA. Initial evidence that GLP-1 receptor blockade fails to suppress postprandial satiety or promote food intake in humans. Appetite. 2014 Nov;82:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 15. PubMed 25049134 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2010, a primary completion of Jul 2016 and a completion of Jul 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 15, 2010
First posted
Jun 29, 2010
Start
Jul 2010
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2016
CompletionEst.
Jul 2016
Last update
Jun 19, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 19, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01152333
Responsible party
Ellen Schur, MD, MS (Ellen A Schur, MD, MS, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 29, 2010
Start date
Jul 2010
Primary completion
Jul 2016 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 19, 2015

Study contacts

Ellen A Schur, M.D., M.S.
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jun 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion