CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01150760Updated Aug 7, 2015Results posted

Clinical Outcomes After Bowel Resection in Patients Receiving Alvimopan Versus Patients Not Receiving Alvimopan in the Premier Perspective Database

An observational study in Ileus, sponsored by Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-08-07.

Sponsored by Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
7,050
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Alvimopan is the first and currently the only FDA-approved therapy for acceleration of the time to upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) recovery following partial large or small bowel resection surgery with primary anastomosis.

The primary objective of this retrospective observational trial is to assess postoperative morbidity and mortality as reported during the index hospitalization for bowel resection and 15/30-day readmissions of alvimopan vs. non-alvimopan matched patients in the combined Premier/Care Science database(a large medical claims database).

02

Conditions studied

  • Ileus

Keywords

  • GI recovery after bowel resection
  • morbidity after bowel resection
  • mortality
  • readmission
  • length of stay
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA) is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Retrospective cohort study using the medical claims Premier/Care Science database. The study time frame was from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years at discharge
  • Medical claim with an ICD-9-CM procedure code for a primary procedure (identified at position 1 or 2 involving large or small segmental bowel resection with primary anastomosis
  • Discharged within the study dates
  • Surgery at a participating Premier/Care Sciences hospital

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Had a diverting ostomy without a primary anastomosis during the index hospitalization
  • Had a trauma diagnosis
  • Had bowel resections performed on more than 1 day during index hospitalization (this includes cases where a bowel resection and intestinal anastomosis were performed on different days during the index hospitalization)
  • Had an excluded non-bowel resection surgical code (i.e., code for a major non-BR surgical procedure [eg., nephroureterectomy, total joint replacement] in position 1 or 2
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
7,050 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Alvimopan Users

    Drug: Alvimopan

  • Matched controls

Interventions

  • DrugAlvimopan

    At least 1 dose of alvimopan 12 mg during the hospitalization for bowel resection

    Also known as: Entereg

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Who Died

    All-cause

    Time frame: Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection

  2. Percentage of Patients With Reported In-hospital Postoperative Gastrointestinal (GI) Morbidity

    GI morbidity will be identified using International Classification of Disease 9th Edition Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis and procedure codes for paralytic ileus, flatulence, eructation, gas pain, insertion of a nasogastric tube, total parenteral nutrition, peripheral parenteral nutrition, digestive symptom complications, diarrhea following GI surgery, intestinal obstruction, abdominal pain, peritoneal adhesions, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, parenteral infusion of concentrated nutritional substances, or enteral infusion of concentrated nutritional substances.

    Time frame: Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection

  3. Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Cardiovascular Morbidity

    Cardiovascular morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for myocardial infarction; other ischemic events; congestive heart failure and shock; arrhythmias; or other cardiovascular events (cardiac complications, peripheral vascular complications).

    Time frame: Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection

  4. Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Cerebrovascular Morbidity

    Cerebrovascular morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for ischemic, thrombotic, embolic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accidents; acute but ill-defined cerebrovascular disease; transient cerebral ischemia; syncope; or postoperative cerebrovascular accident.

    Time frame: Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection

  5. Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Pulmonary Morbidity

    Pulmonary morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for pneumonia; infectious pneumonia; respiratory complications, pulmonary collapse; acute respiratory failure or edema; pulmonary congestion and hypostasis; pulmonary/respiratory insufficiency after trauma and/or surgery; dyspnea; or respiratory arrest; transfusion related acute lung injury.

    Time frame: Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection

  6. Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Infection Morbidity

    Infection morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for infection due to central venous catheter; abscess of intestine; peritoneal abscess; sepsis or severe sepsis; infection due to vascular device, implant and graft; urinary tract infection; disruption of internal or external surgical wound; persistent postoperative fistula; or postoperative infection.

    Time frame: Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection

  7. Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Thromboembolic Morbidity

    Thromboembolic morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for pulmonary embolism and infarction; arterial embolism and thrombosis or thrombosis of the lower extremities; vascular disorders of the kidney; acute vascular insufficiency of the intestine; or venous thromboembolism.

    Time frame: Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection

  8. Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Other Morbidity

    Other morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for disruption of wound, decubitus ulcer, or postoperative complications not elsewhere classified.

    Time frame: Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection

  9. Percentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Within 15 Days of Discharge

    Time frame: Within 15 days of discharge from hospitalization for bowel resection

  10. Percentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Between 16 and 30 Days After Discharge

    Time frame: Between 16-30 days after hospital discharge after bowel resection

  11. Percentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Within 30 Days of Discharge

    Time frame: Between 0-30 days after hospital discharge after bowel resection

  12. Percentage of Patients Discharged to Various Locations

    Location of discharge for patients who were admitted to the hospital for their bowel resection from home

    Time frame: Hospital discharge after bowel resection

  13. Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay

    Time frame: Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay

    Calendar day of discharge - calendar day of surgery = postoperative length of stay

    Time frame: Measured from the day after bowel resection to the day of hospital discharge

07

Results

Posted Sep 8, 2010

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Started35253525
Completed35253525
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Patients Who Died

All-cause

Time frame:
Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Died
Percent of participantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Percentage of Patients Who Died0.41.0
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = 0.0007 · Mean difference (net): -0.6
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With Reported In-hospital Postoperative Gastrointestinal (GI) Morbidity

GI morbidity will be identified using International Classification of Disease 9th Edition Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis and procedure codes for paralytic ileus, flatulence, eructation, gas pain, insertion of a nasogastric tube, total parenteral nutrition, peripheral parenteral nutrition, digestive symptom complications, diarrhea following GI surgery, intestinal obstruction, abdominal pain, peritoneal adhesions, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, parenteral infusion of concentrated nutritional substances, or enteral infusion of concentrated nutritional substances.

Time frame:
Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Patients With Reported In-hospital Postoperative Gastrointestinal (GI) Morbidity
Percent of participantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Percentage of Patients With Reported In-hospital Postoperative Gastrointestinal (GI) Morbidity29.835.7
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = < 0.0001 · Mean difference (net): -5.9
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With In-hospital Cardiovascular Morbidity

Cardiovascular morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for myocardial infarction; other ischemic events; congestive heart failure and shock; arrhythmias; or other cardiovascular events (cardiac complications, peripheral vascular complications).

Time frame:
Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Cardiovascular Morbidity
Percent of participantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Cardiovascular Morbidity19.424.0
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = 0.0001 · Mean difference (net): -4.6
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With In-hospital Cerebrovascular Morbidity

Cerebrovascular morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for ischemic, thrombotic, embolic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accidents; acute but ill-defined cerebrovascular disease; transient cerebral ischemia; syncope; or postoperative cerebrovascular accident.

Time frame:
Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Cerebrovascular Morbidity
Percent of participantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Cerebrovascular Morbidity0.20.5
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = 0.1022 · Mean difference (net): -0.3
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With In-hospital Pulmonary Morbidity

Pulmonary morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for pneumonia; infectious pneumonia; respiratory complications, pulmonary collapse; acute respiratory failure or edema; pulmonary congestion and hypostasis; pulmonary/respiratory insufficiency after trauma and/or surgery; dyspnea; or respiratory arrest; transfusion related acute lung injury.

Time frame:
Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Pulmonary Morbidity
Percent of participantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Pulmonary Morbidity7.310.5
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = < 0.0001 · Mean difference (net): -3.2
SecondaryPostoperative Length of Hospital Stay

Calendar day of discharge - calendar day of surgery = postoperative length of stay

Time frame:
Measured from the day after bowel resection to the day of hospital discharge
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay
DaysAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay5.3 ± 3.16.4 ± 4.8
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = < 0.0001 · Mean difference (net): -1.1
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With In-hospital Infection Morbidity

Infection morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for infection due to central venous catheter; abscess of intestine; peritoneal abscess; sepsis or severe sepsis; infection due to vascular device, implant and graft; urinary tract infection; disruption of internal or external surgical wound; persistent postoperative fistula; or postoperative infection.

Time frame:
Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Infection Morbidity
Percent of participantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Infection Morbidity9.211.5
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = 0.0012 · Mean difference (net): -2.3
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With In-hospital Thromboembolic Morbidity

Thromboembolic morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for pulmonary embolism and infarction; arterial embolism and thrombosis or thrombosis of the lower extremities; vascular disorders of the kidney; acute vascular insufficiency of the intestine; or venous thromboembolism.

Time frame:
Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Thromboembolic Morbidity
Percent of participantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Thromboembolic Morbidity1.22.1
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = 0.0030 · Mean difference (net): -0.9
PrimaryPercentage of Patients With In-hospital Other Morbidity

Other morbidity was identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes for disruption of wound, decubitus ulcer, or postoperative complications not elsewhere classified.

Time frame:
Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Other Morbidity
Percent of participantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Percentage of Patients With In-hospital Other Morbidity0.60.7
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = 0.7637 · Mean difference (net): -0.1
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Within 15 Days of Discharge
Time frame:
Within 15 days of discharge from hospitalization for bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of partcipants
Percentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Within 15 Days of Discharge
Percent of partcipantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Percentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Within 15 Days of Discharge7.48.7
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = 0.0402 · Mean difference (net): -1.3
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Between 16 and 30 Days After Discharge
Time frame:
Between 16-30 days after hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Between 16 and 30 Days After Discharge
Percent of participantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Percentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Between 16 and 30 Days After Discharge1.92.5
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = 0.0755 · Mean difference (net): -0.6
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Within 30 Days of Discharge
Time frame:
Between 0-30 days after hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Within 30 Days of Discharge
Percent of participantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Percentage of Patients Who Were Readmitted Within 30 Days of Discharge9.311.2
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = 0.0532 · Mean difference (net): -1.9
PrimaryPercentage of Patients Discharged to Various Locations

Location of discharge for patients who were admitted to the hospital for their bowel resection from home

Time frame:
Hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Patients Discharged to Various Locations
Percent of participantsAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Health care facility7.913.8
Home87.580.7
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Chi-squared · p = < 0.0001
PrimaryIntensive Care Unit Length of Stay
Time frame:
Participants were followed up until their hospital discharge after bowel resection
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay
DaysAlvimopan UsersMatched Controls
Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay0.3 ± 1.40.6 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • Alvimopan Users vs Matched Controls · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = < 0.0001 · Mean difference (net): -0.3

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Alvimopan Users———
Matched Controls———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Alvimopan UsersMatched ControlsTotal
Mean61.9 ± 14.161.8 ± 14.761.9 ± 14.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Alvimopan UsersMatched ControlsTotal
Female184718723719
Male167816533331
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Alvimopan UsersMatched ControlsTotal
Black or African American331368699
White267525435218
Other5196141133
Procedure type
Procedure type(Participants)Alvimopan UsersMatched ControlsTotal
Laparoscopic colon or rectal resection142714272854
Open colon or rectal resection117111712342
Laparoscopic or open colon or rectal resection424424848
Laparoscopic or open small bowel resection181181362
Laparoscopic or open ostomy takedown, bypass,other322322644
Surgeon type
Surgeon type(Participants)Alvimopan UsersMatched ControlsTotal
General surgeon180918093618
Colorectal surgeon135713572714
Other359359718
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Premier database
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28208, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Delaney CP, Craver C, Gibbons MM, Rachfal AW, VandePol CJ, Cook SF, Poston SA, Calloway M, Techner L. Evaluation of clinical outcomes with alvimopan in clinical practice: a national matched-cohort study in patients undergoing bowel resection. Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):731-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824a36cc. PubMed 22388106 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01150760
Lead sponsor
Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 25, 2010
Start date
Apr 2010
Primary completion
Aug 2010
Completion
Aug 2010
Results posted
Sep 8, 2010
Last update
Aug 7, 2015

Study contacts

Lee Techner, DPM
study director · Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion