CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01144559Updated Nov 1, 2010

Continuous Femoral Nerve Blocks: Relative Effects of Basal Infusion and Bolus Doses on Sensory and Motor Function

A Phase 4 interventional study of Continuous Infusion and Bolus Administered in Nerve Block, sponsored by University of California, San Diego. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-11-01.

Sponsored by University of California, San Diego · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a research study to determine if the way local anesthetic- or numbing medication- is delivered through a tiny tube next to the nerves that go to the thigh affects the strength and sensation in the thigh.

Read the detailed description

Specific Aim: Research study to test the null hypothesis that differing the delivery method (continuous basal infusion vs. repeated bolus doses) but providing an equal total dose of Ropivacaine has no impact on quadriceps muscle strength. These results will help define the optimal delivery method of local anesthetic used for continuous peripheral nerve blocks and help guide future research in this clinically relevant area.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nerve Block

Keywords

  • Femoral
  • Nerve Block
  • Bolus
  • Continuous Infusion
  • UCSD
  • Perineural Catheter
  • Volunteer
  • lower extremity nerve blocks
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Diego is the lead sponsor of 958 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Of its 110 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 70 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • willing to have bilateral femoral perineural catheters place with a subsequent ropivacaine infusion and motor/sensory testing for 9 hours
  • willing to stay overnight in the UCSD GCRC/CTRI to allow dissipation of local anesthetic infusion effects by the following morning.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current daily analgesic use
  • opioid use with in the previous 4 weeks
  • any neuro-muscular deficit of either femoral nerves and/or quadriceps muscles
  • pregnancy
  • incarceration
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
15 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Continuous Infusion

    Each subject will have one lower extremity (Right or Left) randomized to receive a perineural catheter with a continuous infusion of local anesthetic and then the outcomes will be measured.

    Procedure: Continuous Infusion

  • Active comparator
    Bolus Administration

    The opposite lower extremity (right or left) will be randomized to receive a perineural catheter with the local anesthetic being delivered via a bolus as opposed to continuous as is the case with their other extremity. The outcome measures will then be assessed as described.

    Procedure: Bolus Administered

Interventions

  • ProcedureContinuous Infusion

    Extremity randomized continuous infusion will be given a peripheral nerve block and 5cc of Ropivacaine will be administered continuously every hour by a pain pump. Outcome measures will be tested.

  • ProcedureBolus Administered

    Extremity randomized continuous infusion will be given a peripheral nerve block and 5cc of Ropivacaine will be administered using a bolus every hour by a pain pump. Outcome measures will be tested.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quadriceps Femoris Muscle Strength

    The primary end point will be the quadriceps femoris maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) expressed as percentage of the pre-ropivacaine MVIC: post/pre x 100; with the two sides of each subject compared with each other.

    Time frame: Every Hour for 14 hours

  2. Quadriceps Femoris Muscle Strength

    The primary end point will be the quadriceps femoris maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) expressed as percentage of the pre-ropivacaine MVIC: post/pre x 100; with the two sides of each subject compared with each other.

    Time frame: Hour 22

Secondary outcomes

  1. Muscle Strength

    This will be evaluated using a portable isometric force dynamometer to measure the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) in a seated position.

    Time frame: Every Hour for 14 hours

  2. Sensory Level

    Evaluated in the seated position, using Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (TES)in the same manner as outlined in the current anesthesia literature. The current will be increased from 0mA until the subject identifies sensation at which time the current is recorded as the TES value and the nerve stimulator is turned off.

    Time frame: Every Hour for 14 hours

  3. Muscle Strength

    This will be evaluated using a portable isometric force dynamometer to measure the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) in a seated position.

    Time frame: Hour 22

  4. Sensory Level

    Evaluated in the seated position, using Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (TES)in the same manner as outlined in the current anesthesia literature. The current will be increased from 0mA until the subject identifies sensation at which time the current is recorded as the TES value and the nerve stimulator is turned off.

    Time frame: Hour 22

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UCSD Medical Center, Hillcrest
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01144559
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Diego
First posted
Jun 15, 2010
Start date
Jun 2010
Primary completion
Sep 2010
Completion
Sep 2010
Last update
Nov 1, 2010

Study contacts

Brian M Ilfeld, M.D., M.S.
principal investigator · University of California, San Diego

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion