CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01141647PrOMOTEUpdated May 11, 2017Results posted

SCI-VIP: Predictive Outcome Model Over Time for Employment (PrOMOTE)

An interventional study of Vocational Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injuries, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-11.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,047
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will be an extension of the Spinal Cord Injury Vocational Integration Program (SCI-VIP). The study involves research about how to help Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) gain employment. Vocational rehabilitation is a special field of service aimed at putting persons with disabilities in the best possible position to become employed. The Veterans Administration has a long history of providing vocational rehabilitation for Veterans with mental health issues and has recently started providing similar services to persons with physical disabilities, including SCI. Past research has shown that vocational rehabilitation is effective in helping some Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) gain employment. The extension of this work through PrOMOTE study will establish a large national database of over 2000 Veterans with SCI, containing extensive employment, medical, functional and psychosocial data. The study will analyze both quantitative and qualitative measures to maximize its findings.

Read the detailed description

Extending SCI-VIP through PrOMOTE will operationalize the critical features of supported employment that lead to obtaining and maintaining employment over time in spinal cord injury. There are no current studies that examine how the level and intensity of supported employment services by Veterans with SCI impacts employment outcomes. This extension will allow the examination of longitudinal factors associated with successful employment that are not possible within the time constrains of SCI-VIP and to extend the cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis to include longer term and costs of quality of life outcomes. The study will include a more comprehensive qualitative analysis across several sites of factors that contribute to program success. The PrOMOTE study will add three more sites. This expansion will allow examination of outcomes in areas where there is a high penetration of OIF/OEF Veterans as well as sites where there are other vocational programs available.

Primary HO: Identify factors that predict employment after SCI.

Secondary HO 1: Determine ongoing effectiveness of SE over time.

Secondary HO 2: Evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategy and level of SE model implementation across sites.

Secondary HO 3: Determine costs, health care utilization over time and cost-effectiveness.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Depression
  • Supported Employment
  • Health Service
  • Humans
  • Outcomes
  • Quality of Life
  • Veterans/rh (rehabilitation)
  • Workplace
  • Spinal Cord Injuries
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,047 is above the median of 24 across 1,566 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All Veterans who meet inclusion criteria will be approached about completing a baseline interview to gather information on employment, health, and quality of life after spinal cord injury.

Inclusion criteria for the baseline interview include:

  • 18 to 65 years old
  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Medically and neurologically stable

At the end of the baseline interview, some of these Veterans who meet additional inclusion criteria will be enrolled to receive the SE intervention or other available vocational services and complete longitudinal follow-up interviews every three months while participating in the study.

The additional inclusion criteria for enrollment in vocational services include:

  • Unemployed
  • Living within 100 mile radius of the enrolling VA Medical Center
  • Desiring competitive employment

A subsample of Veterans who consent to the study will be selected for participation in qualitative interviews. Family members and/or caregivers identified by these Veterans may also be included in qualitative interviews. A representative sample of VA staff members who provide care to these Veterans will also be approached to participate in qualitative interviews.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medically and/or surgically unstable
  • Mentally impaired such that independent reasoning and judgment jeopardize safety of self or others
  • Active alcohol and/or drug dependency that is untreated
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,047 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    24-Month Supported Employment

    Evidence-Based Supported Employment Vocational Rehabilitation or Other Vocational Services

    Behavioral: Vocational Rehabilitation

Interventions

  • BehavioralVocational Rehabilitation

    SCI-VIP: PrOMOTE evidence-based supported employment implemented for Veterans with spinal cord injury or other available vocational services

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Identify Factors That Predict Employment After SCI.

    To model the probability of obtaining CE, we first dichotomized CE as 'yes' or 'no'. The Competitive Employment Rate is reported in Outcome Measure 2. We then used unconditional logistic regression to model the probability of obtaining CE through a univariate modeling approach to determine statistically significant predictors of CE. Statistically significant predictors at the p\<0.10 criterion level were then explored in a final multivariate model. Demographic (age, race, marital status, etc.), clinical (severity of injury, comorbidities, time since injury, etc.), barriers and facilitators, and quality of life (depression, Satisfaction with Life, etc.) were considered for modeling. A final model was obtained by including all parameters meeting the p\<0.10 criterion into a final multivariate model.

    Time frame: 24-month phase with face-to-face quarterly interviews

Secondary outcomes

  1. Employment Rate

    Competitive Employment (CE) rate for individuals who participated in the Supported Employment arm of the PrOMOTE Study.

    Time frame: 24 Months

  2. Determine Ongoing Effectiveness of SE Over Time.

    This measure is used to evaluate the participants who were both in SCI-VIP and PrOMOTE. It assesses the number of people who obtained CE in SCI-VIP and sustained the same CE through their time in the PrOMOTE study. The cohort of SCI-VIP SE participants in PrOMOTE were analyzed separately from the 213 PrOMOTE participants.

    Time frame: 48-month phase with face-to-face quarterly interviews

  3. Evaluate the Effectiveness of Implementation Strategy and Level of SE Model Implementation Across Sites.

    Level of implementation was assessed by interviewing clinical and vocational providers from the seven sites who were involved in or knowledgeable about the program. Values reported represent the numbers of clinical staff who cited having the VRS integrated on the clinical team, a full-time VRS, leadership support, engagement of staff, resources provided immediately, making adjustments to the implementation to fit with the local context, and having audit and feedback as supporting strong implementation

    Time frame: 24-month phase with face-to-face quarterly interviews

  4. Determine Total Cost Per Patient Over 24 Months

    Total cost is the mean total cost per patient over 24 months in US dollars. The minimum value is 0 representing no cost in US dollars and larger numbers indicating higher costs in US dollars.

    Time frame: 24-month phase with face-to-face quarterly interviews

  5. Determine Cost-effectiveness.

    QALYs are the mean quality adjusted life years per patient for the Supported Employment and Standard Care groups. The QALY is a non-negative number assessing the quality and length of life and not just the crude number of years. The minimum value is 0 representing no improvement in the quality of life or length of life and larger numbers indicate healthier and longer life. Maximum QALYs are limited only by the life span of study participants, but may not exceed 1 (perfect health) in any given year.

    Time frame: 24-month phase with face-to-face quarterly interviews

07

Results

Posted Mar 31, 2017
Limitations and caveats
Majority of sample is male.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone24-Month Supported Employment
Started213
Completed167
Not completed46

Outcome measures

PrimaryIdentify Factors That Predict Employment After SCI.

To model the probability of obtaining CE, we first dichotomized CE as 'yes' or 'no'. The Competitive Employment Rate is reported in Outcome Measure 2. We then used unconditional logistic regression to model the probability of obtaining CE through a univariate modeling approach to determine statistically significant predictors of CE. Statistically significant predictors at the p\<0.10 criterion level were then explored in a final multivariate model. Demographic (age, race, marital status, etc.), clinical (severity of injury, comorbidities, time since injury, etc.), barriers and facilitators, and quality of life (depression, Satisfaction with Life, etc.) were considered for modeling. A final model was obtained by including all parameters meeting the p\<0.10 criterion into a final multivariate model.

Time frame:
24-month phase with face-to-face quarterly interviews
Reported as:
Number · Odds Ratio
Identify Factors That Predict Employment After SCI.
Odds Ratio24-Month Supported Employment
Identify Factors That Predict Employment After SCI.3.56 (1.80 to 7.07)
Statistical analysis
  • 24-Month Supported Employment · Odds ratio (or): 3.56 · 90% CI 1.80 to 7.07
SecondaryEmployment Rate

Competitive Employment (CE) rate for individuals who participated in the Supported Employment arm of the PrOMOTE Study.

Time frame:
24 Months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants with CE
Employment Rate
percentage of participants with CE24-Month Supported Employment
Employment Rate43.2
SecondaryDetermine Ongoing Effectiveness of SE Over Time.

This measure is used to evaluate the participants who were both in SCI-VIP and PrOMOTE. It assesses the number of people who obtained CE in SCI-VIP and sustained the same CE through their time in the PrOMOTE study. The cohort of SCI-VIP SE participants in PrOMOTE were analyzed separately from the 213 PrOMOTE participants.

Time frame:
48-month phase with face-to-face quarterly interviews
Reported as:
Number · participants
Determine Ongoing Effectiveness of SE Over Time.
participants48-Month Supported Employment
Determine Ongoing Effectiveness of SE Over Time.5
SecondaryEvaluate the Effectiveness of Implementation Strategy and Level of SE Model Implementation Across Sites.

Level of implementation was assessed by interviewing clinical and vocational providers from the seven sites who were involved in or knowledgeable about the program. Values reported represent the numbers of clinical staff who cited having the VRS integrated on the clinical team, a full-time VRS, leadership support, engagement of staff, resources provided immediately, making adjustments to the implementation to fit with the local context, and having audit and feedback as supporting strong implementation

Time frame:
24-month phase with face-to-face quarterly interviews
Reported as:
Number · participants
Evaluate the Effectiveness of Implementation Strategy and Level of SE Model Implementation Across Sites.
participantsEarly StageMid StageLate Stage
Integration of vocational and clinical team323030
VRS201419
Leadership Support171713
Engagement of staff21913
Obtaining resources1096
Fit of IPS Model0134
Audit and Feedback007
SecondaryDetermine Total Cost Per Patient Over 24 Months

Total cost is the mean total cost per patient over 24 months in US dollars. The minimum value is 0 representing no cost in US dollars and larger numbers indicating higher costs in US dollars.

Time frame:
24-month phase with face-to-face quarterly interviews
Reported as:
Mean · US dollars
Determine Total Cost Per Patient Over 24 Months
US dollars24-Month Supported EmploymentParticipants in SCI-VIP Standard Care
Determine Total Cost Per Patient Over 24 Months134,029 ± 148,449169,433 ± 187,661
SecondaryDetermine Cost-effectiveness.

QALYs are the mean quality adjusted life years per patient for the Supported Employment and Standard Care groups. The QALY is a non-negative number assessing the quality and length of life and not just the crude number of years. The minimum value is 0 representing no improvement in the quality of life or length of life and larger numbers indicate healthier and longer life. Maximum QALYs are limited only by the life span of study participants, but may not exceed 1 (perfect health) in any given year.

Time frame:
24-month phase with face-to-face quarterly interviews
Reported as:
Mean · years
Determine Cost-effectiveness.
years24-Month Supported EmploymentParticipants in SCI-VIP Standard Care
Determine Cost-effectiveness.1.27 ± 0.0681.15 ± 0.058

Adverse events

Collected over 4 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Baseline Sample (N=1047)—150/1,047 (14.3%)21/1,047 (2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent serious events
EventBaseline Sample (N=1047)
HospitalizationSurgical and medical procedures38/1047
HospitalizationInfections and infestations33/1047
DeathNervous system disorders27/1047
HospitalizationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications14/1047
HospitalizationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders9/1047
HospitalizationPsychiatric disorders8/1047
HospitalizationNervous system disorders7/1047
HospitalizationSocial circumstances7/1047
DeathInfections and infestations6/1047
HospitalizationGastrointestinal disorders5/1047
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBaseline Sample (N=1047)
Hospitalization - RespiteSocial circumstances14/1047
Hospitalization - Annual ExamSurgical and medical procedures7/1047

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)24-Month Supported Employment
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years1047
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)24-Month Supported Employment
Mean53.3 ± 10.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)24-Month Supported Employment
Female45
Male1002
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)24-Month Supported Employment
Caucasion653
African American306
Asian13
Native American15
Other/Unknown60
Functional Independence Measure
Functional Independence Measure(units on a scale)24-Month Supported Employment
Mean71.5 ± 27.2
ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)
ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS)(participants)24-Month Supported Employment
A408
B121
C133
D366
E7
Missing12
AIS and neurological Level
AIS and neurological Level(participants)24-Month Supported Employment
High Tetraplegia, AIS, A, B, C91
Low Tetraplegia, AIS A,B,C200
Paraplegia, AIS A,B,C371
AIS D/E372
Missing13
Marital Status
Marital Status(participants)24-Month Supported Employment
Married373
Divorced366
Other305
Refused/NA3

11 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

7 sites
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
    Palo Alto, California 94304-1290, United States
  • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA
    Boston, Massachusetts 02130, United States
  • VA Medical Center, Cleveland
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX
    Dallas, Texas 75216, United States
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
    Richmond, Virginia 23249, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Cotner BA, Njoh EN, Trainor JK, O'Connor DR, Barnett SD, Ottomanelli L. Facilitators and barriers to employment among veterans with spinal cord injury receiving 12 months of evidence-based supported employment services. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Winter;21(1):20-30. doi: 10.1310/sci2101-20. PubMed 25762857 ↗
  • Sutton BS, Ottomanelli L, Njoh E, Barnett SD, Goetz LL. The impact of social support at home on health-related quality of life among veterans with spinal cord injury participating in a supported employment program. Qual Life Res. 2015 Jul;24(7):1741-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0912-4. Epub 2015 Jan 11. PubMed 25577499 ↗
  • Goetz LL, Ottomanelli L, Barnett SD, Sutton B, Njoh E. Relationship Between Comorbidities and Employment Among Veterans with Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Winter;24(1):44-53. doi: 10.1310/sci16-00047. Epub 2017 Sep 27. PubMed 29434460 ↗
  • Budd MA, Dixon TM, Barnett SD, Njoh E, Goetz LL, Ottomanelli L. Examination of traumatic brain injury exposure among veterans with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Aug;62(3):345-352. doi: 10.1037/rep0000129. Epub 2017 Jun 8. PubMed 28594193 ↗
  • Ottomanelli L, Goetz LL, Barnett SD, Njoh E, Dixon TM, Holmes SA, LePage JP, Ota D, Sabharwal S, White KT. Individual Placement and Support in Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal Observational Study of Employment Outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug;98(8):1567-1575.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.12.010. Epub 2017 Jan 20. PubMed 28115071 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will only be presented de-identified.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01141647
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 10, 2010
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Mar 2015
Completion
Mar 2015
Results posted
Mar 31, 2017
Last update
May 11, 2017

Study contacts

Lisa Ottomanelli, PhD
principal investigator · James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion