ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01135693Updated Jun 3, 2010

Service Users' Perspective of Reasons for Detention Under Section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983

An observational study in Reasons for Detention Under Mental Health Act 1983, sponsored by South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-06-03.

Sponsored by South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2010), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Section 136 of the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1983 allows the police to detain someone in a public place if there are reasons to believe that they may be suffering from a mental disorder and to be in need of care or control. For a significant number of psychiatric patients, detention under section 136 and accessing psychiatric services via the police remains an important, and sometimes the only pathway to care. Approximately 17400 people were detained under section 136 of the MHA 1983 during the year 2005-2006 (Independent Police Complaints Commission, 2008).

Despite the large number of patients accessing mental health services via the police, there is no research available to identify the service users' perspective of what led them to come into contact with police and to identify the reasons for care not being accessed by conventional routes. Royal College Psychiatrists (RCP, 2008) and Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC, 2008) found that there was lack of research into the service users' perspective and recommended research into this area.

The investigators have devised this research project to help themselves and the wider research and clinical community understand the service users' perspective of how they came to be detained by the police, whether the community services had failed and explore their views to understand what can be done to improve the service provisions.

Fieldhead hospital, Wakefield provides acute inpatient care for psychiatric patients. Those who are detained under section 136 of the MHA in Wakefield area are taken to a place of safety and following assessment they may be admitted formally or informally to Fieldhead hospital for assessment and treatment. Those who are detained under section 136 of MHA and subsequently admitted as inpatients to Fieldhead hospital will be included in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Reasons for Detention Under Mental Health Act 1983

Keywords

  • Section 136
  • Mental Health Act 1983
  • Police
  • Detention
  • Failure of community care
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Psychiatric patients who are detained under Section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 in Wakefield district and subsequently admitted as inpatients to psychiatric wards at Fieldhead Hospital, Wakefield.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Those who have been detained under Section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and subsequently admitted to Fieldhead Hospital, Wakefield
  • Those service users aged between 18 and 65 years
  • Those service users who have the capacity to consent to the interview

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those service users who are under 18 years old and over 65 years old at the time of the study
  • Service users who are assessed to be incapacitated to consent to the study
  • Adults with dementia
  • Those who cannot understand and/or speak English sufficiently to participate in interview
  • Service user's who are currently experiencing crisis
05

Study design

Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
06

Study locations

1 site
  • Fieldhead Hospital
    Wakefield, West Yorkshire WF1 3SP, United Kingdom
    • Santhana K Gunasekaran, MBBS MRCPsych LLM · Principal investigator
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Kent J, Gunasekaran S. Mentally disordered detainees in the police station: the role of the psychiatrist. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment (2010) 16: 115-123. Docking M, Grace K, Bucke T. Police Custody as a "Place of Safety". Examining the Use of Section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983. Independent Police Complaints Commission, London (2008). Royal College of Psychiatrists. Standards on the Use of Section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 (Council Report CR149). Royal College of Psychiatrists, United Kingdom (2008).
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2010, a primary completion of Oct 2010 and a completion of Jan 2011. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 2, 2010
First posted
Jun 3, 2010
Start
Aug 2010
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2010
CompletionEst.
Jan 2011
Last update
Jun 3, 2010
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01135693
Lead sponsor
South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
First posted
Jun 3, 2010
Start date
Aug 2010
Primary completion
Oct 2010 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2011 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 3, 2010

Study contacts

Santhana K Gunasekaran, MBBS MRCPsych LLM
Contact
san.gunasekaran@gmail.com
0044 1924 32 7378
John H Kent, MBBS FRCPsych
Contact
john.kent@swyt.nhs.uk
0044 1924 32 7375
Santhana K Gunasekaran, MBBS MRCPsych LLM
principal investigator · South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
John H Kent, MBBS FRCPsych
study chair · South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion