ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01120808Updated Dec 13, 2018Results posted

Prevention Trial Assessing Paper-Tape in Endurance Distances (PreTAPED)

A Phase 1 interventional study of Paper tape in Blister, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-13.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
136
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Blisters are a very common complaint in both the general population and also the athlete. This study's aim is to determine whether applying paper tape (an inexpensive and common component of most foot care kits) to the foot of endurance runners prevents the frequency and severity of friction blisters.

Read the detailed description

Participants will be approximately 100 ultra-endurance athletes competing in Racing the Planet's 250 mile/7 day 4 Desert ultra-endurance races. A convenience sample will be used, with full consent signed before inclusion into the study, with participants being informed that study inclusion is entirely optional and will not affect medical care. A foot will berandomly selected for each participant, a coin will be flipped to determine which foot is to be taped, heads - right foot, and tails, left foot. The non-taped foot will be used as a control. No preventive treatment will be applied to the control foot. The runner's normal sock/shoe system will be used to reflect natural wilderness conditions. Runners will be excluded if any blisters, broken blisters, or hot spots are present on either foot at the time of initial taping as determined by visual foot inspection by a study administrator. The participant will also be excluded if they have a pre-existing blistering condition or known sensitivity to paper tape. Participants will have demographic data collected prior to the race, including age, gender, country of origin, number of marathons run prior, pack weight, and sock type. The study endpoint occurs when a hot spot or blister develops on either the treated or untreated foot. Runners will be instructed to treat suspected blisters or hot spots as they normally would, and to inform the study administrators the same day for visual inspection and final questionnaire to determine if they develop blisters or hot spots, whether they applied or re-applied tape themselves, removed tape, and the reasons for these actions. Participants will be allowed to have their experimental taped foot re-taped by a physician at any point in the race as deemed necessary by the runner. Before applying tape, a visual inspection will determine that feet were clean of dirt and no hot spots or blisters / broken blisters were present. Tape will be applied by trained study physicians. One inch micropore paper tape from 3M will be applied to each toe in the following manner. A piece of tape will be placed on each toe longitudinally from the base of the phalanx dorsally to the base of the phalanx on the plantar side. The tape will be smoothed against the skin. Any tape extending beyond the tip of the phalanx will be adhered together. A second piece of one inch paper tape will be applied circumferentially around each toe, with the ends of the tape located on the dorsum of the toe. In this manner, all five toes on the experimental foot will be taped. Any "dog ears" (tape extending beyond the phalanges) will be then trimmed with a scissors. One 2 inch piece of micropore paper tape will be applied horizontally to the posterior heel over the Achilles tendon, extending from the posterior medial malleolus to the posterior lateral malleolus. One 2 inch piece of micropore tape will be applied perpendicular to the head of the 5th metatarsal, another perpendicular to the 1st metatarsal covering medial as well as plantar aspect.

02

Conditions studied

  • Blister

Browse trials for

03

In context

Blister

36 studies on the registry are indexed under Blister; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 136 is above the median of 65 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Blister.

Browse Blister studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,168 studies on the registry; 431 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 207 (78%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All runners who are enrolled in an RTP 4 deserts event,
  • All runners who are 18-75 years old, and
  • All runners who speak English. The study will be enrolling only those who speak English, so they can fully understand and have knowledgeable consent to the study enrollment protocols.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any blisters, broken blisters, or hot spots present on either foot at the time of initial taping as determined by visual foot inspection by a enrolling study physician.
  • The runner has a pre-existing blistering condition.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
136 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    All Participants

    Participants were registered competitors in RacingThePlanet 6 stage 7 day 155mile (250km) ultramarathon.

    Procedure: Paper tape

Interventions

  • ProcedurePaper tape

    Paper tape assigned to each participant's randomly selected foot.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Count of Participants With Blisters

    Time frame: 1 week

07

Results

Posted Mar 24, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Participants
Started136
Completed90
Not completed46

Outcome measures

PrimaryCount of Participants With Blisters
Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count of Participants With Blisters
ParticipantsAll Participants
Blisters on both feet8
Blister on taped foot47
Blister on untaped foot35

Adverse events

Collected over 7 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Participants—0/90 (0%)0/90 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Per protocol, participants completing the primary outcome measure were analyzable for baseline characteristics.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Participants
Mean40 ± 9.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Participants
Female32
Male58
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of California Davis
    Davis, California 95616, United States
  • Stanford University School of Medicine
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lipman GS, Ellis MA, Lewis EJ, Waite BL, Lissoway J, Chan GK, Krabak BJ. A prospective randomized blister prevention trial assessing paper tape in endurance distances (Pre-TAPED). Wilderness Environ Med. 2014 Dec;25(4):457-61. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Oct 31. PubMed 25443754 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2010, a primary completion of Dec 2011 and a completion of Dec 2011. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Mar 2017, 5 years 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 7, 2010
First posted
May 11, 2010
Start
Apr 2010
Primary completionActual
Dec 2011
CompletionActual
Dec 2011
Results first posted
Mar 24, 2017
Last update
Dec 13, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 13, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01120808
Responsible party
Grant S Lipman (PI, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 11, 2010
Start date
Apr 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2011
Completion
Dec 2011
Results posted
Mar 24, 2017
Last update
Dec 13, 2018

Study contacts

Grant S Lipman
principal investigator · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion