CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01097694KIAUpdated May 19, 2017Results posted

Effects of cKit Inhibition by Imatinib in Patients With Severe Refractory Asthma (KIA)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Imatinib mesylate and Placebo in Asthma, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Completed at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-19.

Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
176
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to see whether a new investigational drug (Imatinib) may help improve asthma in people whose symptoms are not well controlled with high dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment.

Read the detailed description

Severe asthmatics remain poorly controlled despite high doses of standard asthma therapy or even daily doses of systemic corticosteroids or their equivalent. They account for a large proportion of the morbidity and mortality associated with asthma. Features that seem to characterize many patients with this disorder include persistent inflammation, symptoms, and airway hyperresponsiveness in the face of corticosteroid therapy. Mast cells are powerful, long-lived tissue dwelling effector cells that are resistant to corticosteroid effects and have been implicated in the pathobiology of asthma. Mast cells in the airway smooth muscle have been found to be the major distinguishing difference between asthmatic and non-asthmatic eosinophil airway disease; and putative circulating mast cell progenitors are increased 5 fold in asthma. Stem cell factor (SCF) is critical to mast cell homeostasis and upregulation and has pleiotropic effects on mast cells and eosinophils . SCF levels are elevated in relation to asthma severity and SCF antibodies block hyperresponsiveness and inflammation and remodeling in murine asthma models. Imatinib, a specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibits cKit (Kit), the receptor for SCF on mast cells. Imatinib at doses equivalent to, or below, doses safely used in humans, also mimics or exceeds anti-SCF effects in the murine asthma model. Therefore we would like to know Does imatinib, an inhibitor of Kit, ameliorate severe asthma, in association with effects on lung mast cell phenotype and/or function?

Specific Aims of the study are:

Specific Aim 1: To investigate whether, in patients with persistent airway responsiveness and poor asthma control despite intensive asthma therapy, 24 weeks of imatinib therapy results in a reduction in airway responsiveness and in secondary indicators of asthma control, airway inflammation, and structural changes in the airways.

Patients will be treated with imatinib in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Assessments will include methacholine and AMP reactivity, airway function, symptoms, airway wall thickness by CT scan, analysis of induced sputum, non-invasive markers of airway inflammation, and bronchoscopy including endobronchial biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage - all before and at the end of therapy.

Specific Aim 2: To investigate whether, in patients with persistent airway responsiveness and poor asthma control despite intensive asthma therapy, 24 weeks of imatinib therapy results in changes in airway mast cell population and/or phenotype.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cKIT inhibition in Asthma
  • Efficacy of Imatinib in severe resistent asthma.
03

In context

Asthma

3,921 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 507 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 176 is above the median of 83 across 2,752 interventional studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,236 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (55%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients 18-65 years of age, diagnosed with asthma for at least 1 year;
  2. Refractory asthma, defined as reporting that their asthma has not been completely controlled in the past 3 months despite continuous treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and an additional controller medication, with or without continuous oral corticosteroids (OCS)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current smoking or smoking history of greater than 10 pack-years
  2. Any other significant respiratory or cardiac disease, or the presence of clinically important comorbidities, including uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled coronary artery disease
  3. If subject cannot undergo bronchoscopy procedure due to safety reasons
  4. Previous treatment with Imatinib
  5. A history of acute heart failure or chronic left sided heart failure
  6. Uncontrolled systemic arterial hypertension
  7. History of major bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage
  8. History of immunodeficiency diseases, including HIV
  9. Use of other investigational drugs at the time of enrollment, or within 30 days or 5 half-lives of enrollment, whichever is longer
  10. History of malignancy of any organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases.
  11. Diagnosis of Hepatitis B or C.
  12. History of alcohol abuse within 6 months of screening.
  13. History of illicit drug abuse within 6 months of screening.
  14. Regular use of anticoagulants (eg: Warfarin Sodium, Coumadin), amiodarone, carbamazepine, Cyclosporine, Rifampicin, or reverse transcriptase inhibitors
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
176 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Imatinib mesylate

    Group on active imatinib treatment

    Drug: Imatinib mesylate

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Group on Placebo treatment

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugImatinib mesylate

    Imatinib will be initiated at an oral dose of 200 mg (two 100 mg film-coated tables) per day during the first two weeks of treatment. If the treatment is well tolerated, an up-titration to 400 mg daily (four 100 mg film-coated tables) will occur.

    Also known as: Gleevec, Zoleta, Glivec, Ziatir

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Mean Methacholine Responsiveness as Assessed by the Provocation Concentration Causing a 20% Fall in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) (PC20) at Month 3 and 6 Versus Baseline

    Our primary outcome was change in airway hyperresponsiveness, as assessed by PC20, from baseline to 3 and/or 6 months of therapy in imatinib treated participants as compared with controls. Change in PC20 was assessed using log2-transformed ratios of PC20 at month 3 and /or month 6 vs PC20 at baseline. Our null hypothesis was that the mean of this ratio will be 0 after log2-transformed. We used a linear mixed-effects model for a repeated-measures analysis to compare the primary outcome between the two groups. PC20 is determined by the provocation concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1).

    Time frame: Over 6 months from beginning of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Serum Total Tryptase

    Change in serum total tryptase after 24 weeks of imatinib vs placebo treatment

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  2. Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Fluid Tryptase Level

    Change in BAL fluid tryptase levels after 24 weeks of imatinib vs. placebo

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  3. Change in Maximum Post-Bronchodilator (BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) %

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  4. Number of Asthma Exacerbations

    Number of asthma exacerbations experienced from randomization to study completion.

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

  5. FEV1 in Liters

    Change in FEV1 in treatment group compared to placebo group

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  6. FEV1%

    Change in FEV1% of predicted

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  7. Morning Peak Flow Measurement

    Change in patient-reported morning peak flow measurement (L/s)

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  8. Evening Peak Flow

    Change in patient-reported evening peak flow measurement (L/s)

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  9. Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)

    Change in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Measurement (ppb)

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  10. Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)

    Change in patient-reported ACQ score The six-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) is a scale from 0 to 6 with a lower value denoting an improvement in asthma control. The minimal important difference is 0.5.

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  11. Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)

    Change in patient-reported Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score The asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) is a 32-item scale with a range from 1-7 with a higher value denoting improvement. The minimal important difference is 0.5.

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  12. Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)

    Change in patient reported ASUI score The asthma symptom utility index (ASUI) is a 10-item weighted scale with a range from 0.2 to 1 with a higher value indicating improvement. The minimal important difference is 0.09.

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  13. BAL Neutrophil %

    Change in BAL neutrophil percentage from baseline

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  14. BAL Eosinophil %

    Change in BAL eosinophil percentage

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  15. Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) PGD2

    Change in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) PGD2 levels from baseline at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  16. Endobronchial Biopsy Total Tryptase-positive Mast Cells

    Change in endobronchial biopsy total tryptase-positive mast cells from baseline at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  17. Endobronchial Biopsy Smooth Muscle Tryptase-positive Mast Cells

    Change in the biopsy smooth muscle tryptase-positive mast cells from baseline at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  18. Blood Eosinophils

    Change in blood eosinophil count

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  19. Airway Wall Thickness

    Change in airway wall thickness as assessed by computerized tomography (CT)

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  20. Airway Wall Area

    Change in airway wall area as assessed by computerized tomography (CT)

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  21. Bronchoalveolar Lavage Histamine

    Change in bronchoalveolar lavage histamine levels from baseline

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  22. Urinary Prostaglandin D2

    Change in urinary Prostaglandin D2 levels from baseline

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  23. Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cysteinyl Leukotrienes

    Change in bronchoalveolar lavage cysteinyl leukotrienes levels from baseline

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  24. Urinary Leukotriene E4

    Change in urinary leukotriene E4 levels from baseline

    Time frame: 6 months after start of treatment

  25. Change in Sputum Supernatant Differential, Supernatant Tryptase and IL-13

    Change in sputum eosinophil and neutrophil percentage. Change in sputum supernatant tryptase as measured by ELISA. Change in sputum IL-13 level as measured by ELISA.

    Time frame: baseline to 24 weeks

  26. Change in Inflammatory Mediators in Exhaled Breath Condensate

    Assessment of change in eicosanoids in the exhaled breath condensate

    Time frame: baseline to week 24

  27. Change in Number of Self-Reported Asthma Symptom Free Days

    Time frame: baseline to week 24

07

Results

Posted May 19, 2017

Participant flow

Subjects were recruited from November 2010 until December 2014 in seven academic medical centers.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Started3230
Completed2426
Not completed84
Withdrew: Adverse event50
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up03
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject31

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Mean Methacholine Responsiveness as Assessed by the Provocation Concentration Causing a 20% Fall in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) (PC20) at Month 3 and 6 Versus Baseline

Our primary outcome was change in airway hyperresponsiveness, as assessed by PC20, from baseline to 3 and/or 6 months of therapy in imatinib treated participants as compared with controls. Change in PC20 was assessed using log2-transformed ratios of PC20 at month 3 and /or month 6 vs PC20 at baseline. Our null hypothesis was that the mean of this ratio will be 0 after log2-transformed. We used a linear mixed-effects model for a repeated-measures analysis to compare the primary outcome between the two groups. PC20 is determined by the provocation concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1).

Time frame:
Over 6 months from beginning of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · Log2 Ratio
Change in Mean Methacholine Responsiveness as Assessed by the Provocation Concentration Causing a 20% Fall in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) (PC20) at Month 3 and 6 Versus Baseline
Log2 RatioImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Change in Mean Methacholine Responsiveness as Assessed by the Provocation Concentration Causing a 20% Fall in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) (PC20) at Month 3 and 6 Versus Baseline1.73 ± 0.521.07 ± 0.60
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05
SecondarySerum Total Tryptase

Change in serum total tryptase after 24 weeks of imatinib vs placebo treatment

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · ng/ml
Serum Total Tryptase
ng/mlImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Serum Total Tryptase-2.02 ± 2.32-0.56 ± 1.39
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = <0.05Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryBronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Fluid Tryptase Level

Change in BAL fluid tryptase levels after 24 weeks of imatinib vs. placebo

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Fluid Tryptase Level
ng/mLImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Fluid Tryptase Level-0.74 ± 2.350.43 ± 2.19
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.12Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryChange in Maximum Post-Bronchodilator (BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) %
Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · % of predicted
Change in Maximum Post-Bronchodilator (BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) %
% of predictedImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Change in Maximum Post-Bronchodilator (BD) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) %0.01 ± 0.2-0.08 ± 0.26
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.10Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryNumber of Asthma Exacerbations

Number of asthma exacerbations experienced from randomization to study completion.

Time frame:
Up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Number · events
Number of Asthma Exacerbations
eventsImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Number of Asthma Exacerbations1620
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Poisson regression model · p = 0.36
SecondaryFEV1 in Liters

Change in FEV1 in treatment group compared to placebo group

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · L
FEV1 in Liters
LImatinib MesylatePlacebo
FEV1 in Liters0.046 (0.036 to 0.056)0 (0 to 0)
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05adjusted for baseline values
SecondaryFEV1%

Change in FEV1% of predicted

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · % of predicted
FEV1%
% of predictedImatinib MesylatePlacebo
FEV1%2.3 ± 8.860.78 ± 13.1
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.06Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryMorning Peak Flow Measurement

Change in patient-reported morning peak flow measurement (L/s)

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · L/second
Morning Peak Flow Measurement
L/secondImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Morning Peak Flow Measurement7.3 ± 46.1-6.4 ± 39.3
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.38Adjusted for baseline
SecondaryEvening Peak Flow

Change in patient-reported evening peak flow measurement (L/s)

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · L/second
Evening Peak Flow
L/secondImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Evening Peak Flow8.3 ± 53.6-8.2 ± 37.2
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.31Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryFractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)

Change in Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Measurement (ppb)

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · parts per billion
Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)
parts per billionImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO)7.89 ± 33.0-5.92 ± 33.2
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.11Adjusted for baseline
SecondaryAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)

Change in patient-reported ACQ score The six-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) is a scale from 0 to 6 with a lower value denoting an improvement in asthma control. The minimal important difference is 0.5.

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)
units on a scaleImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-0.62 ± 0.96-0.49 ± 0.89
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.31Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryAsthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)

Change in patient-reported Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score The asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) is a 32-item scale with a range from 1-7 with a higher value denoting improvement. The minimal important difference is 0.5.

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
units on a scaleImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)0.55 ± 1.00.25 ± 0.8
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.11Adjusted for baseline
SecondaryAsthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)

Change in patient reported ASUI score The asthma symptom utility index (ASUI) is a 10-item weighted scale with a range from 0.2 to 1 with a higher value indicating improvement. The minimal important difference is 0.09.

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)
units on a scaleImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)0.07 ± 0.200.05 ± 0.18
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.62Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryBAL Neutrophil %

Change in BAL neutrophil percentage from baseline

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · % neutrophils
BAL Neutrophil %
% neutrophilsImatinib MesylatePlacebo
BAL Neutrophil %-0.8 ± 5.6-0.4 ± 7.0
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.57Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryBAL Eosinophil %

Change in BAL eosinophil percentage

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · % eosinophils
BAL Eosinophil %
% eosinophilsImatinib MesylatePlacebo
BAL Eosinophil %2.55 ± 8.8-2.63 ± 10.4
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.15Adjusted for baseline
SecondaryBronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) PGD2

Change in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) PGD2 levels from baseline at 6 months

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) PGD2
pg/mLImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) PGD212.2 ± 57.2-4.2 ± 54.4
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.33Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryEndobronchial Biopsy Total Tryptase-positive Mast Cells

Change in endobronchial biopsy total tryptase-positive mast cells from baseline at 6 months

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mast cells per mm2
Endobronchial Biopsy Total Tryptase-positive Mast Cells
mast cells per mm2Imatinib MesylatePlacebo
Endobronchial Biopsy Total Tryptase-positive Mast Cells-54.2 ± 96.5-32.3 ± 79.8
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.11Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryEndobronchial Biopsy Smooth Muscle Tryptase-positive Mast Cells

Change in the biopsy smooth muscle tryptase-positive mast cells from baseline at 6 months

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mast cells per mm2
Endobronchial Biopsy Smooth Muscle Tryptase-positive Mast Cells
mast cells per mm2Imatinib MesylatePlacebo
Endobronchial Biopsy Smooth Muscle Tryptase-positive Mast Cells-102.7 ± 167.9-79.2 ± 157.3
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.07Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryBlood Eosinophils

Change in blood eosinophil count

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · eosinophils per microliter
Blood Eosinophils
eosinophils per microliterImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Blood Eosinophils-10.2 ± 50.6-2.6 ± 25.6
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.94Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryAirway Wall Thickness

Change in airway wall thickness as assessed by computerized tomography (CT)

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · % of airway
Airway Wall Thickness
% of airwayImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Airway Wall Thickness-0.0040 ± 0.03-0.0027 ± 0.02
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.13Adjusted for baseline
SecondaryAirway Wall Area

Change in airway wall area as assessed by computerized tomography (CT)

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · % of area
Airway Wall Area
% of areaImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Airway Wall Area0.0002 ± 0.020.0002 ± 0.02
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.25Adjusted for baseline
SecondaryBronchoalveolar Lavage Histamine

Change in bronchoalveolar lavage histamine levels from baseline

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · nM
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Histamine
nMImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Histamine2.1 ± 6.3-1.1 ± 13.4
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.54Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryUrinary Prostaglandin D2

Change in urinary Prostaglandin D2 levels from baseline

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mg Creatinine
Urinary Prostaglandin D2
ng/mg CreatinineImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Urinary Prostaglandin D2-0.30 ± 1.50.39 ± 1.73
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.18Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryBronchoalveolar Lavage Cysteinyl Leukotrienes

Change in bronchoalveolar lavage cysteinyl leukotrienes levels from baseline

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cysteinyl Leukotrienes
pg/mLImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cysteinyl Leukotrienes3.0 ± 37.36.5 ± 32.9
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.56Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryUrinary Leukotriene E4

Change in urinary leukotriene E4 levels from baseline

Time frame:
6 months after start of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mg Creatinine
Urinary Leukotriene E4
ng/mg CreatinineImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Urinary Leukotriene E40.07 ± 0.650.01 ± 0.18
Statistical analysis
  • Imatinib Mesylate vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.47Adjusted for baseline.
SecondaryChange in Sputum Supernatant Differential, Supernatant Tryptase and IL-13

Change in sputum eosinophil and neutrophil percentage. Change in sputum supernatant tryptase as measured by ELISA. Change in sputum IL-13 level as measured by ELISA.

Time frame:
baseline to 24 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange in Inflammatory Mediators in Exhaled Breath Condensate

Assessment of change in eicosanoids in the exhaled breath condensate

Time frame:
baseline to week 24

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange in Number of Self-Reported Asthma Symptom Free Days
Time frame:
baseline to week 24

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected from randomization to study drug vs. placebo up to 24 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Imatinib Mesylate—3/32 (9.4%)29/32 (90.6%)
Placebo—5/30 (16.7%)23/30 (76.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Asthma ExacerbationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/323/30
Acute URIInfections and infestations0/321/30
Ankle DislocationMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/321/30
AngioedemiaImmune system disorders0/321/30
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/320/30
LeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/320/30
Leg CrampsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/320/30
HypokalemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/320/30
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent other events
EventImatinib MesylatePlacebo
Asthma ExacerbationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders14/3213/30
Upper Respiratory InfectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders9/3212/30
Nausea/VomitingGastrointestinal disorders6/322/30
Muscle CrampsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders6/321/30
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders5/322/30
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/323/30
HypophosphatemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/320/30
Back/Shoulder PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/323/30
FatigueGeneral disorders0/322/30
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/322/30

Baseline characteristics

severe asthmatics ages 18-65

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Imatinib MesylatePlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years323062
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Imatinib MesylatePlaceboTotal
Mean40.2 ± 10.237.7 ± 11.840.1 ± 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Imatinib MesylatePlaceboTotal
Female191837
Male131225
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Imatinib MesylatePlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino5510
Not Hispanic or Latino272552
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Imatinib MesylatePlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American111324
White201535
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported011
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Imatinib MesylatePlaceboTotal
United States323062
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • University of Alabama
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • Brigham and Womens Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Columbia University
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Temple University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, United States
  • University of Wisconsin
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Al-Muhsen SZ, Shablovsky G, Olivenstein R, Mazer B, Hamid Q. The expression of stem cell factor and c-kit receptor in human asthmatic airways. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Jun;34(6):911-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01975.x. PubMed 15196279 ↗
  • Bischoff SC, Dahinden CA. c-kit ligand: a unique potentiator of mediator release by human lung mast cells. J Exp Med. 1992 Jan 1;175(1):237-44. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.1.237. PubMed 1370529 ↗
  • Brightling CE, Bradding P, Symon FA, Holgate ST, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Mast-cell infiltration of airway smooth muscle in asthma. N Engl J Med. 2002 May 30;346(22):1699-705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012705. PubMed 12037149 ↗
  • Campbell E, Hogaboam C, Lincoln P, Lukacs NW. Stem cell factor-induced airway hyperreactivity in allergic and normal mice. Am J Pathol. 1999 Apr;154(4):1259-65. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65377-1. PubMed 10233863 ↗
  • Carroll NG, Mutavdzic S, James AL. Increased mast cells and neutrophils in submucosal mucous glands and mucus plugging in patients with asthma. Thorax. 2002 Aug;57(8):677-82. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.8.677. PubMed 12149526 ↗
  • Flood-Page P, Swenson C, Faiferman I, Matthews J, Williams M, Brannick L, Robinson D, Wenzel S, Busse W, Hansel TT, Barnes NC; International Mepolizumab Study Group. A study to evaluate safety and efficacy of mepolizumab in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Dec 1;176(11):1062-71. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200701-085OC. Epub 2007 Sep 13. PubMed 17872493 ↗
  • Proceedings of the ATS workshop on refractory asthma: current understanding, recommendations, and unanswered questions. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Dec;162(6):2341-51. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.6.ats9-00. No abstract available. PubMed 11112161 ↗
  • Lukacs NW, Kunkel SL, Strieter RM, Evanoff HL, Kunkel RG, Key ML, Taub DD. The role of stem cell factor (c-kit ligand) and inflammatory cytokines in pulmonary mast cell activation. Blood. 1996 Mar 15;87(6):2262-8. PubMed 8630386 ↗
  • Nair P, Pizzichini MM, Kjarsgaard M, Inman MD, Efthimiadis A, Pizzichini E, Hargreave FE, O'Byrne PM. Mepolizumab for prednisone-dependent asthma with sputum eosinophilia. N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):985-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805435. PubMed 19264687 ↗
  • Reber L, Da Silva CA, Frossard N. Stem cell factor and its receptor c-Kit as targets for inflammatory diseases. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006 Mar 8;533(1-3):327-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.12.067. Epub 2006 Feb 17. PubMed 16483568 ↗
  • Yuan Q, Austen KF, Friend DS, Heidtman M, Boyce JA. Human peripheral blood eosinophils express a functional c-kit receptor for stem cell factor that stimulates very late antigen 4 (VLA-4)-mediated cell adhesion to fibronectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1). J Exp Med. 1997 Jul 21;186(2):313-23. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.2.313. PubMed 9221761 ↗
  • Cahill KN, Katz HR, Cui J, Lai J, Kazani S, Crosby-Thompson A, Garofalo D, Castro M, Jarjour N, DiMango E, Erzurum S, Trevor JL, Shenoy K, Chinchilli VM, Wechsler ME, Laidlaw TM, Boyce JA, Israel E. KIT Inhibition by Imatinib in Patients with Severe Refractory Asthma. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 18;376(20):1911-1920. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613125. PubMed 28514613 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01097694
Lead sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Collaborators
Baim Institute for Clinical Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Elliot Israel, MD (Director of the Asthma Research Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 2, 2010
Start date
Nov 2010
Primary completion
Aug 2015
Completion
Aug 2016
Results posted
May 19, 2017
Last update
May 19, 2017

Study contacts

Elliot Israel, M.D
principal investigator · Brigham and Womens Hospital
Joshua Boyce, M.D
principal investigator · Brigham and Womens Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion