CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01092715Updated Mar 25, 2010

Cervical Mobilization vs. Standard Physical Therapy for Chronic Neck Pain

A Phase 2 interventional study of Spinal mobilization and Massage in Neck Pain, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-03-25.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neck pain is a common problem in our society, accounting for 20% of all chiropractic visits. Physical therapy interventions for chronic neck pain have been chosen based on the patient's symptoms and examination findings. These interventions include superficial and deep heat, massage, traction, manual therapy, and exercise programs. There is little controlled research addressing the efficacy of these therapies. Although many of these interventions provide some patients with pain relief and increased function, studies often utilize multiple interventions on the same subject such as heat, ultrasound, cervical traction, range of motion exercises, making interpretation of the results difficult. Much of the literature to date has focused on studies of subjects suffering from acute neck pain. Many of these studies suggest that subjects report decreased pain, decreased disability and increased cervical spine active range of motion. There are no controlled studies comparing the effects of spinal mobilization and standard physical therapy on subjects with chronic neck pain. The object of this study is two fold: 1) to determine the score variability of two neck disability questionnaires )both baseline and change scores) to be used in sample size calculations, and 2) to establish the ability to recruit, treat and follow sufficient numbers of subjects needed for a full clinical trial. The ability to predict outcomes of neck pain treatment will lead to more appropriate therapies and an avoidance of unnecessary treatments.

Read the detailed description

Background and Purpose: Chronic neck pain is a common problem. Studies of physical therapy for neck pain often utilize multiple interventions on the same subject making interpretation of the results difficult. The objectives of this study were two fold, 1) to establish the ability to recruit and treat subjects needed for a clinical trial of mobilization vs. massage for neck pain and 2) to estimate the variability of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) in a defined population of patients with neck pain and determine sample size for a trial. Subjects and

Methods: Subjects were randomized to either sedative massage (SM) to the neck and upper back or joint mobilization to the cervical spine (JM). All subjects also received moist heat and a home exercise program. Outcomes tracked for establishing trial feasibility included the number of referrals, number of referrals meeting inclusion criteria, number of subjects declining to participate and reasons for their refusal, acceptance rate of randomization, number of dropouts, and reasons for dropout. Descriptive statistics and baseline data were analyzed with means and standard deviations when appropriate. Groups were compared in regard to demographic and clinical characteristics only. The Neck Disability Index scores were calculated for pre-treatment, post-treatment, and change scores within each group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Neck pain
  • Spinal manipulation
  • Massage
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 23 is below the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Neck pain of at least 12 weeks duration

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Signs and/or symptoms of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy
  • Symptomatic shoulder pathology
  • History of cervical spine surgery
  • History of motor vehicle collision within the past three years
  • Recent neck or shoulder trauma
  • Fibromyalgia or generalized pain syndrome
  • History of cancer affecting the head or neck
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mobilization

    Spinal mobilization and exercises

    Procedure: Spinal mobilization · Procedure: Neck exercises

  • Active comparator
    Massage

    Neck massage and exercises

    Procedure: Massage · Procedure: Neck exercises

Interventions

  • ProcedureSpinal mobilization

    Non thrust mobilization to the cervical spine

  • ProcedureMassage

    Sedative massage to cervical paraspinal muscles

  • ProcedureNeck exercises

    Range of motion exercises to include foraminal opening

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neck Disability Index

    Neck Disability Index score (patient generated score from questionnaire)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic Dept of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 25, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01092715
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
First posted
Mar 25, 2010
Start date
Jun 2003
Primary completion
Jun 2004
Completion
Jun 2004
Last update
Mar 25, 2010

Study contacts

Timothy J Madson, PT
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic
Timothy J Madson, PT
study director · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion