CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01087931Updated Jun 25, 2018Results posted

Pain Relief at Iliac Crest Bone Harvest Sites in Spine Surgery Using Bupivacaine

An interventional study of Bupivacaine and Normal Saline in Pain, sponsored by Vanderbilt University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-06-25.

Sponsored by Vanderbilt University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The use of iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) remains the gold-standard in spinal reconstructive surgery for achieving fusion. Major complications from the harvesting of ICBG are rare, but chronic pain has been reported in 10-39%. Catheters implanted at the time of surgery have been used to provide local anesthetic at the harvest site for 24-48 hours after surgery. This has been shown to decrease chronic pain at 4 years post-operatively. A single application of local anesthetic at surgery has been shown to decrease pain at the harvest site for up to 5 days. No study has demonstrated a benefit to using a single application of local anesthetic at the ICBG site beyond 5 days. In current clinical practice, the use of a local anesthetic at the ICBG site is determined according to surgeon preference. The purpose of this study is to determine if a single application of bupivacaine at the ICBG site, as currently done in some cases, provides any pain relief beyond 5 days such as that demonstrated with longer infusions of local anesthetics.

Read the detailed description

The use of local anesthetic at the donor site has been investigated to decrease the morbidity of iliac crest bone harvesting. Along with a decrease in early post-operative pain that may be expected a decrease in chronic pain and improved long-term results have also been demonstrated. Local anesthetics may cause such long-term results by dampening the initial chemical response to injury by reducing the release of inflammatory mediators from neutrophils, neutrophil adhesion to the endothelium, and the formation of free oxygen radicals. Most studies have utilized continuous or periodic infusions of anesthetic through a catheter placed at the time of surgery for 24-48 hours postoperatively. The drawbacks to using a catheter include increased infection risk and increased cost if a continuous infusion is used . A single treatment of local anesthetic at the time of surgery is therefore preferable. Only one study has evaluated a single injection of local anesthetic in adult spine patients, demonstrating decreased pain and narcotic usage through 5 post-operative days. No study to date has demonstrated a decrease in intermediate or long-term donor site pain through a single application of anesthetic, as achieved in previous studies utilizing post-operative infusions via a catheter.

Participants in the study will be identified in by the attending surgeons on this study who are clinical faculty within the department of orthopaedics and board certified in spine surgery. Randomization will be done by random selection of a sealed envelope by the attending physician at the time of enrollment. Sealed envelopes will contain a paper that assigns the patient to the treatment (bupivacaine at bone harvest site) or placebo (normal saline at bone harvest site) group. Note that all surgical wounds are routinely irrigated with normal saline prior to skin closure. In the control group, 10ml more of normal saline will be used in the ICBG site. In the treatment group, 10ml of bupivacaine 0.5% will be administered directly into the surgical wound, as done in some cases currently. Therefore, there are no new procedures in this protocol outside of what is already being done in practice. The current practice of using versus not using local anesthetic at the iliac crest bone graft site is at the discretion of the attending surgeon. Please note that the randomization in this study has nothing to do with the surgery that is done, and all patients will be treated according to standard of care regardless of this randomization. There are no other differences between treatments in the two study groups. There are no deviations from normal post-operative care received.

Patients will not be told whether or not they receive bupivacaine at the iliac crest bone graft site at the time of surgery. The patient will be blinded to their treatment group throughout the study. At the patient's request, they will be informed of their treatment group at the end of the study. The attending surgeon will not be blinded to the treatment group. The PI will not be blinded to the treatment group.

Background information about the patient and a pain assessment will be done at the time of enrollment by asking participants to fill out a paper questionnaire. Paper questionnaires to assess the patient's pain level will be given to and collected from patients at discharge from the hospital, the first follow up appointment (approximately 2-4 weeks postoperatively), and at the next follow up appointment (approximately 3 months postoperatively). In addition, patients will be given a paper narcotics log to enter their daily oral narcotic usage between the time of discharge and their first follow up appointment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Keywords

  • Local anesthetic
  • Iliac crest bone harvest
  • Patients undergoing spine surgery that require use of iliac crest bone autograft
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University is the lead sponsor of 508 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patients 18 years of age or older undergoing posterior cervical, thoracic, or lumbar surgery
  • willingness to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • individuals who underwent surgical intervention in the past 6 months
  • previous iliac crest bone harvesting
  • history of tumor and spondyloarthropathies (rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative arthritis)
  • history of adverse reaction to local anesthetic
  • history of severe pelvic and hip conditions that can interfere with the outcome assessment of the study
  • opioid addiction
  • pregnancy
  • acute mental illness
  • uncontrolled major depression and any other psychiatric disorders
  • prisoners
  • non-english speaking patients
  • inability to understand the informed consent and demands of the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Bupivacaine

    This group will receive bupivacaine (10ml of 0.5%) administered directly into the surgical wound at the iliac crest bone harvest site.

    Drug: Bupivacaine

  • Placebo comparator
    Saline

    This group will receive normal saline (10ml) administered directly into the surgical wound at the iliac crest bone harvest site.

    Other: Normal Saline

Interventions

  • DrugBupivacaine

    Single application of 10ml of bupivacaine 0.5% into the iliac crest bone harvest surgical site.

    Also known as: Marcaine.

  • OtherNormal Saline

    Normal saline 0.9%, 10ml, single application directly into iliac crest bone harvest surgical site.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, 1st Follow Up

    Cumulative Visual Analog Score pain score scores were calculated using the sum of scores (at rest and with movement, pain on average at rest and with movement, and maximum pain at rest and with movement) Range = 0-60 for cumulative visual analog pain score with 0=no pain and 60=worst pain ever.

    Time frame: about 4 to 5 weeks after surgery

  2. Pain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, Final Follow up

    Cumulative Visual Analog Score pain score scores were calculated using the sum of scores (at rest and with movement, pain on average at rest and with movement, and maximum pain at rest and with movement) Range = 0-60 for cumulative visual analog pain score with 0=no pain and 60=worst pain ever.

    Time frame: about 18 to 20 weeks after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Narcotic Use, 1st Follow up

    Number of participants using narcotics for pain

    Time frame: about 4 to 5 weeks after surgery

  2. Narcotic Use, Final Follow up

    Number of participants using narcotics for pain

    Time frame: about 18 to 20 weeks after surgery

07

Results

Posted Jun 25, 2018
Limitations and caveats
Original Study data cannot be found. Data for this record was pulled from the publication, Bupivacaine for pain reduction after iliac crest bone graft harvest, PMID: 24810818.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBupivacaineSaline
Started2020
1st follow up2019
Final follow up1917
Completed2020
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, 1st Follow Up

Cumulative Visual Analog Score pain score scores were calculated using the sum of scores (at rest and with movement, pain on average at rest and with movement, and maximum pain at rest and with movement) Range = 0-60 for cumulative visual analog pain score with 0=no pain and 60=worst pain ever.

Time frame:
about 4 to 5 weeks after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, 1st Follow Up
units on a scaleBupivacaineSaline
Pain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, 1st Follow Up10.5 ± 1121.7 ± 17
PrimaryPain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, Final Follow up

Cumulative Visual Analog Score pain score scores were calculated using the sum of scores (at rest and with movement, pain on average at rest and with movement, and maximum pain at rest and with movement) Range = 0-60 for cumulative visual analog pain score with 0=no pain and 60=worst pain ever.

Time frame:
about 18 to 20 weeks after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, Final Follow up
units on a scaleBupivacaineSaline
Pain, Cumulative Visual Analog Score, Final Follow up15.33 ± 5.5529.33 ± 7.11
SecondaryNarcotic Use, 1st Follow up

Number of participants using narcotics for pain

Time frame:
about 4 to 5 weeks after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Narcotic Use, 1st Follow up
ParticipantsBupivacaineSaline
Narcotic Use, 1st Follow up913
SecondaryNarcotic Use, Final Follow up

Number of participants using narcotics for pain

Time frame:
about 18 to 20 weeks after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Narcotic Use, Final Follow up
ParticipantsBupivacaineSaline
Narcotic Use, Final Follow up13

Adverse events

Collected over 20 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Bupivacaine0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Saline0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)1/20 (5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBupivacaineSaline
Superficial InfectionInfections and infestations0/201/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)BupivacaineSalineTotal
Mean66 ± 1262 ± 864 ± 10
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BupivacaineSalineTotal
Female7714
Male131326
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)BupivacaineSalineTotal
United States202040
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Vanderbilt Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37209, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • O'Neill KR, Lockney DT, Bible JE, Crosby CG, Devin CJ. Bupivacaine for pain reduction after iliac crest bone graft harvest. Orthopedics. 2014 May;37(5):e428-34. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140430-52. PubMed 24810818 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 25, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01087931
Lead sponsor
Vanderbilt University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 16, 2010
Start date
Apr 2010
Primary completion
Oct 2011
Completion
Oct 2011
Results posted
Jun 25, 2018
Last update
Jun 25, 2018

Study contacts

Kevin R O'Neill, MD, MS
principal investigator · Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department or Orthopaedics
Richard A Davis, MD
study chair · Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department or Orthopaedics
Clint Devin, MD
study chair · Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department or Orthopaedics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion