An interventional study of ERCP mechanical simulator practice in Training, sponsored by East Bay Institute for Research and Education. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 30 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-03-19.
Sponsored by East Bay Institute for Research and Education · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Trainees who are offered ERCP Mechanical Simulator (EMS) training in addition to routine training (study group) will demonstrate improved clinical outcomes compared to those undergoing routine ERCP training only (control group).
Hypothesis #1: Trainees who are offered simulator training in addition to routine training (study group) will demonstrate improved clinical outcomes compared to those undergoing routine ERCP training only (control group).
Hypothesis #2: Trainees who are initially in the control arm, but receive the simulator training after the initial 30 procedures (delayed intervention) will have significantly greater improvement of clinical outcomes in the second phase of the study (steeper learning curve) compared to the initial period.
STUDY DESIGN \& OUTCOMES
East Bay Institute for Research and Education is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Trainees who are offered ERCP Mechanical Simulator (EMS) training in addition to routine training (study group)
Device: ERCP mechanical simulator practice
Trainees undergoing routine ERCP training only (control group).
Trainees will receive ERCP mechanical simulator practice in addition to routine ERCP training
Diagnostic biliary cannulation and deep biliary cannulation success rates
The ability of the trainees to perform solo diagnostic biliary cannulation and deep biliary cannulation
Time frame: 12 months
Trainer assessment
Subjective competency (5-point score) graded by supervising physicians.
Time frame: 12 months
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
East Bay Institute for Research and Education