CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT01063452Updated Jan 5, 2017

Impact of Atkinson Product Design Urinary Slide Valve Versus Standard Catheter Drainage System on Social Functioning

A Phase 4 interventional study of Truvalve and Control (catheter drainage bag) in Urinary Catheterization and Urinary Tract Infections, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Withdrawn at 2 sites in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-05.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Phase 4 and Interventional

Why this study was withdrawn
This trial was never initiated due to inability to obtain the device
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the Atkinson Product Design urinary slide valve on patient morbidity and freedom as measured by impact on activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL). Secondary objectives include assessing the impact of the device on bacteruria and evaluating the impact of the primary treatment on ADL and QOL.

Read the detailed description

Several indications exist in urologic practice where urinary drainage via a urethral catheter is required and an estimated 4 million patients in the United States undergo urinary catheterization per year.(1) Though it is common for urine to be continually collected in a bag attached to the catheter by plastic tubing, catheter valves offer an alternative method of storing and voiding urine. Catheter valves are small devices that fit into the external end of the urethral catheter. Rather than continuous drainage, urine is stored in the bladder and emptied on regular intervals by opening the valve.

This method of drainage may offer several benefits including preserving bladder capacity, function and tone, reducing catheter blockage in cases of urine bacterial colonization, and decreasing traction forces on the bladder neck by removing the downward weight of a collecting bag.(2-4) The use of a catheter valve may offer improvements in social functioning and mobility.(5) Studies to date suggest that catheter valves are well tolerated by patients, but these studies have used non-standardized questionnaires and have not assessed overall quality of life.(5, 6) Additionally, there may be an associated cost benefit to utilizing catheter valves compared to drainage bags.(5)

Further study in this area, focusing on quality of life and social functioning, will enable the clinician to better counsel patients on the risks and benefits of the various methods of urinary drainage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Catheterization
  • Urinary Tract Infections

Keywords

  • Urinary Catheterization
  • Urinary Tract Infections
03

In context

Urinary Tract Infections

753 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Tract Infections; 128 are open to participants now.

Browse Urinary Tract Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 818 studies on the registry; 118 are open to participants now.

Of its 89 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients undergoing brachytherapy or cryotherapy for prostate cancer
  2. Patients undergoing thermal therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia
  3. Patients undergoing catheterization to relieve urinary retention

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with neurogenic bladder
  2. Patients with urinary tract infection
  3. Patients with gross hematuria
  4. Patients undergoing surgery with risk of urinary leak (ex: urethroplasty, radical prostatectomy, bladder repair)
  5. Female patients
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Truvalve

    Atkinson Product Design urinary slide valve on the catheter

    Device: Truvalve

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Drainage bag on the catheter

    Other: Control (catheter drainage bag)

Interventions

  • DeviceTruvalve

    Atkinson Product Design urinary slide valve

  • OtherControl (catheter drainage bag)

    urinary catheter drainage bag

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the Atkinson Product Design urinary slide valve on patient morbidity and freedom as measured by impact on activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL).

    Time frame: 1 month after catheter removal

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary objectives include assessing the impact of the device on bacteruria and evaluating the impact of the primary treatment on ADL and QOL.

    Time frame: At time of catheter removal

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Urology Associates
    Edina, Minnesota 55435, United States
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01063452
Lead sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
First posted
Feb 5, 2010
Start date
Feb 2010
Primary completion
Feb 2010
Completion
Feb 2010
Last update
Jan 5, 2017

Study contacts

Manoj Monga, MD
principal investigator · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion