CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01060150Updated Aug 23, 2013Results posted

An Efficacy Study of Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS) Methylphenidate in Participants With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

A Phase 4 interventional study of OROS Methylphenidate HCl in Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity, sponsored by Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea. Completed. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-08-23.

Sponsored by Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
115
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and effects of Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS) methylphenidate hydrochloride (HCl) on learning skill changes in Korean participants with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

Read the detailed description

This is 12 week, open label (all people involved know the identity of the intervention), prospective (study following participants forward in time), single arm, multicenter study (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study) of OROS methylphenidate HCl. The study will consist of 6 visits at Screening, Baseline, Week 1, 3, 6 and 12. The participants already on other ADHD medications in addition to methylphenidate will be required to undergo a washout period (period when receiving no treatment) of at least 1 week. The participants will be on once daily study medication starting at 18 milligram per day (mg/day) in participants with less than 30 kilogram (kg) of body weight or at 27 mg/day in participants with more than 30 kg. The dose will be increased by 9 mg or 18 mg every week for up to Week 6 based on the treatment efficacy and tolerability, followed by a maximum maintenance dose of 72 mg orally once daily up to Week 12, during which the dose can be decreased by 9 mg depending on tolerability. Efficacy will primarily be assessed using Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) scale, Clinical Global Impression of Improvement of Illness (CGI-I) scale, Korean version of ADHD-IV Rating Scale (K-ARS) and Learning Skill Test (LST) score. Participants' safety will be monitored.

02

Conditions studied

  • Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity

Keywords

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Methylphenidate hydrochloride
  • Methylphenidate
  • CONCERTA
03

In context

Hyperkinesis

729 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperkinesis; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 115 is above the median of 80 across 583 interventional studies indexed under Hyperkinesis.

Browse Hyperkinesis studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea is the lead sponsor of 75 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and are considered to require medication therapy
  • Participants that agreed to observe visit schedules and willingly complete the evaluation defined by participant (possibly to be completed by parents/guardians) during the treatment period
  • Participants and parents/guardians that are able to understand the participation procedures of the research and spontaneously request the discontinuation therein at any time
  • Participants that offered spontaneous consent for participation
  • Participants whose guardian/legal representative provided spontaneous written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypersensitivity to methylphenidate HCl
  • Participants diagnosed with major depression or anxiety disorders according to DSM-IV Diagnostic criteria and who requires drug therapy
  • Participants with a history of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, and substance abuse disorder ordiagnosed with an overall developmental disorder, organic brain disorder, seizure (sudden, uncontrolled muscle spasms and loss of consciousness resulting from abnormal brain function) disorder, movement disorder requiring the medication therapy, or with a family history of Tourette's syndrome (a neuropsychological disorder that causes marked distress or significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning)
  • Taken Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS) Methylphenidate within 3 months prior to screening
  • Currently taking alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist, antidepressant, antipsychotic, benzodiazepines, modafinil, anticonvulsant (drug used to stop seizures) or health food supplements that may have a central nervous system activity
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
115 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    OROS Methylphenidate HCl

    Drug: OROS Methylphenidate HCl

Interventions

  • DrugOROS Methylphenidate HCl

    Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS) Methylphenidate HCl tablet will be given orally once daily at a starting dose of 18 milligram (mg) for those less than 30 kilogram (kg) of body weight and 27 mg for those more than or equal to 30 kg; the dose can be increased by 9 mg or 18 mg per week up to Week 6 depending on a participant's treatment effect and tolerability; then a maximum maintenance dose of 72 mg will be given orally once daily up to Week 12.

    Also known as: Concerta

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Korean Version of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale (K-ARS) Score

    The K-ARS is a rating scale that is used for the ADHD diagnosis and the assessment of treatment efficacy and comprises 18 items in total on the basis of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV), each item being rated from 0-3 points. The total score ranges from 0-54 with 0=normal and 54=severe condition.

    Time frame: Week 12

  2. Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score

    The CGI-S rating scale is a 7 point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant. A rating of 1 is equivalent to "Normal, not at all ill" and a rating of 7 is equivalent to "Among the most extremely ill participants". Higher scores indicate worsening.

    Time frame: Week 12

  3. Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score

    The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Learning Skill Test (LST) Total Score

    The LST measures learning ability of student. This scale is composed of 7 sections: self control, participation, task accomplishment, reading, writing, test taking and information processing. It consists of 70 items for middle school student (age 13-15 years) and 80 items for high school student (age 16-18 years). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). The total score range is 70-350 for middle school version and 80-400 for high school version where higher score indicates better ability for learning. In result analysis, each sub-score and total score was converted to T-score for normalization. The score range of T-score is from 1 to 100 with a mean of 50. Higher score indicates better ability for learning.

    Time frame: Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Diagnostic System (ADS) Test Result for Omission Errors and Commission Errors

    The ADS is composed of 4 factors: omission/missing frequency to measure attention dispersibility; false alarm/commission frequency to measure impulse; mean response/reaction time to measure the speed of task processing; and the response variability/standard deviation of response time to measure the consistency of attention. The total value for both, omission errors and commission errors, ranges from 0-100 errors where high value indicates worsening attention.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Diagnostic System (ADS) Test Score for Reaction Time and Response Variability

    The ADS is composed of 4 factors: omission/missing frequency to measure attention dispersibility; false alarm/comission frequency to measure impulse; mean response/reaction time to measure the speed of task processing; and the response variability/standard deviation of response time to measure the consistency of attention. The score range for both, reaction time and response variability, is 0-100. High score indicates worsening attention. If one or over factor's score is over 65 point, the participant is resulted in having attention deficit.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  3. Digit Span Test Score

    Each participant individually was given a sequence of numbers, with the sequence becoming progressively longer, to repeat the digits in the same sequence, either forwards or backwards. Each sequence length was attempted twice. The test was complete after failure on both trials of any sequence length. 1 point was awarded if the participant passed only 1 trial of a sequence length. 0 points were given if the participant failed both trials. Total score range was 0-16 (forwards) and 0-14 (backwards). A higher score was indicative of better recall and attention.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  4. Finger Window (FW) Test Score

    In FW test, a participant shows memory of a demonstrated visual pattern using a 8x11 inch plastic template containing 9 asymmetrically located holes. The examiner models a given sequence of holes and asks the participant to imitate the sequence by placing his/her finger through the same holes in the correct order. The total number of correct sequences constitutes the total score which ranges from 0-24 (forward FW) and 0-28 (backward FW) with higher score indicating a more favorable health state.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  5. Controlled Oral Words Association Test (COWAT) Score

    This test measures the executive function of the frontal lobe and is consisted of examinations of category/meaning fluency and letter/phoneme fluency. It consisted of three 60 second word generation trials in which the participant orally generates as many words as possible that begin with target letters F, A and S. Dependent variables included total number of acceptable words generated for each target letter and total number of words generated across all three letter trials. Total score was calculated as sum of acceptable words generated, with higher scores indicating better verbal fluency.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  6. Stroop Test Result for Reaction Time

    This test consists of 3 trials: color trial (simple execution), word trial (middle execution) and word-color interference trial (interfering execution). In simple execution, participants have to read the written color names of the words independent of the color of the ink. In middle execution, participants have to read words written in black letters. In interfering experiment, participants have to say the color of the letters independent of the written word. This test estimates spending time for execution. High spending time indicates low ability of suppression of automation.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  7. Stroop Test Result for False Reaction

    This test consists of 3 trials: color trial (simple execution), word trial (middle execution) and word-color interference trial (interfering execution). In simple execution, participants have to read the written color names of the words independent of the color of the ink. In middle execution, participants have to read words written in black letters. In interfering experiment, participants have to say the color of the letters independent of the written word. The total value ranges from 0-24 errors for each execution where high value indicates worsening attention.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  8. Stroop Test Score for Ratio Interference

    Ratio interference is calculated by dividing simple execution time by interfering execution time. The score range is 0-1. Higher value indicates better ability of suppression of automation.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

07

Results

Posted Jul 31, 2013

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Started115
Treated113
Completed92
Not completed23
Withdrew: Adverse event6
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1
Withdrew: Protocol violation6
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject8
Withdrew: Enrolled, but not treated2

Outcome measures

PrimaryKorean Version of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale (K-ARS) Score

The K-ARS is a rating scale that is used for the ADHD diagnosis and the assessment of treatment efficacy and comprises 18 items in total on the basis of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV), each item being rated from 0-3 points. The total score ranges from 0-54 with 0=normal and 54=severe condition.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Korean Version of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale (K-ARS) Score
Units on a scaleOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Korean Version of the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale (K-ARS) Score11.78 ± 7.64
PrimaryClinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score

The CGI-S rating scale is a 7 point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant. A rating of 1 is equivalent to "Normal, not at all ill" and a rating of 7 is equivalent to "Among the most extremely ill participants". Higher scores indicate worsening.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score
Units on a scaleOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score2.81 ± 1.12
PrimaryClinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score

The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score
Units on a scaleOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score2.14 ± 0.75
PrimaryLearning Skill Test (LST) Total Score

The LST measures learning ability of student. This scale is composed of 7 sections: self control, participation, task accomplishment, reading, writing, test taking and information processing. It consists of 70 items for middle school student (age 13-15 years) and 80 items for high school student (age 16-18 years). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). The total score range is 70-350 for middle school version and 80-400 for high school version where higher score indicates better ability for learning. In result analysis, each sub-score and total score was converted to T-score for normalization. The score range of T-score is from 1 to 100 with a mean of 50. Higher score indicates better ability for learning.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Learning Skill Test (LST) Total Score
T-scoreOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Learning Skill Test (LST) Total Score49.61 ± 11.57
SecondaryAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Diagnostic System (ADS) Test Result for Omission Errors and Commission Errors

The ADS is composed of 4 factors: omission/missing frequency to measure attention dispersibility; false alarm/commission frequency to measure impulse; mean response/reaction time to measure the speed of task processing; and the response variability/standard deviation of response time to measure the consistency of attention. The total value for both, omission errors and commission errors, ranges from 0-100 errors where high value indicates worsening attention.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Errors
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Diagnostic System (ADS) Test Result for Omission Errors and Commission Errors
ErrorsOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Omission errors: Baseline58.88 ± 27.35
Omission errors: Week 1257.40 ± 48.79
Commission errors: Baseline62.98 ± 32.32
Commission errors: Week 1251.70 ± 21.19
SecondaryAttention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Diagnostic System (ADS) Test Score for Reaction Time and Response Variability

The ADS is composed of 4 factors: omission/missing frequency to measure attention dispersibility; false alarm/comission frequency to measure impulse; mean response/reaction time to measure the speed of task processing; and the response variability/standard deviation of response time to measure the consistency of attention. The score range for both, reaction time and response variability, is 0-100. High score indicates worsening attention. If one or over factor's score is over 65 point, the participant is resulted in having attention deficit.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Units on scale
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Diagnostic System (ADS) Test Score for Reaction Time and Response Variability
Units on scaleOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Reaction time average: Baseline54.32 ± 15.45
Reaction time average: Week 1249.73 ± 26.33
Response variability: Baseline85.77 ± 60.21
Response variability: Week 1259.42 ± 64.77
SecondaryDigit Span Test Score

Each participant individually was given a sequence of numbers, with the sequence becoming progressively longer, to repeat the digits in the same sequence, either forwards or backwards. Each sequence length was attempted twice. The test was complete after failure on both trials of any sequence length. 1 point was awarded if the participant passed only 1 trial of a sequence length. 0 points were given if the participant failed both trials. Total score range was 0-16 (forwards) and 0-14 (backwards). A higher score was indicative of better recall and attention.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Digit Span Test Score
Units on a scaleOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Forward: Baseline11.19 ± 2.92
Forward: Week 1211.56 ± 2.90
Backward: Baseline7.09 ± 2.39
Backward: Week 127.32 ± 2.41
SecondaryFinger Window (FW) Test Score

In FW test, a participant shows memory of a demonstrated visual pattern using a 8x11 inch plastic template containing 9 asymmetrically located holes. The examiner models a given sequence of holes and asks the participant to imitate the sequence by placing his/her finger through the same holes in the correct order. The total number of correct sequences constitutes the total score which ranges from 0-24 (forward FW) and 0-28 (backward FW) with higher score indicating a more favorable health state.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Finger Window (FW) Test Score
Units on a scaleOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Forward FW: Baseline18.42 ± 4.60
Forward FW: Week 1219.09 ± 4.49
Backward FW: Baseline15.59 ± 4.97
Backward FW: Week 1217.36 ± 3.84
SecondaryControlled Oral Words Association Test (COWAT) Score

This test measures the executive function of the frontal lobe and is consisted of examinations of category/meaning fluency and letter/phoneme fluency. It consisted of three 60 second word generation trials in which the participant orally generates as many words as possible that begin with target letters F, A and S. Dependent variables included total number of acceptable words generated for each target letter and total number of words generated across all three letter trials. Total score was calculated as sum of acceptable words generated, with higher scores indicating better verbal fluency.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Words
Controlled Oral Words Association Test (COWAT) Score
WordsOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Category/semantic: Baseline29.71 ± 5.86
Category/semantic: Week 1230.62 ± 6.16
Letter/phenomic: Baseline28.71 ± 10.82
Letter/phenomic: Week 1233.78 ± 11.18
SecondaryStroop Test Result for Reaction Time

This test consists of 3 trials: color trial (simple execution), word trial (middle execution) and word-color interference trial (interfering execution). In simple execution, participants have to read the written color names of the words independent of the color of the ink. In middle execution, participants have to read words written in black letters. In interfering experiment, participants have to say the color of the letters independent of the written word. This test estimates spending time for execution. High spending time indicates low ability of suppression of automation.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Seconds
Stroop Test Result for Reaction Time
SecondsOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Simple execution time: Baseline14.78 ± 3.8
Simple execution time: Week 1213.64 ± 3.27
Middle execution time: Baseline15.88 ± 3.56
Middle execution time: Week 1215.04 ± 4.57
Interfering execution time: Baseline22.12 ± 6.18
Interfering execution time: Week 1219.72 ± 5.63
SecondaryStroop Test Result for False Reaction

This test consists of 3 trials: color trial (simple execution), word trial (middle execution) and word-color interference trial (interfering execution). In simple execution, participants have to read the written color names of the words independent of the color of the ink. In middle execution, participants have to read words written in black letters. In interfering experiment, participants have to say the color of the letters independent of the written word. The total value ranges from 0-24 errors for each execution where high value indicates worsening attention.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Errors
Stroop Test Result for False Reaction
ErrorsOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Simple execution false reaction: Baseline0.4 ± 0.77
Simple execution false reaction: Week 120.16 ± 0.39
Middle execution false reaction: Baseline0.3 ± 0.67
Middle execution false reaction: Week 120.2 ± 0.47
Interfering execution false reaction: Baseline1.04 ± 1.29
Interfering execution false reaction: Week 120.84 ± 1.00
SecondaryStroop Test Score for Ratio Interference

Ratio interference is calculated by dividing simple execution time by interfering execution time. The score range is 0-1. Higher value indicates better ability of suppression of automation.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Stroop Test Score for Ratio Interference
Units on a scaleOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Baseline0.70 ± 0.19
Week 120.72 ± 0.19

Adverse events

Collected over After signing of informed consent up to Week 12. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
OROS Methylphenidate HCl—2/113 (1.8%)98/113 (86.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOROS Methylphenidate HCl
LymphadenitisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/113
AppendicitisInfections and infestations1/113
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent other events
EventOROS Methylphenidate HCl
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders66/113
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders37/113
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders32/113
HeadacheNervous system disorders31/113
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders19/113
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations19/113
IrritabilityGeneral disorders16/113
Stomach discomfortGastrointestinal disorders15/113
FatigueGeneral disorders13/113
DizzinessNervous system disorders11/113

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(Years)OROS Methylphenidate HCl
Mean15.24 ± 1.43
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)OROS Methylphenidate HCl
Female27
Male86
Korean Version of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale (K-ARS) Score
Korean Version of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale (K-ARS) Score(Units on a scale)OROS Methylphenidate HCl
Mean27.58 ± 8.92
Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score
Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score(Units on a scale)OROS Methylphenidate HCl
Mean4.88 ± 0.79
Learning Skill Test (LST) Total Score
Learning Skill Test (LST) Total Score(T-score)OROS Methylphenidate HCl
Mean40.97 ± 11.07
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Na KS, Lee SI, Hong SD, Kim JH, Shim SH, Choi J, Yang J, Lee MS, Joung YS, Kim EJ, Park JH. Effect of osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate on learning skills in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an open-label study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Jul;28(4):184-92. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283612509. PubMed 23587983 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 23, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01060150
Lead sponsor
Janssen Korea, Ltd., Korea
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 2, 2010
Start date
Jul 2008
Primary completion
Apr 2010
Completion
Apr 2010
Results posted
Jul 31, 2013
Last update
Aug 23, 2013

Study contacts

Janssen Korea, Ltd. Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Korea, Ltd.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion