ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01056887Updated Apr 25, 2011

Copeptin in Differentiation of Polyuria and Polydipsia

An observational study in Polyuria and Polydipsia, sponsored by University of Wuerzburg. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-04-25.

Sponsored by University of Wuerzburg · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The differential diagnosis of patients with polyuria/ polydipsia is often complex, but important for the therapeutic strategy.

Challenging is in particular the clinical differentiation between patients with a partial Diabetes insipidus centralis and patients with primary polydipsia as underlying disease, because both groups are associated with similar urinary osmolalities.

The determination of plasma arginine vasopressin is unusual in this context, since measurement of AVP is not reliably.

C-terminal ProVasopressin (copeptin) is secreted stoichiometrically with AVP from the neurohypophysis, but has a longer half life in the circulation, and is thus easier to measure.

Therefore, the investigators will analyze in that study the diagnostic utility of plasma copeptin in the differential diagnosis of polyuria and polydipsia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Polyuria
  • Polydipsia

Keywords

  • diabetes insipidus
  • primary polydipsia
  • copeptin
  • Utility of plasma copeptin in differential diagnosis of polyuria/ polydipsia while performing a traditional deprivation test
03

In context

Polyuria

14 studies on the registry are indexed under Polyuria; 2 are open to participants now.

Browse Polyuria studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Wuerzburg is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Healthy probands Patients with diabetes insipdus centralis totalis/ partials Patients with diabetes insipidus renalis Patients with primary polydipsia

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with polydipsia/ polyuria, with indication for performing a deprivation test
  • > 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • dDAVP during the last 14d
  • pregnancy
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Groups and cohorts

  • Primary Polydip, D. insipidus
06

Study locations

1 site
  • Univ Hospital Wuerzburg
    Wuerzburg, Bavaria 97080, Germany
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Fenske W, Quinkler M, Lorenz D, Zopf K, Haagen U, Papassotiriou J, Pfeiffer AF, Fassnacht M, Stork S, Allolio B. Copeptin in the differential diagnosis of the polydipsia-polyuria syndrome--revisiting the direct and indirect water deprivation tests. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 May;96(5):1506-15. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2345. Epub 2011 Mar 2. PubMed 21367924 ↗
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01056887
Lead sponsor
University of Wuerzburg
Collaborators
Dr. Carson Liu Med Corp.
First posted
Jan 26, 2010
Start date
Mar 2008
Primary completion
Nov 2010
Completion
Nov 2010
Last update
Apr 25, 2011

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion