CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01043705CenturionUpdated Dec 24, 2015Results posted

TYRX™ Envelope for Prevention of Infection Following Replacement With a CRT or ICD

An observational study in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection, sponsored by TYRX, Inc.. Completed at 52 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-24.

Sponsored by TYRX, Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,262
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection and CIED mechanical complication after CIED replacement with a high-power cardiac implantable electronic device; either a cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRT), or an implantable cardioverter defibrilator (ICD) and TYRX Anti-Bacterial Envelope (formerly known as "AIGISRx"), to the incidence, after replacement with an ICD or CRT and no TYRX.

Read the detailed description

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is associated with significant morbidity and expense. The frequency of CIED infection is increasing faster than the frequency of CIED implants, suggesting more effective prophylactic strategies are needed.

The TYRX Anti-Bacterial Envelope is an FDA-cleared polypropylene mesh that is intended to securely hold a pacemaker pulse generator or defibrillator (ICD) in order to create a stable environment when implanted in the body. It contains the antimicrobial agents, rifampin and minocycline, which have been shown to reduce infection in an in vivo model of bacterial contamination following surgical implant of the generator or defibrillator.

This is a prospective, observational, multicenter registry of subjects undergoing CIED replacement with an ICD or CRT and TYRX, with or without lead revision/addition. The registry subjects will be compared to a published historical control group undergoing CIED replacement with an ICD or CRT and no TYRX , with or without lead revision/addition. The CRT registry subjects will also be compared to a case-matched retrospective control group undergoing CIED replacement with a CRT and no TYRX , with or without lead revision/addition. The primary study endpoints are major CIED infection and CIED mechanical complication during the 12 months following CIED replacement with an ICD or CRT.

Originally executed as two separate studies (Citadel - ICDs) and (Centurion - CRTs), a protocol amendment was executed in 2012 due to slow enrollment, combining the databases for analysis of results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection

Keywords

  • Pacemaker infection
  • Defibrillator infection
  • ICD infection
  • CRT infection
  • Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection
  • Infection
  • Pacemaker, Artificial
  • Defibrillators
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,262 is above the median of 240 across 2,136 observational studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with TYRX, Inc. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who have undergone CIED replacement with an ICD or CRT, with or without (CRT retrospective group only) an TYRX Anti-bacterial Envelope, at US medical centers.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: - Prospective Arms

  • Qualifying CIED Implant procedure was replacement with an ICD or CRT and TYRX, with or without lead revision/addition
  • Received a complete TYRX Anti-Bacterial Envelope Model# 3122 or #3133 according to the Instructions for Use (IFU)
  • Clinically stable to tolerate procedure
  • 18 years or older
  • Able to return for follow-up care through the 12-month visit, or able to have referring physician provide follow-up data to study site by telephone

Exclusion Criteria: - Prospective Arm

  • Unable/unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Contraindication to receiving the TYRX device, in accordance with the package labeling
  • Pregnant or was at risk for becoming pregnant in the 30 day period following the Qualifying TYRX Implant
  • Current CIED infection, or the indication for Qualifying CIED Implant was replacement of CIED that was explanted for infection
  • Clinical diagnosis of an active infection at the time of CIED implant, including pneumonia, urinary tract infection, endovascular, cellulitis, bacteremia, or other major systemic infection. (Note: asymptomatic bacteremia without UTI is not an exclusion criterion)
  • Generator replacement required planned lead extraction
  • Participating in another clinical study evaluating a drug or device designed to reduce CIED infections
  • Life expectancy of less than 6 months
  • Expected to receive a heart transplant within 6 months
  • With the exception of the elderly in good mental health, all vulnerable subjects as defined by the FDA Office of Human Research Protection or local IRB will be excluded

Inclusion Criteria: - Case-matched retrospective Control Arm

  • Qualifying CIED Implant was replacement with a CRT and TYRX, with or without lead revision/addition
  • First un-enrolled patient meeting case-matching criteria in series of patients implanted with a CIED and no TYRX beginning 24 months prior to the date of first TYRX implant at site. If no matching patients in this period, first un-enrolled matching patient implanted with a CIED and no TYRX beginning 24 months prior to the first TYRX implant at site, searching in reverse chronological order
  • Had at least one of following by date of enrollment into the study:

    1. ≥ 12 months follow-up after Qualifying TYRX Implant
    2. Subsequent TYRX Procedure that required opening the generator pocket or implant incision ≤ 12 months after Qualifying TYRX Implant (e.g. battery change, upgrade, lead revision, explant)
    3. Death ≤ 12 months after Qualifying CIED Implant
  • Survived Qualifying CIED Implant to discharge, died of a CIED infection or Mechanical Complication prior to hospital discharge, or died for any reason un-related to Qualifying CIED Implant prior to hospital discharge
  • 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria: - Case-matched retrospective Control Arm

  • Contraindication to receiving the TYRX device, in accordance with the package labeling
  • Pregnant or became pregnant in the 30 day period following the Qualifying TYRX Implant.
  • CIED infection, or the indication for Qualifying CIED Implant was replacement of CIED that was explanted for infection
  • Clinical diagnosis of an active infection at the time of Qualifying CIED Implant, including pneumonia, urinary tract infection, endovascular, cellulitis, bacteremia, or other major systemic infection (Note: asymptomatic bacteriuria without UTI is not an exclusion criterion)
  • Lead extraction was performed at the Qualifying CIED Implant
  • Participated in another clinical study evaluating a drug or device intended to reduce CIED infections
  • Received a heart transplant within 6 months of Qualifying CIED Implant
  • With the exception of the elderly in good mental health, all vulnerable subjects as defined by the FDA Office of Human Research Protection or local IRB will be excluded
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,262 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • CIED replacement with CRT and TYRX

    (Prospective Arm) Patients who have undergone CIED replacement with a CRT and the TYRX Anti-bacterial envelope, with or without lead revision.

  • CIED replacement with ICD and TYRX

    (Prospective Arm) Patients who have undergone CIED replacement with an ICD and the TYRX Anti-bacterial envelope, with or without lead revision.

  • CIED replacement with ICD or CRT and TYRX

    (Prospective Arm) Patients who have undergone CIED replacement with an ICD or CRT and the TYRX Anti-bacterial envelope, with or without lead revision.

  • CIED replacement w/ CRT & no TYRX

    (Retrospective Case-Control Arm) Patients who have undergone CIED replacement with a CRT and no TYRX Anti-bacterial envelope, with or without lead revision/addition.

  • CIED replacement w/ CRT & TYRX vs. Case Match Arm

    Patients who have undergone CIED replacement with a CRT and TYRX Anti-bacterial envelope, with or without lead revision/addition. Cohort is TYRX Case, Matched to Retrospective Case-Control Arm)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Major CIED Infection

    CIED Major Infections

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. CIED Mechanical Complication

    All mechanical Complications related to CIED Implant

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted Dec 24, 2015
Limitations and caveats
This was a non-randomized study and did not have an active comparator.

Participant flow

First Patient Enrolled = 1 January 2010; Last Patient Enrolled = 7 May 2013

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneICD With TYRX ImplantCRT and TYRX Cases, Matched to Retrospective Non-TYRX ImplantsCRT With no TYRX Retrospective Case Control
Started459578578
Completed352447498
Not completed10713180
Withdrew: Death286026
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up27120
Withdrew: Multiple reasons470
Withdrew: Protocol violation210
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject860
Withdrew: Site closure800
Withdrew: Subsequent procedure92429
Withdrew: Adverse event020
Withdrew: Screen fail2100
Withdrew: Other01925

Outcome measures

PrimaryMajor CIED Infection

CIED Major Infections

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of Participants
Major CIED Infection
percentage of ParticipantsCIED Replacement With CRT and TYRXCIED Replacement With CRT and no TYRXCIED Replacement With CRT and TYRX vs. Case Match Arm
Major CIED Infection0.6 (0 to 1.4)1.0 (0 to 2.0)0.7 (0 to 1.6)
Statistical analysis
  • CIED Replacement With CRT and TYRX vs CIED Replacement With CRT and no TYRX · Fisher Exact · p = 0.0023 · One sided fisher's exact test.: 0.0044
  • CIED Replacement With CRT and TYRX vs CIED Replacement With CRT and no TYRX · Fisher Exact · p = 0.0052 · 1-sided fisher's exact text: 0.002
  • CIED Replacement With CRT and TYRX · Fisher Exact · p = 0.0176 · 1-sided fisher's exact test: 0.006
  • CIED Replacement With CRT and no TYRX vs CIED Replacement With CRT and TYRX vs. Case Match Arm · Fisher Exact · p = 0.3764 · Fisher's exact test: .7
PrimaryCIED Mechanical Complication

All mechanical Complications related to CIED Implant

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of Participants
CIED Mechanical Complication
percentage of ParticipantsCIED Replacement With ICD and TYRXCIED Replacement With CRT and no TYRXCIED Replacement With CRT and TYRX vs. Case Match Arm
CIED Mechanical Complication3.1 (1.7 to 5.1)5.5 (3.8 to 7.7)5.4 (3.7 to 7.5)
Statistical analysis
  • CIED Replacement With ICD and TYRX vs CIED Replacement With CRT and no TYRX · 1-sided Chi-square · p = 0.0005 · Rate compared to performance goal: 4.4 · 95% CI 3.3 to 5.8
  • CIED Replacement With ICD and TYRX · 1-sided Chi-square test · p = 0.0444 · Rate compared to a performance goal: 3.1 · 95% CI 1.7 to 5.1
  • CIED Replacement With ICD and TYRX vs CIED Replacement With CRT and no TYRX · 1-sided Chi-squared test · p = 0.0006 · Rate compared to performance goal: 5.4 · 95% CI 3.8 to 5.4
  • CIED Replacement With CRT and no TYRX vs CIED Replacement With CRT and TYRX vs. Case Match Arm · Chi-squared · p = 0.0745 · Descriptive: 5.4 · 95% CI 3.7 to 7.5

Adverse events

Collected over During 12 month follow up period. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CIED Replacement With CRT and TYRX—96/578 (16.6%)—
CIED Replacement With ICD and TYRX—46/459 (10%)—
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 161
Most frequent serious events
EventCIED Replacement With CRT and TYRXCIED Replacement With ICD and TYRX
DeathGeneral disorders45/57824/459
HospitalisationSurgical and medical procedures27/57810/459
Cardiac Failure CongestiveCardiac disorders18/5786/459
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders9/5784/459
PneumoniaInfections and infestations7/5782/459
Implant Site HaematomaGeneral disorders6/5780/459
Cardiac ArrestCardiac disorders5/5782/459
Emergency CareSurgical and medical procedures5/5781/459
Cardio-respiratory failureCardiac disorders4/5781/459
Device dislocationGeneral disorders4/5781/459

Baseline characteristics

Prospective Population: ICD and CRT replacement implant patients receiving a TYRX Envelope Retrospective Population: CRT Patients receiving a CRT and no TYRX envelope. Patients are site medical charts from just previous to use of TYRX Evelope

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)CIED Replacement With ICD and TYRXCIED Replacement With CRT and no TYRXCIED Replacement With CRT and TYRX Vs. Case Match ArmTotal
Median70 ± 12.0173 ± 10.9473 ± 10.7072 ± 11.45
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CIED Replacement With ICD and TYRXCIED Replacement With CRT and no TYRXCIED Replacement With CRT and TYRX Vs. Case Match ArmTotal
Female3394344441217
Male120144134398
08

Study locations

52 sites
  • Princeton Medical Center
    Birmingham, Alabama 35211, United States
  • Decatur General Hospital
    Decatur, Alabama 35601, United States
  • Eliza Coffee Memorial Hospital
    Florence, Alabama 35630, United States
  • Riverview Regional Hospital
    Gadsden, Alabama 35901, United States
  • Arizona Heart Hospital
    Scottsdate, Arizona 85251, United States
  • Community Memorial Hospital
    Ventura, California 93003, United States
  • Watsonville Community Hospital
    Watsonville, California 95076, United States
  • Citrus Memorial Hospital
    Inverness, Florida 34452, United States
  • Osceola Regional Medical Center
    Kissimmee, Florida 34741, United States
  • University of Miami
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Orlando Regional Hospital
    Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
    Tallahassee, Florida 32308, United States
  • Piedmont Medical Center
    Atlanta, Georgia 30309, United States
  • Emory University Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Veteran's Administration Medical Center
    Atlanta, Georgia 30345, United States
  • Wellstar Kennestone Hospital
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Trinity Medical Center
    Rock Island, Illinois 61201, United States
  • St. John's Hospital
    Springfield,, Illinois 62769, United States
  • St. Mary's Medical
    Hobart, Indiana 46342, United States
  • Community Hospital, Munster
    Munster, Indiana 46321, United States
  • St. Margaret Mercy
    Munster, Indiana 46321, United States
  • P and S Surgical Hospital
    Monroe, Louisiana 71201, United States
  • University of Maryland Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
  • Penninsula Regional Medical Center
    Salisbury, Maryland 21804, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02144, United States
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States
  • Henry Ford Health System
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Sparrow Hospital
    Lansing, Michigan 48910, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • Gulfport Memorial Hospital
    Biloxi, Mississippi 39532, United States
  • Keesler Air Force Base Hospital
    Biloxi, Mississippi 39534, United States
  • Southern Heart Center
    Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39401, United States
  • Alegent Health
    Omaha, Nebraska 68124, United States
  • Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
    Englewood, New Jersey 07631, United States
  • St. Francis Hospital
    Hamilton, New Jersey 08690, United States
  • Newark Beth Israel Hospital
    Newark, New Jersey 07112, United States
  • Valley Hospital
    Ridgewood, New Jersey 07450, United States
  • Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
    Sewell, New Jersey 08080, United States
  • St. Luke's - Roosevelt Hospital
    New York, New York 10025, United States
  • Frye Regional Medical Center
    Hickory, North Carolina 28601, United States
  • Catholic Health Partners
    Youngstown, Ohio 44510, United States
  • Doylestown Hospital
    Doylestown, Pennsylvania 18901, United States
  • Pinnacle Health Harrisburg Hospital
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17110, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • York Hospital
    York, Pennsylvania 17403, United States
  • Landmark Medical Center
    Woonsocket, Rhode Island 02895, United States
  • Stern Cardiovascular Foundation
    Germantown, Tennessee 38138, United States
  • University of Tenn. Medical Center - Knoxville
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37920, United States
  • Texas Heart Institute - St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • NE Methodist
    San Antonio, Texas 78258, United States
  • Aurora Health Care
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53215, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sohail MR, Henrikson CA, Braid-Forbes MJ, Forbes KF, Lerner DJ. Comparison of mortality in women versus men with infections involving cardiovascular implantable electronic device. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 1;112(9):1403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.06.031. Epub 2013 Aug 22. PubMed 23972346 ↗
  • Ballo P, Chiodi L, Zuppiroli A. Cardiac implantable electronic devices: prevention starts from ethics. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 23;172(8):670-1; author reply 671-2. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.346. No abstract available. PubMed 22529239 ↗
  • Henrikson CA, Sohail MR, Acosta H, Johnson EE, Rosenthal L, Pachulski R, Dan D, Paladino W, Khairallah FS, Gleed K, Hanna I, Cheng A, Lexcen DR, Simons GR. Antibacterial Envelope Is Associated With Low Infection Rates After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Replacement: Results of the Citadel and Centurion Studies. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Oct;3(10):1158-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 May 31. PubMed 29759500 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 24, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01043705
Lead sponsor
TYRX, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 7, 2010
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Completion
May 2015
Results posted
Dec 24, 2015
Last update
Dec 24, 2015

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion