An interventional study of Effect of breakfasts with whole vs milled rye kernels on appetite in Obesity Prevention, sponsored by Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Completed. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-01-05.
Sponsored by Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Food structure influence metabolic response including appetite. Whole grain foods include a wide range of products; cracked or cut kernels, rolled flakes or milled to flour and used in foods such as breads, breakfast cereals and pasta.
The aim of the present study was to investigate if rye grain structure influence perceived appetite. A comparison of whole rye kernels and milled rye kernels were done in two study parts. In the first part the rye was served as porridge breakfasts and in the second one milled and whole kernels were included into bread breakfasts. In order to observe potential effects that would arise when the remains of the meal reaches the colon, the period of measurement was set to 8 h after intake of iso-caloric rye bread and rye porridge breakfasts.
A randomized, crossover design was used to compare the effects of iso-caloric breakfast meals on subjective appetite during 8 h after consumption.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Effect of breakfasts with whole vs milled rye kernels on appetite
Other: Effect of breakfasts with whole vs milled rye kernels on appetite
Other: Effect of breakfasts with whole vs milled rye kernels on appetite
Iso-caloric portions of the three breakfast foods along with identical additional foods are tested in a cross over design
Subjective appetite (hunger, satiety, desire to eat)
Time frame: 8 hours
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences