CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01041430Updated Apr 21, 2015

Day-case or Inpatient Care Following Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients

An interventional study of day surgery group and inpatient group in Hernia, Inguinal, sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Finland. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-21.

Sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
89
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of day surgery for elderly patients undergoing elective open inguinal hernia repair. Medically stable patients aged 65 years or older, with postoperative care available at home, were randomized to receive treatment either as day-cases or inpatients. Younger day-case patients undergoing the same procedure served as controls. Outcome measures during two postoperative weeks were complications, unplanned admissions and visits to the hospital, unplanned visits to primary health care and patients' acceptance of the type of provided care. The investigators expected to find a higher degree of satisfaction in the patient group receiving day-case care.

Read the detailed description

For repair of inguinal hernia, standard open mesh repair methods were used. For anaesthesia, local infiltration with lidocaine (10 mg/ml) and light intravenous sedation with propofol and fentanyl were primarily used. Reasons for choosing spinal or general anaesthesia were registered. For postoperative pain relief bupivacaine (5mg/ml) 10 ml was infiltered into the wound and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics (NSAID) and paracetamol combined with codeine were prescribed, when suitable. Day-case patients were discharged home according to commonly approved criteria. Inpatients stayed on the hospital ward overnight. All patients received the same preoperative and postoperative instructions orally and in writing. Physical activity was not restricted after the operation, and patients were encouraged to resume to normal life as soon as possible.

At the hospital, patient characteristics, type of anaesthesia, duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay and perioperative complications including unplanned overnight admissions were registered.

The study nurse interviewed all patients on the 1st and 14th postoperative day (POD) by telephone, using standardised follow-up questionnaires. The investigated variables on both dates included: satisfaction with treatment, patient-reported overall condition and functional capacity compared to the preoperative state, intensity of pain and use of pain medication. On POD 1, patients were inquired whether convalescence had been as expected, and asked to specify if not. Also the incidence and intensity other symptoms apart from pain were questioned. On POD 14 patients were questioned of unplanned contacts with primary healthcare, unplanned hospital visits, readmissions, and corresponding reasons.

Patient satisfaction with treatment in the operating room and following arrival to the postanaesthesia care unit was evaluated numerically (0-10), using the numeric rating scale (NRS), with 0 indicating lowest, and 10 highest possible satisfaction as rated by the patient. Intensity of postoperative pain was evaluated by NRS. Overall condition and functional capacity were evaluated using a 3 -point scale (good / moderate / poor). Health-related quality of life was measured using the RAND-36-instrument.

Patients were inquired about the degree of impairment in the groin area at the preoperative visit, and three months postoperatively.

Results are given as median (range) or mean (SD) as appropriate. Patient characteristics and surgery -related variables and NRS scores were compared using the Chi-square, Mann-Whitney-U and Kruskall-Wallis tests when appropriate. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon test for related samples. P-values \< 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hernia, Inguinal

Keywords

  • Ambulatory Surgery
  • Aged
03

In context

Hernia

1,096 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia; 132 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 89 is above the median of 80 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Hernia.

Browse Hernia studies →

Lead sponsor

Helsinki University Central Hospital is the lead sponsor of 299 studies on the registry; 60 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • referral for open repair of inguinal hernia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe comorbidity (ASA class IV, unstable ASA class III)
  • postoperative care at home not available
  • not willing to receive day-case care
  • unable to understand numeric rating scale
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Care provider)
Enrollment
89 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Day Surgery Group

    discharge planned on day of surgery, inguinal hernia repair

    Other: day surgery group

  • Active comparator
    Inpatient Group

    overnight admission at the hospital, inguinal hernia repair

    Other: inpatient group

Interventions

  • Otherday surgery group

    inguinal hernia repair, discharge from the hospital on the day of surgery

  • Otherinpatient group

    inguinal hernia repair, patient admitted overnight to hospital

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction

    satisfaction based on type of care

    Time frame: 2 weeks postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. short term outcome

    rate of complications, unplanned admissions, unplanned visits to the hospital, unplanned visits to primary health care

    Time frame: 2 weeks postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Jorvi Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital
    Espoo, HUS 00029, Finland
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 21, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01041430
Lead sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Responsible party
Kristiina Mattila (MD, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 31, 2009
Start date
Feb 2006
Primary completion
Feb 2008
Last update
Apr 21, 2015

Study contacts

Kristiina Mattila, MD PhD
principal investigator · Helsinki University Central Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion