ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01027156Updated Dec 7, 2009

The Influence of a High Intensity Physical Activity Intervention on a Selection of Health Related Outcomes: An Ecological Approach

An interventional study of High Intensity Exercise in To Assess the Impact of the HIT Intervention on Physiological Responses, To Assess the Role of a Secondary High School as a Setting for Promoting Healthy Eating and PA Behaviours and To Determine the Associations Between CVD Risk Factors at Baseline in 15 - 18 Year Old Youth, sponsored by University of the West of Scotland. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-12-07.

Sponsored by University of the West of Scotland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Ages
15 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a High Intensity exercise intervention can elicit cardiovascular disease protection in adolescents.

02

Conditions studied

  • To Assess the Impact of the HIT Intervention on Physiological Responses
  • To Assess the Role of a Secondary High School as a Setting for Promoting Healthy Eating and PA Behaviours
  • To Determine the Associations Between CVD Risk Factors at Baseline in 15 - 18 Year Old Youth

Keywords

  • Public Health
  • Biochemistry
  • Ecological
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of the West of Scotland is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy
  • 15 - 18 yer old that are capable of performing vigorous exercise

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any health condition that would prevent them from undertaking vigorous exercise
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High Intensity Exercise

    Behavioral: High Intensity Exercise

Interventions

  • BehavioralHigh Intensity Exercise

    In this study, participants will be instructed to sprint maximally for a period of 30 seconds. Following 30s rest, the participants will be instructed to repeat this procedure a further 3 times. This equates to 2 minutes of maximal effort sprinting interspersed with 2 minutes recovery. Participants will be requested to perform this protocol 3 times weekly. Training progression will be implemented by increasing the number of repeats from four repetitions during weeks 1 and 2, to five repetitions during weeks 3 and 4, to six repetitions during weeks 5 and 6. Finally, during week 7 participants will still perform six repetitions but interspersed by only 20 s recovery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To improve blood lipid profiles and lower levels of plasma inflammatory markers.

Secondary outcomes

  1. To determine the associations between CVD risk factors at baseline in 15 - 18 year old youth.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Holy Cross High School
    Hamilton, South Lanarkshire ML3 0BN, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Buchan DS, Ollis S, Young JD, Cooper SM, Shield JP, Baker JS. High intensity interval running enhances measures of physical fitness but not metabolic measures of cardiovascular disease risk in healthy adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2013 May 24;13:498. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-498. PubMed 23705968 ↗
  • Buchan DS, Ollis S, Thomas NE, Baker JS. The influence of a high intensity physical activity intervention on a selection of health related outcomes: an ecological approach. BMC Public Health. 2010 Jan 8;10:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-8. PubMed 20064208 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2009, a primary completion of Dec 2009 and a completion of Dec 2009. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 4, 2009
First posted
Dec 7, 2009
Start
Oct 2009
Primary completionActual
Dec 2009
CompletionActual
Dec 2009
Last update
Dec 7, 2009
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 7, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01027156
Lead sponsor
University of the West of Scotland
Collaborators
Swansea University
First posted
Dec 7, 2009
Start date
Oct 2009
Primary completion
Dec 2009
Completion
Dec 2009
Last update
Dec 7, 2009

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion