CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01024036Updated Mar 21, 2018Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CNTO328 Plus Best Supportive Care in Multicentric Castleman's Disease

A Phase 2 interventional study of Siltuximab and Placebo in Multicentric Castleman's Disease, sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Completed at 57 sites in 23 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-21.

Sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
79
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that CNTO 328 when administered in combination with best supportive care (BSC) is superior to BSC in terms of durable tumor and symptomatic response (complete response or partial response) among patients with Multicentric Castleman's Disease.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter (study conducted at multiple sites), randomized (the study medication is assigned by chance), double blind (neither investigator nor the participant knows the treatment that the participant receives), placebo controlled (an inactive substance that is compared with the study medication to test whether the study medication has a real effect in clinical study), study to assess the efficacy and safety of CNTO 328 plus BSC compared with BSC in patients with symptomatic Multicentric Castleman's Disease. The study mainly consists of 3 phases, including: the screening phase (majority of assessments performed within 28 days of first dose), the treatment phase (blinded and unblinded), and the follow up phase. In the blinded treatment phase, approximately 78 patients will be randomly assigned in 1:2 ratios to either of 2 treatment groups, ie, Placebo + BSC, or CNTO 328 + BSC. Participants receiving placebo + BSC during blinded treatment period who do not respond and have treatment failure will have the option to crossover and receive siltuximab + BSC during unbllinded treatent period. The follow up phase will be 3 months after last dose of study medication and the survival will be followed up until the study ends. Safety evaluations for adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, vital signs, patient-recorded temperature, and physical examination will be monitored throughout the study. The total study duration will be 5 years after the last patient starts study medication.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multicentric Castleman's Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Multicentric Castleman's Disease
  • MCD
  • CNTO 328
  • Best Supportive Care
  • Tumor
  • Symptomatic response
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Interleukin-6
  • IL6
03

In context

Castleman Disease

33 studies on the registry are indexed under Castleman Disease; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 79 is above the median of 25 across 19 interventional studies indexed under Castleman Disease.

Browse Castleman Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC is the lead sponsor of 912 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 278 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 131 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Measurable and symptomatic Multicentric Castleman's Disease
  • Adequate organ function as assessed by laboratory values evaluated by the investigator to determine eligibility prior to treatment
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2
  • Corticosteroids dose that does not exceed 1 mg/kg/day of prednisone, and has remained stable or decreased over the 4 weeks before treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus or Human Herpes Virus-8 positive
  • Skin lesions as sole measurable manifestation of Multicentric Castleman's Disease
  • Previous history of lymphoma
  • Malignancies, except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or cancer other than lymphoma, from which the patient has been disease-free for 3 or more years
  • Concurrent medical condition or disease that may interfere with study participation
  • Prior exposure to Interleukin-6 or Interleukin-6 receptor targeted therapies
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
79 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Siltuximab+best supportive care (BSC)

    Siltuximab 11 mg/kg will be administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks + BSC.

    Drug: Siltuximab · Drug: Best Supportive Care (BSC)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo+BSC

    Placebo will be administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks + BSC. Participants who do not respond to placebo during the blinded treatment period will have option to crossover and receive siltuximab 11 mg/kg which will be administered by 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks + BSC during the unblinded treatment period.

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Best Supportive Care (BSC)

Interventions

  • DrugSiltuximab

    Siltuximab 11 mg/kg will be administered by 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks

    Also known as: CNTO 328

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo will be administered by 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks

  • DrugBest Supportive Care (BSC)

    BSC included treatment for effusions, antipyretics, antipuretics, antihistamines, pain medication, treatment for infections, transfusions, management of infusion-related reactions, and corticosteroids.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Durable Tumor and Symptomatic Response - by Independent Radiology Review

    Durable tumor and symptomatic response is complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). CR: complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease (eg, pleural effusion) and resolution of baseline symptoms attributed to multicentric Castleman's disease, sustained for at least 18 weeks. PR: \>=50 percent decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of indicator lesion(s), with at least stable disease in all other evaluable disease in the absence of treatment failure sustained for at least 18 weeks. The statistical analysis shows difference in symptomatic response rate (siltuximab+best supportive care \[BSC\] minus Placebo+BSC).

    Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 of treatment with study medication until treatment failure or discontinuation of treatment or withdrawal from study, or up to 48 weeks after last participant started study medication(approximately 3 years), whichever occurred earlier

Secondary outcomes

  1. Median Duration of Tumor and Symptomatic Response - by Independent Radiology Review

    Duration of tumor and symptomatic response is defined as time from first documentation of tumor and symptomatic response (CR or PR) to treatment failure. Whenever possible, treatment failure documented by the appearance of new lesions should be confirmed by histologic examination of the new lesions. Symptomatic response is complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). CR: complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease (eg, pleural effusion) and resolution of baseline symptoms attributed to multicentric Castleman's disease, sustained for at least 18 weeks. PR: \>=50 percent decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of indicator lesion(s), with at least stable disease in all other evaluable disease in the absence of treatment failure sustained for at least 18 weeks.

    Time frame: From the date when durable tumour and symptomatic response is achieved until treatment failure, as assessed until 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) (Tumor Response Rate) - by Independent Radiology Review

    Overall tumor response is CR + PR assessed according to Cheson criteria. CR: complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease (eg, pleural effusion). PR: a \>=50 percent decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of index lesion(s), with at least stable disease in all other evaluable disease. Statistical analysis shows difference of overall response rates (siltuximab+best supportive care \[BSC\] minus Placebo+BSC).

    Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until the date when durable tumour and symptomatic response is achieved, as assessed up to 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)

  3. Median Duration of Tumor Response - by Independent Radiology Review

    Duration of tumor response is defined as time from first documentation of tumor response to tumor progression. Tumour response is complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) as assessed according to Cheson criteria. CR: complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease (eg, pleural effusion). PR: a \>=50 percent decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of index lesion(s), with at least stable disease in all other evaluable disease. Statistical analysis shows difference of overall response rates (siltuximab+best supportive care \[BSC\] minus Placebo+BSC).

    Time frame: From the date when tumour response is achieved until tumour progression, as assessed up to 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)

  4. Time to Treatment Failure

    Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from randomization until the participant fails treatment. Treatment failure was defined as any of the following: a sustained increase from baseline in disease related symptoms \>=Grade 2 persisting for at least 3 weeks despite best supportive care (BSC); onset of any new disease related Grade 3 or higher symptom despite BSC; sustained (ie, at least 3 weeks) deterioration in performance status (increase from baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status by more than 1 point) despite BSC; radiologic progression, as measured by modified Cheson criteria; Initiation of any other therapy intended to treat multicentric Castleman's disease ie, prohibited treatments. Statistical analysis shows difference in treatment failure rate (siltuximab+BSC minus Placebo+BSC).

    Time frame: From the date of randomization until a participant fails treatment, as assessed up to 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years), whichever occurred earlier

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Gram Per Liter (g/L) Hemoglobin at Week 13 (Hemoglobin Response Rate)

    Hemoglobin response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved \>= 15 g/L hemoglobin at Week 13.

    Time frame: Week 13

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >= 20 g/L Hemoglobin at Week 13 (Hemoglobin Response Rate)

    Hemoglobin response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved \>= 20 g/L hemoglobin at Week 13.

    Time frame: Week 13

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Corticosteroids

    Percentage of participants who discontinued corticosteroids during blinded treatment period and who were dependent on corticosteroids at baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1).

    Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until 48 weeks after the after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)

  8. 6-year Survival Rate

    Overall survival was defined as percent chance of survival of participants who were still alive at 6 years from time of first study treatment was analyzed.

    Time frame: until 6 years

  9. Median Time Required to Achieve >=1 Point Decrease in the Multicentric Castleman's Disease Symptom Scale (MCD-SS) Score From Baseline

    A patient-reported symptom scale. Symptom presence/absence and severity are noted on an anchor-based numeric scale. Scores range from 1 (very mild) to 5 (very severe).

    Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 (baseline) until 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)

  10. Median Time Required to Achieve >=3-point Increase in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores From Baseline

    The FACIT-F, a 13-item instrument, was designed to measure patient-reported fatigue. It is one of the suite of FACIT instruments developed for outcomes in cancer. Concepts measured in the scale include tiredness, weakness, and difficulty conducting usual functional activities or social interaction due to fatigue. Response options range from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4), and yield a summary score. Total FACIT-F score is the sum of 13 items, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 52 (very much). Higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 (baseline) until 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)

  11. Median Time Required to Achieve >=5-point Increase in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores From Baseline

    SF-36 is a questionnaire and PCS is a part of subscale assessing physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The scores range from 0 (worst score) to 100 (best score), with a higher score indicating better quality of life.

    Time frame: From Day 1 of Cycle 1 (baseline) until 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)

07

Results

Posted Aug 20, 2014

Participant flow

79 participants were enrolled at 38 study centers in 19 countries. The first participant signed the informed consent on 09 Feb 2010, and the last participant's last visit for the primary analysis was 28 Feb 2013. The data until the end of study is presented here.

Blinded Treatment
Participant flow — Blinded Treatment
MilestoneSiltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Started5326
Completed316
Not completed2220
Withdrew: Adverse event11
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1614
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Death02
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject43
Unblinded Treatment
Participant flow — Unblinded Treatment
MilestoneSiltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Started013
Completed010
Not completed03
Withdrew: Adverse event01
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy02
Follow-Up Period
Participant flow — Follow-Up Period
MilestoneSiltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Started146
Completed93
Not completed53
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Adverse event41

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Durable Tumor and Symptomatic Response - by Independent Radiology Review

Durable tumor and symptomatic response is complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). CR: complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease (eg, pleural effusion) and resolution of baseline symptoms attributed to multicentric Castleman's disease, sustained for at least 18 weeks. PR: \>=50 percent decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of indicator lesion(s), with at least stable disease in all other evaluable disease in the absence of treatment failure sustained for at least 18 weeks. The statistical analysis shows difference in symptomatic response rate (siltuximab+best supportive care \[BSC\] minus Placebo+BSC).

Time frame:
From Day 1 of Cycle 1 of treatment with study medication until treatment failure or discontinuation of treatment or withdrawal from study, or up to 48 weeks after last participant started study medication(approximately 3 years), whichever occurred earlier
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Durable Tumor and Symptomatic Response - by Independent Radiology Review
Percentage of participantsPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Durable Tumor and Symptomatic Response - by Independent Radiology Review034
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0012 · Difference in the response rate: 34 · 95% CI 11.1 to 54.8Adjusted for the stratification factor: corticosteroid use
  • Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) · Fisher Exact · p = 0.0004 · Difference in the response rate: 34.0 · 95% CI 11.1 to 54.8Without adjusting for the stratification factor: corticosteroid use
SecondaryMedian Duration of Tumor and Symptomatic Response - by Independent Radiology Review

Duration of tumor and symptomatic response is defined as time from first documentation of tumor and symptomatic response (CR or PR) to treatment failure. Whenever possible, treatment failure documented by the appearance of new lesions should be confirmed by histologic examination of the new lesions. Symptomatic response is complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). CR: complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease (eg, pleural effusion) and resolution of baseline symptoms attributed to multicentric Castleman's disease, sustained for at least 18 weeks. PR: \>=50 percent decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of indicator lesion(s), with at least stable disease in all other evaluable disease in the absence of treatment failure sustained for at least 18 weeks.

Time frame:
From the date when durable tumour and symptomatic response is achieved until treatment failure, as assessed until 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Median Duration of Tumor and Symptomatic Response - by Independent Radiology Review
DaysPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Median Duration of Tumor and Symptomatic Response - by Independent Radiology Review—383.0 (232 to 676)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) (Tumor Response Rate) - by Independent Radiology Review

Overall tumor response is CR + PR assessed according to Cheson criteria. CR: complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease (eg, pleural effusion). PR: a \>=50 percent decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of index lesion(s), with at least stable disease in all other evaluable disease. Statistical analysis shows difference of overall response rates (siltuximab+best supportive care \[BSC\] minus Placebo+BSC).

Time frame:
From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until the date when durable tumour and symptomatic response is achieved, as assessed up to 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) (Tumor Response Rate) - by Independent Radiology Review
Percentage of participantsPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) (Tumor Response Rate) - by Independent Radiology Review3.837.7
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0022 · Difference in overall response rates: 33.9 · 95% CI 11.1 to 54.8
SecondaryMedian Duration of Tumor Response - by Independent Radiology Review

Duration of tumor response is defined as time from first documentation of tumor response to tumor progression. Tumour response is complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) as assessed according to Cheson criteria. CR: complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease (eg, pleural effusion). PR: a \>=50 percent decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of index lesion(s), with at least stable disease in all other evaluable disease. Statistical analysis shows difference of overall response rates (siltuximab+best supportive care \[BSC\] minus Placebo+BSC).

Time frame:
From the date when tumour response is achieved until tumour progression, as assessed up to 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Median Duration of Tumor Response - by Independent Radiology Review
DaysPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Median Duration of Tumor Response - by Independent Radiology Review70 (70 to 70)356 (55 to 674)
SecondaryTime to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from randomization until the participant fails treatment. Treatment failure was defined as any of the following: a sustained increase from baseline in disease related symptoms \>=Grade 2 persisting for at least 3 weeks despite best supportive care (BSC); onset of any new disease related Grade 3 or higher symptom despite BSC; sustained (ie, at least 3 weeks) deterioration in performance status (increase from baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status by more than 1 point) despite BSC; radiologic progression, as measured by modified Cheson criteria; Initiation of any other therapy intended to treat multicentric Castleman's disease ie, prohibited treatments. Statistical analysis shows difference in treatment failure rate (siltuximab+BSC minus Placebo+BSC).

Time frame:
From the date of randomization until a participant fails treatment, as assessed up to 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years), whichever occurred earlier
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to Treatment Failure
DaysPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Time to Treatment Failure134 (85 to NA)NA (378 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) · Log Rank · p = 0.0084 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.418 · 95% CI 0.214 to 0.815Hazard ratio and 95% CI from a Cox proportional hazards model
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Gram Per Liter (g/L) Hemoglobin at Week 13 (Hemoglobin Response Rate)

Hemoglobin response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved \>= 15 g/L hemoglobin at Week 13.

Time frame:
Week 13
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Gram Per Liter (g/L) Hemoglobin at Week 13 (Hemoglobin Response Rate)
Percentage of participantsPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Gram Per Liter (g/L) Hemoglobin at Week 13 (Hemoglobin Response Rate)061.3
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0002 · Difference of hemoglobin response rates: 61.3 · 95% CI 28.3 to 85.1Difference in hemoglobin response rates is equal to hemoglobin response rate for siltuximab+best supportive care \[BSC\] arm minus hemoglobin response rate for Placebo+BSC arm.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved >= 20 g/L Hemoglobin at Week 13 (Hemoglobin Response Rate)

Hemoglobin response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieved \>= 20 g/L hemoglobin at Week 13.

Time frame:
Week 13
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >= 20 g/L Hemoglobin at Week 13 (Hemoglobin Response Rate)
Percentage of participantsPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >= 20 g/L Hemoglobin at Week 13 (Hemoglobin Response Rate)041.9
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC) vs Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0195 · Difference of hemoglobin response rates: 41.9 · 95% CI 7.8 to 70.7Difference in hemoglobin response rates is equal to hemoglobin response rate for siltuximab+best supportive care \[BSC\] arm minus hemoglobin response rate for Placebo+BSC arm.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Corticosteroids

Percentage of participants who discontinued corticosteroids during blinded treatment period and who were dependent on corticosteroids at baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1).

Time frame:
From Day 1 of Cycle 1 until 48 weeks after the after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Corticosteroids
Percentage of participantsPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Corticosteroids11.130.8
Secondary6-year Survival Rate

Overall survival was defined as percent chance of survival of participants who were still alive at 6 years from time of first study treatment was analyzed.

Time frame:
until 6 years
Reported as:
Median · Percent chance of survival
6-year Survival Rate
Percent chance of survivalPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
6-year Survival Rate79.5 (57.5 to 91.0)86.3 (71.9 to 93.6)
SecondaryMedian Time Required to Achieve >=1 Point Decrease in the Multicentric Castleman's Disease Symptom Scale (MCD-SS) Score From Baseline

A patient-reported symptom scale. Symptom presence/absence and severity are noted on an anchor-based numeric scale. Scores range from 1 (very mild) to 5 (very severe).

Time frame:
From Day 1 of Cycle 1 (baseline) until 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Median Time Required to Achieve >=1 Point Decrease in the Multicentric Castleman's Disease Symptom Scale (MCD-SS) Score From Baseline
DaysPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Median Time Required to Achieve >=1 Point Decrease in the Multicentric Castleman's Disease Symptom Scale (MCD-SS) Score From Baseline262 (40 to NA)85 (22 to 379)
SecondaryMedian Time Required to Achieve >=3-point Increase in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores From Baseline

The FACIT-F, a 13-item instrument, was designed to measure patient-reported fatigue. It is one of the suite of FACIT instruments developed for outcomes in cancer. Concepts measured in the scale include tiredness, weakness, and difficulty conducting usual functional activities or social interaction due to fatigue. Response options range from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4), and yield a summary score. Total FACIT-F score is the sum of 13 items, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 52 (very much). Higher scores represent better outcomes.

Time frame:
From Day 1 of Cycle 1 (baseline) until 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Median Time Required to Achieve >=3-point Increase in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores From Baseline
DaysPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Median Time Required to Achieve >=3-point Increase in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores From Baseline22 (8 to 64)15 (8 to 23)
SecondaryMedian Time Required to Achieve >=5-point Increase in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores From Baseline

SF-36 is a questionnaire and PCS is a part of subscale assessing physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. The scores range from 0 (worst score) to 100 (best score), with a higher score indicating better quality of life.

Time frame:
From Day 1 of Cycle 1 (baseline) until 48 weeks after the last participant started study treatment (approximately 3 years)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Median Time Required to Achieve >=5-point Increase in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores From Baseline
DaysPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Median Time Required to Achieve >=5-point Increase in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores From BaselineNA (169 to NA)420 (106 to NA)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 7 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC) (Blinded)—7/26 (26.9%)25/26 (96.2%)
Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) (Blinded)—12/53 (22.6%)53/53 (100%)
Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) (Unblinded)—4/13 (30.8%)13/13 (100%)
Placebo + BSC (Follow-up Period)—1/6 (16.7%)5/6 (83.3%)
Siltuximab + BSC (Follow-up Period)—3/14 (21.4%)14/14 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC) (Blinded)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) (Blinded)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) (Unblinded)Placebo + BSC (Follow-up Period)Siltuximab + BSC (Follow-up Period)
Oedema PeripheralGeneral disorders1/260/531/131/60/14
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/260/531/131/60/14
Pleural EffusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/261/532/131/60/14
PneumoniaInfections and infestations3/260/531/130/60/14
Lung InfectionInfections and infestations1/260/531/130/60/14
Accidental OverdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/260/531/130/60/14
Mycobacterium TestInvestigations1/260/531/130/60/14
Poems SyndromeNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/260/531/130/60/14
Pain ManagementSurgical and medical procedures1/260/531/130/60/14
Cholecystitis ChronicHepatobiliary disorders0/261/530/130/61/14
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 169
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC) (Blinded)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) (Blinded)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC) (Unblinded)Placebo + BSC (Follow-up Period)Siltuximab + BSC (Follow-up Period)
FatigueGeneral disorders14/2618/538/132/64/14
Oedema PeripheralGeneral disorders8/2619/534/133/65/14
Weight DecreasedInvestigations7/264/533/133/62/14
Decreased AppetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders7/269/534/133/64/14
Peripheral Sensory NeuropathyNervous system disorders7/2613/535/133/63/14
Pleural EffusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/262/532/133/62/14
MalaiseGeneral disorders7/2615/536/132/65/14
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders6/2622/534/132/63/14
HyperhidrosisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders7/2610/535/132/62/14
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations6/2620/534/131/62/14

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Total
Mean47.7 ± 13.444.4 ± 13.3245.5 ± 13.35
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Total
Female42327
Male223052
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Placebo + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Siltuximab + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Total
AUSTRALIA011
BELGIUM033
BRAZIL246
CANADA101
CHINA51116
EGYPT101
FRANCE224
GERMANY101
HONG KONG235
ISRAEL112
NEW ZEALAND112
NORWAY112
RUSSIAN FEDERATION033
SINGAPORE033
SOUTH KOREA246
SPAIN112
TAIWAN134
UNITED KINGDOM123
UNITED STATES41014
08

Study locations

57 sites
  • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
  • Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Tampa, Florida, United States
  • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Lansing, Michigan, United States
  • Rochester, Minnesota, United States
  • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
  • Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  • Houston, Texas, United States
  • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Seattle, Washington, United States
  • East Melbourne, Australia
  • Brussels, Belgium
  • Leuven, Belgium
  • Brasilia, Brazil
  • Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
  • Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Toronto, Canada
  • Beijing, China
  • Chengdu, China
  • Guangzhou, China
  • Hangzhou, China
  • Shanghai, China
  • Cairo, Egypt
  • Clermont Ferrand, France
  • Grenoble Cedex 1, France
  • Lille Cedex, France
  • Montpellier, France
  • Paris, France
  • Rennes, France
  • Tours Cedex 9, France
  • Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
  • Berlin, Germany
  • Mainz, Germany
  • München, Germany
  • Sha Tin, Hong Kong
  • Budapest, Hungary
  • Hyderabad N/A, India
  • Pune, India
  • Petach Tikva, Israel
  • Ramat Gan, Israel
  • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Pandan, Malaysia
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Auckland, New Zealand
  • Oslo, Norway
  • Kazan, Russian Federation
  • Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • St.-Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Singapore, Singapore
  • Barcelona, Spain
  • Madrid, Spain
  • Taipei, Taiwan
  • London, United Kingdom
  • Manchester, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • van Rhee F, Rosenthal A, Kanhai K, Martin R, Nishimura K, Hoering A, Fajgenbaum DC. Siltuximab is associated with improved progression-free survival in idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease. Blood Adv. 2022 Aug 23;6(16):4773-4781. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007112. PubMed 35793409 ↗
  • Fajgenbaum DC, Uldrick TS, Bagg A, Frank D, Wu D, Srkalovic G, Simpson D, Liu AY, Menke D, Chandrakasan S, Lechowicz MJ, Wong RS, Pierson S, Paessler M, Rossi JF, Ide M, Ruth J, Croglio M, Suarez A, Krymskaya V, Chadburn A, Colleoni G, Nasta S, Jayanthan R, Nabel CS, Casper C, Dispenzieri A, Fossa A, Kelleher D, Kurzrock R, Voorhees P, Dogan A, Yoshizaki K, van Rhee F, Oksenhendler E, Jaffe ES, Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Lim MS. International, evidence-based consensus diagnostic criteria for HHV-8-negative/idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease. Blood. 2017 Mar 23;129(12):1646-1657. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-10-746933. Epub 2017 Jan 13. PubMed 28087540 ↗
  • van Rhee F, Wong RS, Munshi N, Rossi JF, Ke XY, Fossa A, Simpson D, Capra M, Liu T, Hsieh RK, Goh YT, Zhu J, Cho SG, Ren H, Cavet J, Bandekar R, Rothman M, Puchalski TA, Reddy M, van de Velde H, Vermeulen J, Casper C. Siltuximab for multicentric Castleman's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Aug;15(9):966-74. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70319-5. Epub 2014 Jul 17. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):417. PubMed 25042199 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 21, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01024036
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 2, 2009
Start date
Mar 18, 2010
Primary completion
Mar 25, 2013
Completion
Feb 24, 2017
Results posted
Aug 20, 2014
Last update
Mar 21, 2018

Study contacts

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion