CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01007487Updated Jul 20, 2011

Plastic Wound Retractors and Bacterial Translocation in Abdominal Surgery

An observational study in Bacterial Translocation, Surgical Site Infection and Abdominal Surgery, sponsored by St Vincent's University Hospital, Ireland. Completed at 2 sites in Ireland. Open to participants aged 14 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-07-20.

Sponsored by St Vincent's University Hospital, Ireland · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250
Ages
14 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hypothesis: Plastic wound retractors reduce passage of bacteria from the abdomen to the surgical incision site in abdominal surgery

Currently, plastic wound retractors are used in abdominal surgery to facilitate access to the abdominal cavity. This study aims to establish whether they also prevent bacteria crossing from the abdominal cavity to the surgical incision site. Patients undergoing abdominal surgery in which a plastic wound retractor (Alexis®)is used are eligible for inclusion in the study. Swabs are taken from the inside and the outside of the plastic wound retractor prior to removing the retractor from the abdomen. The bacterial flora from swabs taken inside and outside the plastic wound protector are then compared to see if there is any difference between inside and outside the retractor. Bacteria are classified as 'enteric'(i.e. from the gastrointestinal tract) or 'skin' bacteria, depending on their usual location. The study aims to establish whether a plastic wound retractor (Alexis®) reduces translocation of enteric bacteria to the surgical incision site.

Read the detailed description

Plastic wound retractors are currently used in abdominal surgery for wound retraction. They allow access to intra-abdominal organs through an incision in abdominal surgery. Plastic wound retractors may also act as a barrier to bacterial translocation from the abdominal cavity to the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare microbial flora from inside and outside the plastic wound retractor to establish whether plastic wound retractors affect bacterial translocation.

METHODS This multi-centre prospective observational study is being conducted between November 2007 and January 2010. Patients undergoing elective or emergency abdominal surgery in which an Alexis® wound retractor is used are eligible for inclusion in the study. Swabs are taken from inside and outside the Alexis® wound protector immediately prior to removal of the wound protector from the abdominal cavity. Swabs undergo gram stain and culture. "Inside" the wound swab is defined as the part of the wound protector in contact with the intra-abdominal organs, "outside" is the part in contact with the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Results from inside and outside swabs are then compared to establish whether there is a difference in bacterial flora. The study aims to establish whether a plastic wound retractor (Alexis®) reduces translocation of enteric bacteria to the surgical incision site.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bacterial Translocation
  • Surgical Site Infection
  • Abdominal Surgery
  • Wound Infection

Keywords

  • Plastic wound protector
  • Plastic wound retractor
  • Bacterial translocation
  • Surgical site infection
  • Abdominal surgery
  • Wound infection
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 250 is close to the median of 240 across 2,136 observational studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

St Vincent's University Hospital, Ireland is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing abdominal surgery in which a plastic wound retractor is used.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing abdominal surgery in which a plastic wound retractor is used

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A
05

Study design

Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250 participants (actual)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of inside swabs positive for enteric bacteria and outside swabs positive for enteric bacteria.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of bacteria isolated from intraoperative swabs and subsequent post-operative swabs (<30days post-operatively)

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • St. Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park
    Dublin 4, Ireland
  • Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street
    Dublin, Dublin 1, Ireland
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01007487
Lead sponsor
St Vincent's University Hospital, Ireland
First posted
Nov 4, 2009
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2010
Completion
Jul 2010
Last update
Jul 20, 2011

Study contacts

Desmond Winter
principal investigator · St Vincent's University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion