An observational study in Blood Pressure, sponsored by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-04-16.
Sponsored by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · Observational
The purpose of this study was to compare the Continuous Non-invasive Arterial Pressure (CNAP) monitor with the gold standard of invasive arterial pressure monitoring during:
The CNAP monitor continuously measures blood pressure using a finger cuff. It showed a good agreement to invasive blood pressure measurements during anaesthesia induction and maintenance during surgery. In critical ill patients cardiac arrhythmia is probably a confounding factor affecting accuracy and interchangeability of CNAP. As systolic arterial CNAP pressure in comparison to mean pressure shows no statistical interchangeability with invasive measurements, mean pressure should be considered when making therapy decisions.
A problem is the missing standard criterion for comparison of continuously devices with invasive pressure.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein is the lead sponsor of 157 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
patients undergoing major surgery or intensive care unit treatement with the need for an invasive blood pressure measurement
Exclusion Criteria:
ASA status 3 or 4 patients with invasive blood pressure measurement on the intensive care unit
Bias and percentage error of CNAP compared with invasive arterial pressure measurement
Time frame: 1.) Induction of general anaesthesia. 2.) Maintanance of general anaesthesia. 3.) Intensive Care Treatement after surgery
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein