CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01001026Updated Apr 10, 2015

Rapid Evaluation of Pandemic H1N1 Influenza Vaccine in Aboriginal Children and Adults

A Phase 4 interventional study of Arepanrix and Arepanrix in H1N1/2009 Influenza, sponsored by David Scheifele. Completed at 5 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 59 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-04-10.

Sponsored by David Scheifele · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
156
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
6 Months to 59 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness (immune response) to a licensed H1N12009 influenza vaccine in aboriginal children and adults. The study will enroll 200 healthy adults (ages 20-59 years) and 75 healthy children (ages 6-35 months). Adults will receive one dose of a licensed H1N1 vaccine and children will receive two doses of a licensed H1N1 vaccine approximately 3 weeks apart. Study procedures include: medical history, blood samples and completing a memory aid. Participants will be involved in study related procedures for approximately 3 weeks (adults) or 6 weeks (children).

Read the detailed description

During the first wave of the H1N12009 pandemic in Canada, persons of aboriginal background were more often hospitalized with severe infections than were other Canadians. Among First Nations members the hospitalization rate was 5 times higher than the national average. Common risk factors were young age (children and younger adults) and underlying health conditions. A high proportion of aboriginal adults have health conditions that predispose to adverse influenza outcomes, including diabetes, asthma, obesity and smoking-related lung diseases.

Aboriginals could benefit substantially from timely, effective vaccination against pandemic influenza and are expected to be among the first Canadians to be offered vaccine when available. The vaccine dosing recommendation will be based on limited studies in the general population, leaving open the question of whether aboriginals will respond satisfactorily to the recommended dosing. Unique social and biological factors among aboriginals could affect their responses to vaccination, reducing protection or increasing adverse effects. Thus it would be optimal to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the pandemic vaccine among the earliest aboriginal recipients, to inform the subsequent vaccination of other aboriginal groups.

The objectives of this study are two-fold:

  1. To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of H1N12009 influenza vaccine in a convenience sample of children and adults of aboriginal background (First Nations, Metis and Inuit) with emphasis on subgroups at greatest risk of severe disease.
  2. To complete this evaluation soon after the pandemic vaccines become available so as to inform the subsequent use of the vaccines in the aboriginal population.
02

Conditions studied

  • H1N1/2009 Influenza

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • vaccine
  • H1N1
  • influenza
  • H1N1 influenza vaccine
  • pandemic
03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,214 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 156 is below the median of 238 across 1,853 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

David Scheifele is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 59 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Good general health
  • Written informed consent provided by or for the subject
  • Aboriginal ethnicity (First Nations, Metis or Inuit)
  • Adults 20-59 years of age
  • Children 6-35 months of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergies to eggs, thimerosal or gentamicin sulphate
  • Life-threatening reaction to previous Flu vaccine
  • Bleeding disorder
  • Pregnancy
  • Receipt of blood or blood products in past 3 months
  • Compromised immune system
  • Chronic illness
  • Previous lab-confirmed H1N1/2009 infection
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
156 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    1

    Adults: One doses of H1N12009 vaccine

    Biological: Arepanrix

  • Other
    2

    Children: Two doses of H1N12009 vaccine given 3 weeks apart

    Biological: Arepanrix

Interventions

  • BiologicalArepanrix

    Adults: One dose Arepanrix vaccine given IM (0.5 mL)

  • BiologicalArepanrix

    Children: Two doses of Arepanrix vaccine given IM (0.25 mL) three weeks apart

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of adverse events (AEs) for days 0-6 after each vaccination

    Time frame: Day 7 and Day 21 post vaccination

  2. Occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) and other significant health events up to 21 days after each vaccination

    Time frame: Day 7 and Day 21 post vaccination

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of baseline and post-immunization antibody titres

    Time frame: Day 21 (adults) and Day 42 (children)

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Calgary Health Services and Alberta Children's Hospital
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Capital Health District, Alberta Health Services
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Child and Family Research Center
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Vaccine Evaluation Center, University of British Columbia
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • University of Manitoba Health Sciences Centre
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rubinstein E, Predy G, Sauve L, Hammond GW, Aoki F, Sikora C, Li Y, Law B, Halperin S, Scheifele D. The responses of Aboriginal Canadians to adjuvanted pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccine. CMAJ. 2011 Sep 20;183(13):E1033-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110196. Epub 2011 Jul 25. PubMed 21788422 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 10, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01001026
Lead sponsor
David Scheifele
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network
Responsible party
David Scheifele (Principal Investigator, University of British Columbia) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2009
Start date
Nov 2009
Primary completion
Feb 2010
Completion
Feb 2010
Last update
Apr 10, 2015

Study contacts

David Scheifele, MD
principal investigator · University of British Columbia
Ethan Rubinstein, MD
study director · University of Manitoba Health Sciences Centre
Gerald Predy, MD
study director · Alberta Health Services, Edmonton
Laura Sauve, MD
study director · University of British Columbia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion