CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00999999Updated Sep 15, 2015

Efficacy of Tachosil as Dural Sealant Compared to Standard Treatment

A Phase 4 interventional study of Craniotomy supra- or infratentorial, dural closure in Subjects Scheduled for Supra-/Infratentorial Craniotomy, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-09-15.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
241
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Main objective of this trial is to assess the hypothesis whether the application of TachoSil® as a dural sealant improves the quality of craniotomy procedure and outcome in general compared with standard dural closure techniques in a controlled and randomized way. As a primary endpoint the investigators look at possible postoperative occurrence of CSF pads or leakages needing any kind of intervention until day 30 after the primary craniotomy. Furthermore, the investigators will look at other surgery-related complications and at pharmacoeconomic endpoints such as hospital stay or cost of the implant. Overall, the results of this study will provide important information on whether or not the adjunct of a relatively expensive implant on a routinely basis for the closure of elective craniotomies is safe and effective, or not.

To date, TachoSil® is often used in neurosurgery and other surgical disciplines in a non-standardized fashion also to prevent CSF leakage after dural closure. So far, adverse events directly related to the product have not been reported. Theoretically, any implant may be associated with a higher incidence of postoperative infections (e.g. epidural, subdural or subgaleal empyema). On the other hand, it is not known whether or not the application of TachoSil® on the dural suture may reduce CSF leakage.

02

Conditions studied

  • Subjects Scheduled for Supra-/Infratentorial Craniotomy

Keywords

  • Craniotomy outcome
  • CSF leakage
  • Dural sealant
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland is the lead sponsor of 968 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Neurosurgical indication for craniotomy and opening of dura to access cerebral structures/pathologies (discussed in the indication conference of board certified neurosurgeons at the University Hospital of Basel).
  • The list of pathologies includes:

    • primary or secondary benign/malignant brain tumors
    • aneurysms
    • arterious-venous malformations
    • cavernomas
    • pituitary adenomas
    • temporal lobectomy (epilepsy surgery)
    • longterm posttraumatic revisions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of subdural empyema/abscess or any kind of infection affecting/infiltrating the dura mater
  • Emergency for trauma
  • Previous surgery on the same site
  • Cases, where water-tight dural suture is not possible (intraoperative exclusion decision)
  • Known hypersensitivity to TachoSil®
  • Participation in another study
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to read and understand the participant's information
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
241 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard

    Standard dural closure

    Procedure: Craniotomy supra- or infratentorial, dural closure

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    Experimental dural closure, adding of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP)

    Procedure: Craniotomy supra- or infratentorial, dural closure

Interventions

  • ProcedureCraniotomy supra- or infratentorial, dural closure

    After dural closure with a water-tight suture, randomization is performed. Depending on the randomization outcome, the study drug Tachosil is applied on the dural suture or omitted.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurence of CSF pad or leakage needing any kind of intervention.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Basel
    Basel, Basel-Stadt 4031, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hutter G, von Felten S, Sailer MH, Schulz M, Mariani L. Risk factors for postoperative CSF leakage after elective craniotomy and the efficacy of fleece-bound tissue sealing against dural suturing alone: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):735-44. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.JNS131917. Epub 2014 Jul 18. PubMed 25036199 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00999999
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Collaborators
Nycomed
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2009
Start date
Oct 2009
Primary completion
Jul 2012
Completion
Aug 2012
Last update
Sep 15, 2015

Study contacts

Mariani Luigi, Prof.
principal investigator · University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion