CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00996580Updated Jun 24, 2013Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DR-103 for the Prevention of Pregnancy

A Phase 3 interventional study of DR-103 in Pregnancy Prevention, sponsored by Teva Women's Health. Completed at 94 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-06-24.

Sponsored by Teva Women's Health · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,597
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is an open-label, single-treatment study. All subjects will receive 12 months of oral contraceptive therapy with DR-103. Study participants will receive physical and gynecological exams, including Pap smear. During the study, all participants will be required to complete a diary.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy Prevention

Keywords

  • Contraception
  • Oral contraceptives
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Teva Women's Health is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Sexually active at risk for pregnancy
  • Agreement to use study OC therapy as their only method of birth control during the study
  • history of regular spontaneous menstrual cycles or withdrawal bleeding episodes
  • Others as dictated by FDA-approved protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindication to the use of oral contraceptives
  • Pregnancy or plans to become pregnant in the next 14 months
  • Smoker and age ≥ 35 years
  • Others as dictated by FDA-approved protocol
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3,597 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DR-103

    Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: * 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; * 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; * 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; * 7 days of 10 mcg EE.

    Drug: DR-103

Interventions

  • DrugDR-103

    One tablet daily. Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE.

    Also known as: levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol, Quartette®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

    Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles)

    Time frame: Day 1 up to year 1

  2. Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

    Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles)

    Time frame: Day 1 up to year 1

  3. Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

    Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles)

    Time frame: Day 1 up to year 1

  4. All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

    Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles)

    Time frame: Day 1 up to year 1

  5. Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

    Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles)

    Time frame: Day 1 up to year 1

  6. Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

    Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles)

    Time frame: Day 1 up to year 1

  7. Summary of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

    The on-treatment time frame spanned the time during which study drug was administered until 3 weeks beyond the last study drug date. Relationship to study drug was assessed by the investigator. Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to 13 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. All Users Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

    A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to year 1

  2. Compliant-Use Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

    A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to year 1

07

Results

Posted Jun 14, 2013

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDR-103
Started3597
Pregnancy intent-to-treat population3019
Completed2144
Not completed1453
Withdrew: Adverse event466
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up480
Withdrew: Noncompliance with the protocol137
Withdrew: Physician decision5
Withdrew: Pregnancy68
Withdrew: Protocol violation16
Withdrew: Sponsor requested participant withdrawal35
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject217
Withdrew: Other29

Outcome measures

PrimaryAll Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles)

Time frame:
Day 1 up to year 1
Reported as:
Number · pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure
All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight
pregnancies / 100 woman years exposureDR-103: TotalDR-103: <90 kg SubpopulationDR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation
All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight2.82 (2.1787 to 3.5920)2.46 (1.8111 to 3.2719)4.54 (2.6963 to 7.1601)
PrimaryTypical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles)

Time frame:
Day 1 up to year 1
Reported as:
Number · pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure
Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight
pregnancies / 100 woman years exposureDR-103: TotalDR-103: <90 kg SubpopulationDR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation
Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight3.25 (2.5101 to 4.1372)2.83 (2.0793 to 3.7556)5.32 (3.1636 to 8.3840)
PrimaryCompliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles)

Time frame:
Day 1 up to year 1
Reported as:
Number · pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure
Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight
pregnancies / 100 woman years exposureDR-103: TotalDR-103: <90 kg SubpopulationDR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation
Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight3.71 (2.8629 to 4.7173)3.23 (2.3742 to 4.2869)6.04 (3.5894 to 9.5044)
SecondaryAll Users Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles.

Time frame:
Day 1 up to year 1
Reported as:
Number · pregnancies / cumulative exposure
All Users Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight
pregnancies / cumulative exposureDR-103: TotalDR-103: <90 kg SubpopulationDR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation
Cycle 10.0074 (0.0048 to 0.0113)0.0060 (0.0035 to 0.0101)0.0139 (0.0066 to 0.0289)
Cycle 20.0134 (0.0097 to 0.0186)0.0114 (0.0077 to 0.0168)0.0231 (0.0129 to 0.0415)
Cycle 30.0212 (0.0162 to 0.0277)0.0185 (0.0135 to 0.0254)0.0339 (0.0205 to 0.0558)
Cycle 40.0272 (0.0213 to 0.0346)0.0239 (0.0179 to 0.0317)0.0429 (0.0270 to 0.0676)
PrimaryAll Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles)

Time frame:
Day 1 up to year 1
Reported as:
Number · pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure
All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight
pregnancies / 100 woman years exposureDR-103: TotalDR-103: <90 kg SubpopulationDR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation
All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight2.74 (2.1189 to 3.4975)2.40 (1.7618 to 3.1869)4.42 (2.6192 to 6.9735)
PrimaryTypical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles)

Time frame:
Day 1 up to year 1
Reported as:
Number · pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure
Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight
pregnancies / 100 woman years exposureDR-103: TotalDR-103: <90 kg SubpopulationDR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation
Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight2.92 (2.2558 to 3.7234)2.55 (1.8745 to 3.3905)4.72 (2.7973 to 7.4467)
PrimaryCompliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or \> 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)\*(total number of pregnancies)\*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles)

Time frame:
Day 1 up to year 1
Reported as:
Number · pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure
Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight
pregnancies / 100 woman years exposureDR-103: TotalDR-103: <90 kg SubpopulationDR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation
Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight3.07 (2.3692 to 3.9105)2.68 (1.9696 to 3.5625)4.94 (2.9315 to 7.8034)
PrimarySummary of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

The on-treatment time frame spanned the time during which study drug was administered until 3 weeks beyond the last study drug date. Relationship to study drug was assessed by the investigator. Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention.

Time frame:
Day 1 up to 13 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Summary of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
participantsDR-103
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs)2605
Treatment-related AEs1086
Serious AEs58
TEAEs leading to discontinuation463
SecondaryCompliant-Use Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight

A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles.

Time frame:
Day 1 up to year 1
Reported as:
Number · pregnancies / cumulative exposure
Compliant-Use Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight
pregnancies / cumulative exposureDR-103: TotalDR-103: <90 kg SubpopulationDR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation
Cycle 10.0080 (0.0044 to 0.0144)0.0062 (0.0030 to 0.0130)0.0164 (0.0062 to 0.0431)
Cycle 20.0134 (0.0083 to 0.0215)0.0116 (0.0066 to 0.0204)0.0215 (0.0090 to 0.0511)
Cycle 30.0236 (0.0162 to 0.0344)0.0203 (0.0129 to 0.0317)0.0392 (0.0196 to 0.0776)
Cycle 40.0291 (0.0206 to 0.0412)0.0256 (0.0170 to 0.0385)0.0457 (0.0238 to 0.0871)

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 - one year and three weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DR-103—58/3,597 (1.6%)1,567/3,597 (43.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 52
Most frequent serious events
EventDR-103
Abortion spontaneousPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions5/3597
Suicide attemptPsychiatric disorders5/3597
Deep vein thrombosisVascular disorders3/3597
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders3/3597
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/3597
ConvulsionNervous system disorders2/3597
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders2/3597
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders2/3597
OverdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/3597
AppendicitisInfections and infestations2/3597
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDR-103
HeadacheNervous system disorders420/3597
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations342/3597
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations323/3597
SinusitisInfections and infestations246/3597
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders241/3597
MetrorrhagiaReproductive system and breast disorders216/3597
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations214/3597
AcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders193/3597
DysmenorrhoeaReproductive system and breast disorders188/3597

Baseline characteristics

Safety population: participants who took at least one dose of intervention.

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)DR-103
Mean27.4 ± 7.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DR-103
Female3597
Male0
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)DR-103
American Indian or Alaska Native14
Asian78
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander10
Black or African American696
White2324
Hispanic or Latino404
Other71
Height
Height(inches)DR-103
Mean64.6 ± 2.7
Weight
Weight(pounds)DR-103
Mean162.5 ± 43.2
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index(kg/m^2)DR-103
Mean27.4 ± 7.0
Systolic Blood Pressure
Systolic Blood Pressure(mmHg)DR-103
Mean113.1 ± 10.4
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic Blood Pressure(mmHg)DR-103
Mean72.3 ± 8.3

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

94 sites
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Montgomery, Alabama 36116, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85015, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85037, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Tucson, Arizona 85741, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Anaheim, California 92801, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Irvine, California 92618, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    National City, California 91950, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 29103, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92108, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    San Francisco, California 92103, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80909, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Pueblo, Colorado 81001, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Washington, District of Columbia 20036, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Clearwater, Florida 33759, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Jacksonville, Florida 32207, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Leesburg, Florida 34748, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33143, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33186, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    New Port Richey, Florida 34652, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Palm Beach, Florida 33409, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33709, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30303, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Decatur, Georgia 30034, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Roswell, Georgia 30075, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Sandy Springs, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Savannah, Georgia 31406, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Meridian, Idaho 83642, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Champaign, Illinois 61820, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Wichita, Kansas 67207, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Lexington, Kentucky 40509, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Louisville, Kentucky 40291, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Mt Sterling, Kentucky 40353, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Metairie, Louisiana 70006, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    St. Louis, Missouri 63117, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Lincoln, Nebraska 68510, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89146, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Berlin, New Jersey 08009, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Moorestown, New Jersey 08057, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Port Jefferson, New York 11777, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Rochester, New York 14609, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Cary, North Carolina 27518, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28209, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    New Bern, North Carolina 28562, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27609, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Salisbury, North Carolina 28144, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28401, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43213, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Edmond, Oklahoma 73013, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Eugene, Oregon 97401, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Medford, Oregon 97504, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19114, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15206, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Columbia, South Carolina 29201, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Goose Creek, South Carolina 29445, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Greenville, South Carolina 29605, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Greer, South Carolina 29651, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Hilton Head Island, South Carolina 29926, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Bristol, Tennessee 37620, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Jackson, Tennessee 38305, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37920, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Memphis, Tennessee 38120, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Austin, Texas 78759, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75234, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Ft. Worth, Texas 76135, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77054, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Waco, Texas 76712, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84107, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Arlington, Virginia 22203, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Newport News, Virginia 23602, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Norfolk, Virginia 23507, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Richmond, Virginia 23233, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
  • Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site
    Tacoma, Washington 98405, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Poindexter A, Reape KZ, Hait H. Efficacy and safety of a 28-day oral contraceptive with 7 days of low-dose estrogen in place of placebo. Contraception. 2008 Aug;78(2):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Jun 2. PubMed 18672111 ↗
  • Portman DJ, Kaunitz AM, Howard B, Weiss H, Hsieh J, Ricciotti N. Efficacy and safety of an ascending-dose, extended-regimen levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol combined oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2014 Apr;89(4):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Jan 29. PubMed 24576794 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00996580
Lead sponsor
Teva Women's Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 16, 2009
Start date
Oct 2009
Primary completion
Sep 2011
Completion
Sep 2011
Results posted
Jun 14, 2013
Last update
Jun 24, 2013

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion