CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00991302DASHUpdated Mar 20, 2018Results posted

Durability of Adherence in Self-Management of HIV

An interventional study of CAP-IT in HIV Infections, sponsored by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-20.

Sponsored by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
172
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is critical to successful treatment of HIV. This study tested an intervention that helps people infected with HIV take all their medications when and how they were supposed to.

Read the detailed description

People infected with HIV must take the regimen of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) medications as prescribed to them, without missing doses, or they risk developing a resistant strain of the virus. Resistant strains of the virus do not respond to certain HAART regimens and are more dangerous for patients. Poor HAART adherence can lead to further HIV progression, more hospitalizations and opportunistic infections, and required use of second-line therapies. Interventions to increase adherence have had mixed success, with little data to support long-term effects and no one strategy emerging that provides consistent positive effects. The client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT) program was first developed to increase adherence among people already on HAART with in-home nursing. This study modified CAP-IT to treat people newly on HAART and then tested whether this modified CAP-IT improved long-term HAART adherence.

This study included two stages. The first stage consisted of two focus groups, one made up of HIV care providers and professionals and the other made up of people infected with HIV who had started HAART within the last year. Each focus group met once, for approximately 2 hours, to determine what modifications would best adapt the CAP-IT program to HIV-infected people first starting HAART.

The second stage consisted of a randomized trial comparing the modified CAP-IT program to standard of care. Participation in this stage lasted for 72 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either standard care or the modified CAP-IT program in addition to standard care. The CAP-IT program involved two steps. The first was an assessment of factors relating to adherence, and the second was development of an individualized plan to address the deficits found.

Study visits were completed at entry, at Weeks 4 and 12, and then every 12 weeks for approximately 72 weeks. Assessments for the study included a questionnaire about health attitudes, a physical exam, counting of pills, and answering questions about taking medications.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV Infections

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Behavioral Intervention
  • Antiretroviral Therapy
  • ART
  • Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy
  • HAART
  • Treatment experienced
03

In context

HIV Infections

4,258 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 240 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 172 is above the median of 83 across 3,251 interventional studies indexed under HIV Infections.

Browse HIV Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections is the lead sponsor of 70 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Stage 1

    • HIV infected Individuals on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART):

      • HIV-1 infection
      • Initiated HAART within 1 year prior to study entry and remained on HAART for at least 30 consecutive days
      • Men and women who hade reached the legal age of majority in the country where they are being enrolled
      • Ability and willingness to provide informed consent
      • Willingness to discuss personal topics during an audio-taped group interview
      • Willingness to protect the confidentiality of other focus group participants
    • Health Care Providers and Professionals:

      • Healthcare providers or professionals (e.g., medical doctors [MDs], nurse practitioner [NPs], physician assistants [PAs], adherence counselors) recruited from outside of the local clinical research site (CRS) whose patient population included a majority of HIV-1 seropositive patients and who had recent experience managing ART-naive individuals starting HAART
      • Men and women who had reached the legal age of majority in the country where they are being enrolled
      • Willingness to discuss personal topics during an audio-taped group interview
      • Willingness to protect the confidentiality of other focus group participants and of the proceedings
  • Stage 2:

    • HIV-1 infection
    • Antiretroviral (ARV) treatment naive, but planning to initiate HAART within 7 days of study entry either in the context of an approved parent AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) clinical trial or in the context of primary HIV care at a University of California, San Diego (UCSD), USA or Asociacion Civil Impacta Salud Y Educaci (IMPACTA), Peru, CRS-affiliated site
    • HIV-1 RNA greater than 1,000 copies/mL obtained within 90 days prior to study entry by any laboratory that has a clinical laboratory improvement amendments (CLIA) certification or its equivalent
    • CD4+/CD8+ count obtained within 90 days prior to study entry by any laboratory that has a CLIA certification or its equivalent
    • Men and women who had reached the legal age of majority in the country where they are being enrolled
    • Ability to follow instructions and complete surveys and questionnaires with minimal assistance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stage 1

    • HIV-1 Infected Individuals on HAART:

      • Failure to remain on HAART for at least 30 consecutive days
      • Diminished cognitive capacity that, in the opinion of the screening CRS clinician, would interfere with study participation
      • Participation in any prior focus group for study A5250
    • Health Care Providers and Professionals:

      • Health care providers and professionals who would be involved in administering standard of care (SOC) treatment and adherence counseling to Stage 2 participants randomized to the SOC arm or CRS investigators or health care providers and professionals directly involved in measuring adherence outcomes in Stage 2
      • Participation in any prior focus group for study A5250
  • Stage 2:

    • Potential participants who were, in the judgment of the research team, unable to complete the protocol
    • Potential participants who were starting a NNRTI-based regimen within 12 months after receiving single-dose NVP during pregnancy to prevent MTCT of HIV
    • Potential participants who were partners or close contacts of participants enrolled in Stage 2
    • Potential participants who were currently enrolled in an ACTG protocol utilizing or testing an adherence intervention
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
172 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CAP-IT

    Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)

    Behavioral: CAP-IT

  • No intervention
    Standard care

    Participants received standard care.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCAP-IT

    Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)

    Also known as: Client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Self-reported Adherence Score (%) Over a One-month Recall

    The adherence self-report questionnaire captured adherence at an Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) regimen over a one-month recall (0-100): 0 means none of anti-HIV medications were taken, 100 means every single dose of anti-HIV medications were taken. The primary endpoint evaluated for each participant was the average self-reported adherence over a one-month recall across each of their study visit week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48: missing values were ignored. Note: This was a change to the primary endpoint as described in the study protocol. This was due to an update to ACTG Case Report Form (CRF) that captured self-report adherence. Since the data captured on this form captured adherence over a longer timeframe and allowed for more variability in response, it was anticipated this endpoint would provide greater power to assess treatment differences.

    Time frame: At weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Self-reported Adherence Score Over a One-month Recall

    The mean of participant's average self-reported adherence score over a one-month recall across visit week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72; missing values were ignored.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72

  2. Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Cumulative Probability of Time to Change of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment Regimen for Any Reason by Week 48

    The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of initial antiretroviral (ARV) treatment regimen for any reason by week 48. Time to ARV treatment regimen change was defined as first time to change in the drug class of participant's ART regimen for any reason from study entry. Participants completing the study without a change in the drug class of their ART regimen were censored at their last visit.

    Time frame: From study entry to week 48

  3. Virologic Suppression

    Virologic suppression was defined as HIV-1 RNA \<=200 copies/mL at week 24, 48, and 72. The results obtained within +/- 12 weeks of 24, 48, and 72 weeks were included. If there were multiple HIV-1 RNA measurement within the specified window, the HIV-1 RNA result closest to the center of the window was selected.

    Time frame: At week 24, 48, 72

  4. Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score

    The GSES is a 10-item scale designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs used to cope with a variety of demands in life. The scale was designed to assess self efficacy, i.e., the belief that one's actions are responsible for successful outcomes. The scaled score for each question ranges from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate participant's stronger belief in self-efficacy. The GSES score was sum of all responses. The range was from 0 to 40 scores: any unfinished question got a score of zero.

    Time frame: At weeks 0 (entry), 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72

  5. Cumulative Probability of First Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)

    The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of experiencing a grade 3 or 4 adverse event by week 72. New Grade 3 or 4 signs, symptoms were identified by MedDRA preferred term. Events were included regardless of participant status on ART. If a participant had multiple reports of the same event, only the event reported at the highest grade were included. Time was measured from the study entry until the date of the first new grade 3 or 4 adverse event. Participants lost to follow-up prior to reaching an adverse event endpoint or not documented to have reached an adverse event endpoint at the end of the study had their endpoint censored at the date of their last visit.

    Time frame: From study entry to week 72

07

Results

Posted Aug 26, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCAP-ITStandard Care
Started8686
Completed7273
Not completed1413
Withdrew: Death01
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1412

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Self-reported Adherence Score (%) Over a One-month Recall

The adherence self-report questionnaire captured adherence at an Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) regimen over a one-month recall (0-100): 0 means none of anti-HIV medications were taken, 100 means every single dose of anti-HIV medications were taken. The primary endpoint evaluated for each participant was the average self-reported adherence over a one-month recall across each of their study visit week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48: missing values were ignored. Note: This was a change to the primary endpoint as described in the study protocol. This was due to an update to ACTG Case Report Form (CRF) that captured self-report adherence. Since the data captured on this form captured adherence over a longer timeframe and allowed for more variability in response, it was anticipated this endpoint would provide greater power to assess treatment differences.

Time frame:
At weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48
Reported as:
Median · percentage of adherence score
Mean Self-reported Adherence Score (%) Over a One-month Recall
percentage of adherence scoreCAP-ITStandard Care
Mean Self-reported Adherence Score (%) Over a One-month Recall97.5 (93.4 to 100.0)98.2 (94.0 to 99.8)
Statistical analysis
  • CAP-IT vs Standard Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.52stratified by dosing complexity
SecondaryMean Self-reported Adherence Score Over a One-month Recall

The mean of participant's average self-reported adherence score over a one-month recall across visit week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72; missing values were ignored.

Time frame:
Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72
Reported as:
Median · percentage of adherence score
Mean Self-reported Adherence Score Over a One-month Recall
percentage of adherence scoreCAP-ITStandard Care
Mean Self-reported Adherence Score Over a One-month Recall97.2 (92.9 to 99.4)97.8 (93.4 to 99.7)
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of the Cumulative Probability of Time to Change of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment Regimen for Any Reason by Week 48

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of initial antiretroviral (ARV) treatment regimen for any reason by week 48. Time to ARV treatment regimen change was defined as first time to change in the drug class of participant's ART regimen for any reason from study entry. Participants completing the study without a change in the drug class of their ART regimen were censored at their last visit.

Time frame:
From study entry to week 48
Reported as:
Number · cumulative probability per 100 persons
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Cumulative Probability of Time to Change of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment Regimen for Any Reason by Week 48
cumulative probability per 100 personsCAP-ITStandard Care
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Cumulative Probability of Time to Change of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment Regimen for Any Reason by Week 4817 (9 to 25)19 (11 to 28)
SecondaryVirologic Suppression

Virologic suppression was defined as HIV-1 RNA \<=200 copies/mL at week 24, 48, and 72. The results obtained within +/- 12 weeks of 24, 48, and 72 weeks were included. If there were multiple HIV-1 RNA measurement within the specified window, the HIV-1 RNA result closest to the center of the window was selected.

Time frame:
At week 24, 48, 72
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Virologic Suppression
percentage of participantsCAP-ITStandard Care
Week 24 (nCAP-IT=80, nSOC=79)94 (88 to 99)86 (78 to 94)
Week 48 (nCAP-IT=77, nSOC=73)95 (90 to 100)85 (77 to 93)
Week 72 (nCAP-IT=64, nSOC=66)88 (79 to 96)88 (80 to 96)
SecondarySelf-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score

The GSES is a 10-item scale designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs used to cope with a variety of demands in life. The scale was designed to assess self efficacy, i.e., the belief that one's actions are responsible for successful outcomes. The scaled score for each question ranges from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate participant's stronger belief in self-efficacy. The GSES score was sum of all responses. The range was from 0 to 40 scores: any unfinished question got a score of zero.

Time frame:
At weeks 0 (entry), 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score
scores on a scaleCAP-ITStandard Care
Week 0 (nCAP-IT=86, nSOC=86)36 (31 to 39)36 (32 to 38)
Week 4 (nCAP-IT=84, nSOC=86)37 (33 to 38)36 (31 to 39)
Week 12 (nCAP-IT=81, nSOC=77)36 (33 to 38)36 (32 to 39)
Week 24 (nCAP-IT=81, nSOC=82)36 (32 to 39)37 (34 to 39)
Week 36 (nCAP-IT=81, nSOC=79)37 (33 to 39)37 (33 to 39)
Week 48 (nCAP-IT=75, nSOC=77)37 (34 to 40)38 (33 to 40)
Week 60 (nCAP-IT=73, nSOC=73)37 (34 to 39)36 (33 to 39)
Week 72 (nCAP-IT=71, nSOC=72)37 (31 to 40)38 (33 to 40)
SecondaryCumulative Probability of First Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)

The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of experiencing a grade 3 or 4 adverse event by week 72. New Grade 3 or 4 signs, symptoms were identified by MedDRA preferred term. Events were included regardless of participant status on ART. If a participant had multiple reports of the same event, only the event reported at the highest grade were included. Time was measured from the study entry until the date of the first new grade 3 or 4 adverse event. Participants lost to follow-up prior to reaching an adverse event endpoint or not documented to have reached an adverse event endpoint at the end of the study had their endpoint censored at the date of their last visit.

Time frame:
From study entry to week 72
Reported as:
Number · cumulative probability per 100 persons
Cumulative Probability of First Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)
cumulative probability per 100 personsCAP-ITStandard Care
Cumulative Probability of First Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs)6 (3 to 14)2 (1 to 9)

Adverse events

Collected over From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CAP-IT—0/86 (0%)44/86 (51.2%)
Standard Care—0/86 (0%)38/86 (44.2%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventCAP-ITStandard Care
Drug hypersensitivityImmune system disorders30/8623/86
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders9/866/86
DepressionPsychiatric disorders9/862/86
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders8/864/86
Anogenital wartsNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)3/868/86
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders7/864/86
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations7/865/86
DizzinessNervous system disorders7/864/86
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/863/86
HypertransaminasaemiaHepatobiliary disorders4/866/86

Baseline characteristics

Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the baseline characteristics.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CAP-ITStandard CareTotal
Mean31 ± 832 ± 1031 ± 9
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)CAP-ITStandard CareTotal
18-29 years484391
30-39 years252348
40-49 years101424
50+ years369
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CAP-ITStandard CareTotal
Female156
Male8581166
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)CAP-ITStandard CareTotal
White Non-Hispanic71623
Black Non-Hispanic415
Hispanic (Regardless of Race)7362135
Asian, Pacific Islander033
More than Once Race112
Missing134
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CAP-ITStandard CareTotal
United States262652
Peru6060120
Regimen complexity
Regimen complexity(participants)CAP-ITStandard CareTotal
QD252550
BID or TID6161122
HIV-1 RNA
HIV-1 RNA(log10 copies/mL)CAP-ITStandard CareTotal
Mean4.9 ± 0.85.0 ± 0.75.0 ± 0.7
CD4+ T-cell count
CD4+ T-cell count(cells/mm^3)CAP-ITStandard CareTotal
Mean318 ± 178313 ± 213315 ± 195
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Ucsd, Avrc Crs
    San Diego, California 92037, United States
  • Barranco CRS (11301)
    Lima, 18 PE, Peru
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lu M, Safren SA, Skolnik PR, Rogers WH, Coady W, Hardy H, Wilson IB. Optimal recall period and response task for self-reported HIV medication adherence. AIDS Behav. 2008 Jan;12(1):86-94. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9261-4. Epub 2007 Jun 19. PubMed 17577653 ↗
  • Wagner GJ, Kanouse DE, Golinelli D, Miller LG, Daar ES, Witt MD, Diamond C, Tilles JG, Kemper CA, Larsen R, Goicoechea M, Haubrich RH. Cognitive-behavioral intervention to enhance adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a randomized controlled trial (CCTG 578). AIDS. 2006 Jun 12;20(9):1295-302. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000232238.28415.d2. PubMed 16816559 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00991302
Lead sponsor
Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
Collaborators
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 8, 2009
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Jan 2015
Completion
Jan 2015
Results posted
Aug 26, 2015
Last update
Mar 20, 2018

Study contacts

Constance Benson, MD
study chair · University of California, San Diego
Tari Gilbert, MSN
study chair · University of California, San Diego

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion