CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00983229Updated Nov 15, 2010

Comparison of CTrach, Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) and I-gel for Tracheal Intubation

An interventional study of Tracheal intubation in Intubation, sponsored by Northern Health and Social Care Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-11-15.

Sponsored by Northern Health and Social Care Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Various supraglottic airways may be used as a dedicated airway for insertion of intubating fibrescope and tracheal intubation in the patients with difficult to manage airways (Difficult Airway Society Guidelines).

The investigators aim to compare three different types of supraglottic device as a conduit for tracheal intubation - CTrach optical laryngeal mask, Intubating laryngeal mask airway and I-gel supraglottic airway. Null hypothesis for this study is that all three devices will perform without statistical difference in the means of success rate and time needed for their insertion and tracheal intubation.

Read the detailed description

Supraglottic airway devices such as I-LMa, Igel and LMA Ctrach are designed to create a "dedicated" airway which safely allows both spontaneous and controlled ventilation. The use of supraglottic airways can allow planned fibreoptic intubations in expected difficult cases and can provide an emergency airway in cases of unexpected difficult airway.

The ILMA (Intavent Orthofix Ltd.,Wokingham, UK) has been designed for either blind or fibrescope-guided tracheal intubation, in patients with expected and unexpected difficult airway. Since its development in 1997, it has been used for both blind and fibrescope-guided tracheal intubations in the patients with difficult airway. The ILMA is currently a 'gold standard' in supraglottic airways used for tracheal intubation.

The I-gel (Intersurgical Ltd., Wokingham, UK) is a newer dedicated airway device, which with its wide bore allows direct passage of a tracheal tube.

The CTrach (The Laryngeal Mask Company,Singapore) is a newer device for airway management. It has special optical fibres built-in inside its bowl and a liquid crystal display which allows views of the larynx while the endotracheal tube is being placed.

With reference to these supraglottic airway devices, only a small number of case reports detail tracheal intubation through an I-gel in patients with difficult airways. There have been manikin studies comparing ILMA and CTrach, and some descriptive studies on the use of CTrach in patients with predicted difficult airways- but no studies comparing the performance of these devices in clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intubation

Keywords

  • difficult airway
  • fibreoptic intubation
  • supraglottic airways
  • laryngeal mask airway
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Northern Health and Social Care Trust is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA I-III patients
  • Age 18-89 years, males and females
  • Elective surgical patients needing tracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA IV or V patients
  • Emergency surgical procedures
  • Patients at increased risk of aspiration
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    CTrach

    1. Induction to GA with 1mcg/kg fentanyl, and 1-3 mg/kg of propofol to loss of verbal contact and neuromuscular relaxation with 0.5 mg/kg of atracurium. 2. Direct laryngoscopy, evaluation of laryngeal view grade according to Cormack-Lehane classification. 3. Insertion of CTrach (sizes 3,4 or 5), establishment of ventilation. 4. Direct evaluation of laryngeal view through CTrach 5. Tracheal intubation through CTrach LMA 6. Maintenance of anaesthesia with 02, air and sevoflurane 1-2 MAC and positive pressure ventilation 7. At the end of surgery patient will be awoken as normal. Any sign of trauma to the oral cavity and airways and gastric fluid in trachea will be noted.

    Procedure: Tracheal intubation

  • Active comparator
    Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA)

    1. Induction to GA with 1mcg/kg fentanyl, and 1-3 mg/kg of propofol to loss of verbal contact and neuromuscular relaxation with 0.5 mg/kg of atracurium. 2. Direct laryngoscopy, evaluation of laryngeal view grade according to Cormack-Lehane classification. 3. Insertion of ILMA (sizes 3,4 or 5), establishment of ventilation. 4. Evaluation of laryngeal view through ILMA using fibrescope 5. Tracheal intubation through ILMA using fibrescope. 6. Maintenance of anaesthesia with 02, air and sevoflurane 1-2 MAC and positive pressure ventilation 7. At the end of surgery patient will be awoken as normal. Any sign of trauma to the oral cavity and airways and gastric fluid in trachea will be noted.

    Procedure: Tracheal intubation

  • Active comparator
    I-gel

    1. Induction to GA with 1mcg/kg fentanyl, and 1-3 mg/kg of propofol to loss of verbal contact and neuromuscular relaxation with 0.5 mg/kg of atracurium. 2. Direct laryngoscopy, evaluation of laryngeal view grade according to Cormack-Lehane classification. 3. Insertion of I-gel (sizes 3,4 or 5), establishment of ventilation. 4. Evaluation of laryngeal view through I-gel using fibrescope 5. Tracheal intubation through I-gel using fibrescope 6. Maintenance of anaesthesia with 02, air and sevoflurane 1-2 MAC and positive pressure ventilation 7. At the end of surgery patient will be awoken as normal. Any sign of trauma to the oral cavity and airways and gastric fluid in trachea will be noted.

    Procedure: Tracheal intubation

Interventions

  • ProcedureTracheal intubation

    Insertion of a plastic tube under direct vision (built-in camera, intubating fibrescope) into trachea.

    Also known as: intubation, insertion of tracheal tube

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success rate of tracheal intubation (%)

    Time frame: After successful insertion of tracheal tube

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time needed for successful insertion of a supraglottic device

    Time frame: After insertion

  2. Total time needed for successful tracheal intubation through a device

    Time frame: After insertion

  3. Fibreoptic view following to supraglottic device insertion

    Time frame: After insertion of SGA

  4. Complication rate - sore throat, difficulty swallowing, hoarseness, numb tongue, nausea

    Time frame: at 1 h after operation, at 24 h

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Antrim Area Hospital
    Antrim, BT41 2RL, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Campbell J, Michalek P, Deighan M. I-gel supraglottic airway for rescue airway management and as a conduit for tracheal intubation in a patient with acute respiratory failure. Resuscitation. 2009 Aug;80(8):963. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.04.037. Epub 2009 Jun 10. No abstract available. PubMed 19520483 ↗
  • Michalek P, Hodgkinson P, Donaldson W. Fiberoptic intubation through an I-gel supraglottic airway in two patients with predicted difficult airway and intellectual disability. Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1501-4, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816f22f6. PubMed 18420867 ↗
  • Sreevathsa S, Nathan PL, John B, Danha RF, Mendonca C. Comparison of fibreoptic-guided intubation through ILMA versus intubation through LMA-CTrach. Anaesthesia. 2008 Jul;63(7):734-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05481.x. PubMed 18582259 ↗
  • Ferson DZ, Rosenblatt WH, Johansen MJ, Osborn I, Ovassapian A. Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients with difficult-to-manage airways. Anesthesiology. 2001 Nov;95(5):1175-81. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200111000-00022. PubMed 11684987 ↗
  • Charters P, O'Sullivan E. The 'dedicated airway': a review of the concept and an update of current practice. Anaesthesia. 1999 Aug;54(8):778-86. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00888.x. PubMed 10460531 ↗
  • Pandit JJ, MacLachlan K, Dravid RM, Popat MT. Comparison of times to achieve tracheal intubation with three techniques using the laryngeal or intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 2002 Feb;57(2):128-32. doi: 10.1046/j.0003-2409.2001.02401.x. PubMed 11871949 ↗
  • Joo HS, Kapoor S, Rose DK, Naik VN. The intubating laryngeal mask airway after induction of general anesthesia versus awake fiberoptic intubation in patients with difficult airways. Anesth Analg. 2001 May;92(5):1342-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200105000-00050. PubMed 11323374 ↗
  • Ng BS, Goy RW, Bain JA, Chen FG, Liu EH. The impact of manual in-line stabilisation on ventilation and visualisation of the glottis with the LMA CTrach: a randomised crossover trial. Anaesthesia. 2009 Aug;64(8):894-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05935.x. PubMed 19604194 ↗
  • Liu EH, Goy RW, Lim Y, Chen FG. Success of tracheal intubation with intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized trial of the LMA Fastrach and LMA CTrach. Anesthesiology. 2008 Apr;108(4):621-6. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318167af61. PubMed 18362593 ↗
  • Liu EH, Goy RW, Chen FG. An evaluation of poor LMA CTrach views with a fibreoptic laryngoscope and the effectiveness of corrective measures. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Dec;97(6):878-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael252. Epub 2006 Sep 19. PubMed 16984953 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 15, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00983229
Lead sponsor
Northern Health and Social Care Trust
First posted
Sep 24, 2009
Start date
Aug 2009
Primary completion
Sep 2010
Completion
Sep 2010
Last update
Nov 15, 2010

Study contacts

Pavel Michalek, MD,PhD,DESA
principal investigator · Northern HSC Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion